<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sadr wins another battle by surrendering!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:50:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BohicaTwentyTwo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1118480</link>
		<dc:creator>BohicaTwentyTwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1118480</guid>
		<description>Guess who Time magazine calls the victor? &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20080511/wl_time/alsadrwinsanotherround&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Black Knight Always Triumphs!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess who Time magazine calls the victor? <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20080511/wl_time/alsadrwinsanotherround" rel="nofollow">The Black Knight Always Triumphs!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gr8inferno</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117998</link>
		<dc:creator>gr8inferno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117998</guid>
		<description>yea , big disappointment. I was expecting &quot;all out battle&quot;. ,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea , big disappointment. I was expecting &#8220;all out battle&#8221;. ,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: relpayme</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117834</link>
		<dc:creator>relpayme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117834</guid>
		<description>Victory will only be secured when &quot;Mookie&quot; is 6 feet under. by way of lead posioning!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Victory will only be secured when &#8220;Mookie&#8221; is 6 feet under. by way of lead posioning!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117818</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117818</guid>
		<description>Looks like the cease fire is holding, for today anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the cease fire is holding, for today anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corona</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117790</link>
		<dc:creator>corona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117790</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fg-sadrcity11-2008may11,0,3530713.story?track=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The LA Times doesn&#039;t think Sadr is beaten.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fg-sadrcity11-2008may11,0,3530713.story?track=rss" rel="nofollow">The LA Times doesn&#8217;t think Sadr is beaten.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: South Texian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117676</link>
		<dc:creator>South Texian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117676</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Operation Iraqi Freedom: Year Four...&lt;/strong&gt;

I wrote this entry just under a year ago in response to the consistently gloomy news reporting taking place on the verge of the implementation of the controversial Surge, executed by General David Petraeus. Since then, the situation in Iraq has impro.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Operation Iraqi Freedom: Year Four&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I wrote this entry just under a year ago in response to the consistently gloomy news reporting taking place on the verge of the implementation of the controversial Surge, executed by General David Petraeus. Since then, the situation in Iraq has impro&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117672</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117672</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;major john on May 11, 2008 at 2:26 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank you.  

Now for a harder question, what do you think of this article?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/11/iraq.humanrights&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;My daughter deserved to die for falling in love&#039; &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>major john on May 11, 2008 at 2:26 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you.  </p>
<p>Now for a harder question, what do you think of this article?  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/11/iraq.humanrights" rel="nofollow">&#8216;My daughter deserved to die for falling in love&#8217; </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117671</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117671</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;MB4 on May 11, 2008 at 1:16 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I keep thinking that, like what happened with Lincoln during his second election, if Iraq goes well a month or so before the elections (Iraq has their Provicial elections in Oct), we could see a large McCain victory in the fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>MB4 on May 11, 2008 at 1:16 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I keep thinking that, like what happened with Lincoln during his second election, if Iraq goes well a month or so before the elections (Iraq has their Provicial elections in Oct), we could see a large McCain victory in the fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: major john</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117669</link>
		<dc:creator>major john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117669</guid>
		<description>Things in Basrah are much better - the harrassing attack or two comes from the other side of the Shatt-al Arab or south of the city.

The National Police and Army have replaced the vanished local cops (An IA captain told me a joke - what do the Basrah police and the dinosaurs have in common?  Both are extinct.).
The people of the city are starting to enjoy their freedom from the JAM/Iranian proxy bullies.  Economic activity is starting to revive too.  It will take a while to get the local police rebuilt, and continue to revive the local economy.  But right now, things are all trending upwards.

