<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Democrats argue that Congress can hide legislation from the President?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:10:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145935</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145935</guid>
		<description>&quot;Did Democrats argue that Congress can hide legislation from the President?&quot; Forget Dubya...what about hiding legislation from The People; you know the ones who they &#039;work&#039; for and ultimately &#039;represent&#039;?
Years from now these idiots will still be blaming Dubya for their own mistakes and omissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Did Democrats argue that Congress can hide legislation from the President?&#8221; Forget Dubya&#8230;what about hiding legislation from The People; you know the ones who they &#8216;work&#8217; for and ultimately &#8216;represent&#8217;?<br />
Years from now these idiots will still be blaming Dubya for their own mistakes and omissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM Hanes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145908</link>
		<dc:creator>JM Hanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145908</guid>
		<description>McCain (or the moderator of the nxt debate!) should ask Obama if he condemns, denounces, renounces and repudiates Democratic House Leadership for this hoax upon the President and the Congress.  Surely, this is Old Politics at its worst, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain (or the moderator of the nxt debate!) should ask Obama if he condemns, denounces, renounces and repudiates Democratic House Leadership for this hoax upon the President and the Congress.  Surely, this is Old Politics at its worst, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin-t</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145660</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin-t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145660</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many other times they&#039;ve snuck in stuff after the fact. How would anybody know? NOBODY reads these things any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many other times they&#8217;ve snuck in stuff after the fact. How would anybody know? NOBODY reads these things any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145580</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 04:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145580</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Let’s hear it for the power!” - Pelosi’s exclamation upon taking the Speaker’s gavel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Devil worship, probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Let’s hear it for the power!” &#8211; Pelosi’s exclamation upon taking the Speaker’s gavel.</p></blockquote>
<p>Devil worship, probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145561</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 04:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145561</guid>
		<description>The question begs to be asked and that is WHY are Democrats going to such extents to even TRY to defend and rationalize such outrageous a deed as this?  Do we now have a dictatorship in the Democrat &quot;majority&quot;?  I think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question begs to be asked and that is WHY are Democrats going to such extents to even TRY to defend and rationalize such outrageous a deed as this?  Do we now have a dictatorship in the Democrat &#8220;majority&#8221;?  I think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Pill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145447</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Pill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145447</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ss396 on May 23, 2008 at 9:45 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Indeed.  We cannot allow this activity to stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ss396 on May 23, 2008 at 9:45 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed.  We cannot allow this activity to stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Pill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145442</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Pill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145442</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
volsense on May 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM 
Red Pill on May 22, 2008 at 6:24 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Follow-up comment...have you noticed that Democrats inappropriately use the term &quot;Swiftboated&quot; whereas Republicans appropriately use the term &quot;Borked&quot;?

&lt;blockquote&gt;According to William Safire in The New York Times, the verb &lt;strong&gt;to bork&lt;/strong&gt; is defined as &quot;&lt;strong&gt;attack viciously&lt;/strong&gt; a candidate or appointee, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork#.22Bork.22_as_verb&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;especially by misrepresentation in the media&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
volsense on May 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM<br />
Red Pill on May 22, 2008 at 6:24 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Follow-up comment&#8230;have you noticed that Democrats inappropriately use the term &#8220;Swiftboated&#8221; whereas Republicans appropriately use the term &#8220;Borked&#8221;?</p>
<blockquote><p>According to William Safire in The New York Times, the verb <strong>to bork</strong> is defined as &#8220;<strong>attack viciously</strong> a candidate or appointee, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork#.22Bork.22_as_verb" rel="nofollow"><strong>especially by misrepresentation in the media</strong></a>.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ss396</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145400</link>
		<dc:creator>ss396</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 01:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145400</guid>
		<description>If the Legislature can deliver up only those portions of the bills that they choose to, then the President should be able to sign only those portions of the bills that he/she chooses to.  This is effectively a line-item veto, and it occurs to me that there was a court case about this a few years ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Legislature can deliver up only those portions of the bills that they choose to, then the President should be able to sign only those portions of the bills that he/she chooses to.  This is effectively a line-item veto, and it occurs to me that there was a court case about this a few years ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Pill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1145303</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Pill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1145303</guid>
		<description>Flashback:
&lt;blockquote&gt;...she was a liar.  She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Remember who the &quot;she&quot; mentioned here is?

