<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ed Morrissey Show: Keith Poole, Rick Moran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/the-ed-morrissey-show-keith-poole-rick-moran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/the-ed-morrissey-show-keith-poole-rick-moran/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoHskrs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/the-ed-morrissey-show-keith-poole-rick-moran/comment-page-1/#comment-1143054</link>
		<dc:creator>GoHskrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/the-ed-morrissey-show-keith-poole-rick-moran/#comment-1143054</guid>
		<description>OK, I see references to the podcast in the chat, but I can&#039;t find it.  How do y&#039;all grab a podcast of the show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I see references to the podcast in the chat, but I can&#8217;t find it.  How do y&#8217;all grab a podcast of the show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/the-ed-morrissey-show-keith-poole-rick-moran/comment-page-1/#comment-1141448</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/the-ed-morrissey-show-keith-poole-rick-moran/#comment-1141448</guid>
		<description>People that want to stay home and skip voting should read this Matthew Yglesias* article that he posted yesterday &quot; http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/only_time_will_tell.php 
* Yglesias is a well-known progressive pundit and blogger, who supports Obama.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;&lt;em&gt;I&#039;ll be ready &lt;strong&gt;to write the conservative movement&#039;s epitaph when (a) Barack Obama is inaugurated, and (b) Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid &lt;/strong&gt;enact some stuff with more lasting impact than the meager results of 1977-80 or 1993-4. &lt;/em&gt;There&#039;s real reason to believe a congressional party much less dependent on the votes of white south moderates will, in fact, be able to deliver more. But I&#039;ll believe it when I see it. I think it&#039;s very plausible to imagine &lt;em&gt;a conservative movement that&#039;s still strong enough to frustrate &lt;strong&gt;progressives&#039; &lt;/strong&gt;main legislative goals&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;/blockquote&gt;                                                                                     

Note to any intending to &quot;sit out&quot; that&#039;s the PROGRESSIVES not just plain old &quot;liberals&quot;, who are planning to impliment their agenda with control of Congress and the Presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People that want to stay home and skip voting should read this Matthew Yglesias* article that he posted yesterday &#8221; <a href="http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/only_time_will_tell.php" rel="nofollow">http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/only_time_will_tell.php</a><br />
* Yglesias is a well-known progressive pundit and blogger, who supports Obama.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<em>I&#8217;ll be ready <strong>to write the conservative movement&#8217;s epitaph when (a) Barack Obama is inaugurated, and (b) Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid </strong>enact some stuff with more lasting impact than the meager results of 1977-80 or 1993-4. </em>There&#8217;s real reason to believe a congressional party much less dependent on the votes of white south moderates will, in fact, be able to deliver more. But I&#8217;ll believe it when I see it. I think it&#8217;s very plausible to imagine <em>a conservative movement that&#8217;s still strong enough to frustrate <strong>progressives&#8217; </strong>main legislative goals</em>, </p></blockquote>
<p>Note to any intending to &#8220;sit out&#8221; that&#8217;s the PROGRESSIVES not just plain old &#8220;liberals&#8221;, who are planning to impliment their agenda with control of Congress and the Presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
