Don’t blame Big Oil or Arabs for high gas prices
posted at 10:00 am on May 29, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
If any one entity should take the blame for high gas prices in the US, Mackubin Thomas Owens writes in today’s Wall Street Journal, it should be Congress. Instead of loosening restrictions on domestic supplies when increased future demand from Asia was easily predicted, Congress tightened them instead. They also increased the tax burden on producers at a time when prices had already begun to rise, amplifying the increase and adding to its inflationary effect:
Gasoline prices are through the roof and Americans are angry. Someone must be to blame and the obvious villain is “Big Oil” with its alleged ability to gouge consumers and achieve unconscionable, “windfall” profits. Congress is in a vile mood, and has dragged oil industry executives before its committees for show trials, issuing predictable threats of punishment, e.g. a “windfall profits tax.”
But if there is a villain in all of this, it is Congress itself. That venerable body has made it impossible for U.S. producers of crude oil to tap significant domestic reserves of oil and gas, and it has foreclosed economically viable alternative sources of energy in favor of unfeasible alternatives such as wind and solar. In addition, Congress has slapped substantial taxes on gasoline. Indeed, as oil industry executives reiterated in their appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 21, 15% of the cost of gasoline at the pump goes for taxes, while only 4% represents oil company profits.
To understand the depth of congressional complicity in the high price of gasoline, one must understand that crude oil prices explain 97% of the variation in the pretax price of gasoline. That price, which has risen to record levels, is set by the intersection of supply and demand. On the one hand, world-wide demand has accelerated mainly due to the rapid growth of China and India.
On the other hand, supply has been curtailed by the cartel-like behavior of foreign national oil companies, which control nearly 80% of world petroleum reserves. Faced with little competition in the production of crude oil, the members of this cartel benefit from keeping the commodity in the ground, confident that increasing demand will make it more valuable in the future. Despite its pious denunciations of the behavior of U.S. investor-owned oil companies (IOCs), Congress by its actions over the years has ensured the economic viability of the national oil company cartel.
We’ve talked about this many times at Hot Air, but basic economics applies. If demand increases and supply doesn’t, then prices go up. In this case, demand has increased tremendously over the last few years as India and China accelerate their industrialization. The Bush administration’s treaty with India on nuclear power wasn’t a coincidence; the White House wants India more reliant on non-petroleum energy to both cut emissions and to relieve pressure on crude markets worldwide.
Congress can act in several ways to alleviate the price increases, but not by blaming everyone else but themselves. The shameful performance by Maxine Waters last week may have momentarily taken the steam out of Congress’ blameshifting, but that won’t last long. Voter outrage over fuel prices and inflation will eventually force Congress to take some kind of action. The question will be what policies they will enact, and whether they will solve the problem or increase the damage.
If Congress follows Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, get ready for more damage. The Jimmy Carter policy of windfall-profits taxation will only pass along the burden to consumers while forcing domestic oil producers to cut investments in new production. Instead, just as in the Carter era, oil companies will grow even more reliant on imports, and we can all await the next round of rationing at the pump.
Instead, Owens urges Congress to learn from history and follow the example of Ronald Reagan. Deregulation led to an economic boom and low energy prices for a generation. But we need to go farther than that. Congress needs to promote a shift to nuclear power for domestic electricity, along with a boost for coal solutions. We need to stop being hypocrites and demanding that foreign nations pump more of their oil while we sit on ours to suit our tender sensitivities on the environment. This nation needs to grow up and take responsibility for its energy needs. Congress needs to lead the way.
Drill now. Build nuclear plants. Invest in alternatives for the future, but start taking care of the needs of the present. It’s really not brain surgery or rocket science. Even Maxine Waters should be able to understand it, even if she willfully ignores the reality.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
Regardless of what proves to be the ultimate solution it’s too late for any immediate relief. No matter what is decided it is ten years down the road before it makes a significant contribution to the energy pool.
Short term we are left with energy conservation–which is not bad but still a band aid of sorts. Already at this price we have had the first year to year decline in miles driven since WWII.
Personally I still think its a bubble but a bubble that may have served a valuable lesson. Perhaps this time, unlike the 70’s, we will motivated to finally resolve our long term energy needs. Now however it will prove to be much more difficult with the global warming nuts running around. Don’t forget that almost to a person they all want dramatically higher energy prices.
patrick neid on May 29, 2008 at 6:35 PM
Because smaller cares fare worse in collisions, by the laws of physics, and becayse “alternative energy” ALMOST always translates as “less efficient, more expensive, less available and/or simply not there.”
And “develop alternative sources” almost always means “somebody wave a magic wand, quick!”
The discovery of new resources and principles is rarely subject to an artificial timetable.
