Huckabee: Diabetes bigger threat than terrorism? Update: Governor Huckabee responds
posted at 12:28 pm on May 8, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
See update below for Governor Huckabee’s response.
Mike Huckabee offered a strange analysis of national priorities at a conference on diabetes in Washington. He told the audience that diabetes presents a bigger threat to Americans than terrorism, which is both true and utterly pointless at the same time. He also underscored the suspicion which Republican primary voters had about his nanny-state tendencies (via JWF):
An advocate for better health since his diabetes diagnosis five years ago, Mike Huckabee warned Wednesday that the illness may pose a greater threat than terrorism to the United States.
Nearly 59 million Americans are at risk for type 2 diabetes. The former Arkansas governor said the epidemic would be “the lead story” across the country if tens of millions were in danger of terrorist attacks.
“The greatest challenge to America may not be something from without, it may be something from within,” Huckabee said. “It’s our own unhealthy habits.”
Huckabee, who made an unsuccessful run for the Republican presidential nomination this year, was the keynote speaker at a conference on diabetes.
About two-thirds of Americans are overweight, a major diabetes risk factor. According to a Gallup survey released Wednesday, 24 percent of adults have been diagnosed with diabetes or are at risk for the disease.
I’m not about to dispute the fact that diabetes is a terrible disease. The First Mate had diabetes for over forty years until she got a pancreas transplant in 2005. It blinded her, caused kidney disease which led to three kidney transplants, and gave her degenerative neuropathy which plagues her to this day. We live with the consequences of it every day.
Millions of Americans suffer from diabetes in one form or another, which makes Huckabee’s terrorism comparison technically correct. However, diabetes control isn’t a primary responsibility of the federal government. National security is. And while diabetes is a manageable disease, terrorism isn’t. No tolerable level of terrorism exists for any nation.
The federal government has a Constitutional responsibility to protect us from attack, terrorist or otherwise. The people themselves have responsibility for managing illnesses and maintaining their health. Huckabee forgot the distinction at times during the campaign, sounding more like a nanny-state politician bent on imposing health-related mandates at the federal level, and it sounds like he still hasn’t learned the difference.
Update: I received an e-mail from Governor Huckabee at 4 pm CT today with the following response:
Ed,
There will be 50 million Americans with diabetes by the year 2025 at the current rate. I didn’t say diabetes was “worse than terrorism” and did not at all suggest or even imply that the federal government was the one who needed to fix it…quite the opposite! The point of my remarks was that it required LIFESTYLE changes of individuals and in fact I specifically stated that government can’t force people to make healthier choices. It has to be done over a generation as we change the culture from one of disease to health.
Mike Huckabee
I’ve interviewed Gov Huckabee on a few occasions and have found him intelligent, honest, and refreshing. I think, though, that this demonstrates why conducting rhetorical comparisons between anything and terrorism is problematic. When put in those terms, it implies that some kind of action should be taken by the government. Otherwise, why use terrorism at all? Why not compare diabetes to alcohol addiction, AIDS, high-school dropout rates, etc? As I noted in the first paragraph, the comparison would be apt statistically, but the implication goes much farther than what I think he honestly intended.
However, as the governor notes in his response, diabetes does require action by individuals to lower the risks for the disease, including better diet, more exercise, and a move away from high-sugar foods. And of all people in political life, the governor has the best standing to make that point — and that’s a point all of us can and should support.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »
Someone PLEASE tell me what it will take to make this tool go away. His 15 mins are up.
HawaiiLwyr on May 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM
So basically…disease is bad for your health?
Uh, thanks, Huck.
James on May 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Diaper rash is also pretty bad Mike. Won’t someone think of the children?
Defense Guy on May 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM
sounds like the entire political class. we are babies who need to be coddled. Treat me like a child, please. And voters go along with it. It’s really sad.
lorien1973 on May 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Huckabee is bad for my health.
elraphbo on May 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Hey Huck, a car accident is worse then terrorism. Drowning is worse then terrorism, household accidents are worse then terrorism, divorce is worse then terrorism…
*
What a schmuck…
right2bright on May 8, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Thankfully, his chances of becoming anyone of significance is slim. No doubt he will try, as seen in his futile attempt at staying in the race after it was obvious McCain had made it as the choice.
