Dan Rather to McClellan: Did the White House have any right-wing bloggers on the payroll?
posted at 2:12 pm on June 5, 2008 by Allahpundit
He’s never going to get over it.
RATHER: Is there a special operation in the White House or in the Executive Office Building next door to it that seeks to orchestrate, perhaps even run some of what’s on the Internet?
McCLELLAN: Certainly there’s a large operation, part of the communications operation is the office of strategic iniatives, working to make sure that… the blogosphere has a tremendous amount of influence, and they just want to make sure that we’re helping to shape some of that narrative…
RATHER: To your knowledge, are there bloggers who are paid by the White House political operation? Some campaigns have —
McCLELLAN: — not to my knowledge, but that was not an area I focused on.
It’s a good thing he’s “big on personal responsibility”; I’d hate to see what he’d be like if he was in the habit of blaming shadowy forces for his own mistakes. This insinuation, that conservative bloggers like the ones who helped push Memogate into the media might be working at someone’s behest, has always percolated among Rather and his associates, all the way back to when the scandal first broke and he blamed it — on air — on “partisan political operatives.” Mary Mapes went out of her way in her book to emphasize that the bloggers who developed the story did so anonymously, which is true as applied to me and totally untrue about pretty much everyone else involved, like Powerline, Spacetown, INDC Journal, and LGF. You can almost forgive them their paranoia at the time since blogs were still (relatively) new and old media didn’t fully understand how they worked yet. What’s his excuse four years later, though? To the best of my knowledge, no prominent conservative politician or blogger accused Josh Marshall of surreptitiously coordinating with Pelosi or Reid when he was working on the U.S. Attorneys scandal, even though the lefty blogosphere’s relationship with the Democratic leadership is closer than the right’s with the Republicans. It was a case of collective intelligence and information-gathering at work; no need for cloak-and-dagger explanations when Occam’s razor will do. Rather can’t understand that, or won’t. Exit question for Document Dan: Which lefty blogs do you plan on accusing of being hatchet men for the Democrats after President Obama’s sworn in?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Dan who?
Isn’t that the “what’s the frequency, Kenneth?” guy?
pilamaye on June 5, 2008 at 2:15 PM
What exactly he was focused on?
I’m sure his mama spanked him after publishing that book.
Why every time I look at McClellan, I see a butt?
Indy Conservative on June 5, 2008 at 2:15 PM
McClellan was the Press Secretary and he wasn’t paying attention to bloggers when COMMUNICATING the President’s messsage? Says an awful lot about why he did such a crappy job and got fired.
highhopes on June 5, 2008 at 2:16 PM
Please make me relevant again. PLEASE!!
Sincerely,
Dan Rather
thirteen28 on June 5, 2008 at 2:16 PM
Everyone that has hinted at his wrong-doing!
It’s awesome, isn’t it?
Spirit of 1776 on June 5, 2008 at 2:17 PM
Dannyboy should learn the first rule of holes.
jukin on June 5, 2008 at 2:17 PM
Now I believe in Resurrection!!!
Dan Rather is alive!!
Indy Conservative on June 5, 2008 at 2:17 PM
And he shall be known as “Desperate Dan” henceforth…
right2bright on June 5, 2008 at 2:17 PM
The first blogger found with a shoe phone is in biggggggggg trouble.
Limerick on June 5, 2008 at 2:17 PM
Totally legitimate question. I don see dark forces behind every time there’s someone with an opinion, but if some political websites are essentially paid for by taxpayers: left or right, I’d like to know.
freevillage on June 5, 2008 at 2:18 PM
Because he’s an ass. This man will have no friends, ever. The right despises him and the left will abandon him, after really milking him for propaganda. Turncoats from both sides s/b loathed. Judases are Judases.
Dan Rather has turned into a pathetic carricature.
