Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Andromeda Strain remake midpoint: Twice the pace, with extra added Bush-hatred

posted at 6:51 am on May 27, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

When I first heard that A&E remade the sci-fi classic The Andromeda Strain as a four-hour miniseries, I immediately made it a high priority for this week’s viewing. I read the book repeatedly as a boy, so much so that my father still jokes about it. The original movie followed the book rather closely, but it dragged; except for the first 20 minutes and the last 30, the pace could cure insomnia.

After seeing part 1, I can say that the producers have cured that problem, but at the expense of making the story almost unrecognizable. As in the original, the plot involves a covert effort by the American government to find biological material in space that could be used as a weapon on earth, but unlike the original, we know that immediately. In attempting to cover that up, some members of the government try blaming the North Koreans for infecting the damaged satellite, even though as one character finally points out, why would Pyongyang spend all the money to send a biological weapon into space hoping an American satellite would come close enough to it to hit it and trust that said satellite would hit the US? The character who says that points out that Homeland Security can’t be bothered to inspect most shipping, leaving that method wide open.

And that brings us to some of the other updates. Everyone has personal problems in this remake; the Head Scientist has a bipolar wife, the Nosy Reporter has a cocaine addiction, three of the main characters have unresolved personal conflicts from the war. It’s all very Lifetime Channel in that sense. Worse, though, are the little zingers that the writers of the remake put into the script about the current war and administration. When the Utah National Guard gets mobilized to quarantine the area, the Nosy Reporter tells his television audience that the UNG expects the call-up to be brief and says with a smirk, “Where have we heard that before?” One character postulates that the US supplied Saddam with all of his biological weapons, and so on. These pop up on a regular basis about every 20 minutes during the first installment.

Still, I can sympathize. The producers needed to pick up the pace from the original, which means they had to add a lot more action, which meant more subplots. For the most part, they succeeded, and it’s entertaining even if it’s nowhere near the book any longer. Most of the characters have completely changed and the tone has gone from officious arrogance to near-hysteria. The ride has gotten much faster and more compelling, and as long as viewers don’t mind the 30-point decline in IQ, they should enjoy it.

Both the first installment and the finale air tonight on A&E, starting at 7 pm ET/6 pm CT.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

One character postulates that the US supplied Saddam with all of his biological weapons, and so on.

This “fact” is one of Ten Commandments of anti-war faith. Can’t count how many times I have heard this injected into a debate I’ve had.

Seixon on May 27, 2008 at 7:06 AM

Sounds terrible. I think I’ll pass.

Zorro on May 27, 2008 at 7:06 AM

Like you, AS was a favorite of my younger years and I remember being pretty disturbed by the kid that committed suicide with the glue as well as the fighter pilot that had his plane disintegrate around him. I was looking forward to this but got tied up with weekend events. I look forward to watching tonight and thank you for the heads up on the PC garbage.

jmarcure on May 27, 2008 at 7:09 AM

This “fact” is one of Ten Commandments of anti-war faith. Can’t count how many times I have heard this injected into a debate I’ve had.

Seixon on May 27, 2008 at 7:06 AM

That is the truth. I was able to show via UN records that Saddam got his WMD and Chemical weapons from almost every other country other than the US and the responce ?

I dont care check this “IhateBush.org” sites to get the truth.

I pointed out that this was official UNITED NATIONS information and not some bizzare hate site but non of that mattered.

Still have the info and I use it to bash the anti war from time to time.

William Amos on May 27, 2008 at 7:09 AM

This “fact” is one of Ten Commandments of anti-war faith. Can’t count how many times I have heard this injected into a debate I’ve had.

Seixon on May 27, 2008 at 7:06 AM

“Facts” have the same effect on the left as garlic does on vampires. Now I know vampires are creatures of fantasy but the left does live in a bizarre fantasy world of their own making so I felt it was a valid comparison.

jmarcure on May 27, 2008 at 7:20 AM

Well, c’mon — it is Hollywood, and it is an election year; what did you expect?

