Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


What happened to justice for the USS Cole?

posted at 9:21 am on May 4, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Some call it the forgotten attack, and others remember it merely in the litany of attacks on Americans by radical Islamists.  However, the attack on the USS Cole was at the time the most audacious terrorist attack on the US.  Suicide bombers succeeding in their attack against the mightiest military force in history, killing 17 American sailors while the USS Cole docked at Aden after the Yemeni government begged for a visit and the commerce it would bring.

Almost eight years later, the American government appears less interested than ever in bringing the perpetrators to true justice:

Almost eight years after al-Qaeda nearly sank the USS Cole with an explosives-stuffed motorboat, killing 17 sailors, all the defendants convicted in the attack have escaped from prison or been freed by Yemeni officials.

Jamal al-Badawi, a Yemeni who helped organize the plot to bomb the Cole as it refueled in this Yemeni port on Oct. 12, 2000, has broken out of prison twice. He was recaptured both times, but then secretly released by the government last fall. Yemeni authorities jailed him again after receiving complaints from Washington. But U.S. officials have so little faith that he’s still in his cell that they have demanded the right to perform random inspections.

Two suspects, described as the key organizers, were captured outside Yemen and are being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. Many details of their alleged involvement remain classified. It is unclear when — or if — they will be tried by the military. …

To this day, al-Qaeda trumpets the attack on the Cole as one of its greatest military victories. It remains an improbable story: how two suicide bombers smiled and waved to unsuspecting U.S. sailors in Aden’s harbor as they pulled their tiny fishing boat alongside the $1 billion destroyer and blew a gaping hole in its side.

Despite the initial promises of accountability, only limited public inquiries took place in Washington, unlike the extensive investigations that followed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Basic questions remain about which individuals and countries played a role in the assault on the Cole.

Craig Whitlock tells a story of futility bounded by diplomatic niceties with a Yemeni government that clearly has other priorities than justice for the 17 victims of the Cole.  At times, it appears that Sanaa has cut deals with the AQ terrorists in order to maintain its own internal intelligence on dissidents, and other times, the Yemenis seem more interested in looking moderate to radical Islamists, appeasing them at our expense.  The US pushed the Yemenis hard at the beginning of the investigation, but now hardly push at all.

The Bush administration understands better than most that the war terrorists declared won’t get won with indictments, but even they appear enthralled by the law-enforcement model in some instances, and this appears to be one of them.  The US should have targeted men like Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri for a capture operation like Israel conducted with Adolf Eichmann, or outright assassination.  Nashiri isn’t a civilian, he’s an al-Qaeda terrorist, and we need to clearly demonstrate to terrorists and the governments that refuse to hand them over that we will take appropriate action ourselves to eliminate the problem.

Terrorists like Nashiri declared war on us, especially in the Cole attack.  If we want to discourage that in the future, we had better demonstrate the will to respond appropriately.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Well said, but I find myself more and more cynical about justice being done here.

Grayson on May 4, 2008 at 9:26 AM

Perhaps we should a couple negotiators to help, uh, sort things out.

trubble on May 4, 2008 at 9:32 AM

Justice delayed is justice denied.

rightside on May 4, 2008 at 9:33 AM

They probably could not have been successful in the attack without some help from the Yemeni government.

Johan Klaus on May 4, 2008 at 9:36 AM

Perhaps someone should ask Hillary/Obama/McCain what they intend to do about it. But of course, that should happen after Bush is asked what he HAS done about it.

Dave Rywall on May 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM

What happened to “you either are with us are against us”?

Johan Klaus on May 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM

At times, it appears that Sanaa has cut deals with the AQ terrorists in order to maintain its own internal intelligence on dissidents, and other times, the Yemenis seem more interested in looking moderate to radical Islamists, appeasing them at our expense.

This behavior could be an indication of a division within Sanaa’s government.

Zorro on May 4, 2008 at 9:48 AM

Why would the Clintonista infested State and Justice Departments want to open up this can of worms? Any investigation would probably be headed by Jamie Gorelick.

Tinian on May 4, 2008 at 9:48 AM

they named a stretch of highway here in richmond after Kenneth Eugene Clodfelter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing

:salute:
Hull Maintenance Technician Third Class
Kenneth Eugene Clodfelter – Mechanicsville, Virginia

Electronics Technician First Class
Richard Costelow – Morrisville, Pennsylvania.

Mess Management Specialist Seaman
Lakeina Monique Francis – Woodleaf, North Carolina

Information Systems Technician Seaman
Timothy Lee Gauna – Rice, Texas

Signalman Seaman Recruit
Cherone Louis Gunn – Rex, Georgia

Seaman
James Rodrick McDaniels – Norfolk, Virginia.