Entelechy on June 5, 2008 at 2:19 PM
Nah, he has solid reasoning on his side…
As many of the Lefty blogs were supported by Lefty money (Soros) and supported by lefty candidates (Hill, Bama…), Blogs with a controled agenda are possible, and even prevalent (on the left)…
therefore, as Conservatives are all part of a Vast Right Wing Conspiricy, they MUST be controled by that evil genius, Carl Rove…
It makes perfect sense using Moonbat Logic.
Romeo13 on June 5, 2008 at 2:19 PM
Rather is beginning to look legally insane.
OT: Rasmussen says about 60% of Americans oppose negotiations without preconditions. It would seem that that Gallup poll was a bit too vague.
amerpundit on June 5, 2008 at 2:20 PM
You first, Dan… was there any contact between your staff, or your sources on the fake TANG documents, and the Kerry campaign or the DNC? Just take your time.
drunyan8315 on June 5, 2008 at 2:21 PM
You miss the not so subtle point…if that was so important, did Desperate Dan ask that of any liberal politician?…Desperate Dan is seeking information to “free” him from his lies and deceit.
right2bright on June 5, 2008 at 2:22 PM
He wrote the book because W wouldn’t support his mommy when she was running for Governer of TX. If he had, she would have won, but he didn’t, and she lost. That’s why wittle Scotty is so wery wery upset and wrote the book the way he did.
JustTruth101 on June 5, 2008 at 2:22 PM
I’ve been wondering how Allah finally could afford that Iphone!
AbaddonsReign on June 5, 2008 at 2:22 PM
Screw Rather . . . why is that phony jackass still relevant?
rplat on June 5, 2008 at 2:22 PM
Agee with him, or not, look how decently Tom Brokaw retired.
There are real men, and then there are the Dan Rathers and Scott McClellans of the world.
Entelechy on June 5, 2008 at 2:22 PM
Alright, already Dan….
Robbie Knievel called… he wants his motorcycle back. He says jumping over the tank once is plenty. No need to overdo it.
jrlingreenbay on June 5, 2008 at 2:22 PM
Who has to be paid to hate Dan Rather’s leftist lying guts? Millions do it for free every day.
RBMN on June 5, 2008 at 2:23 PM
OT – apologies in advance, please delete if inappropriate - but mention of right-wing bloggers inspired me to go check out some left-wing bloggers. On the front page of a certain site, a post by the King of the Left Wing himself, about McCain’s teeth. Evidently they’re insufficiently white.
McCain’s teeth were broken off at the gumline from the torture and beatings he endured while a prisoner of war in North Vietnam, btw.
Gilda on June 5, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Perhaps he was on Kerry’s payrol, and he assumes if he was on payroll, everybody else has to be as well. Typical projection.
Aristotle on June 5, 2008 at 2:26 PM
You ain’t gonna make me take him to a Chinese buffet.
After the meal, he’ll go to the liberal media and tell them that I eat a gallon of Wonton soup…oops…
Indy Conservative on June 5, 2008 at 2:28 PM
And drink 10 egg rolls….
Yeah, drink the rolls and eat soup.. the ass..
Indy Conservative on June 5, 2008 at 2:28 PM
Is that when you type a bulletin on a piece of paper and slip it into one of those internet tubes?
James on June 5, 2008 at 2:30 PM
Ok so what is the deal?
Two wash out traitorous reject of America battling out about bloggers they both don’t give two moose nuggets for?
/waits for the Dan death star and Mclellen to say he is the “one” now.
upinak on June 5, 2008 at 2:30 PM
Heh. This is going to torment Dan Rather for the rest of his life.
capitalist piglet on June 5, 2008 at 2:31 PM
Why didn’t Dan use his studio for the interview? Why did he conduct this apparent Q&A at the Y?
What TV station was it on? Which newspaper did the interview appear in?
btw, Monday at the 92nd St. Y was Mah Jongg club night. Wonder if Dan won.
JiangxiDad on June 5, 2008 at 2:31 PM
This just in…Dan Rather still irrelevant. Talks to squirrels.
CP on June 5, 2008 at 2:32 PM
A precipituous fall from CBS to the 92nd Street Y. They may only be separated by about 35 blocks geographically but CBS has a bit larger audience.
