Kevin Drum: This election proves that the blogosphere has no influence

posted at 2:10 pm on May 6, 2008 by Allahpundit

Not at the national level, anyway. This has always been a hobbyhorse of mine but it’s one thing for a righty blogger to admit it and quite another for a lefty, with the vaunted netroots fundraising machine to tout, to do so. Our favorite liberal has always insisted that the power of left-wing blogs was overstated and that that would become clearer the closer we got to the election. KP 1, AP 0:

[T]he real lesson of the 2008 primaries is to raise some serious doubts about the power of the blogosphere in particular and the netroots more generally. On the Republican side, I’d venture that John McCain was the least favorite of the major candidates by a pretty fair margin. But he won anyway. On the Democratic side, Hillary Clinton was the least favorite of the majors but she’s one of the last two standing. And although Barack Obama is a netroots darling now, it’s worth remembering that his initial foray on Daily Kos didn’t endear him to the blogosphere in the beginning. His message of bipartisan reconciliation was about the farthest thing imaginable from the “fighting Dem” spirit of the blogosphere and he took plenty of hits for it. He’s only popular now by default: virtually the entire netroots loathes Hillary Clinton, which means Obama is the only choice they have left.

If the respective left and right blogospheres had any real say in things, would we be looking at a McCain vs. Obama contest in November? Or McCain vs. Hillary? We would not. It would be Giuliani vs. Edwards, or maybe Romney vs. Dodd. [Actually, it'd be Fred Thompson, but point taken. -- ed.] The blogosphere is good at raising modest sums of money, and it likewise plays a modest role at the congressional level, but its influence on the national stage appears to be pretty close to nil.

For further grudging admissions in this vein, see Chris Bowers at Open Left. The counterargument I always get when the subject of blog impotence comes up is the amnesty debacle last summer, but who really torpedoed that — blogs, or conservative talk radio? Their audience is hundreds of times the size of ours. It may be true that their most devoted listeners substantially overlap with blog readership, if you assume that some people want/need a daily political fix and can’t get enough from Rush et al., but then the question simply becomes: Would those same people have been as animated in objecting to the immigration bill if they had to rely “only” on Limbaugh, Hannity, Ingraham and so forth to get them fired up? I’m guessing: yes.

The more interesting question is what the election says about talk radio’s power, not ours. Medved had some interesting theories about that as Captain Amnesty was locking up the nomination. We’ll see how Operation Chaos does in Indiana in a few hours.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Oy, as a Romney supporter I can’t believe anyone would say that Allah was in the tank for Romney – though I often thought that he may be a shark in the Romney tank, smelling blood.

If any of you Huckabee supporters can honestly say that there was anything about Huckabee besides his evangelicalism that made him your shining knight, I would like to hear it. On second thought, no I wouldn’t. I’m convinced that if Romney were evangelical and not Mormon, you’d all be passing the plate for Mitt.

bobthepeeler on May 6, 2008 at 10:28 PM

It’s ironic. I registered here on Day 1 only because of my respect for Michelle. I considered (and still do) her a feisty “little” voice for conservatives. I didn’t register at Hot Air to be “entertained.” I didn’t expect to find a reverence for atheism and its “ists.” Nor did I expect Hot Air to develop into a place where conservatives are bashed for reasons other than their conservatism. I have been somewhat disappointed in the rather immature tone that has been developing here for awhile now.

Perhaps it has to do with the fact that secularism and a lack of family values is running rampant through a society that puts off having children long enough to have the money to pay nannies to raise children. It’s like Cavuto’s insistence on running Victoria Secret crap and O’Reilly finding it necessary to show raunch so we understand what he’s talking about and AP finding it necessary to create headlines with the “c” word to draw headline hits.

Whatever it is, it’s sad.

Connie on May 7, 2008 at 2:10 AM

“As expected, you’ve got no evidence for your claim that Michelle was in the tank for Romney. Complimenting a candidate when he does something right isn’t proof of being in the tank. On the contrary, she specifically refused to endorse anyone, something that should have been easy for her if she was such a Romney shill.”

Bullsh*t. She endorsed Romney by default and it is obvious to anyone who is not her sycophant. I gave proof….Months of coverage without a SINGLE negative post on Romney and several glowing posts on a single day.

I suppose that we’re only supposed to hold our candidates feet to the fire…not the bloggers holding our candidates’ feet to the fire.

I have great respect and admiration for Michelle. And you, Allah. But you have disappointed me and many others with your big-headed opinion of yourselves.

I’ve disagreed with leftists who have used the exact same “give me an example” tactics, Allah. By using those kind of tactics…and refusing…no…LYING about the results of my search, you show yourself no better than a leftist. That’s not good for credibility.

You should listen to some of your readers who disagree with you, Allah. Many times they are right on target.

Just to repeat it because you ignored it:

“”As expected, you’ve got no evidence for your claim that Michelle was in the tank for Romney.” – AP

Three months of blogging absent of criticism of Romney.
Numerous posts praising Romney during those months including one single day with THREE glowing posts.

That’s not evidence?

Al-Ozarka on May 7, 2008 at 9:31 AM

“I can understand why she banned you, though.”

Oh…I can too! She didn’t like the truth I challenged her with.

It revealed to me in a brand new way her lacking tolerance for criticism.

Al-Ozarka on May 7, 2008 at 9:36 AM

Comment pages: 1 2