<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choices Update: A video reminder of the choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:04:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: It Is To Laugh! &#187; Freedom Folks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-2347239</link>
		<dc:creator>It Is To Laugh! &#187; Freedom Folks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-2347239</guid>
		<description>[...] Morrisey is selling the &#8220;tastier crap sandwich&#8221; routine here. (Boo! We miss [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morrisey is selling the &#8220;tastier crap sandwich&#8221; routine here. (Boo! We miss [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Find looking for sugar daddy.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1633735</link>
		<dc:creator>Find looking for sugar daddy.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1633735</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sugar daddy....&lt;/strong&gt;

Rich sugar daddy dating. Russia pictures sugar daddy marriage nude. Sugar daddy dr phil. Find looking for sugar daddy. What is a sugar daddy relationship. Sugar daddy. Sugar daddy personals....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sugar daddy&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Rich sugar daddy dating. Russia pictures sugar daddy marriage nude. Sugar daddy dr phil. Find looking for sugar daddy. What is a sugar daddy relationship. Sugar daddy. Sugar daddy personals&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gekkobear</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1147497</link>
		<dc:creator>gekkobear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1147497</guid>
		<description>Well, sorry Ed, but I won&#039;t vote for McCain come fall either.

My initial reason was McCain-Feingold and I thought that was good enough.  But I have a second one that is also pretty persuasive...

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/14/1019748.aspx

There&#039;s a link with quotes from the Republicans in Congress clearly stating that McCain&#039;s poll numbers show that what they need is to be more big-government nanny state big spending liberals and be more &quot;mavericky&quot; and offend conservatives...

Somehow that isn&#039;t a message I&#039;d like to be sending with my vote.  So either we get Obama, or we get the Republican party remade into a big-spending nanny state copy of the Democrats...

&quot;The long-term disaster of Obama will make Carter look like George Washington.&quot; - VinceP1974

And the long-term disaster of McCain will leave a two-party system where both are fighting for the big government nanny-state liberal path...

&lt;blockquote&gt;What is wrong with you people?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My question exactly.  Do you not believe the Congressional Republicans, or do you think that they&#039;ll somehow learn a different lesson if you give them evidence that this will work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, sorry Ed, but I won&#8217;t vote for McCain come fall either.</p>
<p>My initial reason was McCain-Feingold and I thought that was good enough.  But I have a second one that is also pretty persuasive&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/14/1019748.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/14/1019748.aspx</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a link with quotes from the Republicans in Congress clearly stating that McCain&#8217;s poll numbers show that what they need is to be more big-government nanny state big spending liberals and be more &#8220;mavericky&#8221; and offend conservatives&#8230;</p>
<p>Somehow that isn&#8217;t a message I&#8217;d like to be sending with my vote.  So either we get Obama, or we get the Republican party remade into a big-spending nanny state copy of the Democrats&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The long-term disaster of Obama will make Carter look like George Washington.&#8221; &#8211; VinceP1974</p>
<p>And the long-term disaster of McCain will leave a two-party system where both are fighting for the big government nanny-state liberal path&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>What is wrong with you people?</p></blockquote>
<p>My question exactly.  Do you not believe the Congressional Republicans, or do you think that they&#8217;ll somehow learn a different lesson if you give them evidence that this will work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squid Shark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146898</link>
		<dc:creator>Squid Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146898</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;VinceP1974 on May 25, 2008 at 11:50 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lovely, nice to get another perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>VinceP1974 on May 25, 2008 at 11:50 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Lovely, nice to get another perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceP1974</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146891</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceP1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146891</guid>
		<description>If you Americans want to surrender the world to the forces of evil because things just aren&#039;t fair in who you have to choose from.. then really.. lets just turn off the lights and let the entire world fall to crap.

The long-term disaster of Obama will make Carter look like George Washington.

