Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Sadr wins another battle by surrendering!

posted at 11:15 am on May 10, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

According to the Basra Narrative, Moqtada al-Sadr scored a huge victory yesterday when he capitulated Sadr City to Nouri al-Maliki. Faced off against the Iraqi Army and the US military, Sadr agreed to drop all resistance to the central government as long as his men got to keep their small arms. McClatchy, however, still bitterly clings to its criticism of Maliki for “picking a fight” against armed thugs and rebels:

Followers of rebel cleric Muqtada al Sadr agreed late Friday to allow Iraqi security forces to enter all of Baghdad’s Sadr City and to arrest anyone found with heavy weapons in a surprising capitulation that seemed likely to be hailed as a major victory for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki.

In return, Sadr’s Mahdi Army supporters won the Iraqi government’s agreement not to arrest Mahdi Army members without warrants, unless they were in possession of “medium and heavy weaponry.”

The agreement would end six weeks of fighting in the vast Shiite Muslim area that’s home to more than 2 million residents and would mark the first time that the area would be under government control since Saddam Hussein was toppled in 2003. On Friday, 15 people were killed and 112 were injured in fighting, officials at the neighborhoods two major hospitals said.

It also would be a startling turnaround in fortunes for Maliki, who’d been widely criticized for picking a fight with Sadr’s forces, first in the southern port city of Basra and then in Sadr City.

First the media declared Basra a military disaster, then complained that Maliki didn’t achieve victory quickly enough for them. Then they predicted disaster for Maliki and the US when they turned their attention to Sadr’s biggest power base, sure that a civil war would break out that would undo the gains achieved under the surge — gains they mostly ignored in the first place. They started toting up combat deaths and opined that Bush’s strategy had failed.

Today’s gripe is so absurd as to be comical. Maliki “picked a fight” with an armed militia that gets its funding and support from another country. The Mahdi Army conducts attacks against the government, runs protection rackets in territory it controls, and imposes its own laws on the terrorized populations in those areas. Let me ask McClatchy this: did Rudy Giuliani “pick a fight” with the Mafia in the 1980s? Maliki had tried for years to get Sadr to disband his gangs, but in the end Sadr either couldn’t or wouldn’t do it, and the Iraqi government had to end their rebellious activities and the Iranian hegemony they produced.

Now that Sadr has surrendered Sadr City, he has no more points of refuge outside of Iran. How about the media? What will be their point of refuge?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Funniest part is that they let EVERYONE keep their small arma… Almost American in that way, whole Second Amendment kinda of stuff…

Its the big weapons and explosives that are the danger.

And Malikis stance all along is we’re going to arrest you if you have large weapons… so, Mookies forces got what out of this?

Romeo13 on May 10, 2008 at 11:21 AM

Maliki picked a fight and won. Hooray for the good guys!

How about the media? What will be their point of refuge?

Michael Moore’s house?

Zorro on May 10, 2008 at 11:23 AM

Ed,
Why read McClatchy? They are the most liberal major news service out there?

bnelson44 on May 10, 2008 at 11:34 AM

Maliki enforced the rule of LAW and won.

dogsoldier on May 10, 2008 at 11:34 AM

Bill Roggio, has details:

Sadrist bloc buckles, agrees to let Iraqi Army in Sadr City

bnelson44 on May 10, 2008 at 11:37 AM

Well, that’s gratitude for you. The Democrats have been doing everything within their power to lose the war from here at home, and Mookie goes and surrenders anyway.

