Maliki visits Mosul
posted at 8:55 am on May 14, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view
When Nouri al-Maliki visited Basra, he launched a massive offensive against the Mahdi Army that eventually tore the city from the grasp of Moqtada al-Sadr. Today, Maliki visited Mosul for much the same reason, personally supervising the military offensive against the last bastion of al-Qaeda in Iraq. After the beheadings of almost a dozen police officers, the Iraqi Army appears poised to establish control across the entire nation:
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki visited the northern city of Mosul on Wednesday to supervise a military offensive against al-Qaida in Iraq in its last major stronghold, regional Gov. Duraid Kashmola said.
Maliki’s flight to northern Iraq mirrors a similar trip he took almost two months ago to the southern city of Basra, where government troops fought radical Shiite militias. That fighting spread to the Shiite slum of Sadr City in Baghdad, where a cease-fire to end those clashes was only reached on Monday.
The offensive, called Lion’s Roar, is the latest effort by Iraqi and U.S. troops to clear al-Qaida fighters from Mosul, the nation’s third largest city. Troops began sweeping though the city’s neighborhoods last week.
Mosul is considered the last important urban staging ground for al-Qaida in Iraq after losing its strongholds in Baghdad and other areas during the U.S. troop “surge” last year. American troops will support Iraqi forces when requested, the U.S. military has said.
The terrorists crossed over from Syria to conduct the attacks in Mosul, escalating the tensions before the fighting begins in earnest. They have conducted each abduction individually, which indicates that their strength is low in Mosul, but that they intend on holding the city. Targeting police and police recruits attempts to terrorize local authorities into either submission or outright retreat, which would give AQI effective control of the area.
Maliki’s presence sends a message to Iraqis in Mosul that the central government will not allow terrorists to create a state within a state. Having the leader of the elected government ride into Mosul at the head of a column of Iraqi soldiers gives AQI an answer to its terrorist attacks, which is that Iraq will not be terrorized into retreat. If Maliki can face down a native Shi’ite extremist like Sadr in Basra and Sadr City, he won’t get intimidated by a handful of foreign Sunni lunatics who kill more of their sectarian brethren than anyone else.
Over the last six weeks, Maliki has staged an impressive show of statesmanship and command. He has used his resources daringly and adapted well to changing conditions and tactical setbacks to liberate large swaths of his country from militias and thugs. If he can crush AQI in Mosul in the near future, he may well set Iraq on a path of unity and strength that could barely be predicted at the end of 2006.
Update: The Wall Street Journal rejects the American media’s Basra Narrative:
When Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki ordered a military offensive against rogue Shiite militias in March, it was widely panned as a failure that was one more reason the U.S. needed to abandon Iraqis to their own “civil war.” Well, several weeks later the battle for Basra and Baghdad against Moqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army looks to be both a military and political success. …
However fitfully it began, the Basra campaign is a sign that Iraqis are in fact “standing up” for their own security. It is also a personal vindication for Mr. Maliki, who recognized to his credit that his government had to have a monopoly on violence in Shiite neighborhoods as much as in Sunni enclaves.
In the last year we were told first that the surge was a military failure, and later that it was a military success but that Iraq’s political class had not lived up to its end of the bargain. In fact, just as surge supporters said, the Iraqis have become more confident and effective the more they have become convinced that the U.S. was not going to cut and run.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Nice, :salute:
trailortrash on May 14, 2008 at 9:12 AM
This is really exciting stuff. I get goosebumps just thinking about how far they’ve come. Things aren’t perfect, but when the strongest armed Iraqi force in the country is the national military rather than the Mahdi Army or AQI, you know things are looking good. Let’s see how the defeatist media spins this…
jimmy the notable on May 14, 2008 at 9:14 AM
Ralph Peters/NYP
Nice try, Ralph. Be careful though, these kind of words might land you in hate-speech court soon.
As for Mosul, Basra, SadrCity, etc. I reallllllllllly hate to use the Vietnamization example, but just did anyway. We left our friends with ways and means, then the American traitor MIKE GRAVEL led the way for Dems to kill funding. You know, that Mike Gravel who most HA readers think is just a silly old Dem running for President. It worked out great for Gravel and the Dems as T-62s squashed people in the streets of Saigon. America humiliated, who could ask for anything better.