What is wrong with you people? You have been whining since 2006.. enough already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you Americans want to surrender the world to the forces of evil because things just aren&#8217;t fair in who you have to choose from.. then really.. lets just turn off the lights and let the entire world fall to crap.</p>
<p>The long-term disaster of Obama will make Carter look like George Washington.</p>
<p>What is wrong with you people? You have been whining since 2006.. enough already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squid Shark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146780</link>
		<dc:creator>Squid Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 12:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146780</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We’ve surrendered in Iraq, because McCain was willing to work across the isle, and I know it was predicted by many, and I refused to believe it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh yes, your evidence that the biggest hawk in congress would surrender is what???? You have none expcept your own MDS. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;When detainees from the recently closed Club Gitmo blow up American Troops, blame Bush. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

So you really think hes going to just let everyone go?? Negative, he has said quite the opposite.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Reagan didn’t get them by being Moderate, he got them by being Conservative and educating them on what Conservative meant. He didn’t join them, he called on them to join him. He pushed tax cuts through a Democratic Congress, by popular accord. He didn’t join them in junk science cap and trade crap. He informed the population what Conservative was, he didn’t redefine it to mean Liberal Lite.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I want you to really think that through, this is the biggest myth being touted by you TC&#039;s. Reagan won because he was Reagan. The taxpayers are ALWAYS for Tax cuts. If reagan won on his ideas, he would have brought majorities in congress along with him in every election. As you know, this is not the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We’ve surrendered in Iraq, because McCain was willing to work across the isle, and I know it was predicted by many, and I refused to believe it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh yes, your evidence that the biggest hawk in congress would surrender is what???? You have none expcept your own MDS. </p>
<blockquote><p>When detainees from the recently closed Club Gitmo blow up American Troops, blame Bush. </p></blockquote>
<p>So you really think hes going to just let everyone go?? Negative, he has said quite the opposite.</p>
<blockquote><p>Reagan didn’t get them by being Moderate, he got them by being Conservative and educating them on what Conservative meant. He didn’t join them, he called on them to join him. He pushed tax cuts through a Democratic Congress, by popular accord. He didn’t join them in junk science cap and trade crap. He informed the population what Conservative was, he didn’t redefine it to mean Liberal Lite.</p></blockquote>
<p>I want you to really think that through, this is the biggest myth being touted by you TC&#8217;s. Reagan won because he was Reagan. The taxpayers are ALWAYS for Tax cuts. If reagan won on his ideas, he would have brought majorities in congress along with him in every election. As you know, this is not the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: culturism</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146767</link>
		<dc:creator>culturism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 11:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146767</guid>
		<description>On the SCOTUS, Stevens is 88 and Ginsburg is 75.  We will have at least one retirement under the next president.  But Ginsburg could see this as her best opportunity to be replaced by a liberal and bail.  If Obama gets in he&#039;ll get one maybe two judges.  We will then have a Republican in office to replace the two more That is scary.  If McCain gets in, Ginsburg will hang on.  He&#039;ll get to replace one, but then the Democrat that follows him will get to replace several.  

A lot of this analysis depends on whether Ginsburg, with failing health, would be willing to quit under Obama or might cling to her seat until a Republican President gets to replace her.  Anyone have any insight? 

www.culturism.us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the SCOTUS, Stevens is 88 and Ginsburg is 75.  We will have at least one retirement under the next president.  But Ginsburg could see this as her best opportunity to be replaced by a liberal and bail.  If Obama gets in he&#8217;ll get one maybe two judges.  We will then have a Republican in office to replace the two more That is scary.  If McCain gets in, Ginsburg will hang on.  He&#8217;ll get to replace one, but then the Democrat that follows him will get to replace several.  </p>
<p>A lot of this analysis depends on whether Ginsburg, with failing health, would be willing to quit under Obama or might cling to her seat until a Republican President gets to replace her.  Anyone have any insight? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.culturism.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.culturism.us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lockstein13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146724</link>
		<dc:creator>Lockstein13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 08:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146724</guid>
		<description>...and, by that, I guess I have to qualify that for the readers here, to aviod all the wise cracks about other candidates-in-their-dreams :

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Is this the best candidate &lt;strong&gt;who is running in 2008 &lt;/strong&gt;for America and her future?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and, by that, I guess I have to qualify that for the readers here, to aviod all the wise cracks about other candidates-in-their-dreams :</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Is this the best candidate <strong>who is running in 2008 </strong>for America and her future?&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lockstein13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146723</link>
		<dc:creator>Lockstein13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 08:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146723</guid>
		<description>I find all this &lt;em&gt;&quot;I cannot vote for the lesser of two evils&quot;&lt;/em&gt; talk &lt;strong&gt;very selfish&lt;/strong&gt; at best.