ReubenJCogburn on May 10, 2008 at 11:44 AM

But when the media and Obama worldview says that talking is the only answer, the logical conclusion is that it is “picking a fight” to answer with military action. I’m sure they regard Operation Overlord as picking a fight with Hitler after Roosevelt flew to Berlin to meet personally with Hitler LOL.

acleaver on May 10, 2008 at 11:45 AM

Maliki enforced the rule of LAW and won.

dogsoldier on May 10, 2008 at 11:34 AM

I’ll believe that when I see it. The battle for Sadr City isn’t over, I fear:

“Seeing as how the Special Groups never listened to [Sadr] to begin with, I don’t see how things will change,” Lieutenant Colonel Steven Stover, the chief Public Affairs Officer for Multinational Division Baghdad, told The Long War Journal.

bnelson44 on May 10, 2008 at 11:50 AM

Funniest part is that they let EVERYONE keep their small arma… Almost American in that way, whole Second Amendment kinda of stuff…

Yeah, leave it to us to invade a country that believes in the 2nd Amendment even more than most Americans do!

According to a buddy of mine who just returned a couple of months ago, all men are permitted to keep one AK, and 2 mags of ammo for “personal protection.”

When you have rocket launchers, RPGs, and 12.7 MGs, that’s where the trouble is.

JamesLee on May 10, 2008 at 12:08 PM

JamesLee on May 10, 2008 at 12:08 PM

One per household is how I understand it. You can’t blame a family for keeping something that stings.

Limerick on May 10, 2008 at 12:14 PM

Its as though we are living a Twilight Zone meets The Matrix manufactured reality, where the liberal BDS afflicted media devoid of accountability does whatever it wants, facts and truth be damned.

Activist journalism in action!

dmann on May 10, 2008 at 12:15 PM

tomorrow’s edition of the MSM will complain that Maliki is a meanie and a poopie head

Defector01 on May 10, 2008 at 12:17 PM

Go Mokie! Keep kicking their butts like that!

drjohn on May 10, 2008 at 12:19 PM

So, Mookie wins by surrenduring? At the same time, Obama thinks that a unilateral withdrawal would not be surrenduring. George Orwell, wherever he is, is surely enjoying a good laugh.

Bigfoot on May 10, 2008 at 12:19 PM

What will be their point of refuge?

We’ll hear nothing from Iraq for a few months. Their refuge from victory is to ignore it.

SouthernGent on May 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM

Funny how standing up to Sadr makes him back down. Almost like he’s a bully or something.

rbj on May 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM

What is it with Iraqis, every time they lose they surrender only to start crap back up again. I guess nothing was learned from dealing with Saddam, he who lives wins I guess.

TroubledMonkey on May 10, 2008 at 12:58 PM

Basra is a military disaster even now.

And it is almost totally, but not quite, a purely British military disaster. Sadr and his forces should have been neutralised long ago – what we are seeing now is the ‘hearts and minds’ chickens coming home to roost.

I don’t see anything to crow about in that clusterf*ck.

Ares on May 10, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Well, look on the bright side – at least we know whose side McClatchy’s on.

Merovign on May 10, 2008 at 1:14 PM

With the news of Al Queda urging its followers to go to Lebanon to fight Hezbollah maybe things will quiet down. Maliki has a foothold now and he needs to exploit it. Americans are going to sit idly by now that the narrative has shifted to lack of progress by the Iraqi government. I know they have made strides, more then New Orleans I dare say, but there has to be something that can make that all important 30 second soundbite for the evening news.

Just A Grunt on May 10, 2008 at 1:20 PM

Should say Americans are NOT going to sit idly by

Just A Grunt on May 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM

Now that Sadr has surrendered Sadr City, he has no more points of refuge outside of Iran. How about the media? What will be their point of refuge?

Our congrats to al-Maliki.

Meanwhile, never overlook the most obvious hide-out, embassies and MSM quarters. Who are those new drivers and set-up crew and translators for the reporters? Who are the new cleaning staff at the embassy and hotel? The thing to always expect is that the enemy is present in your midst, dressed appropriately to fit in.

maverick muse on May 10, 2008 at 1:34 PM

How many times does Sadr get to surrender without ever being captured?

corona on May 10, 2008 at 1:57 PM

I think the headline speaks for itself:

In big concession, militia agrees to let Iraqi troops into Sadr City

A little more from the article:

But after initially resisting Maliki’s offensive, the Sadrists ceded their areas, and the change in atmosphere has been palpable. An annual poetry festival, al Mirbed, resumed for the first time in three years, with male and female folk dancers performing in public and poets spouting their verses.