Hint: &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/01/hillary-fired-for-lies-unethical-behavior-from-senate-job-former-boss/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;She&lt;/a&gt; is running for President, and just happened to speak the word &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/wow-hillary-sticking-around-in-case-obama-gets-shot/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;assassinated&lt;/a&gt;&quot; today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flashback:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;she was a liar.  She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.</p></blockquote>
<p>Remember who the &#8220;she&#8221; mentioned here is?</p>
<p>Hint: <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/01/hillary-fired-for-lies-unethical-behavior-from-senate-job-former-boss/" rel="nofollow">She</a> is running for President, and just happened to speak the word &#8220;<a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/23/wow-hillary-sticking-around-in-case-obama-gets-shot/" rel="nofollow">assassinated</a>&#8221; today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1144461</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1144461</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does anyone know the process for recall of an incompetent legislator?

onlineanalyst on May 22, 2008 at 10:36 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Catch them with an underage intern, catch them tapping their foot in a bathroom stall, that&#039;s about it.
Drugs, suspect land deals, funneling projects to your husbands businesses, running your apartment as a gay &quot;fun&quot; house, stealing money and hiding it in a freezer, changing bills after they are voted on, doesn&#039;t seem to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does anyone know the process for recall of an incompetent legislator?</p>
<p>onlineanalyst on May 22, 2008 at 10:36 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Catch them with an underage intern, catch them tapping their foot in a bathroom stall, that&#8217;s about it.<br />
Drugs, suspect land deals, funneling projects to your husbands businesses, running your apartment as a gay &#8220;fun&#8221; house, stealing money and hiding it in a freezer, changing bills after they are voted on, doesn&#8217;t seem to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimothyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1144354</link>
		<dc:creator>TimothyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1144354</guid>
		<description>I think Pres. Bush should demand, due to congressional improprieties, that each and every bill that was submitted to him by congress be reviewed for accuracy and voted on again.  Once he finds even one other case of this malfeasance of office, he should hold the worlds biggest press conference and demand that those responsible appear before his justice department for sworn interviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Pres. Bush should demand, due to congressional improprieties, that each and every bill that was submitted to him by congress be reviewed for accuracy and voted on again.  Once he finds even one other case of this malfeasance of office, he should hold the worlds biggest press conference and demand that those responsible appear before his justice department for sworn interviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1143800</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1143800</guid>
		<description>Senate voted to override... and will send the other 32 pages up as a seperate bill...

Wow... just wow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate voted to override&#8230; and will send the other 32 pages up as a seperate bill&#8230;</p>
<p>Wow&#8230; just wow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSGTAS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1143449</link>
		<dc:creator>MSGTAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1143449</guid>
		<description>Nancy and Maxine seem to share the same malady. 

Suppositoritist.  They are thinking with their heads up their %^^.  

The recent rash of this malady are manifested in illogical thought patterns, a misguided sense of superiority, opening their mouths to change feet, and more important thinking they really make a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy and Maxine seem to share the same malady. </p>
<p>Suppositoritist.  They are thinking with their heads up their %^^.  </p>
<p>The recent rash of this malady are manifested in illogical thought patterns, a misguided sense of superiority, opening their mouths to change feet, and more important thinking they really make a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1143414</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1143414</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Someone asked for a Pelosi, Super Genius photoshop. Here’s a quick one.

cannonball on May 22, 2008 at 6:33 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I love it!  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Someone asked for a Pelosi, Super Genius photoshop. Here’s a quick one.</p>
<p>cannonball on May 22, 2008 at 6:33 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I love it!  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kralizec</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1143124</link>
		<dc:creator>Kralizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 04:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1143124</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;673-page bill&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;It seems part of proper conduct of the office of the Presidency to veto any bill that one can&#039;t read and consider thoughtfully, along with one&#039;s Cabinet, over the course of ten days.  Nor do I care that such a stipulation departs entirely from contemporary custom, for contemporary legislative customs seem largely to depart from good practices.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>673-page bill</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>It seems part of proper conduct of the office of the Presidency to veto any bill that one can&#8217;t read and consider thoughtfully, along with one&#8217;s Cabinet, over the course of ten days.  Nor do I care that such a stipulation departs entirely from contemporary custom, for contemporary legislative customs seem largely to depart from good practices.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicCon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1143048</link>
		<dc:creator>ClassicCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1143048</guid>
		<description>Who cares...