I also get the eery feeling that we’re going to be seeing and hearing from Huckabee as the election season chugs on. Thankfully I only get news from the internet, and primarily in text form. It is easy for me to read the headline containing Huckabee and choosing to ignore it.
Weebork on May 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM
Why is what Mike Huckabee says about anything important right now?
BigD on May 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM
This schmuck could be a VP contender.
amerpundit on May 8, 2008 at 12:40 PM
cuz it shows the trend of the entire political class. republicans are for big government. democrats are for big government. neither party believes that the average american can take care of their own lives. it’s important to understand this.
lorien1973 on May 8, 2008 at 12:40 PM
What is Huckabee’s take on the threat to the health of people in the path of the murderers he let out of prison?
EJDolbow on May 8, 2008 at 12:40 PM
Snickers-hu akbar?
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Heh. Depends on who you ask. I’m sure Bill Ayers feels differently.
Slublog on May 8, 2008 at 12:42 PM
(Formerly) fat guy in a little coat…
(Formerly) fat guy in a little coat…
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Huckananny!
Exurban Jon on May 8, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I’m wondering:
Did he advocate for the Federal Gvt to mandate certain behavior?
Just how is it nanny-statism to declare that a serious didease is dangerous?
You know, here in Arkansas Gov. Huckabee promoted the BMI tests at school. I think it is stupid to waste tax-payer money to test a child to see if he/she is fat…just like the next guy. Any parent can figure that out for his/herself.
But that’s all it is. The school testing then informing the parents of the results.
No mandates. No set of rules for fat kids as opposed to rules for thin kids. Just suggestions.
What’s wrong with that, exactly?
Again, demonization such as this is what has landed the GOP with a liberal Democrat as its nominee.
What’s the point of this post, Ed? Really!
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 12:48 PM
The fact that the BMI is crap, to start.
Two, it’s the role of schools to educate, not look for new and interesting ways to intrude into the lives of students and their parents. Mission-creep in government entities is a dangerous trend.
Slublog on May 8, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Huckabee is promoting the general welfare of “we the people”. That does not imply that he is promoting a “Welfare State”.
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Uh, why is my kid’s school checking his BMI? Furthermore, why did Huck supporting a smoking ban?
amerpundit on May 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Can you imagine Reagan saying, “Diabetes poses a bigger threat to the average American than Communists.”
No.
Try not to be a jackass, Huck. Our soldiers our fighting real terrorists at this moment.
silverfox on May 8, 2008 at 12:58 PM
His approach was not to to write new laws.
His approach was to write a book.
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 12:58 PM
He supported a smoking ban.
amerpundit on May 8, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Its official, sickness and disease causes more deaths than Islamic terrorists. Thanks Einstein. Any more tidbits of genius insight for us.
This guy is truly made for the non-thinking portion of the republican party. The dumber part. Tell me one person..just ONE who is both conservative and intelligent and supports this clown.
Plus, he is Lucifer. That sucks too.
However, RedPill has told us that God told him that this schmuch will be the next POTUS. I think RedPill was listening to Lucifer though not God. Hey RedPill, was the voice you heard really low and did it have a german accent????????
Roger Waters on May 8, 2008 at 1:00 PM
being from Arkansas I tried to explain that this is exactly the sort of thing Huck would do if he were president.
He tried to implement score cards for kids in school in relation to their weight.
Personally, I find that extremely intrusive. It’s not the government’s job to tell me my kid is over weight.
One thing that kills me about this subject: how can the schools complain that our kids are over weight and in the same breath cut physical ed credits back to nill and routine physical activities in school back to nothing… and then blame … VENDING MACHINES?
Seriously, public schools suck, and the people who run them are often completely devoid of (un)common sense.
One Angry Christian on May 8, 2008 at 1:00 PM
Powerful statement.
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:01 PM
One of the first things I look for in a politician is a sense that he/she recognizes that there are things that are none of his/her f*****g business.
Huckabee’s a scold, a busybody, a nanny-stater.
Do. Not. Want.
DrSteve on May 8, 2008 at 1:02 PM
Why don’t you go home now?