Engineman Second Class
Marc Ian Nieto – Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin

Electronics Warfare Technician Third Class
Ronald Scott Owens – Vero Beach, Florida

Seaman Recruit
Lakiba Nicole Palmer – San Diego, California

Engineman Fireman
Joshua Langdon Parlett – Churchville, Maryland

Fireman Apprentice
Patrick Howard Roy – Cornwall on Hudson, New York

Operations Specialist Second Class
Timothy Lamont Saunders – Ringold, Virginia

Electronics Warfare Technician Second Class
Kevin Shawn Rux – Portland, North Dakota

Mess Management Specialist Third Class
Ronchester Mananga Santiago – Kingsville, Texas

Fireman
Gary Graham Swenchonis, Jr. – Rockport, Texas

Ensign
Andrew Triplett – Macon, Mississippi

Seaman Apprentice
Craig Bryan Wibberley – Williamsport, Maryland

trailortrash on May 4, 2008 at 9:54 AM

The bombing happened at exactly the wrong time – at the end of the Clinton years and right before GWB. Clinton only wanted to do enough to get through the election and inauguration, and Bush felt it didn’t happen on his watch, so…. It didn’t help that this got bumped off the news cycle rather abruptly 2 weeks later with a Constitutional crisis – Bush v. Gore (which dragged on for a month and dominated the news for all that time). Our myopia concerning terrorist attacks at the time also saw this as only a small escalation by terrorists and akin to the Beirut bombing of 1983 or the embassies in 1998. After all, risking their lives for our country is part of what the military does, and any US Navy ship is seen as a symbol of our nation and our sovereignty and could reasonably seen as a legitimate terrorist target unlike say, the World Trade Center.

JeffWeimer on May 4, 2008 at 10:03 AM

Weren’t there a lot of disagreement between the US and Yemeni governments on how to proceed with prosecuting? I thought Yemen had put suspects on trial, but don’t know whatever became of it.

JetBoy on May 4, 2008 at 10:15 AM

When the US hung Sgt Evan Vela out to dry why does anyone think they will step on the oil toes?

Tom

marinetbryant on May 4, 2008 at 10:21 AM

Its hard to cover everything.

maybe the dems, being not busy and all, could take care of it. Oh wait, they busy trying to destroy any effort in the war against these types of cowards.

Above ” you are either with us, or against us ”

we know how your party answered that question.

Sonosam on May 4, 2008 at 10:24 AM

Lesson 1: pick your friends carefully. The Yemeni jihadist maggots are not our friends. But we have little leverage in the middle east now, with oil making tinpot Islamic dictatorships rich, and our dollar impotent.

Lesson 2: define “victory” carefully. Attackers: dead. Cole: fine. The Cole could have destroyed most of Yemen from where it sat, in the immediate aftermath of the attack; for this to be proclaimed as “al qaeda’s greatest victory” tells you all you need to know about al qaeda. Suicide attacks are not a growth industry.

That said, it’s pathetic that the Bush administration has done nothing about this. I agree with Ed – we should be assassinating these maggots one by one, with reckless disregard for Yemeni governmental opinion.

Jaibones on May 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Which brings me to another thought. I have sometimes wondered why we don’t take advantage of the superior Israeli infiltration of the middle eastern nations, and borrow on their expertise – i.e., hire Mossad to assassinate people for us — but I guess we know why.

The Israelis can’t be trusted with sensitive information. They have proven it too many times, spying on us, stealing classified data, etc. Apparently, if we give them that kind of dangerous information, they’ll use it to screw us somehow.

When this thought occurs to me, I understand why we sometimes seem to keep them at arms length.

Jaibones on May 4, 2008 at 10:30 AM

You mean there was a problem with attacks on America by radical Islamists before we invaded Iraq?

Thanks to leftist media revisionism, who would have ever thought it?

petefrt on May 4, 2008 at 10:32 AM

That said, it’s pathetic that the Bush administration has done nothing about this. I agree with Ed – we should be assassinating these maggots one by one, with reckless disregard for Yemeni governmental opinion.

there is a time and a place for everything. I want to quell the violence in Dar fur and bring those murderers to justice, but we cant do it directly now.

Not enough people understand that a victory in Iraq ( victory defined as an autonomous and legitimate government ) will have repercussions in these areas.

The strength of these animals is the whole. Start cutting out the places where they can assemble and they start to die.