Call me when you guys are ready to move past your empty internet outrage.  I am more interested in what the FOX sexpert has to say...

Christ what a waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares&#8230;</p>
<p>Call me when you guys are ready to move past your empty internet outrage.  I am more interested in what the FOX sexpert has to say&#8230;</p>
<p>Christ what a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weebork</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142977</link>
		<dc:creator>Weebork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142977</guid>
		<description>While I do believe that the Legislative Branch of the federal government is the most powerful of the three, this bit about hiding stuff from the Executive Branch is just plain ironic and entertaining to a certain level. Of course it&#039;s a bit of a head scratcher when Congress, on the one hand, whines when the President keeps intelligence from them, a right certainly given to the President, but then they turn around and do the same thing! It just makes them look silly and amaturish when they pull stuff like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I do believe that the Legislative Branch of the federal government is the most powerful of the three, this bit about hiding stuff from the Executive Branch is just plain ironic and entertaining to a certain level. Of course it&#8217;s a bit of a head scratcher when Congress, on the one hand, whines when the President keeps intelligence from them, a right certainly given to the President, but then they turn around and do the same thing! It just makes them look silly and amaturish when they pull stuff like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142911</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142911</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know the process for recall of an incompetent legislator?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know the process for recall of an incompetent legislator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142878</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142878</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why don’t we start a drive on the blogs, radio, e-mail, to pressure the conservatives to vote against the bill in the upcoming round? (similar to the immigration drive last year)

Entelechy on May 22, 2008 at 12:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I already called my representative&#039;s office this morning to voice my displeasure after I saw that he had voted &quot;yes&quot; on the original. Normally, he votes conservatively.  Who is to say what motivated him.

Rep. Boehner said on a radio interview that many of the Republicans who voted &quot;Yes&quot; were doing so because of urgings from their rural constituents.

These costly bills should not be allowed to have unrelated items attached nor should committee items be dropped in as add-ons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why don’t we start a drive on the blogs, radio, e-mail, to pressure the conservatives to vote against the bill in the upcoming round? (similar to the immigration drive last year)</p>
<p>Entelechy on May 22, 2008 at 12:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I already called my representative&#8217;s office this morning to voice my displeasure after I saw that he had voted &#8220;yes&#8221; on the original. Normally, he votes conservatively.  Who is to say what motivated him.</p>
<p>Rep. Boehner said on a radio interview that many of the Republicans who voted &#8220;Yes&#8221; were doing so because of urgings from their rural constituents.</p>
<p>These costly bills should not be allowed to have unrelated items attached nor should committee items be dropped in as add-ons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Cwac.Cwac</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142864</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Cwac.Cwac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142864</guid>
		<description>All of this reminds me of an episode of MASH when Radar was trying to get Col. Blake to sign blank sheets of paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this reminds me of an episode of MASH when Radar was trying to get Col. Blake to sign blank sheets of paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmann</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142775</link>
		<dc:creator>dmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 01:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142775</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;DfDeportation on May 22, 2008 at 8:27 PM&lt;/em&gt;

This tool Nunez sounds like the other champion of Hope and Change, Mass. Governor &lt;em&gt;Cadillac Duval Patrick &lt;/em&gt;who has been to busy promoting his new book to recognize the collapse of the Commonwealths finances, any fiscal responsibility/accountability by the democrat legislature is non-existent, spend - spend - spend. Folks whom get weak kneed over Obama should take a look at Patrick, he&#039;s a total and complete failure...just words indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>DfDeportation on May 22, 2008 at 8:27 PM</em></p>
<p>This tool Nunez sounds like the other champion of Hope and Change, Mass. Governor <em>Cadillac Duval Patrick </em>who has been to busy promoting his new book to recognize the collapse of the Commonwealths finances, any fiscal responsibility/accountability by the democrat legislature is non-existent, spend &#8211; spend &#8211; spend. Folks whom get weak kneed over Obama should take a look at Patrick, he&#8217;s a total and complete failure&#8230;just words indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DfDeportation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142569</link>
		<dc:creator>DfDeportation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142569</guid>
		<description>Núñez sees racial bias in attacks on his spending
By Jim Sanders - jsanders@sacbee.com
Published 12:00 am PDT Thursday, May 22, 2008
Former Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez, saying he now can speak more openly, is blasting accusations that he spent lavishly on overseas trips and retail purchases as racially motivated.