Paul_in_NJ on May 27, 2008 at 7:22 AM

BTW This graph shows where Saddam got his WMDs(Using official UN documents)

WISCONSIN PROJECT IRAQI WATCH

And this graph shows where saddam got his military equiptment

http://www.solport.com/resources/Iraqi%20Weapons.JPG

Below is the BBC’s coverage of UN resolutions on Iraq which show that food and medicine were never prevented from going to Iraq

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2246037.stm

Resolution 661 imposed a full trade embargo, stopping all imports from and exports to Iraq except for food, medicine and humanitarian supplies

Also found a congressional report on what was sold to Saddam by the US government during the 1980s

Some info HERE

William Amos on May 27, 2008 at 7:22 AM

William Amos on May 27, 2008 at 7:09 AM

You can lead a dumb horse to water, but you can’t make it drink facts.

bikermailman on May 27, 2008 at 7:22 AM

Can find the Chemical weapons sales stuff here

http://www.iraqwatch.org/suppliers/nyt-041303.gif

William Amos on May 27, 2008 at 7:23 AM

Arms sales to Saddam’s iraq by Country

http://www.solport.com/resources/Iraqi%20Weapons.JPG

William Amos on May 27, 2008 at 7:24 AM

As long as they were altering the story, why not simply combine Crichton novels and have all these whiny characters ultimately eaten by a Velociraptor?

radjah shelduck on May 27, 2008 at 7:24 AM

If the hero isn’t gay I’m not watching.

JiangxiDad on May 27, 2008 at 7:31 AM

Oh this is priceless,or maybe serendipty!

I click on channel 30A/E channel,and I’m checking out the
movie,I’ve never seen,the Andromeda Strain,then with tea in hand I log on,and presto there’s a thread on the Andromeda
strain on the blog,UUmm spooky,eh!

So after I read the post Ed,now your going to tell me that
the movie this morning that started at 7 am is actually a
four part movie,and not an hour and a half movie!

Me thinks I should of logged on first,then turned on the tv!
:)

canopfor on May 27, 2008 at 7:31 AM

Nosy reporter…cocaine…har-de-har-har. I was rooting for him to get popped on the side of the road instead of the hacker on the bike.

When the Utah National Guard gets mobilized to quarantine the area, the Nosy Reporter tells his television audience that the UNG expects the call-up to be brief and says with a smirk, “Where have we heard that before?”

I thought you’d key in on the ‘oh, they’re just training for border enforcement’ justification…and note that Utah isn’t a border state.

James on May 27, 2008 at 7:34 AM

Okay,now I know why I haven’t seen it Ed’
after rereading your post,this movie has
been Liberaly besmirched!

canopfor on May 27, 2008 at 7:40 AM

I have read the original book countless times, have seen the original movie to the point I have it memorized and when I saw what they were going to do with this remake, I decided to not even bother giving it the time of day to watch it.

I am now sick and tired beyond measure of these stupid remakes they insist on doing! If the original still works, why bother improving on it? Leave it alone!

pilamaye on May 27, 2008 at 7:45 AM

I am now sick and tired beyond measure of these stupid remakes they insist on doing! If the original still works, why bother improving on trashing it? Leave it alone!

pilamaye on May 27, 2008 at 7:45 AM

Fixed. By no measure are they improving upon it.

ViperPilot on May 27, 2008 at 8:12 AM

I remember reading the first book and thinking, ‘wow, I’m three quarters through it and everyone is still going through the decontamination process to get into the base’

I read a few other books of his until it seemed to follow a similar plot.. new advancement in some field is revealed. the same advancement starts to spread havoc. Day is saved by dynamic scientist and handful of other academia types (all with double or triple degrees) rescue themselves but not before everyone else (i.e. Enlisted army troops, the street-smart college drop out, and anyone else who hasn’t been beyond 4 years of college) dies..

DaveC on May 27, 2008 at 8:14 AM

Okay a brainwave,how about for some unknown reason’s
Liberals have to re-make war,or political movies that
are brought up to current events or present day in
history!

That way,Liberals can re-make a movie,say the Ten
Commandments and they can bring it up to current
history,that way they can work in President Bush,
and blame him!

This is a good game Liberals in Hollywood are playing,
they re-do a movie,besmirch the original version,bring
up to current history and blame Bush!

So the Left are helping the liberals get elected,through
re-makes before the general,talk about free advertisements
or campaign commercials!

canopfor on May 27, 2008 at 8:25 AM

Hollywood lost millions with their “test market” of anti-war/anti-American films over the past year. Most rational people rejected their propaganda, and as a result the Hollywood-lefts credibility factor will be marginalized in the months ahead. Some one needs to produce a parody that portrays a majority of the hollywood-whackos in their delusional state of mind—-Sean Penn staring in a re-make of “One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest, with Cloony, Rosie, and the gang in an all-star cast.