Sonosam on May 4, 2008 at 10:34 AM

I forgot to add that those animals who attacked the Cole are marked men. Their time will come.

Sonosam on May 4, 2008 at 10:34 AM

Which brings me to another thought. I have sometimes wondered why we don’t take advantage of the superior Israeli infiltration of the middle eastern nations, and borrow on their expertise – i.e., hire Mossad to assassinate people for us — but I guess we know why.

The Israelis can’t be trusted with sensitive information. They have proven it too many times, spying on us, stealing classified data, etc. Apparently, if we give them that kind of dangerous information, they’ll use it to screw us somehow.

When this thought occurs to me, I understand why we sometimes seem to keep them at arms length.

Hey, the US government and other governments have screwed the Israelis over more times than the Israelis actually screwed them over.

The Austrians, Germans, etc decided to stop punishing Nazis and didn’t actually carry out the death penalty but on a few “upper level” Nazis. The Brits and French told the Israelis during the war of Attrition that they would back them up, then suddenly decided not to. The Americans promised to help with developing/selling armaments, then didn’t. The Americans and others decided that come heck or high water, a peace agreement should be signed between the Israelis and the Palestinians, no matter how many Israelis are brutally murdered by terrorist thugs.

You need to understand that there are no friends between governments. There are allies. Mutually advantageous allies. Now, don’t forget that the Israelis are actually the best allies that the West have in the Middle East, but remember that if the West’s interests and Israeli interests aren’t the same, the Israelis will do what’s best for them and vice versa.

Of course, if you’d prefer having no allies in the snake pit that is the Middle East, have at it.

mjk on May 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM

“bringing the perpetrators to true justice” — bah, humbug.

I don’t want them “brought to justice”. I want their heads on poles. I want to see their charred bodies pulled out of an SUV that was hit with a Hellfire. No trials, just hot metal on soft pink bodies.

Lehuster on May 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM

The Israelis can’t be trusted with sensitive information. They have proven it too many times, spying on us, stealing classified data, etc. Apparently, if we give them that kind of dangerous information, they’ll use it to screw us somehow.
Jaibones on May 4, 2008 at 10:30 AM

Horrors! A sovereign nation putting their own interests first! Woodrow Wilson would be shocked I tell you, shocked! I’m sure, of course, we’ve never done the same, nor have any of our other allies.

If you substitute “New York Times” for “Israelis” in your statement, by the way, it works just fine.

Nichevo on May 4, 2008 at 11:38 AM

Why would the Clintonista infested State and Justice Departments want to open up this can of worms? Any investigation would probably be headed by Jamie Gorelick.

Tinian on May 4, 2008 at 9:48 AM

I would rank the Dept of State as one of the biggest threats to our country, up there with Iran, N. Korea and Berkeley. And Jamie Gorelick’s participation in the 9/11 Commission invalidates the entire body of work presented by it.

JonRoss on May 4, 2008 at 11:57 AM

“bringing the perpetrators to true justice” — bah, humbug.

I don’t want them “brought to justice”. I want their heads on poles. I want to see their charred bodies pulled out of an SUV that was hit with a Hellfire. No trials, just hot metal on soft pink bodies.

Lehuster on May 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM

That sounds mean Lehuster. It might offend someone. Don’t you think we should talk it over with these people. Maybe they would have second thoughts about torturing, beheading, raping and killing women and children, bombing high school soccer matches, placing their command and control centers next to hospitals, using their most SACRED mosques as ammo dumps, among other things. Shame on you Lehuster. Perhaps you need some counseling. I would suggest you order Rev. Wrights DVD for some enlightenment.

JonRoss on May 4, 2008 at 12:10 PM

Any way you look though, the mutts that did that deed are on ice. Two are in Gitmo, so justice is tightly defined in this article.

My sense is that any new mutts being scooped up don’t make it to the news.

JAW on May 4, 2008 at 12:11 PM

The Israelis can’t be trusted with sensitive information. They have proven it too many times, spying on us, stealing classified data, etc. Apparently, if we give them that kind of dangerous information, they’ll use it to screw us somehow.

When this thought occurs to me, I understand why we sometimes seem to keep them at arms length.

Jaibones on May 4, 2008 at 10:30 AM

Yeah, you’e so right! They might use the info to bomb a place like Osirak, or…oh, wait a minute…

dmh0667 on May 4, 2008 at 12:22 PM

Shame on you Lehuster. Perhaps you need some counseling. I would suggest you order Rev. Wrights DVD for some enlightenment.

JonRoss on May 4, 2008 at 12:10 PM

Everybody, join in…Kumbaya, ma lawd, kumbahhhhya…

dmh0667 on May 4, 2008 at 12:24 PM

Having tried the legal avenue approach with little success, perhaps it’s time to go the extra-legal approach. If he’s not locked up, it should be easier to squash this cockroach and his buddies….permanently.

Jill1066 on May 4, 2008 at 12:25 PM

Stop negotiating. Stop spinning. Stop arresting. And start killing the terrorists dead with the greatest speed and most devasting force possible. Make examples of them. And then make no apologies for it.

We’re fighting these contemptible Muslim terrorists with one hand tied behind our back, a muzzle on our mouth, and a a cannonball chained to our leg to hobble us. Take them off and take the jihad back to the terrorists with an awesome fury.

Tantor on May 4, 2008 at 1:19 PM

By not dealing with the Yemeni murderers and plotters decisively and with swift justice has only encourage these cockroaches!

Speaking of cockroaches, you do not meet with them, you do not treat with them, you do not make deals with the. You eradicate them. The simile for Islamic murderers is apt and appropriate.

We have done our men and women of the USS Cole wrong by not dealing with the cockroaches! What a signal it sends for everyone else in the military. Thank you Clinton, Bush and the State Department!

JonR on May 4, 2008 at 2:04 PM

We wouldn’t have these problems, and would be a helluva lot closer to world peace, if we’d just go ahead and turn the whole Middle East into a GIANT GLASS PARKING LOT!

…well, it’s how I feel at the moment anyway :/

SilverStar830 on May 4, 2008 at 2:15 PM

Yeah, we definitely don’t seem to have leaned on Yemen hard enough. Remember that shipment of North Korean Scuds we let them have a few years ago?

CP on May 4, 2008 at 3:31 PM

Since everyone in Yemen is evidently bribe-able, couldn’t we have just paid off the prison guards to poison the s.o.b.’s in their cells (when they were still securely behind bars)?

Lo-tech but effective.

The reliance on complex means and legal methods is a wasteful and costly folly if you can simply eliminate the maniacs with some cheap rat poison in their hummus.

profitsbeard on May 4, 2008 at 4:34 PM

Well……. maybe this will cheer everyone up.

Not everyone gets away!

Seven Percent Solution on May 4, 2008 at 6:25 PM

Actions like the USS Cole and the lack of final justice for the perps has been going on for decades.

The real forgotten attack was on the USS Stark (FFG-31) on May 17, 1987. The attack on the USS Stark by Iraqi forces under Sadamm Hussein, killing 26 US sailors, was a seminal point in US government action. Before the attack, Sadamm Hussein’s Iraq was regarded as an enemy of an enemy, due to the ongoing Iran-Iraq war. This unprovoked attack put Iraq on the short list of governments that were currently killing US servicemen, and continued to show hostile intent. This changes policy in Washington. The pilot was never punished, although the Iraqi government made payment to the US.

It also directly contradicts the left’s contention that the Iraqi’s did not harm Americans prior to the first Gulf War; one of a number of factual errors the Democratic Party and it’s left wing supporters continue to make on foreign policy.

Robert

NaCly dog on May 4, 2008 at 7:39 PM

I can assure you that the U.S. Navy will not make the Cole mistake twice. I have a son in the Navy and have occasion to visit Navy ships and bases on a fairly regular basis. The security around anchored boats is now very tight.
I was touring a sub in Annapolis harbor a few years back when one of the officers on the landing platform thought a sailboat was getting too close to the ship. I thought he would have an aneurism screaming into his walkie talkie to get the little “sheepdog boats” as I call them to move the sailboat away from the sub. And, it wasn’t even that close!
The same thing happened in Phillie while touring a destroyer. The destroyer had large soft side boats protecting it with mounted machine guns.

Babs on May 4, 2008 at 11:06 PM

Well said Ed. Terrorists keep adjusting, looking for an “entrance” we aren’t watching. I totally agree that prosecuting these terrorists is not the answer. We should respond to acts of war with acts of war.

Sooner or later someone is going to get tired of it, I doubt it will be us.

Hog Wild on May 4, 2008 at 11:11 PM

Want to find out who is really responsible for the Cole? Ask, “who provided the hundreds of pounds of RDX and provided the engineering for one of the largest shaped charge (”wafer charge”) bombs ever made.”

For myself, as big a problem as letting the bombers loose is the lack of accountability for those who did nothing in its wake. The Clinton Admin knew (according to CNN) five days after the bombing that AQ was behind it, but Pres Clinton ordered an investigation to hold off accountability until after the election and after he left office. Moreover, the investigation never focused on fingering AQ like the 911 Commission did, and instead aimed at clearing the crew of wrongdoing and making no changes to the status quo.

Oh, and how is it that the Clinton Admin knew about the plot, the Navy knew about it, Naval intel and the CIA knew about it, the crew was even informed about it, and no one got any sort of punishment for the fubar?

http://www.abledangerblog.com/2007/09/revisiting-cole.html

scottm on May 5, 2008 at 7:03 AM

“bringing the perpetrators to true justice” — bah, humbug.

I don’t want them “brought to justice”. I want their heads on poles. I want to see their charred bodies pulled out of an SUV that was hit with a Hellfire. No trials, just hot metal on soft pink bodies.

Lehuster on May 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM

Exactly right. The problem with the word ‘justice’ is that it suggests law enforcement, not military action. The attack on the Cole was an act of war. We want revenge, visible revenge that will make it clear we take no crap from anyone.

MrLynn on May 5, 2008 at 7:27 AM

Weren’t there a lot of disagreement between the US and Yemeni governments on how to proceed with prosecuting? I thought Yemen had put suspects on trial, but don’t know whatever became of it.

JetBoy on May 4, 2008 at 10:15 AM

This is precisely why you don’t trust prosecution of terrorists to the legal system, and precisely why you don’t entrust national security to a Liberal!!

landlines on May 5, 2008 at 12:40 PM

Hey, 7%–Thanks so much for posting that link of terrorists getting their final handshake from Uncle Sam. I really appreciate it.

TimothyJ on May 5, 2008 at 1:23 PM

Perhaps someone should ask Hillary/Obama/McCain what they intend to do about it. But of course, that should happen after Bush is asked what he HAS done about it.

Dave Rywall on May 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM

The attack happened toward the end of Clinton’s administration, so the question that should be asked is why Clinton did nothing!

Clinton always has been and always will be a pacifist that loathes everything about the military to the point where he won’t use it defensively (let alone offensively) to protect our nation and its citizens, something which is the most important and fundamental responsibility of our government, and Clinton utterly failed.

The Cole attack was just one of several examples of declarations and outright acts of war committed against our nation by AQ during Clinton’s tenure and he failed to do anything about them, especially his failure to act when he had several opportunities to take out OBL.

As far as I’m concerned Clinton is right up there with Carter as being amongst the worst Presidents of all times. In addition, contrary to the leftard belief that 9-11 happened on Bush’s watch the blame for 9-11 being successful rests firmly on Clinton’s shoulders as 9-11 was being planned for some years before Bush was ever in office and is evident by the following facts; the Clinton administration gutted our military and intelligence capabilities (that’s where the huge budget surplus he always touted came from) the legislation they enacted making it almost impossible for the different agencies to share intelligence, and the fact he was busy chasing interns and playing ‘hide the cigar’ created the perfect storm that allowed AQ to be successful on 9-11.

Clinton failed at the most basic and fundamental responsibilities as our President, he failed to act to protect our nation and its people from all enemies foreign and domestic and IMHO Clinton should be brought up on charges, yet the left holds him up in great esteem as the “greatest President ever” which only goes to prove how delusional and out of touch the leftards are.

Liberty or Death on May 5, 2008 at 1:31 PM

Oh, and how is it that the Clinton Admin knew about the plot, the Navy knew about it, Naval intel and the CIA knew about it, the crew was even informed about it, and no one got any sort of punishment for the fubar?

scottm on May 5, 2008 at 7:03 AM

Here are a couple possible answers to why the above happened:

The Clinton administration gutted our military and intelligence capabilities (that’s where the huge budget surplus he always touted came from) the legislation they enacted making it almost impossible for the different agencies to share intelligence, and the fact he was busy chasing interns and playing ‘hide the cigar’ created the perfect storm that allowed AQ to be successful on 9-11.

Yet the leftards always blame Bush for 9-11, saying it happened on “Bush’s watch” despite what I mention above and the fact Bush was only in office for 9 months when 9-11 happened! Hell, even a miracle worker couldn’t fix the mess and ineptness of the Clinton administration in just 9 months!

Liberty or Death on May 5, 2008 at 1:41 PM

And what did we ever do about the 243 Marines murdered in their barracks in Lebanon, 1983??? Hezbullah is stronger than ever with their Iranian & Syrian re-arming…

Doda McCheesle on May 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Well it’s never too late to kill people that murder US Citizens….isn’t that what we pay our Intell and Defense/War Bureaucrats to do?

el Vaquero on May 5, 2008 at 3:19 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.