Frequent Winds and Eagle Pull are going to seem like childs play once Dems kill Iraq too.
Limerick on May 14, 2008 at 9:20 AM
Hollywood drops the ball again. Don’t they know they’re supposed to get one of their members to do something incredibly stupid so the MSM will report on that rather than the good news coming out of Iraq? Where’s Brittney Spears when you need her?
Kafir on May 14, 2008 at 9:20 AM
The AQ savages are running out of ways to intimidate the Iraqis, their barbaric methods are no longer working.
As for media spin, there is a homeless Iraqi guy living under a bridge in Mosul. Our efforts have failed and its time to bring everyone home.
Bishop on May 14, 2008 at 9:22 AM
Asked to comment on the Maliki administration stepping up to the plate and the subsequent signs of real progress in Iraq, Pelosi and Reid said “The surge won’t work and Bush is a chimpturd who lied and killed all of our troops to get oil.”
fogw on May 14, 2008 at 9:42 AM
It’s even worse than that, Bishop. In neither Iraq nor Afghanistan can gays legally get married. We need to bring all the troops home and tuck our head back into the shell.
rbj on May 14, 2008 at 9:56 AM
When the American troops flushed Al Qaeda out of places like Fallujah and Baqubah by meeting with the locals and asking them for leads, they also had troops surrounding the cities in the outskirts looking to take out fleeing terrorists. If Maliki plans on sending in Iraqi troops to flush out Mosul, hopefully he has coordinated with the Americans to have Mosul surrounded, so that any fleeing Al Qaeda terrorists will run into them, and win a one-way early-bird ticket to 72 virgins.
Steve Z on May 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM
TIME MAGAZINE DECLARES VICTORY FOR AL-QAEDA IN MOSUL
The crack staff at Time announces that American and Iraqi troops have taken control of the streets
and neighborhoods of Mosul.
Local citizens are turning in the terrorist’s left and right, al-qaeda is being killed,run off,or taken into custody in the last strong hold that they held in Iraq.
But due to the fact that al-qaeda has committed to using
hybrid cars for suicide bombings and promises to use more
environmentally friendly explosives,Time declares this a victory for al-qaeda.
Time would also like to announce that it will be naming Harry Reid it’s “person of the year” for correctly calling the war in Iraq “lost”.
Baxter Greene on May 14, 2008 at 10:59 AM
That is where my son is. In his own words ‘We are busy’.
Limerick on May 14, 2008 at 11:25 AM
Good Lord, even LBJ wasn’t that hands on.
MB4 on May 14, 2008 at 11:39 AM
I think this just goes to show how much the locals mean to winning battles. We could slaughter the in force in Iraq, but it the force has supporters, the fight last way longer than it needs to.
With the locals helping the IA, they win the battles faster than we would, with maybe 1/10 the military might and fortitude. Also, the situation may not deteriorate as fast after the battle when we pulled out, the Government stays.
There is something to learn there.
Locals wont help us, but they will help those that look like them. Deep down they may believe in us, but in the end, they feel more comfortable helping the Government.
WoosterOh on May 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM
I think al-Maliki’s worried that if he doesn’t take care of this now, come 2009 he wont have the support to take care of it.
Hopefully even if the next President is a democrat, s/he will recognize the necessity of keeping Iraq a stable working democracy.
apollyonbob on May 14, 2008 at 12:18 PM
apollyonbob on May 14, 2008 at 12:18 PM
Keep dreaming, maybe it will happen.
TimothyJ on May 14, 2008 at 3:41 PM
But, but, Mookie’s still breathing! It’s not over! He’ll fight you with his turban!
Maquis on May 14, 2008 at 3:42 PM
Not quite – the locals help us rather alot, actually. However, the Iraqi governmnet is in the lead and should be getting lots of support from its own citizens, that is the end state for victory in COIN.
LBJ sat and pored over maps and personally approved bombing targets. Maliki is there to clear up bureaucratic logjams and assist his military commanders with what they need. Same thing he did in Basrah. I realize you would rather go back to cursing the darkness than seeing any candles lit, but this is getting silly.
major john on May 15, 2008 at 12:23 AM
Comment pages: