Hot Air poll: Who would you rather have on the ticket, Huckabee — or Lieberman? Update: Poll fixed
posted at 12:59 pm on May 19, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Inspired by this morning’s New York Sun editorial, arguing that the surest way to put Maverick over the top in battleground states is to add a Democratic apostate to the ticket. Yes, he’s excellent on the war and always delivers a tender cut of red meat when opining on his own party, but do we really want a guy who voted no on Alito one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency? If we’re willing to tolerate a pro-choice VP, toss Ridge on there and pick up Pennsylvania.
Even so, I’m intrigued by this as a test of right-wing blog readers — not their admiration of Liebs, necessarily, but of their abiding antipathy to Huck. How’s about it, HA commenters? Imagine Maverick’s shortlist is down to two; either one’s going to piss off a lot of people. Let’s see, in our own highly unscientific way, who’ll piss off more.
Update: Whoops, last poll was broken. Sorry for the hassle. Please re-vote!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9 Next »
Duncan Hunter? The staunch opponent of free trade? No thank you!
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 5:13 PM
Michael Scott, is that you?
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 5:13 PM
Ugh! That’s a choice?
thegreatbeast on May 19, 2008 at 5:15 PM
I think I’ll have a more enjoyable time trying to swollow my tounge, than vote in ‘08.
RMC1618 on May 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM
Well, I have “no sense of social awareness, [have] few friends, and [am] quite lonely.”
davidk on May 19, 2008 at 5:17 PM
I voted for the DINO. Not because it would make me support the ticket more, but because it’ll make me feel better about not supporting the ticket.
Micheal on May 19, 2008 at 5:18 PM
The reason I say that, is because Michelle is the ONE pick that he could make that would convince me that McCain’s: “I learned my lesson”. is anything but an absolute, complete and total Campaign LIE.
Michelle is the one person with the guts to keep him straight on sensible new immigration laws and making him enforce the current ones.
LegendHasIt on May 19, 2008 at 5:18 PM
I am so sick of this “brand” this and “brand” that, and the BDS crap. Bush “damaged” the “brand”? Really?
I’ll tell you what damaged the “brand” for thousands of independent voters, who aren’t slaves to some stupid, meaningless ad slogans.
Craig, Foley, Libby, Bob Allen, David Vitter, Fossela, Hastert…and on and on and on and on. Too many to mention here.
In addition to the people scandals is the failure to act on matters of urgent importance. These turn tail gutless wimps hide from controversy. It takes a leader to step up and make waves, but they’ve been so scared of the “voter” they can’t do the right thing.
What’s the difference between stepping up for what’s right, telling the truth and taking your chances with the voter or acting like a gutless eunuch and sticking your finger in the wind. Numbers..voters can’t forgive gutless cowards, so all of you are in danger.
Don’t blame this f#*!ing mess on Bush.
eaglesdontflock on May 19, 2008 at 5:22 PM
Ridge? is he even popular in Pennsylvania? I’m not a fan.
John McCain, far right winger?
from reason.com
funky chicken on May 19, 2008 at 5:26 PM
Again, neither of those guys will be the VP pick. It’s kinda silly to hyperventilate over a silly poll.
funky chicken on May 19, 2008 at 5:27 PM
I actually often regard the loony purist trolls as “fetishists.” But I don’t say so because I don’t want to carry the responsibility of introducing the detailed mental picture of, e.g., a Ron Paul Fetish into an unsuspecting bystander’s head.
Oops.
Gilda on May 19, 2008 at 5:28 PM
Might as well have added Hillary to that poll… WINO.
MT on May 19, 2008 at 5:30 PM
LOL
funky chicken on May 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM
I said that because he just used the “Don’t call my Shirley” line in the finale of “The Office”. I thought that’s what you were refrencing. But, I guess not.
I wouldn’t rule either of them out. If I was McCain, I would think Huckabee is poison (I’m convinced McCain has the ConChristian base locked up as long as he reminds them of his normally staunch social conservatism) because he turns off some indies. But, I think some of his advisors may think they need him to get those ConChristian votes. Again, if I was McCain, Liebs would be an awesome pick. It puts so many NE states in play. It would also pretty much lock up Florida.
