Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


IAEA to Iran: You’ve got some ’splaining to do! Plus, Carter’s Latest Folly

posted at 12:45 pm on May 27, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The IAEA has spent the last several years talking to Iran about its pursuit of nuclear technology and has little to show for it. Today, the IAEA officially lost patience with Tehran, accusing the mullahcracy of malicious non-compliance and purposeful non-cooperation. They demand “substantial explanations” for enrichment and other activities:

The International Atomic Energy Agency, in an unusually blunt and detailed report, said Monday that Iran’s suspected research into the development of nuclear weapons remained “a matter of serious concern” and that Iran continued to owe the agency “substantial explanations.”

The nine-page report accused the Iranians of a willful lack of cooperation, particularly in answering allegations that its nuclear program may be intended more for military use than for energy generation.

Part of the agency’s case hinges on 18 documents listed in the report and presented to Iran that, according to Western intelligence agencies, indicate the Iranians have ventured into explosives, uranium processing and a missile warhead design — activities that could be associated with constructing nuclear weapons. ….

The report makes no effort to disguise the agency’s frustration with Iran’s lack of openness. It describes, for example, Iran’s installation of new centrifuges, known as the IR-2 and IR-3 (for Iranian second and third generations) and other modifications at its site at Natanz, as “significant, and as such should have been communicated to the agency.”

The agency also said that during a visit in April, it was denied access to sites where centrifuge components were being manufactured and where research of uranium enrichment was being conducted.

The Iranians have stalling for time to produce its nuclear fuel. All indications show that Iran already has its hands on at least a basic weapon design from the AQ Khan network. All they now require is enough highly-enriched uranium to begin building bombs. As the IAEA itself notes, the Iranian military has sponsored a significant amount of this effort, which tends to support the notion that the military is the ultimate consumer of this process.

Of course, this sends the issue back to the UN, which will promptly do nothing with it. Russia and China will still act to protect their client state. The EU’s Javier Solana will go back to Tehran with the latest offer from the West, including the US, to see whether a deal can be struck to end their pursuit of nuclear weapons.

Thanks to Jimmy Carter, however, we can probably guess the outcome of that negotiation:

Our allies have to wonder exactly what else Carter will blurt out in public. Certainly this erodes any confidence in our ability to keep secrets, especially those of our friends. It also signals the mullahs in Tehran to resist any attempts to unilaterally forego nukes without disarming Israel in the process.

Can we prosecute Carter for exposing classified material? Probably not — we’d have to admit the information was accurate — but it certainly would give a certain satisfaction.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Ruh roh.

Can we prosecute Carter for exposing classified material? Probably not — we’d have to admit the information was accurate — but it certainly would give a certain satisfaction.

Can we at least ask for a competency hearing?

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 12:49 PM

The IAEA is in ass covering mode. They can’t conceal their complicity any longer so it it’s time to make the appropriate noises.

a capella on May 27, 2008 at 12:50 PM

Thanks to Jimmy Carter, however, we can probably guess the outcome of that negotiation:

Revoke.His.Passport……NOW.

Israel’s Nukes = Samson Option

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 12:52 PM

a capella on May 27, 2008 at 12:50 PM

Yeah, but Mohamed ElBaradei, the stooge that he is, will try to spin it in some way to make it sound if Iran is the victim.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM

Ah, yes, the “strongly worded letter”. Followed by the “letter of condemnation”. Then comes the “threat of sanctions”, followed by the “And this time I really mean it” letter.

Matticus Finch on May 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM

Oh, no, look out! The UN is on the prowl! Clear the way! Hide the children! Because we all know how well they worked over Saddam!

Weebork on May 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM

Iran is just such a small insignificant nation. Can’t we just send the POTUS over there for a chat?

kirkill on May 27, 2008 at 12:57 PM

Once you piss off the UN, you only have 700 chances to make things right.

Chuck Schick on May 27, 2008 at 12:58 PM

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM

Probably. The fact that he is willing to go public with this makes me a bit nervous. I wonder if the Iranians aren’t quite a bit further along than the world suspects. If so, we can expect some type of Israeli-U.S. combined action before dubya leaves office. That will play hell with the general elections.

a capella on May 27, 2008 at 12:58 PM

a capella on May 27, 2008 at 12:50 PM

yeppers I agree.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 12:52 PM

As much as I agree with you, some cerebral slug will let it slide. As usual.

upinak on May 27, 2008 at 12:59 PM

Would the window between the elections and the swearing in ceremony be sufficient?

a capella on May 27, 2008 at 1:01 PM

10 years from now, the Democrats will be lecturing us on how this IAEA report completely exonerated the Iranians.

