the church does appear to be putting the money towards charitable programs

Well, yes, they provide daycare for 65 kids at $19-$21M per child. Mama mia, that’s some daycare center!

Hollowpoint on June 2, 2008 at 9:46 PM

Shame shame.

Do not end a sentence with a preposition are.

This is why we need McCain.

My Irish ancestors were treated all kinds of racism and bigotry, too.

WHERE’S MY F***ING CHECK??!!???

The New Party’s short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party. Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party’s Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.

Here’s where Barry came in:

Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP.

By the way, if you want to know why we have a sub prime mortgage crisis, much of the blame can be placed on ACORN itself.

Flexible lending programs expanded even though they had higher default rates than loans with traditional standards. On the Web, you can still find CRA loans available via ACORN with “100 percent financing . . . no credit scores . . . undocumented income . . . even if you don’t report it on your tax returns.” Credit counseling is required, of course.

Of course! ACORN
is there to rescue the people who took out the bad loans they encouraged, blaming “predatory lending”.

This is “liberalism” in a nutshell.

Religious organizations get federal money every day of the week.

DrSteve on June 3, 2008 at 7:56 AM

Ohhhhhhhh…it happens all the time? That makes it different somehow, right? My outrage is misplaced because of the commonplace nature of church embezzlement of government funds to enrich the pastors instead of the charities for which the funds are intended?

Well OK then…thanks for clearing that up for me.

Don’t you think they should return the money to the federal treasury or, better than that, donate it Chinese earthquake victims and their families?

Religious organizations get federal money every day of the week.

How is this not money laundering? I thought it was bad enough when I was under the impression that they fleeced the economically poor members of their church to raise the money for that mansion.

offensive defense

“This to me is the future, no boundaries.”
Matt Drudge

Drudge can’t show his face in public with
his brown nose buried so deep up Obama’s ass.

His quote may as well read:
This is me to the future, no boundaries!

I know, I know, I’m a racist.

I thought leftards were adamantly against faith based charities?
Blake on June 2, 2008 at 10:41 PM

Yes.

And if you would watch the videos coming out of that church, you would see a message that includes multiple layers of racism, hate and vitriol, as well as telling the faithful who to vote for, but a message that contains very little, if at all – “faith.”