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 5:32 PM
If you thought Jerry Kiley and Ted Sampley were telling the truth 4 years ago (Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry), why don’t you think they are telling the truth now (Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain)?
They are the same people…
http://vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.org/sampbio.htm
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/sampbio.htm
http://vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.org/kiley_bio.htm
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_bio_jerry.htm
I do not know those men personally, but my personal friend (whom I have known and trusted since 1991) knows and trusts them. My friend served as a Marine in Vietnam and has been active in the POW-MIA effort for 30 (getting close to 40) years. He has spent large amounts of his own time and money supporting the POW-MIA effort. He was there in Washington, D.C. when John McCain and John Kerry were running the Senate Select Committee on POW and MIA Affairs. My friend tells me that John McCain and John Kerry were doing more to hinder their efforts than to help them.
If anyone out there in Hot Air land personally attended any of the sessions run by McCain and Kerry, I’d really like to hear your input.
Again, I trust my friend of over 17 years, who fought for our country in Vietnam and has spent over 30 years of his life (and lots of his own money) fighting for our POW-MIAs.
I trust my friend a lot more than I trust John McCain who deliberately called good men “Agents of Intolerance”. In my opinion, John McCain is a Trojan Horse. George Soros has tried to set it up so that no matter who “wins” the election, he wins and we lose. But I still believe in miracles…
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 5:33 PM
Comedy FAIL. Hillary is awesome. Everyday she stays in the race, she helps the cause. This is NOT the time to be questioning her gender….that only comes if she actually manages to steal the nom away from BO.
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 5:34 PM
My salvation is not contingent on my stance on a candidate – only on my acceptance of the forgiveness found in Christ. That is all. By grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone.
If you find it difficult to believe that a transformed person could hold such a stance on a candidate, then we can discuss why that would be. If you believe my doctrine to be in error, then we have something to discuss.
But to presume to judge someone’s salvation based solely on a political preference? Even assuming I had aborted a child by my own hands, you STILL can’t say anything about the status of my soul. Such is not your place.
I caution you (if you are a brother as you claim) against these rash, angry words. Are your posts here consistent with the following?
I don’t know how you could judge such speech to be gentle or respectful.
TheUnrepentantGeek on May 19, 2008 at 5:34 PM
Another vote for Senator Lieberman. I disagree with him on many things, but he is dead on concerning GWOT and is as strong a supporter of Israel as I am.
He is a man of honor and was among the first to speak out concerning Billy Jeff’s problems with Monica.
Mooseman on May 19, 2008 at 5:34 PM
The chance of either is so very slim, why bother?
Democrats cannot serve as VP according to Republican Party rules. Even if they did change the rules, I doubt the delegates will go for it at the convention.
Huckabee was hanging by a very thin thread until Friday when he servered it finally and thoroughly.
EJDolbow on May 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM
Lieberman would be a reliable ally. On more than one occasion Huck has revealed himself to be a two-faced son-of-a-b*tch with bad character who would destroy the GOP if allowed to be a national leader.
WasatchMan on May 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM
If Lieberman is chosen I am certain there will be many meetings and assurances from Lieberman to Mc Cain and the GOP before the GOP will give their stamp of approval
Guest1.1 on May 19, 2008 at 5:44 PM
I picked Lieberman. I may disagree with him on various issues, but I know for a fact that he truly believes in politics ending at the border. He has stood up for the military. I can disagree with him without him being disagreeable.
As a side benefit, anyone the Leftists hate can’t be all bad.
hadsil on May 19, 2008 at 5:48 PM
I’d rather have myself as president and vice president, but I’m kinda busy these days.
I’m preparing for a new born.
My goat is having a baby.
Indy Conservative on May 19, 2008 at 5:49 PM
While I do not endorse racist language, I need to quote McCain here to prove a point. McCain said:
But the picture here tells a different story.
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 5:49 PM
mccain picks a liberal running mate, barry wins.
peacenprosperity on May 19, 2008 at 5:54 PM
Worked REAL well for Algore. Whoops; sorry – they lost Florida (with a large number of Jewish votes – ask my husband’s loopy family – better yet let’s not look at his family because basically they tend to be the elite, socialist style 1930s Jewish intelligentsia {without the “intelligent” part ;)}
good one!
Branch Rickey on May 19, 2008 at 5:54 PM
Paging Gilda, paging Gilda
Red Pill’s meds wore off again
funky chicken on May 19, 2008 at 5:55 PM
The chance of either is so very slim, why bother?
whoa, total agreement with you.
I’m scared, mommy.
funky chicken on May 19, 2008 at 5:56 PM
So basically, according to you, one sin while claiming to be saved means you were never saved to begin with? Or is it only if you repent immediately? How does that work?
From what scriptures do you draw this conclusion.
Er hem. Paging ColtsFan – I see a discussion involving the word “exegesis” forthcoming.
TheUnrepentantGeek on May 19, 2008 at 5:56 PM
I knew those guys were scumbags 4 years ago, and 8 years ago, and 12 years ago (when they went after GHW Bush with a vengance and helped elect Bill Clinton) and 16 years ago when they were bugging the hell out of President Reagan and VP GHW Bush.
They are scum who suck livelihoods out of grieving military families.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed to post their content here or anywhere else.
Your veteran friend has either been duped or is part of the scam, if such a person even exists in your life.
funky chicken on May 19, 2008 at 6:00 PM
aren’t they grand
eaglesdontflock on May 19, 2008 at 6:01 PM
The poll-results show exactly why the GOP finds itself in the position of fielding a liberal for POTUS.
Before they’ll back a good but imperfect candidate, they’d rather nominate a liberal.
Newsflash, people! There is no perfect candidate. Huckabee was the best of the crop. Too bad there are so many Christian-haters in the GOP these days.
Al-Ozarka on May 19, 2008 at 6:02 PM
This poll should have a third choice:
Hot Air poll: Who would you rather have on the ticket, Huckabee — Lieberman – McCain or Your Name?
Update: Poll fixed
Chose:
The RINOs!
The DINO!
The MINO!
I’ll go for the third choice.
Indy Conservative on May 19, 2008 at 6:02 PM
Nooooooooooooooooooooooo! Mr. “I’m capable of thought, therefore my thoughts are correct”? Perhaps I’m misrepresenting him, but I think he only posts between Midnight & 3AM Eastern.
peski on May 19, 2008 at 6:04 PM
I picked Joe, not so much because I dislike Huckabee, but I trust and admire Joe’s values and intellectual integrity substantially more. Additionally, where Joe and I disagree, I don’t feel the need to worry that he’ll subvert or hijack the traditional political process to forever screw me, as would the Soros/MoveOn element.
Used to be Repubs and Dems shared common values and vision for America, and the disagreement was not over the vision, but how best to achieve it. Nowadays, thanks to neo-liberal progressivism, we share neither visioon nor values. Lieberman, though, is among the few remaining decent Democrats (ignoring a brief lapse during the Gore campaign), and I like him.
petefrt on May 19, 2008 at 6:05 PM
LOL. I love reading ColtsFan too. So embarrassed not to understand more of what he says. Thanks for your comment above at 5:34. As a non-Christian, I read all the Christian comments carefully,as I know so little about it. It took me a long time to realize Apacalyps and St. Olaf was way out of line.
JiangxiDad on May 19, 2008 at 6:07 PM
.
He is the titular head of the party, thus he gets the blame.
Think_b4_speaking on May 19, 2008 at 6:10 PM
OT – Out of curiosity, SaintOlaf, who did Jesus Christ, my Lord and Savior, suffer The Passion for, if not for sinners?
No antagonism toward you, I promise. I just don’t get that statement.
I would prefer a more Judaeo-Christian principled Pres nominee too. {not that I don’t think Juan McVain isn’t a Christian: I think he has sucky policy choices – cow fart hoax just to start & he is a republican???}
After examining Huckabee’s record, and the ancillary “politics” associated with that record that all politicians have to deal with, and came to my own conclusion that he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing with some fairly witty quips and that was all. Not much of a platform for me. That’s all I had to say St. Olaf. Thanks.
Branch Rickey on May 19, 2008 at 6:12 PM
Dr. Marvin, Dr. Leo Marvin…
:-)
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:13 PM
I don’t know what to make of those links you provided. Assuming, for the moment, that what they say is true, does this elevate McCain in your mind to the same level of evil as Obama?
JiangxiDad on May 19, 2008 at 6:15 PM
Huckabee’s the real deal.
McCain’s a Trojan Horse.
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:19 PM
Christian conservatives are starting to realize that mixing religion with politics drags religion down instead of lifting politics up. Hopefully you realize that someday, too.
RightOFLeft on May 19, 2008 at 6:21 PM
No. If McCain is the Republican nominee, and as long as he doesn’t pick a Democrat for his VP, I will vote for him in November.
Similarly, if Huckabee is the Republican nominee, and as long as he doesn’t pick a Democrat for his VP, I expect you to vote for him in November.
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:22 PM
You really don’t know much about the history of our country, do you?
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:23 PM
Yeah it certainly is easier to believe in a false doctrine that allows for(and even encourages)disobedience to God.
It’s called idolatry and all idolaters will have their place in the lake of fire.
It is easy for him to quote one scripture out of context while ignoring the bulk of scripture in order to smear a Christian brother and DOER of the WORD.
Is it worse to be a hearer and not a doer of the word or to willfully avoid both hearing and doing?
You people certainly get all up in arms when you hear someone preach righteousness.
Why is that?
Is that because righteousness is such a terrible thing in your “understanding” of Christianity?
Is it because you are such good Christians that you NEVER speak the Word unless it is to try to take down a brother in Christ because he is preaching righteousness?
You should be ashamed of yourselves.
SaintOlaf on May 19, 2008 at 6:24 PM
Would you rather be hung or shot?
And that is after being knifed.
MB4 on May 19, 2008 at 6:25 PM
Disliking the Huckster as a candidate makes me a Christian hater just like opposing Obama makes me a racist. You make it all so clear.
a capella on May 19, 2008 at 6:25 PM
I voted DINO only because the Huckabots are all some combination of annoying, delusional or insane.
Well, that and the Huckster is a complete and total fraud.
Hollowpoint on May 19, 2008 at 6:26 PM
First Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court:
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:26 PM
Donald Lutz and Charles Hyneman reviewed an estimated 15,000 items with explicit political content printed between 1760 and 1805 and from these items they identified 3,154 references to other sources.
The source they most often quoted was the Bible.
Try reading:
American Political Writing During the Founding Era, 1760-1805
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:28 PM
Lieberman’s a hedgehog. Huckabee’s a fox.
mikeyboss on May 19, 2008 at 6:29 PM
Who said it?
Mike Huckabee?
No.
Barack Obama?
Sure sounds like, but no.
It was our “presumptive” nominee:
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:32 PM
I want nothing to do with a system where folks who think like you are do have influence. Fortunately, the more you post, the less likely that is to happen.
a capella on May 19, 2008 at 6:32 PM
You really don’t know much about politics, do you?
RightOFLeft on May 19, 2008 at 6:34 PM
I would vote for Huck over Obama. But what did you mean you would expect me to?
JiangxiDad on May 19, 2008 at 6:34 PM
You mean like a democracy?
Spirit of 1776 on May 19, 2008 at 6:34 PM
Yes, I’m aware McCain is a Christian. Thanks. God for him attacking Bob Jones U. They deserve it.
RightOFLeft on May 19, 2008 at 6:36 PM
Now you have a glimpse into what I have to deal with on a routine basis.
Sigy on May 19, 2008 at 6:37 PM
Or maybe you would prefer a Muslim wolf in Christian wool.
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:37 PM
Theocracy. He would impose his religous values in a hearbeat, given the opportunity.
a capella on May 19, 2008 at 6:38 PM
It is frankly stunning – and awfully amusing – that a self-righteous monument to ill-informed pomposity like you could hold forth at great length about virtue and faith … and then so completely and utterly misstate the single core tenet of your faith.
How is that even possible?
If you see someone sinning, they are human. If you see a Christian, any and all and every Christian, you know – by definition, by the Word of God Himself – that they are sinning.
That is the very point of Christianity. To even claim that Christians don’t sin is itself sin; and for the non-religious folks who like a good laugh, its the ultimate comedic irony.
If you see someone not sinning, on the other hand … get on your knees and start praying. Christ has returned, and you just met him.
And if you act like this – he’s probably going to slap the crap out of your for screwing up the simplest part of His faith.
Classic project and transference, confused one. You are right: you have much to be ashamed of. Which is okay. You’re a sinner, just like you’re supposed to be. Work on getting better, and go ask for forgiveness, you goofy chump.
To all those Olaf the Stupid insulted – sorry. He is not representing Christianity. He is representing the opposite. Don’t hold him against the rest of us, okay?
Professor Blather on May 19, 2008 at 6:38 PM
you unwittingly do great good. As in many things, the exception often proves the rule. You’re the only Christian guy on here that ever said anything nasty to me about not being a Christian.
Yeah it certainly is easier to believe in a false doctrine that allows for(and even encourages)disobedience to God.
It’s called idolatry and all idolaters will have their place in the lake of fire.
Thanks to all the rest.
JiangxiDad on May 19, 2008 at 6:38 PM
“…no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”
Article VI, Section 3, the United States Constitution.
RightOFLeft on May 19, 2008 at 6:38 PM
Great timing!
JiangxiDad on May 19, 2008 at 6:39 PM
I can not treat your condition but I have a colleague who is an optometrist who hopefully can.
Sigy on May 19, 2008 at 6:41 PM
The crazy keeps on coming.
RightOFLeft on May 19, 2008 at 6:42 PM
With the Huckabee supporters, it’s never stops.
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 6:45 PM
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 6:45 PM
No need to apologize for him Blather. We all know his brand of fanaticism has nothing to do with your faith. Unfortunately, he does provide plenty of fodder for left-wing-nut atheists who aren’t as enlightened as us conservative non-believers. Ironically, he has much in common with those on the far left who use the same thoughtless but dogmatic type of argument.
peski on May 19, 2008 at 6:47 PM
They are not necessarily out-of-line, just different. They are more zealous in defense of their particular interpretation of scripture. I enjoy them all. Apacalyps the baptist, ColtsFan the Calvinist, the Catholic posters, the Mormon posters, even the atheists. I don’t necessarily agree with all of their doctrine, but nevertheless, they deserve to have their say, and the rest of us should be attentive listeners.
Recall that Jesus himself had a decided mix of personalities among his 12 disciples. It is also noteworthy that the “intelligentsia” of the group was only included later, almost as an afterthought (Paul) — and even then, the other disciples sent him off to preach to the foreigners (the gentiles)– at his own insistence.
Of course, there’s a number of the posters that don’t like me (or my dog), but that’s okay. I’ll pray for them just the same. The HotAir blog atmosphere is permeated with the “us versus them” mentality to no more and no less of a degree than mainstream society. If you are a “them” it is only a matter of time before you will be accused of being an “anti-us” bigot. That’s human nature.
As for all the squabbling amongst the various Christian sects, the only thing I am convinced of (for certain) is that denominationalism is a thing of man, not God. They will ALL try to convince you that their church is the “one true faith.” But I, for one, don’t believe that it has anything to do with what building a person shows up at on Sunday morning.
My collie says:
Suck it up, collie.
CyberCipher on May 19, 2008 at 6:52 PM
I’ve found from past experience that the people who like what I say and do tend to be very quiet, while the people who dislike what I say and do tend to be very vocal.
Alright, I’m going to make my own poll of sorts. If you enjoy reading what I have to say (even if you don’t agree with it), please click here. That link is nothing special (just the first “Hello, World!” post I made to my blog), but the simple act of clicking on that link will help me know whether my writing on Hot Air is informative and/or helpful to you. (I can see stats on # of visits, not individual information on who visited)
If you like to see what I post, please click that link. If you don’t, don’t.
Thanks in advance.
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 6:58 PM
Wow.
And you’d think I’d get MORE persecution on lefty blogs right?
No. It’s about the same.
You just don’t get it. Why does the atheist left hate conservatism?
It’s simple. It’s because at the core of conservatism is Christianity and the devil will stop at nothing to stop it.
Those are your inspired words of wisdom right blather?
Christians are supposed to sin.
You are wolf in sheep’s clothing an evil false prophet and not only that the only time you speak to “profess the Word” is to tear down a brother in Christ.
You’re half right there despite yourself…Obviously you know nothing about Christianity.
Christianity is not about continuing sinning like you claim but by being filled with the Holy Spirit and Jesus himself.
We do not get our righteousness ourselves but through Christ Jesus that abides in us. Only through Him do we overcome sin and temptation.
It is amazing how little you dead know about the spiritual world!
You claim to be filled with the Holy Spirit of God while you commit sin….tell me is it the Spirit of God that compels you to sin?
Who is it that tempts you and accuses you to sin?
Does good come from evil or evil from good?
You’re a bunch of false prophets that preach sin!
It is true saving faith that produces righteousness not vice versa and it is dead faith that does not produce righteousness.
You always take the easy way. You quote one scripture out of context while ignoring the bulk of it in order to insult a brother in Christ!
SaintOlaf on May 19, 2008 at 7:01 PM
I really enjoy your posts.
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 7:02 PM
BTW, for those of you that think that Apocalyps, or RedPill, or SaintOlaf, or ColtsFan, et. al. are “over the top”, you clearly have a short memory. There’s only been one zealous Christian poster here at HotAir that ever actually scared me. He was a pentecostal. He got banned. I’m almost afraid to mention his on-line moniker out loud.
My collie says:
Yup, but before anyone accuses me of being an anti-pentecostal bigot, you should all know that I happen to be married to one — and she is a GEM!
CyberCipher on May 19, 2008 at 7:03 PM
I’m not talking about requiring a religious test as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
I’m talking about “We the People” having the privilege and interest of selecting and preferring Christians for their rulers (elected representatives).
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 7:06 PM
Praise the Lord…
right2bright on May 19, 2008 at 7:06 PM
So Jesus would be unfit?
right2bright on May 19, 2008 at 7:07 PM
You have such a warped view of God’s grace.
Christianity is not an ethical system nor a moral construct. That’s not to say Christians shouldn’t be moral or ethical. We above all should be very circumspect in our lives.
Christianity is a relationship based on love. The only command that we Christians have is to love God with all our being and our neighbor as ourselves. How that abstraction is worked out is the message of the NT epistles. And through inductive reasoning we apply those principles to today’s milieu.
We are created for good works, not to beat people over the head with a list of rules. Raher than say “Do this; don’t do that,” we should teach other Christians to be guided by the Holy Spirit on how to workout the commandment to love in their own lives. We really have little to say to non-believers–the Law will judge them, not us. We are to show them Christ’s love.
But we cannot even begin to love others like God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit does. Our goal is to lead people to a relationship with Jesus Who alone is worthy of all praise, honor, and glory.
Yes, there are things which the Bible teaches that are clearly wrong. But if we can bring people into a relationship with our God and Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, all that will work itself out.
Quit “preaching” and start loving. By our love will they know us.
davidk on May 19, 2008 at 7:07 PM
Could you point that out in the bible.
We may sin, we will sin, we are sinful, but we are not supposed to sin…we were supposed to be sinless, but we screwed up.
SaintOlaf, you need to go back to Sunday school.
right2bright on May 19, 2008 at 7:09 PM
Jesus is Lord of all.
Jesus is King of kings, Lord of lords, President of presidents…
Red Pill on May 19, 2008 at 7:09 PM
If they persecuted Christ they will certainly persecute His followers.
Sure make personal insults against me when I preach a Biblical message.
It the Bible that offends you.
You act like giving up sin would be the worst thing on earth when in fact it’s the opposite.
It is much worse when you vipers claim to be Christians while doing your best to destroy the Christian message.
You will receive your reward.
It’s always the easy way for you.
But remember:
SaintOlaf on May 19, 2008 at 7:11 PM
So you don’t sin?
right2bright on May 19, 2008 at 7:12 PM
I like what you write just fine. I don’t think I’ve ever agreed with any of it, but I like to argue (kind of the point of the comments section). It’s the stuff you copy and paste that has me scratching my head. It’s a truther tactic and it should be beneath you.
RightOFLeft on May 19, 2008 at 7:12 PM
Dude…I was quoting the false prophet professor blather.
Read again.
SaintOlaf on May 19, 2008 at 7:13 PM
I see that the Wesleyan/Arminian contingent has arrived. Lord, how could I forget them. They are my heroes.
My collie says:
Did I mention that my collie is a Calvinist?
CyberCipher on May 19, 2008 at 7:14 PM
Don’t tempt me…
right2bright on May 19, 2008 at 7:15 PM
Agreed!
For me SaintOlaf: sometimes the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak. I ask for forgiveness from all three of the Trinity as well as Mary and St. Joseph for offending their Son, my Savior.
I am also weary of politicians and not statesmen warping the Bible and The Constitution just for their own power. I am getting too deep. Just didn’t want you to think everyone was “piling on St.O.” ;)
Branch Rickey on May 19, 2008 at 7:22 PM
I will. Mitt would be an awesome POTUS and VPOTUS.
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 7:22 PM
Thank you for the lesson on loving your brother in Christ, you hypocrite.
You would do well to start learning instead of attacking.
I will forgive you and pray for you.
SaintOlaf on May 19, 2008 at 7:22 PM
Why does every thread that even mentions Huckabee get hijacked by Huckabee supporters that try to justify voting for him simply because of his faith?
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 7:24 PM
You call this persecution? LOL. Might want to go check your experience against that of someone actually suffering for their faith rather than just lobbing stupid potifications and getting verbally slapped. I called troll bating.
Wrong again, as evidenced by atheist conservatives who are perfectly happy to stand along side their conservative Christian compatriots and say NO to dogmatic bigots on both sides of the political isle.
peski on May 19, 2008 at 7:24 PM
Wow, the level of hate for Huckabee is DEEP on here…lol. I voted for Huckabee.
SouthernGent on May 19, 2008 at 7:24 PM
I don’t hate him one bit. He seems like a great guy. What I DO hate are his policies. Dangerous stuff there.
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 7:25 PM
Right on cue. And for the person who earlier inquired, here’s a prime specimen.
Gilda on May 19, 2008 at 7:30 PM
All this in one post, this has to be a record. How many accusations can one man make against another…how many sins were committed by SaintOlaf? He certainly proved he was “human”.
Great post SaintOlaf…truly entertaining…like watching a crazy man trying to get out of a straight jacket.
right2bright on May 19, 2008 at 7:30 PM
WHAT?
Joseph was not the Father of Jesus,buddy.
SaintOlaf on May 19, 2008 at 7:30 PM
I loled at that too. Heard of “immaculate conception”? Jesus, SON OF GOD?
malan89 on May 19, 2008 at 7:31 PM
Are you still mad at me for accusing you of being a mormon?
For that I am sorry and apologize.
Unfortunately your last post makes absolutely no sense.
Let it go brother.
SaintOlaf on May 19, 2008 at 7:34 PM
It’s not the same…BuyDanish has a “special” relationship with Mitt. You just don’t bring it out in me. And she and I have also a special relationship. She tries to hold back, but I stir her so…
But thanks for trying…
right2bright on May 19, 2008 at 7:34 PM
Actually, “immaculate conception” refers to the conception of Mary free from original sin, not the virgin birth of Jesus. Just because I don’t believe this stuff doesn’t mean I don’t know it.
peski on May 19, 2008 at 7:36 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9 Next »