Come and see the bigotry inherent in the (Democratic) system!

posted at 9:58 am on May 13, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Victimology continues in the identity-politics meltdown of the Democratic primaries. The Washington Post profiles racist incidents that young campaigners for Barack Obama have experienced, but fails to note that they occur within the context of a Democratic contest. Meanwhile, women continue to push for Hillary Clinton as a means of breaking through the ultimate glass ceiling, putting gender ahead of qualifications on the priority list.

Doesn’t this count as “distractions”?

For all the hope and excitement Obama’s candidacy is generating, some of his field workers, phone-bank volunteers and campaign surrogates are encountering a raw racism and hostility that have gone largely unnoticed — and unreported — this election season. Doors have been slammed in their faces. They’ve been called racially derogatory names (including the white volunteers). And they’ve endured malicious rants and ugly stereotyping from people who can’t fathom that the senator from Illinois could become the first African American president. …

Victoria Switzer, a retired social studies teacher, was on phone-bank duty one night during the Pennsylvania primary campaign. One night was all she could take: “It wasn’t pretty.” She made 60 calls to prospective voters in Susquehanna County, her home county, which is 98 percent white. The responses were dispiriting. One caller, Switzer remembers, said he couldn’t possibly vote for Obama and concluded: “Hang that darky from a tree!”

Documentary filmmaker Rory Kennedy, the daughter of the late Robert F. Kennedy, said she, too, came across “a lot of racism” when campaigning for Obama in Pennsylvania. One Pittsburgh union organizer told her he would not vote for Obama because he is black, and a white voter, she said, offered this frank reason for not backing Obama: “White people look out for white people, and black people look out for black people.”

Obama campaign officials say such incidents are isolated, that the experience of most volunteers and staffers has been overwhelmingly positive.

Who were these volunteers contacting? Fellow Democrats. They wanted to mobilize the registered Democrats to get them to vote in the closed primary, and received very ugly responses for their trouble.

Some of what the Post reports has nothing to do with racism, however, but it also involves violence:

The bigotry has gone beyond words. In Vincennes, the Obama campaign office was vandalized at 2 a.m. on the eve of the primary, according to police. A large plate-glass window was smashed, an American flag stolen. Other windows were spray-painted with references to Obama’s controversial former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and other political messages: “Hamas votes BHO” and “We don’t cling to guns or religion. Goddamn Wright.”

Who commits all of these acts of racism? When the WaPo article identifies their politics, they turn out to be supporters of … Hillary Clinton. Meanwhile, Politico wonders whether the “sisterhood” can save Hillary:

Just a day after the debilitating results in the North Carolina and Indiana primaries, the New York senator sought help at a fundraiser dubbed by her campaign “Generations of Women for Hillary.”

And, as has been the pattern, the 1,500 mostly women who attended came through, not just meeting the goal of generating $500,000 for her campaign but doubling it.

Even the sight of a couple of loud protesters couldn’t erase the obvious relief and excitement of the candidate, who sponsored the event along with her daughter and mother. As the last heckler was escorted out of Washington’s Omni Shoreham Hotel, Clinton quipped that she hoped “they paid” before they were booted.

Unfortunately for Hillary, Obama has raised more money from more women than she has, at least through the first quarter of 2008. The gender card has turned into a busted flush, but Hillary has yet to stop playing it, and for at least some of her supporters, it will continue to drive energy away from Obama.

As McQ notes, the media should remember this when it comes to accusations of racism and bigotry later in the general election.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

When Dems act this way it isn’t just racism, it’s recidivism.

Akzed on May 13, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Obama campaign officials say such incidents are isolated

Translation= it’s all over the place, we want everyone to know it’s there and we’re going to pretend we never talked about it. But we’ll say it as often as we have to to get some coverage of it.

snaggletoothie on May 13, 2008 at 10:08 AM

Nah, when the Democrat Party act this way it’s just business as usual.

SeniorD on May 13, 2008 at 10:09 AM

I’m surprised that the Washington Post is…. surprised.

I’ve been in more than a few closed door meetings as the only registered Republican in the room (I’m a shape-shifter), and heard this racist crap thrown around.

