Strange as it may seem, Maliki is a neocon.

Well, the surge sure was a military solution to resolving the ongoing conflict in Iraq.

How can you describe an ongoing conflict as resolved? That makes no sense.

aengus on May 28, 2008 at 10:33 PM

Well, the surge sure was a military solution to resolving the ongoing conflict in Iraq. And Maliki’s military attacks on Shia militias was an interesting “negotiation” strategy to simultaneously reign them in–which in turn brought the Sunnis and Kurds back to participation in his government.

Repeat after me: Vietnam is not Iraq.

Repeat after me: Iraq is not Eastern Europe.

Repeat after me: Vietnam is not Iraq.

I guess in Iraq, there actually was a military solution. Not sure how that happened since all the peace-nik, hippy, lib-tards assured us there is no military solution.

There is no military solution for turning a wrecked Islamic country into a shining democratic Republic. Bush and his cronies are a species of libtards since they believe that all people are exactly the same (regardless of culture or religion) and so theres no reason why primitives Islamic countries cannnot be turned into “democracies”.

He meant it. The media here will never admit it, but this man succeeded in spite of them, helped along by the population’s brief but memorable taste of Islamic rule. It ain’t all 72 virgins, kids.

A Last Chance for the Surge [and Maliki]

Pelosi is trying to frown, but her face is frozen.

Hahaha!

Meanwhile, America wins and they lose.

Wins what? Islam is still set to take over chunks of South America, Russia, Western Europe and Central Asia. Mexico gets the US…

…and Maliki still won’t shave. Seriously, whats up with that?

It is very simple…this is the last chance to save your country before I leave office…

Wow tomas I know you’ve been accused of being a Bush sock puppet but I didn’t realise you literally are Bush! Give my best to Laura and the kids.

Anjem Choudary, unlike the neoconservatives, understands Islamic theology.

And somehow, Democrats are going to gain seats in the House and Senate, and perhaps win the Presidency.

Could we maybe get some non-retarded Republicans?

With their defeat (or near defeat; yes, let’s qualify things), the inter-sectarian strife has settled down which in turn has led to a decline in support for the various militias. The government can now step in with a nationalist, trans-sectarian army and, less so, police to restore order.

AQ is gone, the militias fade away, the government fills the vacuum and the various sects establish trust and, one hopes, political reconciliation nationally occurs.

That was easy (yeah, right).

One major obstacle is left: Iranian influence.

You have brought great joy to me with this post. Thanks my brother.

Looks like the Iraqi Army is standing up well.

Right you are sir! Remember how the economy went down the tubes as soon as Bush won in 2000 before he was even sworn in and it was all his fault?

Theworldisnotenough on May 28, 2008 at 6:19 PM

You can bet your life that everything would change the day after a Democratic election victory.

“The progress is due to Petraeus, Maliki, our bold brave fighting men and women, but certainly not Bush.”

Watch it happen.