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:03 PM
I didn’t like his comparison to terrorism either, but it’s amusing to me that the man is talking about improving the health of Americans, and just like clockwork, a group of assorted zombies, each uglier than the other, start crawling out of their graves to breakdance to the new hate-Huckabee anthem.
apacalyps on May 8, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Roger Waters, I’m pulling your leg. I know you’re a Mitt fan.
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Obama aint my guy,Red Pill. You see, Obama wants to regulate morality and behavior just like Huckster. Two peas from the same pod.
Huck is Obama with evangelicism mixed in. A horrible blend.
So, that voice you heard…did it sound like Charleton Heston or Al Pacino. Me thinks you heard from the dark side of the force.
However, Mitt is on the good side of the force. Mitt is a Jedi. Huck is a Sith. Hey, that makes more sense than that fairy tell about a guy who built a big boat and put two giraffes, two alligators, two rats, two hippos, etc and then the world was rained to death.
Roger Waters on May 8, 2008 at 1:09 PM
I can hear the music…
…cause this is Thriller!
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM
No funnier than the usual suspects who defend everything he does, no matter how ridiculous.
Slublog on May 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM
Americans are and should be free to exercise, eat right, eschew smoking, and raise their kids to do the same. They shouldn’t be forced to do any of them.
There, that’s better…and incidentally, all he should be responsible for.
James on May 8, 2008 at 1:12 PM
Maybe instead of primaries we should have had light saber duels.
;-)
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:13 PM
I think you are right. You cant argue with a light saber..especially if have Yoda on your side. :)
Roger Waters on May 8, 2008 at 1:15 PM
Promoting the general welfare of “we the people” is not ridiculous, it’s constitutional.
I kind of like for my President to respect the Constitution, rather than disrespect it with things like McCain-Feingold.
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:15 PM
Huckahu akbar!
The minister of/from Hope spreading the jihad against food liberty.
I hear libertarians and Dhimmicrats always yelling about getting government out of our bedrooms. I never thought I would have to get government out of dinner plate. Stupid people are stupid people. Everyone has had a health class in school at some point in their life. Don’t lump me with the Break-the-Buffet-ers. They know the risk. If Jared from Subway can figure it out………
I would love to discuss this topic further over some deep-fried Oreos or maybe a deep-fried Twinkie. The Indiana State Fair is in August.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 1:17 PM
Where in the Constitution is the government given the authority to monitor the health of its citizens?
Slublog on May 8, 2008 at 1:19 PM
“He supported a smoking ban.” Amerpundit
He is just in favor of intruding into the activities of people who intrude into the breathing space of others.
What’s wrong with that, exactly?
Government won’t let me kick a smoker’s ass for intruding into my breathable space. So shouldn’t government be responsible for keeping the bastards out of my breathable space with their filthy habits?
Of course, it is CONSERVATVE policy to enable filthy, immoral habits at the expenses of purity and morality. That’s why we’re stuck with a liberal Democrat as the GOP nominee.
While you schmucks demonize the BEST candidates and advocates of conservatism, you eliminate any chance of having anyone but an establishment elitist as a candidate.
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 1:23 PM
I’m always a
littlesuspicious of this argument.First, tell me, what invasive nanny-state law CAN’T be justified by the phrase “promote the general welfare”?
Second, of all the things the Constitution says, that’s the favorite phrase of liberals wanting to justify one of those invasive laws.
Third (or perhaps first), that language is aspirational, and has no legal weight. Consider “insure domestic tranquillity.” That can be interpreted in very ominous and oppressive ways.
——-
Of course the Huckster wants to pass those kinds of laws. Didn’t he admit it? No smoking, no soft drinks in schools, etc?
misterpeasea on May 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM
Edwards’ mandatory doctor visits OK with you too?
Just about the only thing I remember from V for Vendetta was that all the armored cars roaming police-state London were marked, in bold letters, “For Your Protection.”
DrSteve on May 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM
People who oppose Huck are not the same people who support Obama. In fact, I’m sure Obama agrees with Huck on many issues.
Esthier on May 8, 2008 at 1:25 PM
Exactly! “Promote the general welfare” has been soooooo perverted to mean entitlements for any and all. Under current law if you’re a gigantic hog from shoving Big Macs down your throat, you can qualify for protected status under the Americans with Disabilities Act. General welfare means that the government will secure for us a nation where we can live our lives to the best of our abilities with the least amount of intrusion by the government. A nation where we can succeed by using all of the talents given by God.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 1:26 PM
How, by moving your legs away from smokers for you?