Ignorance.

Attack a person for anything they can control. Never be so ignorant as to attack a person’s race or gender.

natesnake on May 13, 2008 at 10:09 AM

I’m sure the 92% of blacks that vote for Obama do it because of his policies. Don’t forget, only white males can be racist.

Clark1 on May 13, 2008 at 10:11 AM

Racism knows no color.

natesnake on May 13, 2008 at 10:12 AM

The rules seem to be in place.

If you don’t vote for Obama, you’re a racist bigot intent on the continued oppression of African-Americans.

If you don’t vote for Hillary, you’re a male chauvinistic pig intent on the continued opression of women.

If you vote for McCain, you’re an idiot intent on continuing the rape and pillaging of the nation by the Republicans.

Gosh, these Democrats sure know how to make me be enthusiatic about exercising my right to vote.

When will they change and offer real hope?

I hope it’s sooner, rather than later.

SouthernRoots on May 13, 2008 at 10:12 AM

It’s about policy and experience stupid.

natesnake on May 13, 2008 at 10:13 AM

This is where pure stupidity seeps through.
You can find people that won’t vote for someone who is skinny, who is an Ivy-Leaguer, who is a woman, who is fat, black, Mormon, Catholic, Jewish, Christian, atheist, lives in the South, North, West, Asian, cat owner, dog owner, not owning a pet, fisherman, non-fisherman, you can find people (heard them on the radio) who won’t vote for a white person…
You can find a reason for race or bias in any national race.
The fact is, we all have our reasons, some are reasonable, some are not. Some are dependent on other reasons, and some are “just because”.
Some won’t vote for McCain because he is “cranky”, a little weird, but it is just a reason…it does not reflect on the lifestyle of the person saying he is biased against all people who are “cranky”.

right2bright on May 13, 2008 at 10:13 AM

That last comment was aimed at no one in particular. Just a musing.

natesnake on May 13, 2008 at 10:14 AM

I’m sure the 92% of blacks that vote for Obama do it because of his policies. Don’t forget, only white males can be racist.

Clark1 on May 13, 2008 at 10:11 AM

Funny how that never gets mentioned in the MSM.

jukin on May 13, 2008 at 10:15 AM

Just watch, there will be a story with this template writen at least once a week until november.

ninjapirate on May 13, 2008 at 10:16 AM

Racism has always had a home in the democrat party.

whitetop on May 13, 2008 at 10:17 AM

If you don’t support Obama you are a racist.

Steve McCullough on May 13, 2008 at 10:18 AM

Don’t forget the sexism!

Slublog on May 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM

“They’ve been called racially derogatory names (including the white volunteers).”

Somebody must have rung up Robert “white n*gger” Byrd. (KKK-WV)

fogw on May 13, 2008 at 10:22 AM

The run up to November is going to be really ugly. I honestly think so.

jake-the-goose on May 13, 2008 at 10:23 AM

Come and see the bigotry inherent in the (Democratic) system!
May 13, 2008 9:58 AM by Ed Morrissey

Captain Ed, you crack me up!

It would be cool to hear Obama tell Hillary:

Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM

If you don’t support Obama you are a racist.

And if I don’t support Hillary, I’m a man?

MaryAnn on May 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM

Frankly, I don’t give a rat’s backside what the race baiters say . . . voting for that incompetent Marxist is a nail in the Republic’s coffin. People must not be distracted or intimidated by their race baiting rhetoric.

rplat on May 13, 2008 at 10:26 AM

the media should remember this when it comes to accusations of racism and bigotry later in the general election.

They should. But they won’t.

Gilda on May 13, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Racism is just plain stupid.

We are all one human race.

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 10:27 AM

The MSM can spin until the cows come home, but they are just displaying their ignorance.

The real racism in this country has been exposed during this campaign.

Unfortunately for the Drive By morons agenda, the folks exposed as racists turned out to not be Republicans and not White.

there it is on May 13, 2008 at 10:27 AM

voting for that incompetent Marxist is a nail in the Republic’s coffin. People must not be distracted or intimidated by their race baiting rhetoric.

rplat on May 13, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Exactly.