MarkTheGreat on May 27, 2008 at 1:01 PM

Matticus Finch on May 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM

And if they still don’t coply we’ll make them sit in the corner on a comfy chair

LimeyGeek on May 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM

If any other person like your average Joe would have revealed this information, they would have been arrested and be facing charges of international espionage. So why is a certified idiot like Carter being given a pass on all of this? There has got to be someone in the State Department who has the authority to tell Carter to go have himself a nice hot cup of SHUT THE HELL UP and just keep his peanut picking nose out of international affairs. Or else one of these days, The Worst President, EVUH is really going to do some serious damage! If he hasn’t done so already!

pilamaye on May 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM

And if they still don’t coply we’ll make them sit in the corner on a comfy chair

Dude. Anything but the comfy chair!

Matticus Finch on May 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM

That’s it, pull his passport, and put him back to building homes.
This is the kind of stuff that starts wars. This is what you get from the lefties, so eager to please, that they will help destroy years – decades of diplomacy.
And from an ex-president, shameful…this is where the state department needs to step up and say enough is enough.

right2bright on May 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM

Has anyone noticed that the “Carter” years are coming back even before Bush has left office. I thought it strange, but I see 55 mph signs popping up on the highways here. And I am talking all over the place where as last year they (the highways) were 65.

The man disappeared for a while, why oh why has he come back.

And the fact he is a complete traitor.

upinak on May 27, 2008 at 1:06 PM

Matticus Finch on May 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM

Timeouts are a b!tch. Haven’t you seen Jo Frost on “Supernanny”? I would love to see her sit Ahneedadinnerjacket on the “naughty step”!

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM

Can we prosecute Carter for exposing classified material? Probably not — we’d have to admit the information was accurate — but it certainly would give a certain satisfaction.

‘Man Without A Country’ comes to mind. Maybe sailing on the USS Jimmy Carter, as a mess steward.

Limerick on May 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM

Doofus. How messed up does your worldview have to be that you think that’s in any way good information to blurt out?

BadgerHawk on May 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM

How long before that brain dead Carter starts revealing our national secrets? The bum is a disgrace.

rplat on May 27, 2008 at 1:10 PM

Doofus. How messed up does your worldview have to be that you think that’s in any way good information to blurt out?

BadgerHawk on May 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM

Yeah. The next thing you know he might blurt out the name of a covert

uncovert

overt

CIA desk jockey with an annoying husband.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM

I spy with my eye $10 a gallon before Bush leaves office.
We’re getting closer and closer as the roadwork and options are one by one exhausted. The time for the Iranian glass sheet to be paved is drawing near in my opinion.

Geronimo on May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM

Try it again.

Doofus. How messed up does your worldview have to be that you think that’s in any way good information to blurt out?

BadgerHawk on May 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM

Yeah. The next thing you know he might blurt out the name of a covert uncovert overt CIA desk jockey with an annoying husband.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 1:13 PM

Geronimo on May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM

Oh don’t say that!

Save a gallon, ride an oil exec.

upinak on May 27, 2008 at 1:15 PM

John Bolton. You magnificent bastard!

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 1:16 PM

Can we please chain Carter to a Habitat For Humanity site?

Transport him from site to site in a box?

This is NOT appropriate behaviour for any Citizen of the United States, let alone a former leader of the free world. Pathetic.

Fortunately, Bill Clinton will be much easier to manage – just keep him supplied with a steady stream of young interns and tee times, and keep Hillary otherwise occupied.

Mew

acat on May 27, 2008 at 1:16 PM

upinak on May 27, 2008 at 1:15 PM

I’ll put a saddle on an oil executive just for kicks. Imagine the honks of the passers by.
That brought a smile to my face. Heh.

Geronimo on May 27, 2008 at 1:18 PM

You would think he was stuffing secrets in his socks and sneaking them out to be destroyed or something…

right2bright on May 27, 2008 at 1:19 PM

Oh No!!! The dreaded Strongly Worded Letter.

Clark1 on May 27, 2008 at 1:20 PM

Oh No!!! The dreaded Strongly Worded Letter.