Rovin on May 27, 2008 at 8:28 AM

The Andromeda Strain is a book that redefines the term of “anti-climatic.” When I finished the book my immediate thought was “what a frackin waste of time that was.”

I can’t believe anyone would re-read it multiple times.

Also, there’s not much that most Americans agree on, other than football and fireworks, so when you’ve got an administration with like a 70% disapproval rating, of course movies are going to take cracks at it – chances are, most viewers will laugh and/or applaud. Except the true believers like Ed who love excessive spending and all else that Bush hath wrought.

e-pirate on May 27, 2008 at 8:28 AM

Also, there’s not much that most Americans agree on, other than football and fireworks, so when you’ve got an administration with like a 70% disapproval rating, of course movies are going to take cracks at it – chances are, most viewers will laugh and/or applaud. Except the true believers like Ed who love excessive spending and all else that Bush hath wrought.

e-pirate on May 27, 2008 at 8:28 AM

Well e-pirate, have you actually seen the miniseries?? If you have, then you know that some of the cheap shots really seem out of place and contrived.

ViperPilot on May 27, 2008 at 8:42 AM

I was rolling my eyes most of the first two hours. The reason this mini-series is a mini-series, and not a two-hour movie of the week, was so that the producers could write in two hours worth of their nauseating, anti-American, anti-Bush, morally equivalent world-view. Sure, the excitement factor is orders of magnitude greater than the original film, but at the cost having to sit through some ridiculously stupid plot additions – the Andromeda Strain makes people suddenly murder each other and then commit suicide (I found it suitably disturbing to imagine an airborne contagion with an essentially 100% kill rate) – along with the above mentioned lefty standard fare BS.

Meh.

-phil

phile on May 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM

Except the true believers like Ed who love excessive spending and all else that Bush hath wrought.

e-pirate on May 27, 2008 at 8:28 AM

You mean like the 20 billion in pork added in the Farm Bill by the Democratically controlled House and Senate (with a 75% disapproval rating) that already has the over-ride numbers to prevent Bush’s veto pen? e-pirate obviously doesn’t have a clue as to Ed’s support of Porkbusters, but nice try. When you make comments that show’s you know nothing about the author, don’t gulp on the Kool-aid.

Got it!

Rovin on May 27, 2008 at 9:07 AM

I saw the first 90 minutes or so and gave up. Why, why must “Hollywood” ALWAYS portray the US military as venal and stupid? The book/movie did enough of that, the remake layed it on like jam.

Ninty minutes of my life I will never get back.

johnsteele on May 27, 2008 at 9:17 AM

Why would I want to watch a re-run of the MSM’s evening news?

landlines on May 27, 2008 at 9:21 AM

I saw the first 90 minutes or so and gave up. Why, why must “Hollywood” ALWAYS portray the US military as venal and stupid? The book/movie did enough of that, the remake layed it on like jam.

Ninty minutes of my life I will never get back.

johnsteele on May 27, 2008 at 9:17 AM

Here’s why:

“You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.”
-John F. Kerry

Vic on May 27, 2008 at 9:28 AM

I read the book numerous times as well, just after it came out, but didn’t see the original movie until the ’80’s or so. That original movie was a disappointment, given that the science depicted didn’t translate well to the screen.

This…thing…is a sensationalized nightmare. You’re right about the 30-point IQ falloff; that’s probably being a bit nice.

Hollywood is a drugmaker for the insensate masses who won’t…can’t…spend the time it takes to sit down and read.

Serr8d on May 27, 2008 at 9:35 AM

I don’t know. Maybe A&E has a good mini on their hands, but I grow weary of the PC waaahmbulance nonsense weighting down many remakes, or even originals.

The distinction between ‘theme’ & ‘message’ has been lost. Take Jurassic Park. Please. It was all THEME (and happy meals) at the expense of the authors original message.

From EM’s description, it sounds like the New Andromeda Strain is a similar pollution.

Perhaps A&E should have simply renamed it ‘601′.

locomotivebreath1901 on May 27, 2008 at 9:37 AM

excessive spending and all else that Bush hath wrought.

e-pirate on May 27, 2008 at 8:28 AM

REALITY CHECK: In the United States, ALL spending bills originate in the House of Representatives….controlled by DEMOCRATS (Approval Rating 22% and dropping like a rock!)…NOT BUSH. Also check who the biggest porkers are: almost all DEMOCRATS!

