Strib about to go under?
posted at 3:20 pm on May 4, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The New York Post reports that our local newspaper, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, teeters on the edge of bankruptcy. The paper has traded hands twice in the last ten years, the latter transaction in 2006 coming at half of the price of the former. It now appears that Avista Capital Partners still overpaid:
The Minneapolis Star Tribune, reeling under a heavy debt load and plummeting advertising sales, is on the brink of bankruptcy, The Post has learned.
One of the nation’s top dailies, “The Strib,” as it is known to readers in the Twin Cities, recently hired the Wall Street powerhouse Blackstone Group to restructure its balance sheet after failing to meet its debt obligations, according to people familiar with the company.
The broadsheet is unlikely to shutter its doors, but its creditors, including the banking giant Credit Suisse Group, figure to eventually end up controlling the paper. Down the road, the creditor group could then sell it after dramatically cutting costs.
The private-equity firm Avista Capital Partners, run by former Credit Suisse deal maker Tom Dean, purchased the Star Tribune from the McClatchy Co. in 2006 for $530 million. The New York firm, which put up $100 million of its own money and borrowed the rest, stands to lose its entire investment, sources said.
When McClatchy sold the Strib in December 2006, many of us pointed to the fire-sale price as an indication of how badly the editorial direction of the paper had devalued it, while Avista insisted that it would keep essentially the same management team in place. Anders Gyllenhaal left for Miami and Avista recruited Par Ridder from the Pioneer Press, leading to an embarrassing lawsuit last year after it came out that Ridder had e-mailed Strib management some privileged information on the competitor.
I’m not exactly bubbling over with schadenfreude with this news. For one thing, I have friends at the Strib, whose livelihoods may disappear through no fault of their own. Second, the Pioneer Press is hardly a world-class newspaper, although it works well for a local broadsheet. I would have much preferred that the Strib fix its problems, most of which originate in its editorial positions, and produce a newspaper that valued truth and objectivity more than wheezing for its pet political issues.
The world will have its eyes on the Twin Cities this summer, when the Republican National Convention comes to St. Paul. We should have a metropolitan newspaper that can show leadership in covering one of the biggest national stories of 2008. Instead, we’ll have to rely on the wire services and newspapers from hundreds of miles away, unless the Strib and Avista gets its act together and make the major changes necessary to instill credibility at the paper. (via True North)
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
No one will miss it but the CPUSA!
Warner Todd Huston on May 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM
sounds like total mismanagement to me.
how could they have deep problems and not do anything major to correct them? seems like newspapers today do not have a clue what is really going on. on all fronts, the fifth estate has let us down.
jimmer on May 4, 2008 at 3:29 PM
None of the left of center daily rags will ever change. They do not believe that their editorial policies are the problems. Instead, they prefer to believe people are stupid.
Blake on May 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM
Banner headline:
James Lileks to be named Publisher and Editor in Chief. Paper saved!!!
ScottG on May 4, 2008 at 3:33 PM
And the Gray Lady is wheezing and coughing. Good riddance to them all. Sorry, Ed.
SouthernGent on May 4, 2008 at 3:33 PM
So if you don’t fix the problem in the first place, what makes you think the problem will go away by selling the problem to someone else.
It’s a common problem in most newspapers today.
Kini on May 4, 2008 at 3:36 PM
The problem is, stupid people don’t read a lot of newspapers. Oh, newspaper readers may seem stupid, but most who seem that way are just misguided.
Only a few newspapers are prospering right now. Editorial content is only a small part of the problem. The big problem is, “Why buy the paper when you read the news on the web last night?”
Buford Gooch on May 4, 2008 at 3:40 PM
It seems they just dont get it, they will take the paper down to preserve their ideology. I have noticed that the NYT and LAT have added comment from the conservative perspective yet their underlying ideology remains intact. IT seems that they can offset decades of left of center reporting by adding Jonah Goldberg or not reporting as much negative on Iraq as they can.
If newspapers are to survive they are going to have to reflect the views of the people that will buy their papers, and that is not liberals.
Theworldisnotenough on May 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM
Is there any data that indicates that right-leaning, conservative papers have better ad revenue and larger subscriber bases than left-leaning, liberal newspapers?
Rod on May 4, 2008 at 3:55 PM
The Fifth Estate has become a Fifth Column instead. It’s no wonder so many of them are going under.
JimK on May 4, 2008 at 3:56 PM
What’s Lileks going to do?
someone on May 4, 2008 at 4:02 PM
I am sure they believe the problem isn’t them; it’s the fault of the public for not buying into their propaganda that is being offered instead of accurate reporting that they should be doing if they were truly journalists.
katieanne on May 4, 2008 at 4:15 PM
Why is it I have to solve all the problems around here. Simply replace the current editor with Al Franken, who will shortly be available, and walaaa, all your problems are solved.
.
Now, let’s get down to some real problems,…. ok?
Ghostbuster on May 4, 2008 at 4:16 PM
I’ve never had any regrets about leaving the newspaper business when I did. I sensed 20 years ago what’s obvious now. They’re crumbling under the weight of their own hubris and bias.