Clark1 on May 27, 2008 at 1:20 PM

Heh!

right2bright on May 27, 2008 at 1:25 PM

Timeouts are a b!tch. Haven’t you seen Jo Frost on “Supernanny”? I would love to see her sit Ahneedadinnerjacket on the “naughty step”!

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM

After that they can send him over to What Not To Wear.

This is NOT appropriate behaviour for any Citizen of the United States, let alone a former leader of the free world. Pathetic.

acat on May 27, 2008 at 1:16 PM

Neither was planting a sloppy kiss on Brezhnev, so perhaps we can’t assume that for an ex officio title of the American president. I think LOTFW was just a vacant position from ‘76 – 80′.

Nosferightu on May 27, 2008 at 1:26 PM

Geronimo on May 27, 2008 at 1:18 PM

Giddy up!

upinak on May 27, 2008 at 1:26 PM

Manchurian ex-President????? I say put the traitor in Guantanamo and waterboard him for information. I would love to see him spitting water out of his nose for his treasonous activities. If I were Jewish, I’d really be pissed at this anti-Semetic POS…My two cents….

adamsmith on May 27, 2008 at 1:28 PM

The NY Times isn’t suggesting that talking to Iran is futile, are they?

Hmmm….

drjohn on May 27, 2008 at 1:28 PM

a capella on May 27, 2008 at 12:50 PM

Add my nick to the list of those who agree.

IAEA is trying to document how they detected the Iranian nuclear threat ‘and tried to warn the world about the danger’.

Iran must be getting close to a nuclear test.

rockhauler on May 27, 2008 at 1:29 PM

Isn’t it sort of against some kind of law for an ex-President to classified information?

drjohn on May 27, 2008 at 1:29 PM

rockhauler on May 27, 2008 at 1:29 PM

Not until Barak takes the oath. It puts the heel of the boot exactly where they want it.

Limerick on May 27, 2008 at 1:30 PM

How is it that our country can have so many jackasses with so much influence and power?

ballz2wallz on May 27, 2008 at 1:31 PM

How is it that our country can have so many jackasses with so much influence and power?

ballz2wallz on May 27, 2008 at 1:31 PM

Because people, since the dawn of time, have always been baffled with BS!

upinak on May 27, 2008 at 1:35 PM

Take him out back and…

No, I know, I’m better than that. Still…

MadisonConservative on May 27, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Time for Jimmuh to build Habitats for Humanity on a kibbutz until Yahweh decides He’s had enough of Jimmuh.

Steve Z on May 27, 2008 at 2:00 PM

Ah, yes, the “strongly worded letter”. Followed by the “letter of condemnation”. Then comes the “threat of sanctions”, followed by the “And this time I really mean it” letter.

Matticus Finch on May 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM

And then comes the “Double Secret Probation” letter as outlined in a lesser know codicil to the IAEA charter…

rbb on May 27, 2008 at 2:05 PM

Comfy chair? I say we attack immediately with as much fresh fruit as we can assemble. Attacking with bananas actually seems appropriate for the blue helmets.

“Pineapple? I thought my number was on that one.”

connertown on May 27, 2008 at 2:07 PM

Once you piss off the UN, you only have 700 chances to make things right.

Chuck Schick on May 27, 2008 at 12:58 PM

Seriously…..at least 17.

kcd on May 27, 2008 at 2:09 PM

but it certainly would give a certain satisfaction.

Damn right it would.

mattyj86 on May 27, 2008 at 2:17 PM

It strikes me that Carter is just making up the number of Israeli nukes. I doubt that Bill Clinton would have permitted Jimmy Carter to be briefed on intelligence after his North Korea fiasco, and I can’t see George W letting Carter be briefed. (I’m not sure how clear it was that Carter had gone over to the dark side in the 80’s, and thus whether Reagan or Bush Pere would have permitted Carter access to any intelligence.)

If Carter is just making stuff up, you can’t prosecute him for being insane.

thuja on May 27, 2008 at 2:29 PM

Look out Iran! You can expect a few sternly written letters any day now. Don’t make us send Hans Brix over there!

cannonball on May 27, 2008 at 2:32 PM

Man Without A Country’ comes to mind. Maybe sailing on the USS Jimmy Carter, as a mess steward.

Limerick on May 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM

Please. The nuclear Navy managed to get rid of Jimmy when he was a Lieutenant, and feels good that he was gotten rid of at that time. I don’t need him anywhere near any of our nuclear reactors anymore, even as a Mess Cook. The Emergency Procedures in the Reactor Plant Manuals are complex enough without needing to add chapters on how to handle a Loss of Jimmy’s Brain Accident (LJBA).

Step 1. Silence the alarm(ist ex-President).
Step 2. Inject makeup brain into ex President. If his mouth moves, proceed to Step 3. Otherwise reset the alarm.
Step 3. Tie a dozen Trash Disposal Unit weights around his ankles.
Step 4. Load ex Pres in Trash Disposal Unit (TDU)
Step 5. Conduct TDU operations (shoot trash overboard).
Step 6. File Missing Lost Stolen Report (MLSR) on TDU weights as expensive lost items.
Step 8. Proceed on patrol.

Sounds like more time and effort than my sailors need to spend on Jimmy to me.

Subsunk out.

Subsunk on May 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM

This is the funniest thing about the “new breed” of “conservative”. Carter states something that everyone with a brain cell already knows and all this idiotic whining. His biggest error here is stating a fact when your President is trying to give you $200 barrel oil and WW III. If you are going to debate over war with Iran then Israel’s “secret” arsenal has to be one of the premises in your decision making no matter where you come down on the topic. This whole hush hush garbage needs to go or at least stay with those that wish to remain ignorant.

LevStrauss on May 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM

This is the funniest thing about the “new breed” of “conservative”. Carter states something that everyone with a brain cell already knows and all this idiotic whining. His biggest error here is stating a fact when your President is trying to give you $200 barrel oil and WW III. If you are going to debate over war with Iran then Israel’s “secret” arsenal has to be one of the premises in your decision making no matter where you come down on the topic. This whole hush hush garbage needs to go or at least stay with those that wish to remain ignorant.

LevStrauss on May 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM

You know whats funnier? A shill for an anti-semitic POS that has the unmitigated gall to lecture “conservatives” on the putative moral equivalency of Israel and Iran. Dumba$$.

Andy in Agoura Hills on May 27, 2008 at 3:23 PM

This is the funniest thing about the “new breed” of “conservative”. Carter states something that everyone with a brain cell already knows and all this idiotic whining.

There is as much in the “who” as in the “what” regarding his statement. As an ex-president his words have a bit more consequence than the average person, even though he is doing his level best to remedy that situation. And by stating it, he gives the Iranians a bigger bargaining chip and another excuse to stall.

His biggest error here is stating a fact when your President is trying to give you $200 barrel oil and WW III.

Don’t be silly. Bush has to do those things. After engineering Hurricane Katrina and piloting those planes into the World Trade Center what else is there for an encore?

If you are going to debate over war with Iran then Israel’s “secret” arsenal has to be one of the premises in your decision making no matter where you come down on the topic. This whole hush hush garbage needs to go or at least stay with those that wish to remain ignorant.

Wait a minute. Is this Jimmy Carter?

Buckley F. Williams on May 27, 2008 at 3:35 PM

Revoke that terrorist-coddling, anti-Semetic traitor’s passport, and change him with the Logan Act, for his little unauthorized junkett, in the first place. Then, if Mossad were to accidentally find out exactly where he was, and the full details of his PSD (Personal Security Detail), well, there’d be nothing we could do about it, but ask Israel’s cooperation in locating the former (and utterly failed) president that is lost (and has been lost for over a decade, now).

Virus-X on May 27, 2008 at 3:50 PM

“…we will be very angry with you… and we will write you a letter, telling you how angry we are.”

misterpeasea on May 27, 2008 at 3:54 PM

LevStrauss on May 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM

So, the president sets the price of oil?

Johan Klaus on May 27, 2008 at 5:04 PM

LevStrauss on May 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM

And the president is responsible for the muslim terrorist attacks?

Johan Klaus on May 27, 2008 at 5:06 PM

LevStrauss on May 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM +———– WARNING!

This is a PaulBot, Ronulan, Paulian, or whatever they are called. He’s a sick, vile, twisted piece of excrement. Don’t waste your time.

Andy in Agoura Hills on May 27, 2008 at 6:01 PM

Time for the Mossad to give Jimmy a call on his cell…

Maquis on May 27, 2008 at 7:53 PM

I don’t for one minute believe that he ‘blurted’ anything. He knew exactly what he was saying, and to whom he was saying it.

He would have been aware that pressure was about to be placed upon Iran, and he was giving them some ammo.

OldEnglish on May 27, 2008 at 9:24 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.