Sounds pretty good (except “spouting verses”).

You’re taking one sentence out of a really positive article to condemn the whole thing. And who knows, that one statement might even be factual.

I never thought I’d say this, but I almost feel bad for the media. Here they are finally reporting the good news and they get shelled for… I’m not even sure what the complaint is. If Maliki was getting criticized, but he’s not getting criticized now, isn’t that also good news? You know, a turnaround? It would’ve been nice if the article was more clear about who was criticizing Maliki. Is that the problem with the article? Seriously, I’m not seeing it.

RightOFLeft on May 10, 2008 at 2:10 PM

I can’t wait to see how Harry “the war is lost” Reid and the rest of the cut and run crowd up on capital hill try to spin this into bad news right before the war funding bill comes up to a vote.

We are kicking al-qaeda’s and Mookie’s a$$ in front of the whole world in the central front of the War on Terror and all the democrats can do is yell “surrender!!!”.

Not my idea of “hope”.

I like this guy’s idea of “hope”.

Incredible! George S Patton’s New Speech-Iraq & modern world
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WynLgJFBxSs

Baxter Greene on May 10, 2008 at 2:16 PM


Sadrist bloc buckles, agrees to let Iraqi Army in Sadr City

By Bill RoggioMay 10, 2008 10:54 AM

“The Iraqi government insists that internal pressure forced the Sadrist movement to the negotiating table. “It is not the government who pressured the Sadrists into entering this agreement,” said Ali al Adeeb, a leading member of the Dawa party. “It is the pressure from the people inside Sadr City and from their own people that will make them act more responsibly.”
http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2008/05/sadrist_bloc_buckles.php

This is good news.

I just hope it is not Sadr/Iran’s way of creating some space and time to regroup and start up again before the elections in October.

Baxter Greene on May 10, 2008 at 2:33 PM

They get to keep their AK,s , I’ll bet Geraldo has a fit.

2theright on May 10, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Funniest part is that they let EVERYONE keep their small arma… Almost American in that way, whole Second Amendment kinda of stuff…

Last I knew, If you are a felon you weren’t allowed to keep your small arms in most states. In Iraq the felons have a free ride: no on arrests, yes on keep guns.

burt on May 10, 2008 at 2:44 PM

Rightofleft
“I never thought I’d say this, but I almost feel bad for the media.”

I understand and see your point concerning this article,but saying you “feel bad” for the media is going to far.

Their obvious agenda to undermine this administration and this war has been pathetically disgusting.

There is literally hundreds if not thousands of examples over the last 7 years of out right cut and paste reporting or lying concerning Iraq/Afghanistan/Gitmo/NSA/Bush/Haliburton/Plamegate/Pre-war
intelligence…etc….etc….etc.

I am not accusing you of subscribing to what the MSM is selling,just questioning your empathy for them.

Here is a good example of where the media stands:

YOU KNOW, sometimes I feel like maybe I’m too harsh in my charges of media bias. Then I read accounts like this one from Baghdad, by the Daily Telegraph’s correspondent Toby Harnden:

The other day, while taking a break by the Al-Hamra Hotel pool, fringed with the usual cast of tattooed defence contractors, I was accosted by an American magazine journalist of serious accomplishment and impeccable liberal credentials.

She had been disturbed by my argument that Iraqis were better off than they had been under Saddam and I was now � there was no choice about this � going to have to justify my bizarre and dangerous views. I�ll spare you most of the details because you know the script � no WMD, no �imminent threat� (though the point was to deal with Saddam before such a threat could emerge), a diversion from the hunt for bin Laden, enraging the Arab world. Etcetera.

