Surrender: Lebanese government caves to Hezbollah’s demands
posted at 7:48 pm on May 14, 2008 by Allahpundit
They moved on Beirut after the government had the temerity to shut down their communications (i.e. spy) network and fire their stooge from overseeing security at the airport. Problem solved: The network has been restored and the stooge is back at work, thanks to a “settlement” brokered by the Arab League in which Hezbollah gets everything it wants and the opposition maybe gets some token rhetoric about disarmament one of these days. No wonder there was celebratory gunfire in Hezbollah-controlled areas after the deal was announced.
What’s the practical effect of all this? As I understand it, there was only one national institution that had earned the trust of Lebanon’s various sects: namely, the army. That’s gone now, shattered by its complicity in Hezbollah’s coup. Writes Caroline Glick:
[S]ince Hizbullah began its violent takeover of Lebanon last Wednesday, it has done so with the full cooperation of the Lebanese army. When Hizbullah forces raided, set fire to and destroyed Hariri’s Future News newspaper offices and Future TV station, they did so with Lebanese army escort. Suleiman’s forces did not reopen Hariri’s pro-democracy media outlets after they ordered Hizbullah forces to leave the streets of Beirut over the weekend. They did not confront Hizbullah forces in Tripoli or Tyre. And now they are allowing the Druse to be destroyed.
And of course, the Shi’ite-dominated Lebanese army rendered Hizbullah the victor in its coup when the generals announced they would not carry out the Saniora government’s anti-Hizbullah decisions from last Tuesday.
The hard lesson is that the only protection the Sunnis, Christians, and Druze have from the Shiites in the future will be from their own militias, a fact the Sunnis are already digesting and acting upon. Quote: “[L]ocal media already are reporting the formation of Sunni jihadist networks around the northern city of Tripoli, as well as in the eastern Bekaa Valley, where there’s a major Hezbollah stronghold.” Abu Kais says hatred of the Shiites in non-Shiite areas is worse than it’s ever been and declares that the “sectarian genie … is out of the bottle.” Consider it a sneak preview of Iraq if the Shiite elements within the Iraqi army ever succeed in tilting it towards the majority and away from being a national force. Exit question: What do we do now? Start sending weapons to the other sects to keep Hezbollah in check or hang back, dare them to take over the country, and wait for Israel to come up with a brilliant idea?










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
There will be more where that came from.
NickTx on May 14, 2008 at 7:50 PM
We do nothing. And then next time Israel needs to deliver the smackdown, we don’t let Rice run in there and say, ‘Stop! let the UN handle it!’ That’d be the best first step.
Spirit of 1776 on May 14, 2008 at 7:55 PM
“… dare them to take over the country …?”
Yes, and then carpet bomb it. Call it “Operation Dresden”.
Then fire-bomb it and call it “Operation Tokyo”.
And if that doesn’t work, launch “Operation Tibbits”.
Tony737 on May 14, 2008 at 8:11 PM
And then “Operation Close Tags!” Ugh!
Tony737 on May 14, 2008 at 8:12 PM
Please tell me you’re a 35-year-old natural born citizen.
This story is painful. God be with the Lebanese.
emailnuevo on May 14, 2008 at 8:13 PM
Did you know he passed away last year? I didn’t. Best line ever:
“If you give me the same circumstances, hell yeah, I’d do it again.”
emailnuevo on May 14, 2008 at 8:15 PM
I can see it now, Hezbollah takes over officially and President Obama has a state dinner for Narallah soon after.
I hope Hezbollah does something stupid at the the Israeli border so it’ll give Israel the pretext to finally wipe them out for good.
Lance Murdock on May 14, 2008 at 8:21 PM
Michelle Obama is very, very proud.
This is extremely distressing news. I hope Israel hasn’t lost any chutzpah.
SouthernGent on May 14, 2008 at 8:25 PM
It makes me wonder why Israel doesn’t say “enough is enough” and just fry the source of all this misery. Iran is going to get whacked eventually. Might as well get it over with.
Guardian on May 14, 2008 at 8:33 PM
from an earlier post on May 10th…
“It’s over.”
There’s no there in Lebanon. When the Prime Minister gives a speech after four days during which an armed group takes over a city terrorizing the residents and his first utterances are to apologize to the insurgents–it’s over.
I don’t care how many folks march up and down the town square today’s short speech says it all.
This from the government we supposedly support spoken by the Prime Minister today:
“Siniora: Did we have a problem with Hezbollah? Yes, we had a real problem with Hezbollah… Has the Lebanese government ever said it wanted to forcefully disarm Hezbollah? Never. Never. We have said that openly and before the international community.
Siniora: Is our problem with Hezbollah that we diverge on who the enemy is? Not at all, for Israel is our enemy and Syria was and will remain our sister… built on mutual respect.