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 10:28 AM

Racism knows no color.

natesnake on May 13, 2008 at 10:12 AM

Bingo.

Jaibones on May 13, 2008 at 10:28 AM

No human rights for journalists.

mymanpotsandpans on May 13, 2008 at 10:30 AM

Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM

Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!

Jaibones on May 13, 2008 at 10:34 AM

All-in-all, liberals have the highest concentrations of racist, bigoted scumbags I’ve ever encountered. Not to say they’re all like that, for certain; the love of my life was liberal, and her family, too. However, I’ve rarely been treated as badly, in terms of racism, by Conservatives/Republicans, as I have by liberals (especially democrats). For all their flowery talk of equality, equity, egalitarianism, etc., once they’re in power, all that goes away. Remember: the democratic party’s planks were built upon racism (http://www.wrongonrace.com/hillaryundecided.asp), for quite a while, while the Republican Party’s NEVER were.

Plain-and-simple: if you’re voting democrat, because you oppose racism and prejudice, you’re clearly backing the wrong horse.

Virus-X on May 13, 2008 at 10:41 AM

Here in Toledo, last election cycle I saw a bunch of Bush signs that were vandalized. None of the Kerry ones were.

rbj on May 13, 2008 at 10:46 AM

Come and see the bigotry inherent in the (Democratic) system!
May 13, 2008 9:58 AM by Ed Morrissey

EM, did you mean to write (Democrat)…?

J_Gocht on May 13, 2008 at 10:51 AM

I’m not voting for Obama, in fact I fart in his general direction!

saltydogg14 on May 13, 2008 at 10:52 AM

As a generalization, those screaming BIGOT the loudest and most frequently advertise themselves loud and clear.
That said, color blind promotions for good work beats the absolutely defeatist game of awarding the favorite color merely for being the favorite color.

When is the Supreme Court going to lance the boil on the butt of justice, aka “hate crime” legislation?

maverick muse on May 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM

Political expediency. Stinking racists playing one man and woman against another man and woman. Mao marxists who love power and greenbacks.

Ready for the rice fields?

saved on May 13, 2008 at 11:07 AM

“When Dems act this way it isn’t just racism, it’s recidivism.” No, Dubya made them do it.

Christine on May 13, 2008 at 11:19 AM

As I commented in the headlines section [lest I be accused of plagiarizing my own stuff :-) ], racism, sexism, and all other isms are subsets of favoritism. Blacks, whites, women, men–all of us are capable of it, but not all of us are guilty of it. Many of us use logic, principle, and reason to guide our decisions. If you resort to identity politics, you immediately become an -ist.

DrMagnolias on May 13, 2008 at 11:21 AM

The Washington Post profiles racist incidents that young campaigners for Barack Obama have experienced …

That they claim to have experienced. I don’t believe them. I think a lot of those accusations are made up. Conveniently, the accusations closely track the psychology of a liberal. E.g.,

One caller, Switzer remembers, said he couldn’t possibly vote for Obama and concluded: “Hang that darky from a tree!”

Nobody said that to her. She pulled that out of her butt.

paul006 on May 13, 2008 at 11:21 AM

I just realized…I’m a Democratist.

RushBaby on May 13, 2008 at 11:36 AM

Victoria Switzer, a retired social studies teacher, was on phone-bank duty one night during the Pennsylvania primary campaign. One night was all she could take: “It wasn’t pretty.” She made 60 calls to prospective voters in Susquehanna County, her home county, which is 98 percent white. The responses were dispiriting. One caller, Switzer remembers, said he couldn’t possibly vote for Obama and concluded: “Hang that darky from a tree!”

The “racism” of this answer has to be put in context. The Democratic elites at Universities and the Media have talked them into the position that voting for Obama because he is black is a blow against racism and thus as important to them as being baptized is to a Christian. The voters of Susquehanna county are quite aware of this absurd position of the Democratic elite and some will fight back by mocking it. I think we should be open to the possibility that the “Hang that darky from a tree” wasn’t so much racist as an attempt to blaspheme the racial religion of the Democratic elite. I think I’ll say it myself to some Obama true believer.

thuja on May 13, 2008 at 11:37 AM

Nobody said that to her. She pulled that out of her butt.

paul006 on May 13, 2008 at 11:21 AM

I agree – no one talks like that to a total stranger and who uses the phrase “darky” anymore? Honestly.