But then she came to the point. Not only had she �known� the Iraq war would fail but she considered it essential that it did so because this would ensure that the �evil� George W. Bush would no longer be running her country.
Her editors back on the East Coast were giggling, she said, over what a disaster Iraq had turned out to be. �Lots of us talk about how awful it would be if this worked out.� Startled by her candour, I asked whether thousands more dead Iraqis would be a good thing.

I have nothing but contempt for the bogus,biased,and agenda driven group of idiots that make up the MSM.

Baxter Greene on May 10, 2008 at 2:57 PM

Basra is a military disaster even now.

Huh? Are you in a different Basrah than I am? The one I am in is in Southern Iraq, the continent of Asia, on the planet Earth.

Sure, the Brits should have handled things differently, but the Iraqi Army and National Police are in charge in Basrah now – not the British.

major john on May 10, 2008 at 3:07 PM

DAMN IT, IT IS A DISASTER!!!!

I belieeeeeeeeeve it is.

Pelosi knows it a success by the way she ram-roded that appropriations bill for the war through. There shall be no discussion of when victory is near in Iraq

jukin on May 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM

AP is also “surprised” about the turn of events. They will come up with some good faked photos though to remind us what brutes and our Iraqi allies are.

Fake Mourning?

PattyJ on May 10, 2008 at 4:17 PM

The MNF in Sadr City will go door to door, room by room sweeping for bad guys and weapons caches. I just read a report an op started in Mosul against AQI.

And the MNF is generally mopping the terrorists up, left and right, as reported on the MNF website.

And a snappy salute to you, Major John.

Dog

dogsoldier on May 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM

So, a strong central government supported by a sympathetic population feeling it has grounds to trust that government’s competence and purposes together peacefully eliminate a large malignant militia in their midst?

Almost sounds like civilization to me.

Maquis on May 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM

This time, I have to agree with the “Basra Narrative.” This is AT LEAST the third or fourth time that al-Sadr has effectively used the “rope-a-dope” tactical surrender strategy to stay alive.

A wise Iraqi Government would have said: No Dice. This time it is a fight to the finish, unless all your guys agree to lay down their arms and submit to time in political re-education camps.

I may be wrong (and I hope that I am), but this probably means he will live on to fight another day.

sanantonian on May 10, 2008 at 5:19 PM

Can’t let the facts get in the way of a good BDS driven storyline. Trust me, they won’t let it get in the way either, sadly. Please keep pointing it out though Ed.

ikez78 on May 10, 2008 at 5:19 PM

Funny how standing up to Sadr makes him back down. Almost like he’s a bully or something.

rbj on May 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM

He has used this tactic repeatedly: And he always returns to haunt us once again.

Once upon a time (ca. 2004), (a mentally much tougher) President Bush and (a still very tough, albeit, retired) General Sanchez agreed that al-Sadr needed either to be killed or captured.

But, we blinked, and have been paying a heavy price in Iraqi instability ever since.

In my view: He STILL needs to be “killed or captured.”

sanantonian on May 10, 2008 at 5:26 PM

Sadr agreed to drop all resistance to the central government as long as his men got to keep their small arms

In return, Sadr’s Mahdi Army supporters won the Iraqi government’s agreement not to arrest Mahdi Army members without warrants, unless they were in possession of “medium and heavy weaponry.”

Have they ever had much, if anything, other than small arms?

Does anyone know how they are defining “medium and heavy weaponry“.

Does this come down to one of those, it depends on what the meaning of sex is and what the meaning of is, is?

MB4 on May 10, 2008 at 5:36 PM

“medium and heavy weaponry“.

Mortars and rockets. These weapon systems were used to get publicity by firing at, and sometimes hitting, the Green Zone. Occasionally, a media worthy victim was also hurt.
This is good news.

NaCly dog on May 10, 2008 at 5:58 PM

Huh? Are you in a different Basrah than I am? The one I am in is in Southern Iraq, the continent of Asia, on the planet Earth.

I am not anywhere near there – is the place totally civilised now? Are the militias neutralised? Is the rule of law in effect?

