Waging the incompetent jihad in London
posted at 7:10 pm on May 22, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
The British have had some luck in recent attempts to launch terrorist attacks by radical jihadists. Last year in Glasgow, the best the terrorists could do was to set fire to his own car in an attack at the airport. If that was the B team, then today’s attack on a London restaurant shows that jihadists in Britain have reached the bottom of the barrel:
Police arrested a “radicalised” convert to Islam after he was injured in a bomb explosion in a city centre on Thursday.
The centre of Exeter was evacuated after the lunchtime blast at a restaurant popular with families in a shopping centre and bomb disposal experts and sniffer dogs were sent in.
Police later named the 22-year-old, who suffered cuts to his eye and facial burns in the explosion and remains in police custody at a hospital, as Nicky Reilly, a man with a history of mental illness. …
Deputy Chief Constable Tony Melville said initial police inquiries suggested Reilly “had adopted the Islamic faith.”
“We believe, despite his weak and vulnerable state, he was preyed upon, radicalised and taken advantage of,” he said.
The bombs were designed for maximum damage. Like most jihadist devices, the two Reilly bombs included nails to send deadly shrapnel in all directions. Only one bomb detonated, and only partially, apparently while Reilly tried to plant it.
I don’t mean to make light of this, but have the jihadists in the UK run out of volunteers? Authorities make Reilly sound like someone with minimal connection to reality. Did his handlers really expect him to have the competence to carry out this attack? If so, they must be either as nimble as Reilly or simply out of options. The only casualty in the blast was Reilly himself, and he’s apparently alive and able to talk — and probably not all that adept at keeping his mouth shut, either.
The attack serves as a reminder that London remains a high-priority target of the radical Islamists. However, their resources appear to get thinner and thinner, which shows that radical and violent jihad may have lost its luster as much in Europe as it has in Iraq.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
It’s the same MO as using those handicapped women in Iraq.
p0s3r on May 22, 2008 at 7:14 PM
POOF!
“Am I missing an eyebrow?”
/mythbusters
innominatus on May 22, 2008 at 7:18 PM
Is radicalized another word for devout?
Why is it that with Islam, the more firmly a person believes in the faith, the more likely they are to try to kill people. Compare it to any of the world’s actual religions. A depth of devotion for any other religious sect seems to bring one closer to the Creator and toward service for mankind.
Mormon Doc on May 22, 2008 at 7:18 PM
I would feel silly talking about how many suicide bombers the religion of peace can produce per annum.
snaggletoothie on May 22, 2008 at 7:19 PM
snaggletoothie
Now that’s GDP. Gross Demolishing Product
Mormon Doc on May 22, 2008 at 7:21 PM
There are no radicals or extremists, there are only the followers of Islam. There are no hijackers of a noble religion , there has been no misinterpretations of Islamic scripture,
Please stop defending Islam by tying to qualify it as something that has been run away with by outsiders with tenuous backing. There is only the peace of the grave in Islam.
BL@KBIRD on May 22, 2008 at 7:26 PM
trying not tying
BL@KBIRD on May 22, 2008 at 7:27 PM
Who took advantage of him? How was he radicalized and by whom? Eventually, these guys will get lucky and there’ll be dozens dead. Or worse. Again. The one thing we can never forget with this conflict is we can never, ever, even for one second, take it lightly. We must forego no advantage, exploit every opportunity and make their war not only unwinnable, but unfightable.
trubble on May 22, 2008 at 7:28 PM
Exeter’s a beautiful city.
ToddonCapeCod on May 22, 2008 at 7:29 PM
And yet, people keep telling me that these people are the biggest threat to western civilization, like since forever. At one time, I held that viewpoint. It gets harder to justify with every botched attack.
Krydor on May 22, 2008 at 7:30 PM
Islam: The Ideal Religion for the Mentally Ill
It works.
Cicero43 on May 22, 2008 at 7:34 PM
… Nicky Reilly, a man with a history of mental illness.
If he’s a convert to islam, I predict a *future* of mental illness too.
Converts. The Janissary Corps of the 21st century.