And in the SENATE, 8 of the 10 worst senators on the subject of earmark reform are DEMOCRATS (1 Republican, 1 Independent).

landlines on May 27, 2008 at 9:38 AM

I tuned out the not so subtle hits at Bush and enjoyed the 1st part of the series. I have not read the book, nor seen the original movie, so I am watching it with brand new eyes.

Sue on May 27, 2008 at 9:46 AM

I now want to read the book, btw.

Sue on May 27, 2008 at 9:47 AM

I’m a big fan of the original film. The weight, experience and non-heart throb cast was very cool and real. There was an over weight female scientist, an old guy and so on. The remake casts known, 20-30 somethings right out of other TV shows. Too bad.

jimmer on May 27, 2008 at 9:56 AM

the remake sucks, could only stomach about 15 minutes of bad acting and cheap special effects

windansea on May 27, 2008 at 10:05 AM

Worse, though, are the little zingers that the writers of the remake put into the script about the current war and administration. When the Utah National Guard gets mobilized to quarantine the area, the Nosy Reporter tells his television audience that the UNG expects the call-up to be brief and says with a smirk, “Where have we heard that before?” One character postulates that the US supplied Saddam with all of his biological weapons, and so on. These pop up on a regular basis about every 20 minutes during the first installment.

I suspected that’s what this remake was going to be and that was the reason I didnt watch it. I did like the original though.

abcurtis on May 27, 2008 at 10:05 AM

I saw this a few weeks ago and was stunned to see the shrill environmental scaremongering throughout. I can’t believe that Michael Crichton of all people signed off on it.

rjjago on May 27, 2008 at 10:08 AM

my thougths on the first half of the A&E miniseries “Andromeda Strain”
“good enough to watch the second half”

my thoughts on the Hot Air thread about the first half of the A&E mini-series “Andromeda Strain”
“Meh, forget about it”

RMC1618 on May 27, 2008 at 10:20 AM

JiangxiDad on May 27, 2008 at 7:31 AM

Stay tuned.

MikeZero on May 27, 2008 at 10:27 AM

Count me as another hater.

I thought, for a brief second, that the writers had taken on the task of updating the science and technology of the original with newer techniques that had been learned since then.

What I got instead was what’s actually happened in the last 40 years. The hard science was pushed aside and/or watered down to concentrate on “real” problems and personal demons and political viewpoints. So much so that they had the audacity to claim that project Scoop was a sooper-dooper secret satellite meant to investigate a WORMHOLE ABOVE EARTH. Now I still haven’t figured out if that’s just a con-job the general gave to the scientists but the scientists just sat there and believed it.

That plus the addition of smarmy reporters and military people while the scientists are turned into cartoon cutout caricatures who are just naive truth seekers who look and act like you and me but who can instantly blurt out insanely detailed technobabble as if possessed by a demon then their eye color stops glowing and they start talking like joe-schmoe again…

Skywise on May 27, 2008 at 10:30 AM

Last I heard saddam was fighting our enemies in the Iraq-Iran war. an enemy that declared war on us in 1979. committed acts of war on us by taken our embassy, terrorist acts on our citizens and troops. IF the USA armed Saddam during this period so what? We should have gave him more IMO. if Saddam could have made a stronger blow to Iran we wouldn’t have the problems we have in Iraq right now. If I give my neighbor a gun and after 20 years he becomes a homosucidal monster and uses that gun in ways I could never imagine 20 years ago, would a court convict me of aiding a crimnal act? I don’t think so. So the anti-war crowd needs to get over itself. you deal with the world as you find it not as you wish it were.

Would the world be a better place if we did not arm saddam and let Iran take over Iraq? would our oil supply not be in jerpody and would we probably not be still in Iraq fighting a much stronger Iran? this rewriting of history to suit peoples beliefs is tiring and stupid. saddam’s actions are his and he deserves all responsibility for it not the USA government.

as far as the movie. the last 15 secs really sucked. I still can’t figure out what happened. Why the hell did the plane just start to fall apart? The helicopters didn’t. And why the hell didn’t the dog die with the toxins released. And why didn’t the baby and man died. They got the order mixed up. you investigate the scence first then you drop the toxin to kill everything. If your looking for surviors would you really spray the entire city with posion before you land? I’m just glad the media won’t be in charge of a crisis or we might get another kitrina.

I will watch the second part but it doesn’t look like it will be worth the time. Maybe a Tivo and skip the commercials at least then it won’t be a 2 hour waste. Just an hour.

unseen on May 27, 2008 at 10:54 AM

The definition of the New Andromeda Strain …..

The sensation of reluctantly viewing something unbearable to watch, hoping beyond hope that the plot picks up and Hollywood’s subtle Bush-bashing goes away.

The cure for the New Andromeda Strain …..

Change the channel.

fogw on May 27, 2008 at 10:55 AM

Unseen: The toxins released were designed to kill the birds as part of containment. Birds being a standard way that a disease can get transferred because they could eat infected people and carry the disease to another location.

This was explained, clearly, in the original movie but poorly explained here and the only clear point they got across was a zinger about the Audubon society not liking it.

The plane breaking up will be explained. (Hopefully)

Skywise on May 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM

I disagree completely Ed…The original movie is excellent and the pace is fine. No spectacular CG effects, no movie stars, just good sci-fi, good sets, good plot, and real characters. The scientists seemed like people you would actually run into at say 1970s NASA, not glamourous and flawed like so many modern Hollywood idiots, but human. Matter of fact I’m putting it on my to-buy DVD list now…

It will join the collection that includes The Omega Man, Soylent Green, and Planet of the Apes.

MechEng5by5 on May 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM

I loved the original AS movie – especially the middle part Ed so easily dismissed, in part because it was largely realistic science.

The remake last night was all BS military=evil/personal issues nonsense. Turned it off after 90 minutes.

Clark1 on May 27, 2008 at 11:09 AM

Was there a plot? I was too busy drooling over Daniel Dae Kim to notice.

Kidding. Sort of. (I don’t get why they made his character Chinese?) I’m a huge Crichton fan, and I’ve read TAS about five times — but when a movie takes this many liberties with the original story, I just switch gears and think of it as a completely unrelated movie. The book is so cerebral, it’s hard to translate to film without being a little dull, as you say.

At least it’s not as bad as the film of Sphere. Or Rising Sun. What butchery that was.

Tanya on May 27, 2008 at 11:25 AM

When I heard that A&E did the remake, rather than Sci-Fi, I knew it would be crap.

Go ahead, call me psychic.

mojo on May 27, 2008 at 11:33 AM

Skywise on May 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM

I understood about that but wouldn’t the toxins also kill everything else too? Not sure if there is a toxin that just kills birds and nothing else.

It will join the collection that includes The Omega Man, Soylent Green, and Planet of the Apes.

MechEng5by5 on May 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM

All great movies. Omega Man made I am legend look weak. The remake of the planet of the apes also sucked, Still waiting for Soylent Green remake but it would be so jammed packed with global warming mythology I don’t think I would like it much.

At least it’s not as bad as the film of Sphere. Or Rising Sun. What butchery that was.

Tanya on May 27, 2008 at 11:25 AM

don’t forget how they destroyed the Jurassic Park

unseen on May 27, 2008 at 11:38 AM

don’t forget how they destroyed the Jurassic Park

You know? I’m a huge dinosaur freak. I love that movie so much, I can actually almost-forgive them for totally rewriting the story.

Tanya on May 27, 2008 at 11:43 AM

The Chinese guy is there to give credence to the moral equivalence – “Our country (China) was developing biological weapons,just like YOURS was…”

I really enjoyed the original movie – I thought they did the story a disservice by NOT spending more time on the decon process. Walk through some blue water, drink this, and go through a foaming “car wash”? You really don’t understand the depth of just HOW germ free this place is supposed to be.

And I think the technology updates are a bit much: the “Star Trek” esque “communicators” on their chests? A little too much reliance on “Computer”? In the opriginal story, the doctors actually had to do some work – in this version, they all stand around pontificating.

And right from the beginning – Army is evil, government is full of conspiracies, the President (running for re-election) has that constantly thrown out there, the army doctor justs wants to nuke EVERYTHING right from the start, the “racially and gender” diverse cast, the reporter is the one on a crusade and is being used by the scientists to get around the evil military industrial complex. Oh, and they made sure to have a female pilot fly the plane to deliver the bomb…

In the original movie, it was a bit slow, but is was interesting – the minutia made it interesting. In this movie the minutia is actually boring and distracts from why these people are doing what they are doing in the first place. I got the feeling that “Andromeda” was the subplot, not the main focus of the story.

Ridley and Tony Scott executive produced this? I also can’t believe Michael Crichton signed off on this – though he did write and allow Sphere…

catmman on May 27, 2008 at 11:56 AM

IMHO: Best Crichton book? The Great Train Robbery.

Best Adaptation? Crichton’s own film version of it.

I was looking forward to this updated version of TAS. We TiVOed it for later viewing. But the Direct TV capsule description of it said, “An investigative reporter uncovers a government conspiracy. . .” After reading that, I don’t think I’m interested anymore.

A reporter uncovering a government conspiracy? That is just so Capricorn One.

Gottafang on May 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM

The Chinese guy is there to give credence to the moral equivalence – “Our country (China) was developing biological weapons,just like YOURS was…”

But Daniel Dae Kim is (South) Korean. Couldn’t they just as easily have said (North) Korea was developing biological weapons?

I thought they did the story a disservice by NOT spending more time on the decon process.

I know, right? That part is so cool.

Tanya on May 27, 2008 at 12:12 PM

“Time to wake up, sir.”

Gottafang on May 27, 2008 at 12:17 PM

Save yourself and rent the original movie from Netflix. My favorite part is where one scientist tells another scientist to take blood from a victim’s buttocks. The scientist’s reaction to this request is worth the rental.

And all that anti-Bush screed aside, can we not just rate the movie as is, in other words, as a piece of crap due to bad acting? It seriously looks like they all got together one long weekend and decided to do a movie really quickly; not only that but the writing is crap. Additionally, as a military man, I cannot watch a movie when the producers don’t care enough to get the actors berets that fit their heads. And guess what else: not every organization or group in the military is run by a 4-star general.

We will not be tuning in tonight…and my wife is a serious Benjamin Bratt “fan” and she doesn’t even want to waste two hours of her life (again).

mjtyson on May 27, 2008 at 12:20 PM

catmman on May 27, 2008 at 11:56 AM

You think that is bad. saw the new Indy Movie last night also. they destroyed that also. Why if a movie is set in the 1950 must present day politics come into a movie. At least TAS is suppose to be set in present day. IJCS was suppose to be set in 1950. Not multiclutral america by any degree yet the movie was cast as if it were 2009 America. And to top it off it made absolutely no sense. The plot was broken. It was only moved forward by special effects that you had to suspend disbelief to believe that the people doing the stunts could somehow possibly survive. Indy is not a super hero. Most of the special effects and stunts would have killed an avg human.

unseen on May 27, 2008 at 12:22 PM

At least Iron Man made our troops good guys. And they wonder why Transformers and Iron Man has done so well at the box office. I would not be surprised if the Indy movie has a 60-70% fall off in box office revs next week.

unseen on May 27, 2008 at 12:25 PM

Did they somehow manage to blame Karl Rove and FEMA?

viking01 on May 27, 2008 at 12:26 PM

viking01 on May 27, 2008 at 12:26 PM

Not yet. So far the evil guy is the head of the NSA. He chews alot of gum. Does chenny chew gum? the gum is important. they spent more time on the gum chewing then on the the bug it seems. so it must be important right?

unseen on May 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM

And you forgot to mention the line uttered by the film’s president… something about being tired of starting wars based on rumors and half-baked intelligence.

I almost hurled…. then I turned it off and went to bed.

Needless to say, I won’t be watching part 2 tonight.

Gartrip on May 27, 2008 at 12:32 PM

I read the book many times in my youth – in fact, it was my second “adult” book, after “Journey to the Center of the Earth.” TAS got me interested in science and computers – the technology proposed in the original was both cool as heck to an eight-year-old, and visionary to an adult looking back from 2008. I would have enjoyed a true “update” of the original story, instead of what we got, which is essentially a movie about Bush Derangement Syndrome – a far more difficult bug to kill than the Andromeda Strain. Anyone who hasn’t seen Part 2 yet, brace yourself: you got some weapons-grade stupid coming at you.

For anyone who enjoyed the original book, I highly recommend “The Swarm” by Arthur Herzog. It was adapted into a schlocky movie in the 70s, at the height of the killer-bee craze, but the book has much of the same sense of genuine scientific wonder as “The Andromeda Strain.” At least, I thought so when I was eight. I probably should dig up my old copy and reread it before I recommend it, but what the heck – eight-year-old me gives it two thumbs up!