Ares on May 10, 2008 at 8:10 PM

major john on May 10, 2008 at 3:07 PM

Major John,
Can you give us a report on the situation there?

bnelson44 on May 10, 2008 at 9:01 PM

Ares on May 10, 2008 at 8:10 PM

Ares,
It is the middle of the night in Iraq right now. I’ll let Major John report when he can. What I hear is that Basra is about 70% contained and improving, if that helps.

bnelson44 on May 10, 2008 at 9:03 PM

MB4 on May 10, 2008 at 5:36 PM

That would be anything above an Ak-47. RPG’s, RPK’s, mortars, ect ect. Fortunately for the U.S. side the insurgents, militias, ect have never been very good with using indirect and crew serve type weapons.

gator70 on May 10, 2008 at 10:48 PM

militias, ect have never been very good with using indirect and crew serve type weapons.

gator70 on May 10, 2008 at 10:48 PM

They can mess up equipment though.

Lots of activity, by the way, Saturday, in Sadr City

bnelson44 on May 10, 2008 at 11:16 PM

Our guys are mopping up the medium and heavy stuff:

BAGHDAD – Multi-National Division – Baghdad aerial weapons teams conducted operations against criminal elements in Baghdad May 10.

Following an indirect-fire attack in central Baghdad, an MND-B AWT made positive identification of a rocket rail at the point of origin in the Sadr City district of Baghdad used to launch the attack.

The AWT engaged a criminal element on site at approximately 6:40 a.m. with two Hellfire missiles. One criminal was killed, and the rocket rail and a shack were destroyed. Secondary explosions at the site also indicate that illegal weapons also were destroyed.

At approximately 10 a.m., an AWT observed five criminals east of Al Hajj Jabr in the New Baghdad district of eastern Baghdad. The criminals were heavily armed with a rocket-propelled grenade, two PKC light machineguns and two AK-47 rifles. The AWT fired two Hellfire missiles and killed all five men.

Entire piece and many others from today HERE

dogsoldier on May 10, 2008 at 11:31 PM

It sounds like things are going so well in Iraq now that Jaun McCain should start slamming Obamawan Barakobi for wanting to take a whole damn 16 months, and not even stating until at least next January, to withdraw American troops.

MB4 on May 11, 2008 at 1:16 AM

Things in Basrah are much better – the harrassing attack or two comes from the other side of the Shatt-al Arab or south of the city.

The National Police and Army have replaced the vanished local cops (An IA captain told me a joke – what do the Basrah police and the dinosaurs have in common? Both are extinct.).
The people of the city are starting to enjoy their freedom from the JAM/Iranian proxy bullies. Economic activity is starting to revive too. It will take a while to get the local police rebuilt, and continue to revive the local economy. But right now, things are all trending upwards.

We’ll still get some Iranian influenced harrassing attacks, so be sure to catch them on the McClatchy or AP wires…

major john on May 11, 2008 at 2:26 AM

MB4 on May 11, 2008 at 1:16 AM

I keep thinking that, like what happened with Lincoln during his second election, if Iraq goes well a month or so before the elections (Iraq has their Provicial elections in Oct), we could see a large McCain victory in the fall.

bnelson44 on May 11, 2008 at 2:48 AM

major john on May 11, 2008 at 2:26 AM

Thank you.

Now for a harder question, what do you think of this article? ‘My daughter deserved to die for falling in love’

bnelson44 on May 11, 2008 at 2:50 AM

Looks like the cease fire is holding, for today anyway.

bnelson44 on May 11, 2008 at 11:42 AM

Victory will only be secured when “Mookie” is 6 feet under. by way of lead posioning!!

relpayme on May 11, 2008 at 12:16 PM

yea , big disappointment. I was expecting “all out battle”. ,,

gr8inferno on May 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM

Guess who Time magazine calls the victor? The Black Knight Always Triumphs!

BohicaTwentyTwo on May 12, 2008 at 9:08 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.