Núñez, who is termed out of the Assembly in December, lashed out Saturday during an interview on Spanish-language television.

The Los Angeles Democrat said he has no regrets over his spending of campaign funds, despite controversy over tens of thousands of dollars spent on high-priced hotels, wine, gifts and other purchases.

&quot;Everyone&#039;s done it like this,&quot; Núñez said of previous legislative leaders. &quot;The difference is there are some in politics who want to judge me in a certain manner.

&quot;Because of the fact I am Mexican, they think I have to sleep under a cactus and eat from taco stands.&quot;

Núñez&#039;s spending included more than $47,000 in plane fare, more than $5,000 at a wine cellar in France, and more than $2,500 for &quot;office expenses&quot; at Vuitton, the Los Angeles Times reported last October.

In the interview on Univision&#039;s Voz y Voto program, Núñez defended in Spanish his accommodations in fine hotels overseas.

&quot;What&#039;s a luxury hotel? A stay at a Sheraton? … I am, you could say, like a head of state. I&#039;m the leader of the Assembly of the state of California. Where am I supposed to sleep?&quot;

Núñez&#039;s spending became a target last year in the campaign against Proposition 93, which would have altered term limits and allowed him to serve as Assembly leader an extra six years.

&quot;The only thing that really results out of this is that groups that don&#039;t like Latinos use this as a weapon to inflame anti-Mexican, anti-Latino politics,&quot; he said.

Hector Barajas, communications director of the California Republican Party, called Núñez&#039;s racial comments disgraceful and disheartening.

&quot;Questioning someone&#039;s expenses, especially when they&#039;re in public office, is something the public should do,&quot; he said.

Kevin Spillane, a GOP strategist who ran the campaign against Proposition 93, noted that the campaign also accused President Pro Tem Don Perata, who is white, of political corruption.

&quot;Political corruption is colorblind,&quot; Spillane said.

Steve Maviglio, who served as Núñez&#039;s spokesman, said the speaker was justified in feeling that some people exploited controversy over his spending for racial purposes.

&quot;You cannot deny there&#039;s some overtly racial overtones to this,&quot; Maviglio said.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Núñez sees racial bias in attacks on his spending<br />
By Jim Sanders &#8211; <a href="mailto:jsanders@sacbee.com">jsanders@sacbee.com</a><br />
Published 12:00 am PDT Thursday, May 22, 2008<br />
Former Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez, saying he now can speak more openly, is blasting accusations that he spent lavishly on overseas trips and retail purchases as racially motivated.</p>
<p>Núñez, who is termed out of the Assembly in December, lashed out Saturday during an interview on Spanish-language television.</p>
<p>The Los Angeles Democrat said he has no regrets over his spending of campaign funds, despite controversy over tens of thousands of dollars spent on high-priced hotels, wine, gifts and other purchases.</p>
<p>&#8220;Everyone&#8217;s done it like this,&#8221; Núñez said of previous legislative leaders. &#8220;The difference is there are some in politics who want to judge me in a certain manner.</p>
<p>&#8220;Because of the fact I am Mexican, they think I have to sleep under a cactus and eat from taco stands.&#8221;</p>
<p>Núñez&#8217;s spending included more than $47,000 in plane fare, more than $5,000 at a wine cellar in France, and more than $2,500 for &#8220;office expenses&#8221; at Vuitton, the Los Angeles Times reported last October.</p>
<p>In the interview on Univision&#8217;s Voz y Voto program, Núñez defended in Spanish his accommodations in fine hotels overseas.</p>
<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s a luxury hotel? A stay at a Sheraton? … I am, you could say, like a head of state. I&#8217;m the leader of the Assembly of the state of California. Where am I supposed to sleep?&#8221;</p>
<p>Núñez&#8217;s spending became a target last year in the campaign against Proposition 93, which would have altered term limits and allowed him to serve as Assembly leader an extra six years.</p>
<p>&#8220;The only thing that really results out of this is that groups that don&#8217;t like Latinos use this as a weapon to inflame anti-Mexican, anti-Latino politics,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Hector Barajas, communications director of the California Republican Party, called Núñez&#8217;s racial comments disgraceful and disheartening.</p>
<p>&#8220;Questioning someone&#8217;s expenses, especially when they&#8217;re in public office, is something the public should do,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Kevin Spillane, a GOP strategist who ran the campaign against Proposition 93, noted that the campaign also accused President Pro Tem Don Perata, who is white, of political corruption.</p>
<p>&#8220;Political corruption is colorblind,&#8221; Spillane said.</p>
<p>Steve Maviglio, who served as Núñez&#8217;s spokesman, said the speaker was justified in feeling that some people exploited controversy over his spending for racial purposes.</p>
<p>&#8220;You cannot deny there&#8217;s some overtly racial overtones to this,&#8221; Maviglio said.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake307</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142502</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142502</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t weep for the nation. I laugh at the blatant stupidity and asinine decisions of supposedly smart people. I figure, if you&#039;re going down the tubes faster and faster, you might as well enjoy the show. This election clearly shows that the last of the honorable politicians is either dead, or retired. We&#039;re stuck with the D team dreaming of the days when we had a B team running for office. 