Whoever suggested they knew TAS remake would be crap when they found out A&E produced it, instead of Sci-Fi, I have one word for you: Riverworld. Once upon a time, I hoped the Sci-Fi Channel would produce reverent adaptations of classic science fiction, instead of movies about giant snakes. I demand a Congressional investigation into that…

Doctor Zero on May 27, 2008 at 1:46 PM

unseen on May 27, 2008 at 11:38 AM

Totally agree, give me the originals any day…not that they didn’t make awful scifi in the 70s…anyone ever see Zardoz?

MechEng5by5 on May 27, 2008 at 1:51 PM

Most rational people rejected their propaganda, and as a result the Hollywood-lefts credibility factor will be marginalized in the months ahead.

Don’t count on it… these people LIVE the fantasy– it’s their existence, and what is dreamed of is as good as truth in their minds. They’ll just “CG” the environment to make it look real.

leftnomore on May 27, 2008 at 1:53 PM

I loved the movie as a 12 year old kid, and have watched it on TV many times. I thought the pace was suspenseful, not slow. If you want fast, go see Indiana Jones’ Crystal Skull… it’s fast, if that’s your priority.

leftnomore on May 27, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Oh, and did anyone catch the “Odd Man” hypothesis hypocrisy?

They have an unmarried male to take care fo blowing up the Wildfire lab in case of infection…

But it’s apparently OK for a female fighter pilot to drop a themonuclear device on an American town.

This is what happens when you PC up a good story and add a little BDS to the mix –

A convoluted mish-mash of Hollyweird tripe.

catmman on May 27, 2008 at 2:05 PM

Short review: The movie is gay.

Long review: The movie is totally gay.

Kevin M on May 27, 2008 at 2:32 PM

Criticisms well deserved, that said it was entertaining and I will watch part 2.

koolbrease on May 27, 2008 at 2:52 PM

It will join the collection that includes The Omega Man, Soylent Green, and Planet of the Apes.

MechEng5by5 on May 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM

I just watched ‘The Omega Man’ the other day..

I’ll never forget Chuck in a crumpled velvet suit..

DaveC on May 27, 2008 at 4:11 PM

Dude, where’s my War, Inc. talkback? This summer’s sleeper hit, guaranteed!

saint kansas on May 27, 2008 at 6:22 PM

Totally agree, give me the originals any day…not that they didn’t make awful scifi in the 70s…anyone ever see Zardoz?

MechEng5by5 on May 27, 2008 at 1:51 PM

Zardoz?? HAHAHAHHAHAHA!!! That movie what WHACKED! It wouldn’t even make sense if you were stoned!

Back to AS: Did anyone get the jab at the left’s favorite corporations in the name of the chemical company that was pushing for undersea mining? “Enburtel.” As in ENron-haliBURTon-bechtEL.

CurtZHP on May 27, 2008 at 7:08 PM

I also can’t believe Michael Crichton signed off on this

Believe it: Alimony for your goldigging ex-wife and private school for your kid is expensive. Which, coincidentally, also explains why any of Tom Clancy’s books turned into movies after 1999 are crap.

ScottMcC on May 27, 2008 at 7:20 PM

Believe it: Alimony for your goldigging ex-wife and private school for your kid is expensive. Which, coincidentally, also explains why any of Tom Clancy’s books turned into movies after 1999 are crap.

ScottMcC on May 27, 2008 at 7:20 PM

You should hear the commentary for ‘Some of all Fears.’ He spanks the director all the way through it. Clancy even introduces himself as “I’m the guy who wrote the book that they didn’t read.”

- The Cat

MirCat on May 27, 2008 at 9:02 PM

Wow, not even 15min into the second part, and there’s already another cheap shot at Bush regarding the “warrentless wiretaps”.

ViperPilot on May 27, 2008 at 9:15 PM

Wow, just when you thought the second part couldn’t be lamer than the first, you’d be wrong!

ViperPilot on May 27, 2008 at 11:06 PM

I just came home from a kid event and my wife made me watch the “thumb” scene again. How pathetic…

And now we’re all re-enacting the scene in the living room. Here’s my 5-yr old:

“Jeremy…the thumb!”

Sad.

mjtyson on May 28, 2008 at 12:52 AM

Ed….still think it’s a good movie?

mjtyson on May 28, 2008 at 12:52 AM

Zingers against Bush.

“Where have we heard that before?”

Glad I didn’t watch it.

hadsil on May 28, 2008 at 6:44 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.