Siniora: Did the government declare war on Hezbollah and think of targeting a sect? We did not and will not declare war on Hezbollah. We have all partners been in building the country and will remain. The problem is that Hezbollah decided what the fate and future of Lebanon will be.”
http://www.nowlebanon.com/NewsArticleDetails.aspx?ID=42085
Now on May 14th with all that has happened, Bush wants to give the Leb army more money! For what? So they can give it to Hezbollah?
patrick neid on May 14, 2008 at 8:50 PM
we need to arm our proxies and stop pussyfooting around. lebanon’s problems will not be solved without another civil war.
we have a stake in the outcome. it is unconscionable to ignore our allies here. the christian militias need our support. so do the druze.
the Druze were begging for our aid this weekend. they wanted weapons. i know our military has been in touch with the christian militias for a while now.
elduende on May 14, 2008 at 9:00 PM
The UN will address this issue shortly, I’m sure.
Right after they condemn Israel for something or other.
Priorities, priorities..
SteveMG on May 14, 2008 at 9:01 PM
Really? Even worse than when “87 percent of Sunnis, 80 percent of Christians, and 80 percent of Druze” supported Hezbollah? How can it get worse than that?
dave742 on May 14, 2008 at 9:02 PM
Iran tightens its grip on the region while the fleckless UNIFIL watches weapons destine for Hezbollah cross the Syrian border and a flaccid US administration is more concerned with its legacy than protecting our vital interests. The die is cast, the cock has crowed, its all over but the dyin’!
dmann on May 14, 2008 at 9:11 PM
Anyone who wishes to know what Iran is trying to do in Iraq needs only to look so far as Lebanon as their template. But for whatever reason we’re solely focused on Al Qaida in Iraq and Muqtada Al Sadr, rather than the real threat of Iran and its surrogates like Hezbollah and Badr Corps.
Send_Me on May 14, 2008 at 9:26 PM
Ahmedinejad: Israel is going to be a smoking pile of rubble.
The World: Yawn.
silverfox on May 14, 2008 at 10:09 PM
pull out…then nukem’ from orbit.
jerrytbg on May 14, 2008 at 10:25 PM
There’s a joke in there somewhere.
- The Cat
MirCat on May 14, 2008 at 10:29 PM
The Lebanese govt would surrender to the Girl Scouts if they insisted for more than five minutes.
Cheer up.
Akzed on May 14, 2008 at 10:29 PM
Aliens
jerrytbg on May 14, 2008 at 10:36 PM
MirCat on May 14, 2008 at 10:29 PM
No joke.
More precisely…. The futility of any additional effort.
jerrytbg on May 14, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Clearly, AP, you are giving this issue far more analytical treatment than anyone in the Bush Administration can apparently be bothered to do. After all, the Prez had a wedding to attend last weekend.
The President’s compartmentalized insouciance about major disasters in areas (e.g., Darfur, Zimbabwe, Beirut) he deems unworthy of our focussed attention (in contrast to, well, Israel’s counter-attacks on Hezbollah two summers ago, for instance) truly bothers me.
sanantonian on May 15, 2008 at 12:59 AM
“Really? Even worse than when “87 percent of Sunnis, 80 percent of Christians, and 80 percent of Druze” supported Hezbollah? How can it get worse than that?”
dave742 on May 14, 2008 at 9:02 PM
It can get worst than that by your bogus poll. Why don’t you tell folks when you post that shit that the poll was taken while Israel was inside Lebanon in July 06 responding to Hezbollah’s kidnap of of two Israeli soldiers.
There was a dave at captain’s quarters you remind me of.
patrick neid on May 15, 2008 at 7:55 AM
patrick neid:
Yes, last time I brought up the issue I did mention that. It is not a secret, and only makes an additional point.
First of all, support for Hezbollah has not decreased since the war.
Second, apologists in this country like to paint the Israel role in that war as a rational response to Hezbollah’s aggression. This is insane, and is shown in the poll results. If anyone in Lebanon believed that Hezbollah was to blame for the war, they would not have received the widespread support from all sectors like they did. They got this unbelievable support from all sectors because everyone in Lebanon, regardless of whether they are Shiite, Sunni, Christian, or Druze, realizes that Israel was and always is the aggressor, and their wars are always about expansion. When a group within a country stops an outside power from taking over their country, they will receive the support of the people, regardless of sectarion lines. This is what happenned. This is why Hezbollah received such overwhelming support two years ago, and why that support is growing. This is also why Hezbollah only wants a more democratic representation in the Lebanese government. They want this because of their popularity. Of course, Usrael does not want democracy in Lebanon, precisely because of Hezbollah’s popularity. Instead, Usrael will militarily support people with little popular support such as Hariri and Jumblatt. Usrael only supports democracy if the people choose the “correct” leaders. If the people support leaders that resist occupation, democracy is no longer attractive.
dave742 on May 15, 2008 at 10:15 AM
I remember reading that he never lost a moment of sleep for what he did – said (basically the quote that you put) that given the evidence he had, it was definitely the way to go so he had no need to feel guilty and would do it again given the same evidence.
JadeNYU on May 15, 2008 at 4:31 PM
dave742
No one wants to hear your anti-semitic rants here.
Lance Murdock on May 15, 2008 at 7:05 PM