Tony737 on May 22, 2008 at 7:36 PM
“… radical and violent jihad may have lost its luster …”
That may be, but the soft jihad marches on.
Tony737 on May 22, 2008 at 7:39 PM
“We must forego no advantage, exploit every opportunity and make their war not only unwinnable, but unfightable.”
Trubble ’08!
Tony737 on May 22, 2008 at 7:42 PM
I’m guessing they promised Nicky 72 qualudes.
fogw on May 22, 2008 at 7:43 PM
I’m not sure I would minimize this. You don’t need too much intelligence to do a suicide bombing. And if you have a supply of sickos, some of them will succeed, even if they do not all.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on May 22, 2008 at 8:14 PM
Not London…but the point remains valid.
G on May 22, 2008 at 8:48 PM
“their resources appear to get thinner and thinner, which shows that radical and violent jihad may have lost its luster as much in Europe as it has in Iraq.”
Wrong. To paraphrase the great Mark Steyn, why attack your enemy by flying commercial jets into tall, glass skyscrapers, when your enemy will be perfectly willing to hand over the keys to the skyscrapers voluntarily in a decade or so?
Sean A on May 22, 2008 at 9:12 PM
Seems to. That’s why they make such a huge attempt to convert in prisons.
Connie on May 22, 2008 at 10:01 PM
EXETER IS NOT IN LONDON!!!
It’s a damn fer piece from London. Why the hell is everybody calling this a LONDON bombing.
I know it doesn’t matter, but I’m drunk and I got nothing else to bitch about!
Kasper Hauser on May 22, 2008 at 10:10 PM
I blame Bush!
Er, no, he doesn’t get credit, he just gets blame. Sorry.
PattyJ on May 22, 2008 at 10:41 PM
London is where the report was filed from, not where it happened.
jic on May 23, 2008 at 12:34 AM
This was about as much of an attack on London as a bomb in Providence, Rhode Island would be an attack on New York. Exeter is about as far west from London as you can get without leaving the British mainland. There is a serious point as it usually IS London which gets targeted by terrorists. Exeter is one of the last places we, in the UK, would expect to be a terrorist target. So whilst this latest episode does highlight the breathtaking incompetence of the jihadis it is an unwelcome development.
schiehallion on May 23, 2008 at 1:37 AM
Jihad is a malignant thing in metaphor and the literal.
- The Cat
MirCat on May 23, 2008 at 2:24 AM
Yeah Ed, it’s really not in London.
passingtramp on May 23, 2008 at 4:53 AM
London = Exeter? The two cities are more than 150 miles away!
Still, glad that only the scumbag Islamist was injured.
Pax americana on May 23, 2008 at 6:13 AM
And yet such sparkling intellects as Joe Biden in today’s WSJ continue to make claims that George W Bush’s foreign policy has caused jihadist recruiting to skyrocket, making al Qaida stronger than ever this year? After reading Joe Lieberman yesterday lament his former party’s loss of testicular fortitude, and the confirmation of said neutering in today’s WSJ by Joe Biden, I am just so highly amused by Dhimmicrats opening of their big fat mouths, and then proceeding to place their size 14 feet up to the knees into it.
The Jihad lurches ineptly along. With holy soldiers like these numbnuts, who honestly believes radical Islam will eventually win their caliphate, unless we in the West simply give up and fail to oppose them? I’m constantly amazed by the confused logic Dhimmicrats use to make radical Islam ten feet tall and bulletproof while claiming we are impotent in the face of their vast numbers.
What BS.
Subsunk
Subsunk on May 23, 2008 at 6:41 AM
My favorite part of the AFP story;
“Both Melville and Otter said it was too early to determine the motive behind the incident.”
So we have a classic author and a character on National Lampoons ‘Animal House’ agreeing that they are clueless? Priceless…
percysunshine on May 23, 2008 at 7:51 AM
It would be helpful to know who, when, where, how and why but only if he agrees to co operate. I’d hate to think the State would violate his privacy by digging around his personal effects.
moxie_neanderthal on May 23, 2008 at 3:47 PM