You can keep yourself away from smoke if you choose. It’s not the government’s responsibility. Your welfare is your responsibility.
THAT’S the conservative position.
Esthier on May 8, 2008 at 1:27 PM
I interpret that as promoting the general welfare. How do you interpret that as “authority to monitor the health of its citizens”?
A one-time free test (such as a BMI) is not “monitoring”. Monitoring implies an ongoing tracking by the Government. I am an not in favor of that, and I don’t believe Huckabee is, either.
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:28 PM
And if it somehow has that ability, then obviously it should start shutting down fast food places and outlaw cigarettes and alcohol.
Esthier on May 8, 2008 at 1:29 PM
I already said I was pulling his leg.
I was playing, not serious.
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:30 PM
Now smoking is immoral? On what possible theory? Or does “immoral” = “anything you disagree with”? I don’t smoke, cigarette smoke makes me nauseous, but immoral?
And hey. Call people who disagree with you a few more names, I’m sure they’ll come around to your way of thinking.
Of course the Huckster wants to regulate our lives. Look at what he was adocating in Arkansas.
misterpeasea on May 8, 2008 at 1:30 PM
Here they come!!!!
apacalyps on May 8, 2008 at 1:31 PM
Isn’t the government already trying to get people to stop smoking? If they were not, why do governments keep increasing taxes on tobacco products? Aren’t tobacco sales supposed to fund S-CHIP programs? It sounds like a self-defeating cycle.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 1:31 PM
I’ve got a meeting to go to … I’ll check back later.
Red Pill on May 8, 2008 at 1:31 PM
Check the details of his BMI plan for schools. You may find differently.
Slublog on May 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM
It’s hard to tell when you keep calling Huck Reagan, insulting Reagan in the process.
Esthier on May 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM
Didn’t you just answer your own question?
Esthier on May 8, 2008 at 1:34 PM
Hi Slublog. I hope you are doing well. Huckabee wasn’t perfect, but he had character. I’ll take character over empty promises any day.
apacalyps on May 8, 2008 at 1:34 PM
And I really have a problem with this if you’re referring to Huck. The man belongs in a church, not the White House.
Esthier on May 8, 2008 at 1:35 PM
Amen!
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 1:37 PM
Here’s the preamble to the Constitution:
I’ve made the relevant sections bold. Promoting the “general welfare” was a goal of the Constitution, but the government’s power to do so is constrained by the words of the document itself.
Madison and Jefferson both wrote against the very interpretation you’re trying to make here.
Slublog on May 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM
Correct. Promote versus supply are two different things. Unfortunately, most people believe in the supply side.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 1:39 PM
That’s a straw man you’re building and then tearing down. No one said anything about forcing Americans to do anything. The guy’s talking about diabtetes. You strain at a gnat and swallow a camel. Compared to all the other candidates, Huckabee was most for your personal freedoms and rights (ie, taxes, gun rights).
apacalyps on May 8, 2008 at 1:40 PM
The thing is, we didn’t like his character.
Esthier on May 8, 2008 at 1:41 PM
Every breath intrudes into the ‘breathing space’ of others. It is one of the vectors for communicable illnesses. Whether or not it has smoke particles in it is only one potentially problematic factor. I’d be more concerned about the moisture from inside others’ lungs carrying an illness. Perhaps there should be a law dictating that we all wear masks in public? Sterile surgical gloves too?
Medically, the theory of ’secondhand smoke’ is unproven. There simply isn’t a statistically significant basis for public health concerns. Sure makes for good politics and bad legislation though.
LimeyGeek on May 8, 2008 at 1:42 PM
That says more about you, than it does him.
apacalyps on May 8, 2008 at 1:45 PM
Ahh, Red Pill, you should really pick up Jonah Goldberg’s new book Liberal Fascism. Read it. Everything will be clear to you once you do. When fascism comes to the United States it will not come in the form of goose stepping Natzis, it will arrive with a smile on its face spouting words like “promoting the general welfare of we the people.”
Zetterson on May 8, 2008 at 1:45 PM
“The thing is, we didn’t like his character.
