Clinton and Carter are an embarassment.

rockmom on May 27, 2008 at 8:45 AM

They’ve been mocked, ignored, insulted, and kicked to the curb by the media as well as the Dem party. The best revenge? Run as an Independent and sink Obama’s boat.

Nobody cares about you any more. How about you shut up and go away?

Billy Dale had worked in the White House travel office for three decades. He had served 7 presidents…But Hillary Clinton wanted Dale and his associates gone. She wanted him gone very badly….
What had Dale done to Hillary? The answer is he had done nothing. Dale and six others were simply in the way of her plans.
…during the 1992 campaign, the Clintons used an Arkansas travel agency, World Wide Travel. They worked with a Clinton cousin, Catherine Cornelius. WWT provided a million dollars in deferred travel for the Clinton campaign, freeing up much needed cash for campaigning. Employees of the firm donated to the Clinton campaign.
It gets even better. The supposed investigation against Travel Office “accounting improprieties” was headed by none other than Cornelius herself just as she was planning with World Wide Travel for a reorganization that would put her in charge of the department. She gets a good job and Thomason gets a hugely profitable business.
The Clintons had every right to simply dismiss Dale and the others and bring in their own people. Hillary, the brains behind the operation, not only had Dale fired, but also tried to send him to prison. Firing was not good enough. In May of 1993 the employees were given one hour’s notice to clean out their desks, and they were escorted away in a windowless van. The replacement was made without competitive bid.
The firing and trumped-up charges against Dale became a public relations nightmare, so Hillary had to distance herself. Keeping in mind that the first instinct of the Clintons is always to lie, that is exactly what she did. She claimed that she had nothing to do with the firing.
The nightmare grew worse for Dale as the FBI was brought in and he was charged with embezzling money from the Travel Office. At one point, the cost of trial would have been so prohibitively expensive that Dale tried to do a plea bargain to just make it go away. Fortunately, the government did not accept a plea bargain. When it came to trial, Dale was acquitted by the jury in under 2 hours.

Sometimes you just have to bring up the past to remember who we are really talking about.
If anyone knows about disrespect, the Clinton’s do.

Bill wants to fight this all summer long, using the two disputed states as the bloody shirt.

Just picking up where Rush left off.

It doesn’t really matter what anyone thinks of the Clintons, Bill’s point that Hillary may have the popular vote, but will lose the nomination to the “Super-delegates” is a valid argument.
The fact that a candidate can have the popular vote, but not be elected, is an electoral collage loophole that needs to be fixed.

KMC1 on May 27, 2008 at 7:32 AM

Sure, go ahead and fix the EC “loophole”. You’ll see the end to the two party system in this country when all the large liberal/socialist urban areas determine who the president will be.
And I noticed the Clintons werent complaining when Bill won the EC twice but only obtained something like 43% of the popular vote. The democrats only want things like super delegates and the EC done away with then they are losing.
Frankly, I’m sick of Bill’s whining. If he doesnt like the superdelegate system, then use his influence in the democrat party to change it. Otherwise STHU.
Maybe an Obama victory will get these two off of the public stage for good. But no, Bill will be another Jimmy Carter trying to undermine President Obama. Bill’s a nasty vindictive SOB.

“George S. Patton he’s not.”

Ed, In the credit where credit is due department, It was Winston Churchill that said “Never have so many owed so much to so few” Not General Patton. Or did you say it that way because Bill is standing in front of a large American Flag? Still… I think you are getting your mix all talked up. And about Patton on Memorial day?! tsk. tsk.

The press treated Hillary Clinton as an inevitability from the moment even before she announced her bid for the presidency NYS Senate.

The reason the Liberal MSM are pouncing on Hillary
relentlessly is there’s no way the media wants to
be under Cru-ella De HilRods thumb for another eight
years like they did with Slick Willy!

In an appearance this weekend, Bill told a South Dakota audience that his wife has been victimized by the primary process.

Hillery is a victim, again..

the entire justification of the two (HRC and BHO) are just who is the bigger victim of the process and deserves it more..

In a few years Obama will be thrown under the bus as well.

I don’t think so. Yesterday, MSM (including Fox) gave Obama’s speech prominence more so than the Prez. Did anyone hear about Obama’s BIG GAFFE?

bikermailman on May 27, 2008 at 7:36 AM

I’m not saying you’re wrong, but worldwide instant communication media has changed the fundamental equation of ‘paying attention to small states’ and both campaign and election mechanics have remained in the anachronistic ‘campaign by horseback’ method the Founders had to deal with. Instead, they’re starting campaigns earlier and earlier, with everyone getting the point at around month 3 and campaign fatigue at around month 6.

In this day and age, with all the media technology we have at our disposal, there should be no reason whatsoever that a candidate should have to personally travel to any of the ’57 states’ or expand a campaign out BEYOND the time it took to elect someone in the 1700s…the addition of states to the Union, legitimate or imaginary, aside.

Can’t feel sorry for the Clinton’s though. Talk about “what goes around comes around.” Both of the Clinton’s should be spending the remainder of their lives behind bars for the crimes they have committed to country (think Chinese); these folks should take their millions and slink back out of sight, hoping that the MSM never reveals what they actually know about these two snakes.