Well, break out the popcorn, I&#039;m sure that McCain will be here soon to once again demonstrate what a jacka** he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t weep for the nation. I laugh at the blatant stupidity and asinine decisions of supposedly smart people. I figure, if you&#8217;re going down the tubes faster and faster, you might as well enjoy the show. This election clearly shows that the last of the honorable politicians is either dead, or retired. We&#8217;re stuck with the D team dreaming of the days when we had a B team running for office. </p>
<p>Well, break out the popcorn, I&#8217;m sure that McCain will be here soon to once again demonstrate what a jacka** he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernGent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142446</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernGent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142446</guid>
		<description>And y&#039;all were defending the likes of Ted Kennedy the other night?  THIS is the stuff he and his ilk do.  They are America&#039;s enemies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And y&#8217;all were defending the likes of Ted Kennedy the other night?  THIS is the stuff he and his ilk do.  They are America&#8217;s enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegendHasIt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1142445</link>
		<dc:creator>LegendHasIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/22/did-democrats-argue-that-congress-can-hide-legislation-from-the-president/#comment-1142445</guid>
		<description>Just imagine.....  If the Republicans had more than half a dozen even half way decent candidates across the nation; If the RNC had any competent speechwriters and publicists; if the  State GOP organizations were anything but double-dealing political establishment hacks....

There would be a huge Republican landslide throwing these Obama, Clinton, Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, McDermott, Murtha type jerks out of office and into the septic tank of history.

But when the Republicans, with very few exceptions, can&#039;t do any better than offer mediocre Mediocrats™ (or worse) in opposition to this kind of unconstitutional idiocy, the downward spiral into third world kleptocracy will only accelerate.

There should be a test: Political candidates for any national office should have to pass an in-depth written and oral exam given by Justices Alito, Roberts and Thomas, proving that they have read and understand the Constitution.

I weep for this once great nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just imagine&#8230;..  If the Republicans had more than half a dozen even half way decent candidates across the nation; If the RNC had any competent speechwriters and publicists; if the  State GOP organizations were anything but double-dealing political establishment hacks&#8230;.</p>
<p>There would be a huge Republican landslide throwing these Obama, Clinton, Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, McDermott, Murtha type jerks out of office and into the septic tank of history.</p>
<p>But when the Republicans, with very few exceptions, can&#8217;t do any better than offer mediocre Mediocrats™ (or worse) in opposition to this kind of unconstitutional idiocy, the downward spiral into third world kleptocracy will only accelerate.</p>
<p>There should be a test: Political candidates for any national office should have to pass an in-depth written and oral exam given by Justices Alito, Roberts and Thomas, proving that they have read and understand the Constitution.</p>
<p>I weep for this once great nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