Rather than asking yourself, &lt;em&gt;&quot;Is this the candidate who best reflects/agrees with my principles?&quot; &lt;/em&gt;ask yourself, &lt;strong&gt;&quot;Is this the best candidate for America and her future?&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ED&#039;s points bear repeating:&lt;/strong&gt;
* Spending? No. Obama wants to eliminate the Bush tax cuts and increase federal spending by another $280 billion a year, with an eye towards nationalizing health care. 

* The war on terror and national security? Please! Obama wants to dismantle our nuclear deterrent, end work on missile defense, and do a full-scale retreat from Iraq just as the country has begun standing on its own for security. 

* Foreign policy? Only if conservatives have suddenly discovered a desire for direct meetings with sponsors of international terrorism like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Castro brothers, Bashar Assad, and Hugo Chavez. Even Obama’s own allies think this a bad idea. 

* Abortion? Obama voted to support partial-birth abortion. 
Judges? Obama voted against the confirmation of John Roberts, putting him in the minority of Democrats.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find all this <em>&#8220;I cannot vote for the lesser of two evils&#8221;</em> talk <strong>very selfish</strong> at best.</p>
<p>Rather than asking yourself, <em>&#8220;Is this the candidate who best reflects/agrees with my principles?&#8221; </em>ask yourself, <strong>&#8220;Is this the best candidate for America and her future?&#8221;</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>ED&#8217;s points bear repeating:</strong><br />
* Spending? No. Obama wants to eliminate the Bush tax cuts and increase federal spending by another $280 billion a year, with an eye towards nationalizing health care. </p>
<p>* The war on terror and national security? Please! Obama wants to dismantle our nuclear deterrent, end work on missile defense, and do a full-scale retreat from Iraq just as the country has begun standing on its own for security. </p>
<p>* Foreign policy? Only if conservatives have suddenly discovered a desire for direct meetings with sponsors of international terrorism like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Castro brothers, Bashar Assad, and Hugo Chavez. Even Obama’s own allies think this a bad idea. </p>
<p>* Abortion? Obama voted to support partial-birth abortion.<br />
Judges? Obama voted against the confirmation of John Roberts, putting him in the minority of Democrats.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulcannomad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146467</link>
		<dc:creator>vulcannomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 01:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146467</guid>
		<description>I will ... and I will... and I will... and I will... and I will surender...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will &#8230; and I will&#8230; and I will&#8230; and I will&#8230; and I will surender&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146299</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146299</guid>
		<description>I will gut our defense budget and spend that money (that we currently borrow from the lowest bidder) on social welfare programs.

I will make unenforceable agreements to disarm America, and like Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton before me, stand by while the irrational dictators and kleptocrats that I make these treaties with break them, to our great danger.

I will lose this election in a fashion reminiscent of Walter Mondale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will gut our defense budget and spend that money (that we currently borrow from the lowest bidder) on social welfare programs.</p>
<p>I will make unenforceable agreements to disarm America, and like Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton before me, stand by while the irrational dictators and kleptocrats that I make these treaties with break them, to our great danger.</p>
<p>I will lose this election in a fashion reminiscent of Walter Mondale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squid Shark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146086</link>
		<dc:creator>Squid Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146086</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Snake307 on May 24, 2008 at 3:17 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Here is the &quot;dirty little secret&quot;, conservatives only win when they are talking about what is really important: fiscal responsibility, national defense, low taxes. 

Reagan did not win on the strength of conservative principles (if he did he would have had landslide victories in both houses in 80,82,84,86). He won because he was Reagan, so all this &quot;we could win if we just stuck to all our principles&quot; dont hold water with me and plenty of others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Snake307 on May 24, 2008 at 3:17 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is the &#8220;dirty little secret&#8221;, conservatives only win when they are talking about what is really important: fiscal responsibility, national defense, low taxes. </p>
<p>Reagan did not win on the strength of conservative principles (if he did he would have had landslide victories in both houses in 80,82,84,86). He won because he was Reagan, so all this &#8220;we could win if we just stuck to all our principles&#8221; dont hold water with me and plenty of others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squid Shark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146082</link>
		<dc:creator>Squid Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146082</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Too many of us aren’t tied to the Republican Party, we see ourselves as Conservatives first,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Enjoy the long road to obscurity. You got to where you are with the willing collusion of the RINO&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Too many of us aren’t tied to the Republican Party, we see ourselves as Conservatives first,</p></blockquote>
<p>Enjoy the long road to obscurity. You got to where you are with the willing collusion of the RINO&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake307</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1146064</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1146064</guid>
		<description>Message from the Republican Bloggers to Senator McCain. &lt;em&gt;Senator, they won&#039;t drink the cool aide. They keep insisting that you&#039;re nothing but a back stabbing double crossing untrustworthy son of a Bi*ch.&lt;/em&gt;

I always feel bad for those who try and carry the water for someone like McCain. So far, you&#039;ve all tried to invoke Reagan&#039;s 11th Commandment. Problem is, Too many of us aren&#039;t tied to the Republican Party, we see ourselves as Conservatives first, and not as Republicans, especially the big government double standard Republican party we&#039;ve seen over the last eight years or so. 

If Zell Miller was the nominee of the DNC, we&#039;d all line up happily behind him. Of course, you RNC water toting folks would insist that McCain is more conservative then Miller, but here&#039;s the thing. Miller is far more trustworthy. 

So when McCain loses in November. You&#039;ll blame us Conservatives because you&#039;re nominee couldn&#039;t out Liberal a Democrat. Tell McCain to keep running left. He&#039;s got the nomination sewn up now. Shit on the Conservatives, you don&#039;t need them. You&#039;ll win with your base, Democrats. 

Here&#039;s the dirty little secret. When Obama is nominated, the Hillary or nothing crowd won&#039;t vote for Obama. The Republicans will go into the polls knowing that McCain is losing badly on election day. Most will sit it out rather than spend hours voting for the Maverick. Too many won&#039;t be able to plug their noses and tap the screen for McCain. They won&#039;t like the idea of pulling and praying that McCain stays moderate, having given up any hope of him being conservative.

Nope, McCain is already doomed this Fall. He&#039;s broke, he&#039;s detested by the Conservative base of the Party, and he&#039;s running further left in an effort to get Obama and Hillary&#039;s base, who consider him Bush&#039;s third term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Message from the Republican Bloggers to Senator McCain. <em>Senator, they won&#8217;t drink the cool aide. They keep insisting that you&#8217;re nothing but a back stabbing double crossing untrustworthy son of a Bi*ch.</em></p>
<p>I always feel bad for those who try and carry the water for someone like McCain. So far, you&#8217;ve all tried to invoke Reagan&#8217;s 11th Commandment. Problem is, Too many of us aren&#8217;t tied to the Republican Party, we see ourselves as Conservatives first, and not as Republicans, especially the big government double standard Republican party we&#8217;ve seen over the last eight years or so. </p>
<p>If Zell Miller was the nominee of the DNC, we&#8217;d all line up happily behind him. Of course, you RNC water toting folks would insist that McCain is more conservative then Miller, but here&#8217;s the thing. Miller is far more trustworthy. </p>
<p>So when McCain loses in November. You&#8217;ll blame us Conservatives because you&#8217;re nominee couldn&#8217;t out Liberal a Democrat. Tell McCain to keep running left. He&#8217;s got the nomination sewn up now. Shit on the Conservatives, you don&#8217;t need them. You&#8217;ll win with your base, Democrats. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the dirty little secret. When Obama is nominated, the Hillary or nothing crowd won&#8217;t vote for Obama. The Republicans will go into the polls knowing that McCain is losing badly on election day. Most will sit it out rather than spend hours voting for the Maverick. Too many won&#8217;t be able to plug their noses and tap the screen for McCain. They won&#8217;t like the idea of pulling and praying that McCain stays moderate, having given up any hope of him being conservative.</p>
<p>Nope, McCain is already doomed this Fall. He&#8217;s broke, he&#8217;s detested by the Conservative base of the Party, and he&#8217;s running further left in an effort to get Obama and Hillary&#8217;s base, who consider him Bush&#8217;s third term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigMouthFrog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145984</link>
		<dc:creator>BigMouthFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145984</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama Has Plans To Disarm America...&lt;/strong&gt;

The American Thinker
Rick Moran
This is absolutely shocking and reprehensible. He plans to universally disarm our nation.

In 52 seconds, he rattles off what an Obama presidency would mean for our national defense; slowing down of existing programs to ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama Has Plans To Disarm America&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The American Thinker<br />
Rick Moran<br />
This is absolutely shocking and reprehensible. He plans to universally disarm our nation.</p>
<p>In 52 seconds, he rattles off what an Obama presidency would mean for our national defense; slowing down of existing programs to &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NuclearPhysicist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145857</link>
		<dc:creator>NuclearPhysicist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145857</guid>
		<description>Those who oppose McCain in hopes of a conservative messiah sometime in the future are living in an alternate reality( i.e., the twilight zone). We must all face the fact that the American electorate is not going to elect a President who is anything near to a 100 percent conservative. Our only hope is that we can keep them voting in the middle of the political spectrum. It is highly unlikely that we will ever live in a world where we are not going to have to vote for the lessor of two evils when it comes to our conservative principles. We all need to face this fact and support the only remaining viable candidate that will not threaten the very existence of conservative principles in our American system of governance. A vote against John McCain in November is simply a vote for the ultimate downfall conservatism in this country. If McCain were the equivalent of an anti-Christ, I could see religious reasons for not voting or voting for a 3rd party candidate, but we aren&#039;t anywhere near that point in this election cycle. One time in the past, I wasted my vote on 3rd party candidate (Perot) and watched in horror as the country slipped even further toward the dark side. I will never make that mistake again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who oppose McCain in hopes of a conservative messiah sometime in the future are living in an alternate reality( i.e., the twilight zone). We must all face the fact that the American electorate is not going to elect a President who is anything near to a 100 percent conservative. Our only hope is that we can keep them voting in the middle of the political spectrum. It is highly unlikely that we will ever live in a world where we are not going to have to vote for the lessor of two evils when it comes to our conservative principles. We all need to face this fact and support the only remaining viable candidate that will not threaten the very existence of conservative principles in our American system of governance. A vote against John McCain in November is simply a vote for the ultimate downfall conservatism in this country. If McCain were the equivalent of an anti-Christ, I could see religious reasons for not voting or voting for a 3rd party candidate, but we aren&#8217;t anywhere near that point in this election cycle. One time in the past, I wasted my vote on 3rd party candidate (Perot) and watched in horror as the country slipped even further toward the dark side. I will never make that mistake again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squid Shark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145674</link>
		<dc:creator>Squid Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145674</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;dominigan on May 23, 2008 at 9:58 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh great, now religion is brought into this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>dominigan on May 23, 2008 at 9:58 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh great, now religion is brought into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squid Shark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145673</link>
		<dc:creator>Squid Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145673</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When I see the party fixing our RINO favoring primar schedule,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ill be damned if the 4th largest state and the largest swing state in the country should vote before say Mississippi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When I see the party fixing our RINO favoring primar schedule,</p></blockquote>
<p>Ill be damned if the 4th largest state and the largest swing state in the country should vote before say Mississippi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145594</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 05:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145594</guid>
		<description>McCain will be a nuisance but Obama would be truy dangerous. The Republicans are screwed for 4 years with or without McCain&#039;s navy in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain will be a nuisance but Obama would be truy dangerous. The Republicans are screwed for 4 years with or without McCain&#8217;s navy in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Gal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145448</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145448</guid>
		<description>I guess I see my responsibility to my country trumps my personal reservations about McCain or the GOP given the choices we face in ’08 with the recognition that we face 8 years under a President Obama. That to be followed by a permanent Democratic majority, a Legislative branch that dictates to the Executive branch, a Judicial branch that places into law the manipulation of our Constitution, and the consequences of a socialized America. Truly I fear Obama more than I fear McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I see my responsibility to my country trumps my personal reservations about McCain or the GOP given the choices we face in ’08 with the recognition that we face 8 years under a President Obama. That to be followed by a permanent Democratic majority, a Legislative branch that dictates to the Executive branch, a Judicial branch that places into law the manipulation of our Constitution, and the consequences of a socialized America. Truly I fear Obama more than I fear McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominigan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145415</link>
		<dc:creator>dominigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 01:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145415</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I can no longer vote for the lesser of two evils.  I have done so now for several elections, and have watched the GOP continue to slide left into the slime.