JammieWearingFool on June 5, 2008 at 2:34 PM
Rather is a sad figure. A ‘dinosaur’ in our 21st-century world, he lacks the ability to cope with the advancements he is bewildered by. Thankfully he has enough money to retire and shuffle on in peace. If only he would do so.
LimeyGeek on June 5, 2008 at 2:36 PM
PIMF: precipitous
JammieWearingFool on June 5, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Dan has become the kook he detests.
tarpon on June 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM
You pay a machine?
DAN RATHER: “One would expect that the blogging machine which the White House and the Bush-Cheney campaign has used for any number of purposes over their four years will start now, if it hasn’t started already, to say, listen, Kerry-Edwards, for the good of the country, need to concede.”
aquaviva on June 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM
Isn’t unintelligible muttering his strong suit?
JammieWearingFool on June 5, 2008 at 2:39 PM
Courage
William Amos on June 5, 2008 at 2:39 PM
I’m a loser
I’m a loser
And I’m not what I appear to be
Of all the stories I have won or have lost
there is one story I should never have come across
It was a document in a million, my friend
I should have known it would turn out to be forged in the end
I’m a loser
And I lost an anchorship that was dear to me
I’m a loser
And I’m not what I appear to be
Although I talk and I act like I’ve been all around
Beneath this mask I am wearing a frown
My tears are falling like rain from the sky
Is it for my anchorship and myself that I cry
I’m a loser
And I lost an anchorship that was so dear to me
I’m a loser
And I’m not what I appear to be
What have I done to deserve such a fate
I realized the document was forged but it was by then too late
And so it’s true, pride comes before a fall
I’m telling you so that you won’t lose all
I’m a loser
And I lost an anchorship that was dear to me
I’m a loser
And I’m not what I appear to be
MB4 on June 5, 2008 at 2:40 PM
Rather simply cannot believe that there are people out here in flyover land who would figure out and circulate anything damaging to him or to SeeBS without being on the White House payroll. This is the biggest blind spot that he and his friends have. They really think that nobody in their right minds ever supported George Bush because nobody in their circles did. They think that because all of their friends get all of their news from the New York Times and SeeBS that those news outlets should be above questioning by anyone. So, automatically their mindset causes them to question the motivation of anyone who thinks differently from them. It’s perfectly natural for them to assume that all of the conservative blogs are ersatz ones that were actually funded by the sinister Karl Rove machine. We couldn’t possibly hold such retrograde views honestly, now, could we?
rockmom on June 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM
I think that boy suffers from “inferiority complex.”
He was ignored and was thrown in the press room all by himself to face the media. His job, duh.
And was blamed by the media for a comment he made, if you recall.
He didn’t feel important. He felt victimized.
And now he is seeking revenge.
I don’t blame him.
I bet many will come out and publish books with the same tone.
Don’t be surprised.
The only book that I wouldn’t buy or read is Karl Rove’s. Because Rove will not tell you the whole truth.
The only books that I’ll read are Dick Cheney’s and Bush’s.
Cheney’s, because I’d like to know how’s life between four walls in the bunker underneath the White House and how to shoot your friend with a shotgun without killing him.
And I’ll buy Bush’s book because I like drawings and coloring.
Indy Conservative on June 5, 2008 at 2:42 PM
Ten years ago everybody knew who Dan Rather was and few people knew what a blog was. Now it’s the reverse.
boko fittleworth on June 5, 2008 at 2:42 PM
If the White House pays bloggers, I will say whatever they want me to for good pay.
Jay on June 5, 2008 at 2:45 PM
Is that ever juvenile, petty, and mean-spirited.
RushBaby on June 5, 2008 at 2:48 PM
Dan Rather will never get what really hit him.
Let us play a few oldies but goodies here, shall we?
The Freeper’s thread which opened Pandora’s box on Dan Rather’s career.
Power Line’s complete coverage of the issue – for which they earned the title of “Bloggers of the Year” by Time magazine.
Good Ole’ Charles stating, in two pictures, that the proof is in the pudding.
What else do you want, Dan?
newton on June 5, 2008 at 2:48 PM
Many seniors find comfort and purpose at the Y and senior centers. There are nice crafts and games and companionship, not to mention some awfully great food. Furthermore, there’s the opportunity to learn tasks diametrically opposed to what one did to earn a living.
Dan can knit, do Soduko, learn the internet, and make friends. Your scoffing is silly. Just wait. You too may find it a joy in your tiffany years.
JiangxiDad on June 5, 2008 at 2:49 PM
Was Rather on the White house payroll when he said this?
JammieWearingFool on June 5, 2008 at 2:49 PM
My Tiffany years were in college. It was an ugly breakup.
Seriously though, I wasn’t trashing the Y. I used to play hoops at the YMCA during those cold winter months when the snow made playing outside problematic.
JammieWearingFool on June 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM
They have at least one sane commenter at the DailyPos
A cousin told me on the phone that the teens in school in Europe have declard Obama the president already. One of the reasons “McCain can’t even raise his hand over his head”. When the cousin/teacher asked the teenagers if they knew why, thay said “no”.
Entelechy on June 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM
still FAKE but still ACCURATE.
same old dan.
DrW on June 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM
Oh, c’mon AP. Your wikipedia entry tells the tale:
Admit it…you worked for the Bush administration…;-)
JetBoy on June 5, 2008 at 2:57 PM
With Huseein Banana Obamba, we will be living in “The Dark Ages.”
Pun INTENDED.
Indy Conservative on June 5, 2008 at 2:57 PM
Dan Rather and Barbara Walters are proof that old has beens will not leave until they have removed all doubt that they were never what they ever seemed to be. McClellan, being interviewed by Rather, demonstrates his 15 minutes of fame is near the bottom of the barrel
volsense on June 5, 2008 at 2:57 PM
A pathetic old man.
baldilocks on June 5, 2008 at 2:58 PM
Scott McClellan discusses his book with Dan Rather at the 92nd Street Y in Manhattan.
At least they picked an appropriate venue for their little circle jerk.
cool breeze on June 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM
Tell your cousins to stay where they are.
It’s not a good time to move to America.
It’s cheaper there and life will not be miserable for the poor as it is here especially when Democrats take over.
Indy Conservative on June 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM
C.S. Lewis’s “Men Without Chests.”
baldilocks on June 5, 2008 at 3:03 PM
At the 92nd Street Y, no less.
Sorta makes one wonder.
RhymesWithRight on June 5, 2008 at 3:04 PM
Wow! What a laugh. And still to this day, Dan Rather blames – not himself for not checking the goddamned facts of his story that he was oh so eager to use to take down the President of the United States and get John Kerry elected in 2004 – - he still blames the bloggers in their pajamas. And he fantasizes that these bloggers were on the White House payroll.
What a d**chebag you are, Dan Rather. Go the F away, you pathetic liberal loser.
wise_man on June 5, 2008 at 3:04 PM
The poor old fella – not been right since Kenneth shot him the ultra high-frequency Brown Note.
Enlightened on June 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM
Ha! I almost forgot about that one! Thanks, JammieWearingFool
wise_man on June 5, 2008 at 3:07 PM
Rather is starting to remind me of the French noble in History Of the World that is a shoemaker in prison and drops dead birds out the window telling them to fly away.
“You’re frrrrreeeeee!!!, Your frrrreeeeee!!!”
The guy is a loon….and this is the new company McClellan is keeping.
Hening on June 5, 2008 at 3:07 PM
I prefer Katie Couric over Dan Rather.
My collie says:
I guess that pretty much says it all.
CyberCipher on June 5, 2008 at 3:09 PM
How about Andy Loony?
Hening on June 5, 2008 at 3:09 PM
This is the same guy who used forged documents to embarrass Bush just before the election in 2004.
Geez Louise!
gary fouse
fousesquawk
gary fouse on June 5, 2008 at 3:14 PM
RATHER: To your knowledge, did you witness Mr. Bush eating babies and did you or anyone else in his administration eat the babies too?