Therefore, McCain.
God help us all!
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM
Yeah, no kidding the guy’s talking about diabetes…do you even know that diabetics need to do all of those things I mentioned?
James on May 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM
The thing is he had BAD character.
He is a character…a cartoon character.
A cross between Goofy, Dumbo, and the evil witch who tried to get Snow White to eat a poisened apple.
Roger Waters on May 8, 2008 at 1:47 PM
“promote the general welfare” as quoted by Slublog
Isn’t that what Huckabee was doing? I mean…rather than suggesting the government FORCE it upon us?
Apacalypse said it best…”straining at a gnat and swallowing” the camel, McCain.
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 1:49 PM
True. But one can have good character yet make poor policies and judgments.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 1:49 PM
I’m currently unaware of a Snickers Bar or Beer Bomb that blows sugar into the mouths of unsuspecting victims.
The Huckster is out of his gord.
moxie_neanderthal on May 8, 2008 at 1:49 PM
I’m no fan of Huckabee – primarily because of the nanny state thing but for other reasons too – but I’m a little tired of hearing people field the point that he should stop talking. What a non-point. This is America, and the moment you can make him go away is the moment you can make anyone you disagree with go away. We all get more than 15 minutes.
samuelrylander on May 8, 2008 at 1:49 PM
“Ahh, Red Pill, you should really pick up Jonah Goldberg’s new book Liberal Fascism. Read it. Everything will be clear to you once you do.”
Yeah, Jonah Goldberg is G-O-D!
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 1:51 PM
I didn’t support Huckabee (Romney fan here) but I never understood all the Huck-hate that goes on around here. He’s not a bad guy, just misguided in some ways but very principled in others. He’s nothing like St. MexicCain that you’re all shilling for.
However, just for fun, I’m going to rub salt in some people’s wounds. Who got more votes, Huckabee or Fred?
HYTEAndy on May 8, 2008 at 1:52 PM
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 1:23 PM
Totally agree. Wish I could kick the ass of the smokers who do it in floor above me and let it draft into my house
PrezHussein on May 8, 2008 at 1:53 PM
Actually, Al-Ozarka, I was arguing against Red Pill’s assertion that “promoting the general welfare” means the health of citizens. It’s an oft-misused phrase, and an un-conservative view of constitutional interpretation.
Slublog on May 8, 2008 at 1:53 PM
Ha. To the bomb shelters!
Slublog on May 8, 2008 at 1:54 PM
The truth is that people here react to Huckabee like lefties with BDS react to Rove, Cheney, and the President. It’s kind of sad and, in my opinion, hypocritical.
HYTEAndy on May 8, 2008 at 1:54 PM
Was that intended to be sarcastic or complementary? Given the audience I was talking to, it is impossible for me to make that distinction.
Zetterson on May 8, 2008 at 1:54 PM
And, no, I am not a nanny-stater. People should take personal responsibility, just like in everything else.
HYTEAndy on May 8, 2008 at 1:55 PM
he should stick to eating.
he was good at that.
blatantblue on May 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM
They’re just doing the smoking you won’t do
LimeyGeek on May 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM
In one of the most touching moments I can remember. Paul Weyrich to evangelical leaders: We should have backed Huckabee:
The room—which had been taken over by argument and side-conversations—became suddenly quiet. Weyrich, a Romney supporter and one of those Farris had chastised for not supporting Huckabee, steered his wheelchair to the front of the room and slowly turned to face his compatriots. In a voice barely above a whisper, he said, “Friends, before all of you and before almighty God, I want to say I was wrong.”
In a quiet, brief, but passionate speech, Weyrich essentially confessed that he and the other leaders should have backed Huckabee, a candidate who shared their values more fully than any other candidate in a generation. He agreed with Farris that many conservative leaders had blown it. By chasing other candidates with greater visibility, they failed to see what many of their supporters in the trenches saw clearly: Huckabee was their guy.
apacalyps on May 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM
Besides Cigarettes are the biggest scam. If your product gets people addicted it should not be allowed to be sold.
PrezHussein on May 8, 2008 at 1:57 PM
“True. But one can have good character yet make poor policies and judgments.”
As a matter of fact, ALL of us…regardless of our character…make poor policies and judgements every damned day of our lives.
But go ahead and tear down good people so that worse people end running the country. Because that what’s happened here.
Thanks, folks…for your good-policy making, GOP nominee who has impeccable judgment.
He sure is a character.
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 1:57 PM
That strikes me as an odd comment. You believe in individuality and personal responsibility but see no substance to the comments critical of what Huckabee is saying here?
Zetterson on May 8, 2008 at 1:58 PM
I agree, and well, done. A+ for you.
apacalyps on May 8, 2008 at 1:58 PM
And that’s why we’ve never had a President Hussein in America.
samuelrylander on May 8, 2008 at 2:00 PM
Sounds incredibly touching. Just the thought of it brings a tear to my eye. //eyes roll
Zetterson on May 8, 2008 at 2:01 PM
“It’s kind of sad and, in my opinion, hypocritical.”
Exactly! Hot-Air has exposed itself as pretty hypocritical over the past few months.
They’ve tried to balance it by hiring Ed.
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM
“And that’s why we’ve never had a President Hussein in America.”
Dude! Since you idiots have created a McCain nomination, you may have to eat your words in a few months!
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 2:04 PM
As I said in other posts, I was not a Huckabee supporter because of policy disagreements. What I was stating my disgust at were the vicious personal attacks that 90% of the commenters here leave about Huckabee.
HYTEAndy on May 8, 2008 at 2:04 PM
Wait, what? Huck was touching a man in a wheelchair?
James on May 8, 2008 at 2:04 PM
Dude, your comments are so full of vitriol!
Maybe you should check out this article. It might help.
Why Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
I’m rather happy quite often without being on medication. I really feel like lighting up a nice Arturo Fuente next to you, brotha!
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 2:06 PM
Most of you guys are libertarians not conservatives.
Your freedom arguments do not take into account the fundamentalist christians freedom to live in a moral society
PrezHussein on May 8, 2008 at 2:07 PM
You are free to live as you want. Who’s stopping you? We only object when you try to impose your fundamentalist beliefs on the rest of us. America was never intended to be a theocracy.
phronesis on May 8, 2008 at 2:13 PM
Dude. Go look at the libertarian party platform, and tell me if it lines up with Christian beliefs.
As a Christian, I can say that conservatism is not hostile to our morals, but rather appropriately delegates the “regulation” (for lack of a better word) to state and local governments, so as to also honor the conservative principle of federalism.
2 reasons for the federalist approach. 1) Not everyone agrees. Why should New Yorkers tell Ohioans how to live? 2) However well intentioned, the inevitable outcome of federal intervention leads to accumulation of power and, thus, tyranny.
HYTEAndy on May 8, 2008 at 2:13 PM
In fairness to Huckabee (and it pains me to say this), I don’t see where Huckabee says what the headline says he said.
But it never her quotes him saying that, it only quotes him saying that it should be headline news, like terrorism. I think Aaron Sandler has twisted his comments, which would be a shocka, now wouldn’t it!
From the story:
More junk science?
Buy Danish on May 8, 2008 at 2:13 PM
Yep. That’s what is called a rhetorical question.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on May 8, 2008 at 2:14 PM
Vitriol, Cwac?
How-so?
I’ve been mocked by a hundred commenters in the past few days because I have disagreed with positions of those who write on this blog.
I’ve been called a schmuck among other things.
Truly, a contingent of commenters here are no better than the hate-filled assholes at the KOS.
Not any better at recognizing truth, either.
Michelle, bless her little heart…labeled me a hater for suggesting she was “all-in” for Romney a couple of months ago.
Then she banned me.
She’s doing conservatism no favors being thin-skinned like that. Neither is AllahPundit by being so defensive over every little disagreement with readers.
Al-Ozarka on May 8, 2008 at 2:14 PM
You guys made a BIG mistake forcing Huckabee out while opting for the same old life-long politicians who always promise you change, but change nothing. You are now electing immoral leaders more concerned with their own interests, and corporate interests, than with yours. People are getting sicker to their stomachs by the day thinking about the future of this country. Many of them just won’t vote and I say good, don’t forsake your principles. I really believe it is over for America. We are now witnessing the decline of a mighty nation.
apacalyps on May 8, 2008 at 2:16 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »