a mud wrestling contest–JonRoss

Nancy vs. Hillary: Winner Takes All

maverick muse on May 18, 2008 at 9:10 AM

Uh…only if they are in full burkha’s.

njcommuter on May 18, 2008 at 8:02 PM

Ah yes all that now and then of course if it’s not one thing it will be something else and then there is the multiple organ Islamocarcinoma which is untreatable.

Let’s see. Patient’s hematocrit up to normal reference range — check. Patient’s reticulocyte up to normal reference range — check. Patient’s creatinine, BUN and phosphorous levels down to normal reference range and patient’s electrolytes in balance — check.

And the nurses report that the patient has been grabbing their rear ends and chasing them around his hospital room – checkmate

If the patient is doing so well, why do so many hospital staff have to continue to be at the patient’s side and in the most expensive room in the hospital? I would think that at least most of them could now be scheduled to go elsewhere and the patient could be transfered out of intensive care and to a less expensive room.

Well, let’s see: there’s still an infection, heart rate has only just steadied, blood pressure still requires management, there are wounds just recently sutured which are still liable to open with disastrous consequences, patient’s irrational urges have just subsided … oh, and the patient has relatives and friends who are likely to pass along infections, feed him things he can’t tolerate, punch him and shake him, and trigger irrational outbursts … and due to circumstances beyond our control we cannot deny them access to the patient.

This stupid USEFUL IDIOT, needs another twenty Botox procedures, a few Aspirins, a course on house cleaning, THEN a swift boot in the BUTT!

byteshredder on May 18, 2008 at 7:24 PM

You left out the jalapeno enema. Heard it is quite the rage in her congressional district.

Well, if my view of the Democrats seems a little harsh it’s only because I continually find them advocating disastrous policies, embracing our enemies and undermining core American ideals. And our worst enemies always seem to be endorsing them, I’m sure you remember Hamas for Obama. Even the rhetoric or Osama Bin Laden seems to echo out of the mouths of Democrats.

People of America: the world is following your news in regards to your invasion of Iraq, for people have recently come to know that, after several years of the tragedies of this war, the vast majority of you want it stopped. Thus, you elected the Democratic Party for this purpose, but the Democrats haven’t made a move worth mentioning. On the contrary, they continue to agree to the spending of tens of billions to continue the killing and war there, which has led to the vast majority of you being afflicted with disappointment.

Osama Bin Laden (or perhaps a Bin Laden impostor)
from video tape transcript released 6 September 2007

You are too kind to the Democrats, you see them as merely opportunist, I see them as sinister if not demonic.

I wouldn’t use those terms to describe them, frankly, and can’t imagine a political movement in the America I know and love getting very far with such language and the attitude it implies, but there’s no necessary contradiction between deeply loathing them and seeing them as opportunists. If doing some particular good (such as a victory in Iraq that they can take ownership of) happens to pave the way for greater evils (enabled by full control of the US government and all levers of power and influence), then why should any self-respecting demon resist it?

What bothers me is that Pelosi took off for Iraq when there is a funding bill for Iraq/Afghanistan sitting in limbo. Instead of nurturing that bill along toward resolution, she is off on another ME adventure. (Can we expect her to visit her best buddy Baby Assad as a side trip in order to purchase her spring collection of burkhas?) The fundling bill is lingering under the weight of air-dropped pork and special-interest, unrelated additions.

Nope. The goal is political advantage. If the perception of success in Iraq can be made to serve the Democrats, then that’ll be peachy-keen.

CK MacLeod on May 18, 2008 at 2:56 PM

You are too kind to the Democrats, you see them as merely opportunist, I see them as sinister if not demonic. Their goal is not simply a political advantage, they want our nation to fail as evidenced by their continual chipping at our Republic’s foundation for at least the past fifty years.

They want America to fall so their socialist/globalist Utopian fantasies have a path to realization. In their corrupt minds it’s only American that prevents the perfect global order from rising.

So it’s a tactic change with the same goal in mind, which is to undermine all of our accomplishments in Iraq.

Nope. The goal is political advantage. If the perception of success in Iraq can be made to serve the Democrats, then that’ll be peachy-keen.

Humorous and well said but a bad analogy.

Maxx on May 18, 2008 at 12:20 PM

I thought it was spot on myself and I have got plenty more where that came from, so don’t rattle my cage.

They CAN’T let it turn out to be a success. The entire premise of their opposition is that the war was illegal, adverturist, and increased the danger of terrorism. So now they are going to stay to give MORE reasons to their terrorist buddies to attack? I don’t think so. It is defeat-defeat-defeat all the way. America must be humbled before she can take her place in line with the rest of the U.N.

Limerick on May 18, 2008 at 9:39 AM

You give them too much credit by assuming that thier opposition to the war is principled. Yes, some are really anti-war, but you can be certain that many are also simply anti-Bush and anti-Republican, and have used opposition to the war to advance their own careers.

You must be referring to our current House and Senate leadership that belong in a longterm asylum.

Rovin on May 18, 2008 at 12:46 PM

Well none of those were the patient that I was referring to, but I can’t argue much with your assessment and diagnosis there.

Power Line wonders whether this might be the start of a new tactic by Democrats to declare the war won and demand that the US bring the troops home. — Ed Morrissey

Powerline is years late and several clues short.

On supporting this war – it’s won already. What’s our remaining goal(s)?

Want to know my exit strategy for Iraq? Exit is the strategy. What will result is a civil war between Shia and Sunni. Initially, it’ll be in Iraq. Then, inshallah, it’ll spread to Saudi Arabia, where the Shia in al Hasa province can rebel. Let all that Saudi cash that funds madrassahs and CAIR in the US be diverted towards containing their restive Shia, and in the meantime, let Iran’s cash flow to their science project and Hizbullah be diverted towards encouraging Shia rebellions in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Bahrein. Once we have these 2 US hating groups at each others throats, we can then keep arming at a low level either side so that neither gains the upper hand.
- Democrats Infidelpride of JihadWatch

If the patient is doing so well, why do so many hospital staff have to continue to be at the patient’s side and in the most expensive room in the hospital? MB4 on May 18, 2008 at 12:15 PM

You must be referring to our current House and Senate leadership that belong in a longterm asylum.

Hospital Staff = MSM

And Nancy Pelosi acknowledging all of these signs of the surge’s success

NEOCON!!11!!!!!111!

Heh.

Humorous and well said but a bad analogy.

Let’s see. Patient’s hematocrit up to normal reference range — check. Patient’s reticulocyte up to normal reference range — check. Patient’s creatinine, BUN and phosphorous levels down to normal reference range and patient’s electrolytes in balance — check.

And the nurses report that the patient has been grabbing their rear ends and chasing them around his hospital room – checkmate.

If the patient is doing so well, why do so many hospital staff have to continue to be at the patient’s side and in the most expensive room in the hospital? I would think that at least most of them could now be scheduled to go elsewhere and the patient could be transfered out of intensive care and to a less expensive room.

Well, if the war is won and it’s all over, why do they need to come home so quickly? If there’s no more danger, why the rush to bring ‘em back? If it’s now safe, we can breathe a sigh of relief and take our time redeploying, right? Hmmm, there must be some other reason. I wonder what it could be…