HawaiiLwyr on May 13, 2008 at 11:37 AM

Attack a person for anything they can control. Never be so ignorant as to attack a person’s race or gender.

natesnake on May 13, 2008 at 10:09 AM

Thanks to the wonders of modern technology we can change our gender. Just ask silky. =)

Darth Executor on May 13, 2008 at 11:38 AM

Macaca! Macaca!

fossten on May 13, 2008 at 11:56 AM

As McQ notes, the media should remember this when it comes to accusations of racism and bigotry later in the general election.

Good luck with that! That WP story will probably disappear into the memory hole by July.

William Teach on May 13, 2008 at 11:57 AM

Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!

Jaibones on May 13, 2008 at 10:34 AM

I fart in your general direction!

fossten on May 13, 2008 at 11:57 AM

I just realized…I’m a Democratist.

RushBaby on May 13, 2008 at 11:36 AM

No you’re not. You are a Republican.

This country is not a Democracy, it is a Republic.

Recite the Pledge of Allegiance…it’s to the Republic for which it stands.

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 12:03 PM

Yes, interesting how MSM is focusing on racism, whilst they ignore the Democratic Party’s ageism in regards to McCain.

Seaberry on May 13, 2008 at 12:03 PM

I need a word that clearly communicates my bias against liberals, 2 or 3 syllables at most, works with the ism/ist suffix and effectively invokes maximum shock value by highlighting ideas, not identity. How’s; I’m a Reaganist or I see nothing wrong with Reaganism. Suggestions encouraged and as always, appreciated!

dmann on May 13, 2008 at 12:10 PM

I need a word that clearly communicates my bias against liberals, 2 or 3 syllables at most, works with the ism/ist suffix and effectively invokes maximum shock value by highlighting ideas, not identity. How’s; I’m a Reaganist or I see nothing wrong with Reaganism. Suggestions encouraged and as always, appreciated!

dmann on May 13, 2008 at 12:10 PM

Reaganist and Reaganism are good.

So are Constitutionalist and Constitutionalism.

Liberals have been working for decades to distort and destroy our Constitution.

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 12:13 PM

This stuff is out there, folks. My neighbor was wearing an Obama pin while in the security line at the Atlanta airport. A guy came up to him and said VERY loudly, “well, I guess you are a n***** lover.” After a few seconds of shock, my neghbor replied, “well, I guess you are an a**hole!” The guy tried to punch him and then security took him away.

I have a few other friends who have canvassed for Obama and all of them have had doors slammed in their faces, things said to them like “I’m not voting for that black Muslim,” etc. And yes, these ARE Democrats!

Part of me worries that the whole point of the Obama candidacy was never to actually get him elected President; it was to provoke and document this kind of overt racism in order to make a point about how terrible a place America is. There are radical leftists involved in that campaign in a big way, and they are after something much bigger than winning an election. They want to provoke serious racial and class conflict in this country so that eventually their vision of (probably violent) revolution by “the masses” will happen.

rockmom on May 13, 2008 at 12:14 PM

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 12:13 PM

Constitutionalist and Constitutionalism are far more accurate, but I’m afraid they have to many syllables and most of the libotards have no idea what the Constitution is!

Thanks man!

dmann on May 13, 2008 at 12:21 PM

Remember -
The Democrat party passionately defended slavery. (The Republican party was created to end slavery – and it did.)
The Democrats opposed Eisenhower’s(R) Civil Rights Bill.
The Democrats opposed Johnson’s Civil Rights Bill (passed only because of Republican support).
It was Democrats who blocked the school doors from integration.
The Democrats selected a KKK member as Majority Leader (he is still a ‘respected’ member of the Senate).

The Democrat party has not changed in the last 150 years, why should they change now?

The irony of course is that the Republican party for 150 years has consistantly fought (and died) for the rights and dignity of Black Americans. (Republican George W. Bush has given more aid to Africa than any other president/administration.)

Democrats maintain power as long as Black-Americans are kept poor, ignorant, and dependent on govt (either jobs or welfare). The last 40 years of Democrat policies have been a disaster for Black-Americans. Democrat presidents gave us the War on Poverty (Johnson) and the Dept of Education (created by Carter) with little to show for such efforts – Democrats themselves recognize failure and ask for more money to fix it. Reagan and Bush successfully defended all Americans (Cold War – War on Terror) and cut taxes for all Americans.

Democrats are not worried about the content of your character, just the color of your skin: affirmative action.

Clinton did more for Black-Americans by following the Republicans on welfare reform than any other policy.

jerseyman on May 13, 2008 at 12:22 PM

I read tales on some local TV stations websites about Obama’s people being racist as well here in NC when they went door-to-door. Tonight is the night the good people of West Virginia get openly mocked and insulted by the dinosaur media. It’s as if the media has no idea of the history of the state and why it was ever formed in the first place.

SouthernGent on May 13, 2008 at 12:24 PM

I just realized…I’m a Democratist.

RushBaby on May 13, 2008 at 11:36 AM

No you’re not. You are a Republican.

This country is not a Democracy, it is a Republic.

Recite the Pledge of Allegiance…it’s to the Republic for which it stands.

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 12:03 PM

1. I have dutifully, proudly and gratefully recited the Pledge.
2. I see my joke was a real stinker. The attempt was to snark that I am bigoted towards Democrats.
3. I think I’ll recite the Pledge again. That was very nice.

RushBaby on May 13, 2008 at 12:49 PM

Part of me worries that the whole point of the Obama candidacy was never to actually get him elected President; it was to provoke and document this kind of overt racism in order to make a point about how terrible a place America is. There are radical leftists involved in that campaign in a big way, and they are after something much bigger than winning an election. They want to provoke serious racial and class conflict in this country so that eventually their vision of (probably violent) revolution by “the masses” will happen.

rockmom on May 13, 2008 at 12:14 PM

You are correct. The threat is real. This is their game plan. This is the Communist constitution they want to use to replace our Constitution. Obama started a speech with an intentional misquote of the Preamble of our Constitution:

A MORE PERFECT UNION
Tuesday, March 18th, 2008
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.

Obama started out improperly quoting the preamble of the Constitution of the United States of America, which reads:

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Why did Obama shorten “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…” down to just “We the people, in order to form a more perfect union”?

Why did Obama intentionally leave out “of the United States”?

Because when he says, “We the people” he is talking about all of the low-paid workers of the world. When Obama talks about “Unity”, he is talking about uniting all of the world’s socialists. He is saying, “Workers of the world Unite!”

I did an analysis of Obama’s whole speech here:
Obama Nation: Using Racism In Order To Form A More Socialist Union

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 12:49 PM

fossten on May 13, 2008 at 11:57 AM

Obama – She turned me into a Newt!

Russert – A Newt?

Obama – Well it got better.

misterpeasea on May 13, 2008 at 12:51 PM

It’s as if the media has no idea of the history of the state and why it was ever formed in the first place.

SouthernGent on May 13, 2008 at 12:24 PM

“As if”? I’d be willing to bet the vast majority of them don’t have a clue. The MSM routinely demonstrate an appalling ignorance of this nation’s history.

AZCoyote on May 13, 2008 at 12:54 PM

When Dems act this way it isn’t just racism, it’s recidivism.

Akzed on May 13, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Awesome.

Racism knows no color.

natesnake on May 13, 2008 at 10:12 AM

Au contraire. Racism know nothing but color.

SlimyBill on May 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM

I see my joke was a real stinker. The attempt was to snark that I am bigoted towards Democrats.

RushBaby on May 13, 2008 at 12:49 PM

I realized you were joking, but it’s a hot button for me…

Democrats try to deceive young people into thinking that we are a Democracy, therefore it’s “natural” to be a Democrat. The truth is we are a Republic, so if anything it’s “natural” to be a Republican.

Also, when you hear Democrats using “Democratic Party” instead of “Democrat Party”, I think it’s because they are the “Democratic Socialist Party”.

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM

misterpeasea on May 13, 2008 at 12:51 PM

The Newt Gingrich / Nancy Pelosi commercial should have ended with him saying:

She turned me into a newt!

Let’s pray he gets better!

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 12:58 PM

Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!

Jaibones on May 13, 2008 at 10:34 AM

There are SOOOOOOOOOO many parallels betwen Monty Python and this Democrat race, esp. Hillary’s quandary:
_
= the guy on the bridge with his arms and legs lopped off who keeps challenging his opponent to fight some more,
_
= the guy selling the dead parrot (“pining for the fjords”)
_
= “When danger reared its ugly head, He bravely turned his tail and fled.”

SlimyBill on May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM

SlimyBill on May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM

It’s not just on the Democrat side.
George Soros has been giving money to John McCain since 2001.

DENNIS: Listen. Strange women lying in ponds George Soros distributing swords money is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic MSM ceremony.

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 1:09 PM

One caller, Switzer remembers, said he couldn’t possibly vote for Obama and concluded: “Hang that darky from a tree!”

That just sounds fake to me. Does anyone, even a bigot, say “darky” anymore? I’m willing to bet Switzer made that one up to gain sympathy for her candidate.

irishspy on May 13, 2008 at 1:12 PM

you gotta love the constant Monty Python references…it’s like a secret society, almost.

wildweasel on May 13, 2008 at 1:14 PM

The bigotry has gone beyond words. In Vincennes, the Obama campaign office was vandalized at 2 a.m. on the eve of the primary, according to police. A large plate-glass window was smashed, an American flag stolen.

Funny how quiet and unperturbed the Post was when Republican offices were vandalized during the 2004 campaign.

irishspy on May 13, 2008 at 1:16 PM

I just had lunch with a friend visiting N.C. from Pennsylvania. He said that up there during their Dem primary he heard people say, “I could never vote for a black man for president. Plus, he’s got that racist preacher.” And these are people who have hardly ever seen a black person, much less lived near black people.

Randy Newman’s “Good Ole Boys” came immediately to mind. It ain’t just the South, and never was. It also reminds me of something one of my sociology profs said about 40 years ago: “Southerners long ago accepted blacks as individuals, but not as a group. Northerners have accepted them as a group but not as individuals.”

rivlax on May 13, 2008 at 1:50 PM

“Hang that darky from a tree” wasn’t so much racist as an attempt to blaspheme the racial religion of the Democratic elite.

thuja on May 13, 2008 at 11:37 AM

Wow.

Nonfactor on May 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM

Seaberry on May 13, 2008 at 12:03 PM

You meant to write “Democrat”; right?

El Rushbo, would get on your case for using “Democratic”!

J_Gocht on May 13, 2008 at 2:49 PM

Red Pill on May 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM

Good on you, and on J_Gocht

p.s. RushBaby, I knew what you meant :) Love your one-liners, and forgot to mention your name on a list of such. I beg for your forgiving.

Entelechy on May 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM

I beg for your forgiving.

Entelechy on May 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM

Well……………..OK!

RushBaby on May 13, 2008 at 3:25 PM

I’m actually in the weird position of being violently against racism–but hoping enough Americans ARE racist to defeat this dangerous demagogue. So I’m like a German in 1930 who doesn’t hate Austrians–and even has Austrian family members–but who’s hoping that a majority of Germans secretly hate them…

This analogy might be grossly unfair to Obama. Except…have you looked at his most ardent supporters lately?

Hope P. Muntz on May 13, 2008 at 4:33 PM

The WaPo headline was:

Racist Incidents Give Some Obama Campaigners Pause

Damn, you’re slick WaPo. Nice subliminal reference to Mrs. Clinton’s predominantly menopausal supporters.

jeff_from_mpls on May 13, 2008 at 6:12 PM

ARTHUR Allahpundit: Shut up, will you? Shut up!

DENNIS Red Pill: Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system.

Red Pill on May 14, 2008 at 1:19 AM