We&#039;ll still get some Iranian influenced harrassing attacks, so be sure to catch them on the McClatchy or AP wires...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things in Basrah are much better &#8211; the harrassing attack or two comes from the other side of the Shatt-al Arab or south of the city.</p>
<p>The National Police and Army have replaced the vanished local cops (An IA captain told me a joke &#8211; what do the Basrah police and the dinosaurs have in common?  Both are extinct.).<br />
The people of the city are starting to enjoy their freedom from the JAM/Iranian proxy bullies.  Economic activity is starting to revive too.  It will take a while to get the local police rebuilt, and continue to revive the local economy.  But right now, things are all trending upwards.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll still get some Iranian influenced harrassing attacks, so be sure to catch them on the McClatchy or AP wires&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117645</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117645</guid>
		<description>It sounds like things are going so well in Iraq now that Jaun McCain should start slamming Obamawan Barakobi for wanting to take a whole damn 16 months, and not even stating until at least next January, to withdraw American troops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like things are going so well in Iraq now that Jaun McCain should start slamming Obamawan Barakobi for wanting to take a whole damn 16 months, and not even stating until at least next January, to withdraw American troops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117596</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 03:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117596</guid>
		<description>Our guys are mopping up the medium and heavy stuff:

&lt;blockquote&gt;BAGHDAD – Multi-National Division – Baghdad aerial weapons teams conducted operations against criminal elements in Baghdad May 10. 
 
Following an indirect-fire attack in central Baghdad, an MND-B AWT made positive identification of a rocket rail at the point of origin in the Sadr City district of Baghdad used to launch the attack.
 
The AWT engaged a criminal element on site at approximately 6:40 a.m. with two Hellfire missiles. One criminal was killed, and the rocket rail and a shack were destroyed. Secondary explosions at the site also indicate that illegal weapons also were destroyed.
 
At approximately 10 a.m., an AWT observed five criminals east of Al Hajj Jabr in the New Baghdad district of eastern Baghdad. The criminals were heavily armed with a rocket-propelled grenade, two PKC light machineguns and two AK-47 rifles. The AWT fired two Hellfire missiles and killed all five men. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Entire piece and many others from today &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=19258&amp;Itemid=128&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our guys are mopping up the medium and heavy stuff:</p>
<blockquote><p>BAGHDAD – Multi-National Division – Baghdad aerial weapons teams conducted operations against criminal elements in Baghdad May 10. </p>
<p>Following an indirect-fire attack in central Baghdad, an MND-B AWT made positive identification of a rocket rail at the point of origin in the Sadr City district of Baghdad used to launch the attack.</p>
<p>The AWT engaged a criminal element on site at approximately 6:40 a.m. with two Hellfire missiles. One criminal was killed, and the rocket rail and a shack were destroyed. Secondary explosions at the site also indicate that illegal weapons also were destroyed.</p>
<p>At approximately 10 a.m., an AWT observed five criminals east of Al Hajj Jabr in the New Baghdad district of eastern Baghdad. The criminals were heavily armed with a rocket-propelled grenade, two PKC light machineguns and two AK-47 rifles. The AWT fired two Hellfire missiles and killed all five men. </p></blockquote>
<p>Entire piece and many others from today <a href="http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=19258&amp;Itemid=128" rel="nofollow">HERE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117581</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 03:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117581</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;militias, ect have never been very good with using indirect and crew serve type weapons.

gator70 on May 10, 2008 at 10:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They can mess up equipment though.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=19280&amp;Itemid=128&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lots of activity, by the way, Saturday, in Sadr City&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>militias, ect have never been very good with using indirect and crew serve type weapons.</p>
<p>gator70 on May 10, 2008 at 10:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>They can mess up equipment though.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=19280&amp;Itemid=128" rel="nofollow">Lots of activity, by the way, Saturday, in Sadr City</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gator70</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117559</link>
		<dc:creator>gator70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 02:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117559</guid>
		<description>MB4 on May 10, 2008 at 5:36 PM

That would be anything above an Ak-47. RPG&#039;s, RPK&#039;s, mortars, ect ect.  Fortunately for the U.S. side the insurgents, militias, ect have never been very good with using indirect and crew serve type weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB4 on May 10, 2008 at 5:36 PM</p>
<p>That would be anything above an Ak-47. RPG&#8217;s, RPK&#8217;s, mortars, ect ect.  Fortunately for the U.S. side the insurgents, militias, ect have never been very good with using indirect and crew serve type weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117484</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 01:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117484</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ares on May 10, 2008 at 8:10 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ares,
It is the middle of the night in Iraq right now.  I&#039;ll let Major John report when he can.  What I hear is that Basra is about 70% contained and improving, if that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ares on May 10, 2008 at 8:10 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ares,<br />
It is the middle of the night in Iraq right now.  I&#8217;ll let Major John report when he can.  What I hear is that Basra is about 70% contained and improving, if that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117483</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 01:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117483</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;major john on May 10, 2008 at 3:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Major John,
Can you give us a report on the situation there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>major john on May 10, 2008 at 3:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Major John,<br />
Can you give us a report on the situation there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ares</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117455</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Huh? Are you in a different Basrah than I am? The one I am in is in Southern Iraq, the continent of Asia, on the planet Earth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am not anywhere near there - is the place totally civilised now? Are the militias neutralised? Is the rule of law in effect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Huh? Are you in a different Basrah than I am? The one I am in is in Southern Iraq, the continent of Asia, on the planet Earth.</p></blockquote>
<p>I am not anywhere near there &#8211; is the place totally civilised now? Are the militias neutralised? Is the rule of law in effect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NaCly dog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117328</link>
		<dc:creator>NaCly dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117328</guid>
		<description>“medium and heavy weaponry“.

Mortars and rockets.  These weapon systems were used to get publicity by firing at, and sometimes hitting, the Green Zone.  Occasionally, a media worthy victim was also hurt.    
This is good news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“medium and heavy weaponry“.</p>
<p>Mortars and rockets.  These weapon systems were used to get publicity by firing at, and sometimes hitting, the Green Zone.  Occasionally, a media worthy victim was also hurt.<br />
This is good news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117298</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117298</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sadr agreed to drop all resistance to the central government as long as his men got to keep their &lt;b&gt;small arms&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;In return, Sadr’s Mahdi Army supporters won the Iraqi government’s agreement not to arrest Mahdi Army members without warrants, unless they were in possession of &lt;b&gt;“medium and heavy weaponry.”&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Have they ever had much, if anything, other than &lt;b&gt;small arms&lt;/b&gt;?

Does anyone know how they are defining &quot;&lt;b&gt;medium and heavy weaponry&lt;/b&gt;&quot;.

Does this come down to one of those, it depends on what the meaning of sex is and what the meaning of is, is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sadr agreed to drop all resistance to the central government as long as his men got to keep their <b>small arms</b></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>In return, Sadr’s Mahdi Army supporters won the Iraqi government’s agreement not to arrest Mahdi Army members without warrants, unless they were in possession of <b>“medium and heavy weaponry.”</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Have they ever had much, if anything, other than <b>small arms</b>?</p>
<p>Does anyone know how they are defining &#8220;<b>medium and heavy weaponry</b>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Does this come down to one of those, it depends on what the meaning of sex is and what the meaning of is, is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanantonian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117284</link>
		<dc:creator>sanantonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117284</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Funny how standing up to Sadr makes him back down. Almost like he’s a bully or something.

rbj on May 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He has used this tactic repeatedly: And he always returns to haunt us once again.

Once upon a time (ca. 2004), (a mentally much tougher) President Bush and (a still very tough, albeit, retired) General Sanchez agreed that al-Sadr needed either to be killed or captured.

But, we blinked, and have been paying a heavy price in Iraqi instability ever since.

In my view: He STILL needs to be &quot;killed or captured.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Funny how standing up to Sadr makes him back down. Almost like he’s a bully or something.</p>
<p>rbj on May 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>He has used this tactic repeatedly: And he always returns to haunt us once again.</p>
<p>Once upon a time (ca. 2004), (a mentally much tougher) President Bush and (a still very tough, albeit, retired) General Sanchez agreed that al-Sadr needed either to be killed or captured.</p>
<p>But, we blinked, and have been paying a heavy price in Iraqi instability ever since.</p>
<p>In my view: He STILL needs to be &#8220;killed or captured.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikez78</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117268</link>
		<dc:creator>ikez78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117268</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t let the facts get in the way of a good BDS driven storyline.  Trust me, they won&#039;t let it get in the way either, sadly.  Please keep pointing it out though Ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t let the facts get in the way of a good BDS driven storyline.  Trust me, they won&#8217;t let it get in the way either, sadly.  Please keep pointing it out though Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanantonian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117267</link>
		<dc:creator>sanantonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117267</guid>
		<description>This time, I have to agree with the &quot;Basra Narrative.&quot; This is AT LEAST the third or fourth time that al-Sadr has effectively used the &quot;rope-a-dope&quot; tactical surrender strategy to stay alive.

A wise Iraqi Government would have said: No Dice. This time it is a fight to the finish, unless all your guys agree to lay down their arms and submit to time in political re-education camps.

I may be wrong (and I hope that I am), but this probably means he will live on to fight another day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time, I have to agree with the &#8220;Basra Narrative.&#8221; This is AT LEAST the third or fourth time that al-Sadr has effectively used the &#8220;rope-a-dope&#8221; tactical surrender strategy to stay alive.</p>
<p>A wise Iraqi Government would have said: No Dice. This time it is a fight to the finish, unless all your guys agree to lay down their arms and submit to time in political re-education camps.</p>
<p>I may be wrong (and I hope that I am), but this probably means he will live on to fight another day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maquis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117218</link>
		<dc:creator>Maquis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117218</guid>
		<description>So, a strong central government supported by a sympathetic population feeling it has grounds to trust that government&#039;s competence and purposes together peacefully eliminate a large malignant militia in their midst?

Almost sounds like civilization to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, a strong central government supported by a sympathetic population feeling it has grounds to trust that government&#8217;s competence and purposes together peacefully eliminate a large malignant militia in their midst?</p>
<p>Almost sounds like civilization to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117211</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117211</guid>
		<description>The MNF in Sadr City will go door to door, room by room sweeping for bad guys and weapons caches. I just read a report  an op started in Mosul against AQI.

And the MNF is generally mopping the terrorists up, left and right, as reported on the MNF website.

And a snappy salute to you, Major John.

Dog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MNF in Sadr City will go door to door, room by room sweeping for bad guys and weapons caches. I just read a report  an op started in Mosul against AQI.</p>
<p>And the MNF is generally mopping the terrorists up, left and right, as reported on the MNF website.</p>
<p>And a snappy salute to you, Major John.</p>
<p>Dog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117189</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117189</guid>
		<description>AP is also &quot;surprised&quot; about the turn of events.  They will come up with some good faked photos though to remind us what brutes and our Iraqi allies are.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Iraq-Najaf2C-Iraq-Sadr-City/ss/events/iraq/082701iraqplane/s:/ap/iraq/im:/080510/481/c83142c42df043d395d0685687e66496/;_ylt=AspU5COngeKP9DkaBu6_aDQUewgF#photoViewer=/080510/481/c83142c42df043d395d0685687e66496&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fake Mourning?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AP is also &#8220;surprised&#8221; about the turn of events.  They will come up with some good faked photos though to remind us what brutes and our Iraqi allies are.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Iraq-Najaf2C-Iraq-Sadr-City/ss/events/iraq/082701iraqplane/s:/ap/iraq/im:/080510/481/c83142c42df043d395d0685687e66496/;_ylt=AspU5COngeKP9DkaBu6_aDQUewgF#photoViewer=/080510/481/c83142c42df043d395d0685687e66496" rel="nofollow">Fake Mourning?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jukin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/comment-page-1/#comment-1117113</link>
		<dc:creator>jukin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/10/sadr-wins-another-battle-by-surrendering/#comment-1117113</guid>
		<description>DAMN IT, IT IS A DISASTER!!!!

I belieeeeeeeeeve it is.

Pelosi knows it a success by the way she ram-roded that appropriations bill for the war through.  There shall be no discussion of when victory is near in Iraq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAMN IT, IT IS A DISASTER!!!!</p>
<p>I belieeeeeeeeeve it is.</p>
<p>Pelosi knows it a success by the way she ram-roded that appropriations bill for the war through.  There shall be no discussion of when victory is near in Iraq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