Voting for the lesser of two evils, is still voting for evil.  There is no &quot;against&quot; lever in the voting booth, and I can no longer compromise my values and integrity any longer.

When I stand before God, I will be judged for my actions.  I know that as a Christian, this isn&#039;t my real home and this will never be a perfect place.

I will vote my conscience in the fall, even if I have to write in a vote to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I can no longer vote for the lesser of two evils.  I have done so now for several elections, and have watched the GOP continue to slide left into the slime.</p>
<p>Voting for the lesser of two evils, is still voting for evil.  There is no &#8220;against&#8221; lever in the voting booth, and I can no longer compromise my values and integrity any longer.</p>
<p>When I stand before God, I will be judged for my actions.  I know that as a Christian, this isn&#8217;t my real home and this will never be a perfect place.</p>
<p>I will vote my conscience in the fall, even if I have to write in a vote to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145343</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145343</guid>
		<description>Well done Romeo.  

I, like many here, no longer identify as a Republican and have re-registered as &quot;no affiliation&quot;.  McCain is not my first, second or third choice for the high office of President of the United States.  As a Reagan Conservative I will not vote for democrap lite ever again.  I see McCain as corrupt, vain, dishonest and boorish.  If he ever fires Juan Hernandez, I might think he&#039;s serious about homeland security... &lt;em&gt;maybe&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Romeo.  </p>
<p>I, like many here, no longer identify as a Republican and have re-registered as &#8220;no affiliation&#8221;.  McCain is not my first, second or third choice for the high office of President of the United States.  As a Reagan Conservative I will not vote for democrap lite ever again.  I see McCain as corrupt, vain, dishonest and boorish.  If he ever fires Juan Hernandez, I might think he&#8217;s serious about homeland security&#8230; <em>maybe</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MirCat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145314</link>
		<dc:creator>MirCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145314</guid>
		<description>What does he have against The Enterprise?  I mean how does he expect to get there?

- The Cat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does he have against The Enterprise?  I mean how does he expect to get there?</p>
<p>- The Cat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145305</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145305</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is this like selling at a loss, but planning to make it up in volume?

gekkobear on May 23, 2008 at 8:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;It&#039;s an interesting point, seeing as Congressional leaders came out a couple days ago and said we need to remake the Rep party in his image.  

I don&#039;t think I would mind McCain so much if he came by his positions honestly.  I can&#039;t stand patting a guy on the back that is so quick to lie to me.   Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is this like selling at a loss, but planning to make it up in volume?</p>
<p>gekkobear on May 23, 2008 at 8:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting point, seeing as Congressional leaders came out a couple days ago and said we need to remake the Rep party in his image.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I would mind McCain so much if he came by his positions honestly.  I can&#8217;t stand patting a guy on the back that is so quick to lie to me.   Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanrobins</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/comment-page-3/#comment-1145298</link>
		<dc:creator>seanrobins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/choices/#comment-1145298</guid>
		<description>ED:

I this what conservatives and destined for between now and November: A bunch of desperate attempts by people too scared to admit that McCain will doom us as sure and the Dems...just maybe a little bit slower?

We need to stop kidding ourselves...say, Yeah, we&#039;re gonna vote for McCainiac, rather than let BHO win...but let&#039;s stop trying to make ourselved happy about it.  The effort is dishonest, and very depressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ED:</p>
<p>I this what conservatives and destined for between now and November: A bunch of desperate attempts by people too scared to admit that McCain will doom us as sure and the Dems&#8230;just maybe a little bit slower?</p>
<p>We need to stop kidding ourselves&#8230;say, Yeah, we&#8217;re gonna vote for McCainiac, rather than let BHO win&#8230;but let&#8217;s stop trying to make ourselved happy about it.  The effort is dishonest, and very depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