Merovign on May 29, 2008 at 6:40 PM
Ed, it would exploration not production. If you already have a production well in use you don’t cap it off while prices are this high. That would be insane. But you can stop all exploration, or a good majority of it.
A Production well is a already proven well from either a pool of oil, satellite (smaller pool or bubble of the bigger one) or a pocket of natural gas. They only way to find them is via Exploration and a Discovery (major find). That is when they lease out the land, create Units and specialized orders, so anyone can get their fair share. No worries, a lot get them confused or don’t know.
upinak on May 29, 2008 at 6:50 PM
They have been trying to push for Nuclear and other sources… since the 70’s. Not to sure how you want to solve the long term when people keep voting in the rejects that keep promoting this.
upinak on May 29, 2008 at 6:52 PM
The price comparison depends on whether a fully-loaded cost for oil can be calculated based on the additional military costs to secure the sources for oil. Currently we pay the military part of the price through income taxes rather than per gallon at the pump. Domestic sources of energy don’t require that additional military outlay.
dedalus on May 29, 2008 at 6:53 PM
Really? then why isn’t Yuka Flats open?
Romeo13 on May 29, 2008 at 6:57 PM
Is that yucca mountain? Not sure what Yuka Flats is.
upinak on May 29, 2008 at 7:08 PM
First, smaller cars fare worse only because there are so many gigantic SUV’s on the road in the first place. It’s like a game theory situation: person A buys a bigger safety cage which requires person B to likewise.
Secondly, as others have pointed out, what does our dependence on foreign oil cost? Example, Iran’s nuclear program hasn’t been turned into a smoldering crater because of the blowback that would ensue in the Persian Gulf and probably Saudi oil facilities. I’d much rather subsidize our way out of oil dependence on OPEC, Chavez, etc., than subsidize oil by protecting the shipping lanes for the tankers that bring it to us.
Golden Boy on May 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM
It’s not knee-jerk aversion toward alternative energy and driving smaller vehicles.
It’s knee-jerk aversion to hypocritical politicians reducing our liberty by taking more of our money and throwing it at not-very-well-though-out schemes like ethanol and by forcing us to drive smaller cars.
misterpeasea on May 29, 2008 at 7:39 PM
We had better be contacting our senators repeatedly, as the Boxer-Warner-Lieberman “cap and trade” boondoggle bill comes up for debate in the coming week.
This backdoor tax will drive up the cost of energy and threaten many, many jobs. The disaster unleashed by this bureaucratic bungling is frightening to fathom. The pseudo-science behind this bill is just another example of Congress’s laws of unintended consequences. More agencies will be created, and no more energy will be produced.
Make your opinions known in letters to the editor, to Congress, in blogs, and on call-in radio.
onlineanalyst on May 29, 2008 at 8:04 PM
Right on, but you forgot one. Make your opinion known in the voting booth as well.
Hog Wild on May 29, 2008 at 8:28 PM
And why aren’t the more enlightened legislators not pointing to the boost in the Alberta economy because of the tar-sand extraction of oil? Are these lawmakers interested in our economy or not?
I find it extremely tiresome when members of Congress point to mass transit as a panacea. Many of them represent urban areas, where public transportation is feasible… even though these elite lawmakers probably have never used such transportation themselves.
The fact of the matter is that we have a big country, where most of the foodstuffs and durable goods have to be delivered by both truck and rail. How do the elite figure that food gets to the market? Or are their appetites appeased by exotic items flown in for their feasts?
onlineanalyst on May 29, 2008 at 8:37 PM
Between ethanol and the most recent farm bill, the congress seems to be at least as active handing tax dollars away in rural areas–to individuals who earn up to $1.5MM annually. At least when tax money is spent subsidizing mass transit it doesn’t cause food to be more expensive for the rest of the country.
dedalus on May 29, 2008 at 9:14 PM
If congress and the greenies would stop holding up drilling and building new refineries the price for gasolene would immediately drop, because the oil exporters would loose the incentive to keep their oil in the ground. Investers also would not gamble on higher priced oil futures.
Johan Klaus on May 29, 2008 at 9:42 PM
Does anyone else note the irony of members of Congress wanting to sue OPEC for limiting the supply of oil when Congress itself is limiting our own access to our own resources?
dedalus: Ironically, many of those beneficiaries of the farm bills do not even live in rural areas.
onlineanalyst on May 29, 2008 at 10:02 PM
I just love the idea of “mass transit”. Just imagine asking a bus driver to wait a moment while I tie on some 30 foot ladders, hook up my cement mixer to the back, load on a bunch of lumber or roofing material, and oh, can you stop by the lumber yard I have to get some nails. Mass transit is a band aid. It has a limited following, mainly city use.
Small cars will not with stand the impact of another small car much less a standard size vehicle. The smaller engines require lighter weight materials and crumple zone. The majority of the time when they are hit, they are totaled out by the insurance carrier. Their engines have to rev higher to produce an equivalent amount of power, there fore they are not that fuel efficient considering the weight to power ratio. I think I will stick to my gas guzzling pre 90’s Detroit Iron to get to where I want to go. Yep, the price of gas hurts, considering I still remeber gas at 18 cents a gallon, and then we were lucky to get 10 miles to the gallon.
N4646W on May 30, 2008 at 2:04 AM
The so called Enron Loophole will emerge this coming fall as a campaign point for Obama. McCain is vulerable. The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, approved by Congress and signed into law by former President Clinton on December 21, 2000.
Truth be told, much of the price is built by unregulated speculation on the ICE/OTC exchanges.
The trading of energy commodities by large firms on OTC electronic exchanges was exempted from CFTC oversight by a provision inserted at the behest of Enron and other large energy traders into the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 in the waning hours of the 106th Congress
(Sec. 103) Excludes from coverage under the Act a transaction in an excluded commodity: (1) entered into between eligible contract participants and not executed on a trading facility; or (2) executed on electronic trading facilities as long as the transaction is entered into on a principal—to—principal basis by eligible contract participants trading for themselves.
(Sec. 104) Excludes from coverage under the Act electronic trading of excluded and exempt commodities. States that a board of trade designated as a contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility may establish and operate an electronic trading facility.
Expect to see much more of this…
moxie_neanderthal on May 30, 2008 at 6:52 AM
We have enough resources to power cars until new tech comes along.
We just need to drill and refine the oil. I would bet we haven’t even used 1% of the total earth’s oil. I wouldn’t be surprised if oil is being produced naturally almost as fast as we are using it. Our world is a vast large planet, compared to the amount of people.
right2bright on May 30, 2008 at 8:47 AM
.
Oh, its better than that – last December, the congress snuck a section into the energy bill which will severely limit any petroleum products coming to the US from Alberta oil sands.
http://priceofoil.org/2008/01/15/us-congress-says-no-to-tar-sands-quietly/
Think_b4_speaking on May 30, 2008 at 9:30 AM
Congress point the finger of blame at itself?!?!?!?
That’ll be a cold day in hell.
Yakko77 on May 30, 2008 at 10:53 AM
“I wouldn’t be surprised if oil is being produced naturally almost as fast as we are using it.”
That would be great. I see absolutely no evidence to support that idea, however.
Golden Boy on May 30, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Golden Boy:
Conversations are based on trying to find a common ground. If you really think that the government should override people’s safety choices and mandate inferior options for the sake of a hypothetical and very much in doubt anthropogenic catastrophe, we just plain don’t have that common ground.
Merovign on May 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM
Why is the price of gasoline so high? Taxes that is what all government agencies will never admit.
The real reason of the price of gas is the total lack of an energy policy. And the biggest lie of all is man made global warming.
Listen folks the only way to lower the cost energy is to find a new energy program.
TomLawler on May 30, 2008 at 5:12 PM
Some people think that “BIG OIL” means the largest private oil companies, i.e. Exxon Mobil, BP, Chevron Texaco/Unicol, Total, etc. These are big private companies, but they are pygmies in the oil business. They range down from Exxon Mobil, at number twelve in reserves, which has 1.08% of world reserves. The first nine are all government businesses starting with Aramco which has 21.83% of world reserves or twenty times as much as Exxon. Numbers nine and ten are Lukoil and Gazprom. I think you can still buy stock in those companies, but they are controlled by the Russian government. When Petrobras has its new giant fields confirmed into reserves, it will jump from eighteen to seventh or higher and the largest private company, Exxon, will become thirteenth.
Most of the BIGGER companies i.e. the government companies, belong to the OPEC cartel which controls world wide production. The private companies don’t control beans in the oil business.
burt on May 30, 2008 at 10:25 PM
You left out “quick, someone give me billions of dollars so I can wave a magic wand”…..
I think I want to join that club. Which dot-gov or dot-org do I apply at?
Squiggy on May 31, 2008 at 7:21 AM
It has been shown that Bush didn’t lie but in my judgement at the time he did use poor judgement to take us to war, I support winning it now that we were are engaged. Of course those senators who have voted for the war resolution and have been close to becoming president, Kerry and Clinton, voted for it. Kerry has been an inveterate liar since he first became a public figure with his traitorous speeches and meetings with North Vietnam during the Vietnam war.
Aked has a good moto he just needs to make a small correction.
KERRY LIED PEOPLE DIED!!!
burt on May 31, 2008 at 8:01 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3