McCLELLAN: Mr.
BlatherRather, that is an awful true statement. That totally true statement should not be repeated.Claypigeon on June 5, 2008 at 3:16 PM
The last CBS news “anchor.” If she gets a lot of plastic surgery and a boob job, she could get a job on a local newscast. She’s not foxy enough for FOX– damn, they are so smart. Does Fox own Hooters?
JiangxiDad on June 5, 2008 at 3:17 PM
Meghan Kelly and Julie Banderas together would be a fantastic news program. It’s a wonderful network.
JiangxiDad on June 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM
Loooooooooooooooooser.
peski on June 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM
Stop right there
LimeyGeek on June 5, 2008 at 3:22 PM
Is Danny Boy even relevant any longer?
madmonkphotog on June 5, 2008 at 3:26 PM
Dan who?
Who is the Dan Rather guy again?
wildweasel on June 5, 2008 at 3:29 PM
If this was an open thread I’d have something interesting to tell you. Alas…
JiangxiDad on June 5, 2008 at 3:47 PM
Courage.
Akzed on June 5, 2008 at 3:47 PM
…from Hell’s heart I stab at thee; for hate’s sake I spit my last breath at thee.
Hollowpoint on June 5, 2008 at 3:49 PM
Let’s see: Rove’s a liar, Cheney shot his buddy, Bush is an idiot. Who flew military aircraft and graduated from Harvard and Yale.
Careful, Evita, your conservatism is showing again.
Oh, and of course, America sucks.
Don’t cry for America, Evita.
misterpeasea on June 5, 2008 at 3:50 PM
“not to my knowledge, but that’s not an area I focused on.” So, he doesn’t know but, let’s keep the possibility out there. Both of these guys are such tools. Tell me again why anyone listens to Rather. He gets more ink than when he was on the news every night.
oakpack on June 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM
RATHER: To your knowledge, are there bloggers who are paid by the White House political operation? Some campaigns have —
Boy, am I peeved. I spew all this conservative propaganda for free on my blog when I coulda been getting paid for it! Calling the White House: It’s not too late to send me that check. Or twenties. Twenties would be fine. Or maybe a White House pen. Something for the effort, at least. How about a White House key bob or coaster?
Tantor on June 5, 2008 at 3:55 PM
No Dan, it’s worse. The right wing runs everything.
dentalque on June 5, 2008 at 4:08 PM
Some campaigns have what Dan? Stooges in the media who coordinate their news stories with them like Mary Mapes and Joe Lockhart and various other Democrat National Committee mucky mucks perchance Dan?
Topsecretk9 on June 5, 2008 at 4:17 PM
If they did, can I get some of that money?
ScoopPC11 on June 5, 2008 at 4:33 PM
My favorite comment :)
wytammic on June 5, 2008 at 4:57 PM
RATHER: To your knowledge, are there bloggers who are paid by the White House political operation? Some campaigns have —
Mcbuttboy: Yes, Dan. They shared an office with the White House assasination team that keith olberfruit uncovered.
peacenprosperity on June 5, 2008 at 6:17 PM
Two desperately sad people.
I find it amazing that Rather is obsessed with finding White House involvement in the unraveling of his fantasy when Mary Mapes promised Burkett contact with the Kerry campaign if he spilled. It there a word for uber-hutzpah?
inmypajamas on June 5, 2008 at 7:54 PM
You really can’t blame Rather for trying here, based on what other liberal media people have been able to get Scott McClellan to say over the past two weeks. If you know the hooker your friends have used is willing to do just about anything for the right price, why shouldn’t you give it a shot by proposing your own perverted ideas and see if you can get the same deal?
jon1979 on June 5, 2008 at 8:14 PM
Kenneth! Long time, no see.
Trainwreck on June 5, 2008 at 10:34 PM
Dan Rather: Communist
Red Pill on June 6, 2008 at 12:46 AM
Isn’t John Kerry’s dKos UID# 52?
Connie on June 6, 2008 at 1:58 AM