Ron Paul is the chomsky left on the most important part of the CinC’s job. just because he understands supply/demand laws does not give him a pass.

He is a Rothbard follower, i.e. left-wing libertarian.

Wow, some people are just completely politically clueless. As libertarians go, Rothbard was a right-winger, as opposed to the left-wingers at Cato.

Little-noticed? I’d say for good reason, too

I notice that you seem quite preoccupied with the story.

Ol’ Ron Paul must be losing some of his luster. The mere mention of his name in a blog only brought out a couple of Ronulans this time, instead of the old time avalanche.

Big John on May 28, 2008 at 9:36 PM

That’s because the Paulites got fed up with the naive anti Paul hysteria going on at this site.

I am didn’t vote for Paul, but seriously…some of you are truly naive if you think that the rockefeller/CFR, one world government thing is just a crazy conspiracy theory.

Can anyone explain to me how the Federal reserve system is constitutional either?

Can you explain why Mccain,Hillary and Ubama all want to open the borders?

Or why Mccain is the nominee of the republican party when a few months before the primaries began, 80% of republicans wanted him impeached from the senate?

P.S., for those who would call me a “troll”, I’d rather be a firebrand than a bobble-head who just believes everything their told, and agrees with everybody else.

Clinton supporters, on average, will vote for Obama in November. Paul supporters, on average, will not vote for McCain in November. That’s why it’s notable. Because people like me who traditionally vote Republican and supported Paul will not cast a vote for John McCain. That’s why it’s notable — it does represent dissent.

Oh noooo! McCain is going to miss out on that 2% Bircher Quack vote. How will the party survive!?

LoL @ Ron Paul and his Jewish Reptilian Space-Vampires.

Who is Ron Paul?

upinak on May 28, 2008 at 5:15 PM

Google Ron Paul!

Sincerely,

Lew Rockwell, who is definitely not Ron Paul, ok?

I don’t understand… are you trying to argue that GOP voters are happy with McCain and will gladly pull the lever for him in November?

I’d rather have Ron Paul as president than John Mccain anyday.
SaintOlaf on May 28, 2008 at 5:41 PM

Well then thank God that there weren’t more idiots who voted for Ron Paul and made your day.

I’d rather have Ron Paul as president than John Mccain anyday.

SaintOlaf on May 28, 2008 at 5:41 PM

Ron Paul is the chomsky left on the most important part of the CinC’s job. just because he understands supply/demand laws does not give him a pass.

He is a Rothbard follower, i.e. left-wing libertarian.

hopefully the more right-wing element will take the ‘libertarians’ back to sane land. i.e. Heinlein roots.

Valiant on May 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM

Fixed it.

They want to play up any sign of dissension in the Republican ranks to gin up a matching narrative for the Democratic primaries.

You’re right about Ron Paul, but the media is also right about dissension. I read an article stating that McCain is the only Republican that could win this election and we should be happy with that, but I’m still not going to support the guy. Wail and gnash your teeth all you like, but it isn’t happening.

I lived in Boise for 15 years then I went to University of Idaho in Moscow and I can tell you Idaho is a very Libertarian state. Don’t ask me how we elect Craig tho. One of Idaho’s House of Rep is a very good conservative guy called Bill Salie. If you have a D next to your name on the ballot you will lose in Idaho.

BroncosRock on May 28, 2008 at 5:16 PM

there is a group of well meaning while politically ignorant “Christian libertarians” up there in Moscow, pretty big church outfit. They are paultards, completely clueless about all the newsletter type stuff.

I read that Paul has been campaigning in Arizona, he has practically all of his family on the payroll cashing in from the nutroots support.

/sarc