Audio: Limbaugh wonders, is it time for Operation Chaos to back Obama?
posted at 3:02 pm on May 7, 2008 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
Eh, doesn’t much matter now, but it’s hard to argue with his logic re: black voters. Saying Obama’s a weaker candidate than Hillary, though, is like saying the daisy cutter’s a less effective weapon than the MOAB. True enough, perhaps — but once it lands on us, expect mass casualties.
Oh well. Mitt’s enjoying this, in any case.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « 1 [2]
Obama only wins if “True Conservatives” stay home or vote for him because they have terminal MDS and think the entire country deserves punishment because their candidate didn’t win the GOP primary.
funky chicken on May 7, 2008 at 10:55 PM
I applaud Mitt!
ctmom on May 8, 2008 at 7:03 AM
Dweeb.
peacenprosperity on May 8, 2008 at 8:04 AM
That is assuming “my candidate” was actually in the primary.
Identity or racial politics always produces casualties, AP.
Besides, I still think Hillrod will get the nod. It’s the Clinton’s people!!! Don’t you get it?
TwinkietheKid on May 8, 2008 at 8:14 AM
One of the funniest monologues I have ever heard from Rush. The MSM (and all other Liberals) can’t figure out why Limbaugh is so damn successful; this is an example of why!
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_050708/content/01125114.member.html
Entertaining & educational; a formula for success…
Keemo on May 8, 2008 at 8:16 AM
Truth be told, if Rush wasn’t relevant, we wouldn’t be talking about him. You know this to be true. You don’t talk about things that aren’t relevant.
My fear with Obama being the nominee is that this election will come down to “if you don’t support Obama, you’re a racist”
Mark my words, that day will come. And if it does, then I will proudly wear that label.
Pcoop on May 8, 2008 at 8:26 AM
I will offer money to anyone who can make sense of this.
BigD on May 7, 2008 at 3:55 PM
Totally with you BigD….
Pcoop on May 8, 2008 at 8:26 AM
What has gotten my attention with this election cycle, is just how much racism and hatred prominent black people have for white people; esp. with Michelle Obama. Bill Cosby has been telling us of this dynamic for several years now, I just didn’t know how wide spread this really was/is.
Keemo on May 8, 2008 at 8:32 AM
Try attaboy (61 year old boy)…unless you have strange dreams that I don’t care to know about…
right2bright on May 8, 2008 at 8:44 AM
McCain is a weaker candidate for NOT having made his permanent alliance with conservatives on border security and NEVER providing amnesty to illegal aliens.
McCain is a weaker candidate for not having been grilled in debate amongst REPUBLICANS to clarify the GOP PLATFORM.
McCain is a weaker candidate for not canvassing conservative talk radio shows being interviewed by each and every host: Mark Levin, Michael Savage, Laura Ingraham, the list goes on.
McCain is a weaker candidate for not getting equal time during Rush Limbaugh’s presentations. Operation Chaos has been fun. Yes. Many of us voted for Hillary to spite the damnation Democrats cursed us with: McCain, the weaker candidate.
It would be folly for conservative hosts to sing McCain’s praises while ignoring his HUGE FAULT: he is a PROGRESSIVE. McCain could shore up many misgivings from conservatives by announcing his proposed names to participate within his Presidency. He need not specify the absolute title, but to announce WHO’S WHO in his inner circle, who agrees to have their name associated with McCain’s presidency and willing to take part in his Cabinet, would determine his popular opinion amongst Republicans.
But until that occurs, McCain remains the weaker candidate. We never wanted McCain to begin with!
Conservatives demand McCain’s allegiance PRIOR to any vote.
maverick muse on May 8, 2008 at 9:54 AM
Propaganda begins from the cradle. Why let the DEM determine our children’s affections in literature, cartoons, and movies, GOP?
Time for some children’s books, age appropriate,
infant picture books adoring the elephant’s life cycle, through comic books for juveniles, and interactive games. Make a game sophisticated enough for parents into that stuff. Publish studies and feature news releases.
GOP Wise Elephant
finest familial creature on earth
long memory, rational creature, loyal protector,
hands down majestic victor against a donkey
DEM Stubborn and Unreasonable (stupid) Donkey
has feelings, also, but is too easily manipulated, weaker brain. strong back and sure footed but certainly no more so than an Elephant. It’s smaller size fits a craggy mountain path to benefit cut throat vagabonds and pirates, aka al Quaeda, FARC, killers of parents and bombers of churches, schools and homes.
It’s style and delivery that determine responsive reception as “real” and “authentic” experiences.
maverick muse on May 8, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Even better than the linked clip yesterday was Rush’s outpouring of sympathy to liberal women. Maybe HotAir can score a clip? Also, equally funny is the song Rush played, mocking O-bama’s handling of the Rev. Wright mess. A sample: “I was in the [W]right church, but I was sittin’ in a back pew . . . .”
I was driving and the stream of laughter caused by what he had to say was far more dangerous than any cell phone discussion. It was along the lines of how women can identify with Hillary, having been the breadwinner for her family back when Bill made only $26K as Gov. How for the good of her family she associated with unsavory characters, such as Web Hubble. And yes, even though she was the bread-winner, Rush says she came home and did the laundry and all the other household chores. Probably some truth there, as we know what her husband was up to! Now, having faithfully served her family, the Democrat party is treating her like liberal women always percieve they have been treated in the workplace. She did the hard work and now some man is taking credit for it and being promoted ahead of her.
It’s Hillaryous.
EconomicNeocon on May 8, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Most sincere apologies, Sir.
RushBaby on May 8, 2008 at 10:39 AM
I’d buy those for my kids/nieces & nephews/friends’ kids/etc…
When do you publish?
sporkbender on May 8, 2008 at 10:40 AM
The 3 candidates will hurt this country, in this order, from worst:
Obama
Hillary
McCain
Entelechy on May 7, 2008 at 5:35 PM
Amen…..
mariloubaker on May 8, 2008 at 11:24 AM
Our next “chaos” is to get Bill to campaign for Obama.
right2bright on May 8, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Thursday
Rush had a fine program today. Kudos, Rushbo!
I always enjoy him best when he covers many subjects, one at a time, not stuck on only one for the duration.
maverick muse on May 8, 2008 at 3:03 PM
sporkbender on May 8, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Thank you, kindly.
I shall begin in earnest to produce such work of love, and coordinate with those of media savvy. As it’s said, put the money[effort] where the mouth is.
maverick muse on May 8, 2008 at 3:10 PM
Rush’s observation is true. The DNC holds women as 3rd class citizens, behind the Blacks getting sufferage, and behind the Black getting the POTUS ticket, and behind the men, period. McCain should latch onto that with his mantra’s “respectful nature” mannerism.
Come election day, the DNC will experience its own revelation should working women unite behind Hillary. I suppose when Obama gets the final ticket and Hillary is not given the VP slot, then McCain will woo the working women to replace the conservative vote for his victory.
If Hillary were not so bloodthirsty, I’d support her. But I won’t forget Waco and Hillary’s long arm reaching into private homes to destroy the family.
maverick muse on May 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM
Oh…ooo, then there’s this!
I’ve been listening and lately it would seem El Rushbo has been rather stuck on himself? It would appear that the recent MSM attention to his so called “operation chaos” has placed him into a parallel universe of “self congratulation”.
Yesterday he said OC for Hillary was dead. Then he said perhaps we should consider an OC operation for BHO. Finally he stated he never said OC for Hillary was ever called off. [He’s following Hill’s press releases!]
Nevertheless…!
My thought would be… this is Rush’s attempt at an training exercise to harden his foot soldiers by vicarious means; to include wild gyrations of his public statements and with intent that includes necessary gymnastic mental training for his foot soldiers in IA [immediate action] as opposed to AI [artificial intelligence]..
this has resulted in a nail biting “winner” in Indiana and a absolute blowout of a “looser” for his nemesis/and special heart beat Hillary, in North Carolina!
Don’t yah just luv it!
J_Gocht on May 8, 2008 at 7:59 PM
How about Mc on Hill…? [Missionary]
Jon Stewart thinks it’s a WINNER!
Or…Hill on Mc…? [Dominant]
J_Gocht on May 8, 2008 at 8:46 PM
Comment pages: « 1 [2]