JammieWearingFool on May 4, 2008 at 4:17 PM
Ed, I wouldn’t think of the schadenfreude in which I am presently luxuriating to be vindictively aimed at those employee victims of a bankruptcy, but rather, the very rational “I told you so” that we must drop in the lap of the sickening leftist editorial weenies at the Strib.
They engaged not in honest news gathering and reporting, but in a hateful, vindictive, biased advocacy of liberal and often anti-American values and beliefs. They employed some really nasty scumbags, whose downfall we publicly, happily, and unapologetically celebrate.
Jaibones on May 4, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Huzzah!
Nessuno on May 4, 2008 at 4:32 PM
Perhaps Lileks will move to Arizona, since he seems to have an affinity for the place.
ClericalGal on May 4, 2008 at 4:46 PM
You have to add more sex to sell dull stuff like news.
And food articles.
And celebrity gossip.
And snazzy weather predictions with color maps.
These staples (since Caligula and Catullus) prop up the financing of the more mundane stuff that most people only read because they feel that they have to have a basic grasp of events.
If you don’t appeal to the primal desires (eat, sleep, mate, celebrate) , you can’t expect the (mostly depressingly-familiar) reporting (fires, robbieries, political corruption, ad nauseam) to keep the paper solvent.
Not with all the competition (mags and online) willing to glitz-up their methods of telling the same-old-same-old.
profitsbeard on May 4, 2008 at 4:50 PM
Coupons, it all about coupons.
Give me coupons and I’ll buy your paper to line my bird cage.
Where my bird can comment on your editorials.
Kini on May 4, 2008 at 4:52 PM
There’s just absolutely no (okay, very little) ad revenue with the printed papers anymore; it’s all online. And print simply can’t compete against the internet.
Those stories in papers are there surrounding the ads.
Solution?
Plastics?
Hell if I know.
SteveMG on May 4, 2008 at 5:00 PM
+1
Blarg the Destroyer on May 4, 2008 at 5:00 PM
Morning at our place……
Newspaper, coffee, FOXNews on the TV.
I glance over the front page for anything local, read the funnies, look thru the sports & I am outta there in 10 minutes.
I already read the news on my PC the night before….with much more in the way of options for whose line I want to read.
We are one of three households in our block (ten homes) who even still get the daily doo doo from Tampa Tribune whose liberal bent is so bad as to disgust me.
DukeofDeLand on May 4, 2008 at 5:08 PM
Rod asks a good question. I don’t know the answer.
While ideology doesn’t help – it’s foolish to insult a significant part of your potential customer base when that customer base is shrinking to begin with – IMO it’s more about “customer base is shrinking to begin with.”
The group of people who grab the morning paper & sit down to the 6:30 national news is getting smaller every day because THEY’RE DYING OFF. Succeeding generations are now used to going on the web, turning on a cable channel, watching C-Span, etc. to get their information.
The L.A. Times publishes in Los Angeles, hardly a bastion of conservatism; the New York Times’ editorial posturing is certainly in line with the market it publishes in; and it’s hard to see the STrib as being out of line with the politics of the Twin Cities.
It’s really hard to see IDEOLOGY as the driving factor behind these papers troubles (contributing, sure – but not ‘driving’).
BD57 on May 4, 2008 at 5:16 PM
If there is, I’d like to see that too. It would be interesting.
All I can offer is that I haven’t heard many tales of woe out of The New York Post or, for that matter, the Washington Times, but some real, comprehensive data would be nice.
Oh, and then there’s the small matter of FOX News compared to the rest of the pack.
Misha I on May 4, 2008 at 5:16 PM
You are stupid if you truly believe that the problems faced by print newspapers in an electronic age are some kind of evidence of a ‘conservative’ market correction. Evidence?
Grow Fins on May 4, 2008 at 5:16 PM
Well, not every newspaper is lucky enough to be underwritten by a multimillionaire cult leader.
Grow Fins on May 4, 2008 at 5:18 PM
And just what are the chances of that happening, Ed? Even the most blatantly outwardly-biased newspapers in the nation pride themselves on “unbiased” reporting. I wouldn’t exactly describe my feelings on the matter as “schadenfreude,” per se, but there’s not an ounce of surprise, either. I see the same thing happening here in South Dakota with many papers such as the Aberdeen American News, the Huron Plainsman, and even the Sioux Falls Argus Leader (although each on a much smaller scale than the strib).
Newspapers were bound to feel the consequences, sooner or later, of insulting their readerships’ intelligence, and the broadsheets simply refuse to make an effort to compete with the manifold choices we now have.
gryphon202 on May 4, 2008 at 5:26 PM
If I could reliably find editorial content and news stories as interesting as I find on blogs online in my local paper – I would certainly subscribe (not like it costs a lot.) But I don’t – so I won’t. Is it possible that the same post-modern thinking that got them what they wanted is going to take it away? Or is it that the capital group is to ‘business’ and thinks strictly in terms of capitalizing their investments without considering that there are simple flaws and issues that could make the investment inviable?
It is my opinion that some business people think that a big company in a big city = big money, and will miss little flaws (or fairly large ones) that are destroying that business. Can someone explain to them that papers thrived originally on supposedly objective scooping, or on being a small but scrappy partisan? ‘Yellow journalism’ was all about being a partisan. Fine. But combine this notion of semi-infallibility in your politics leading to completely ignoring objective standards. The little guys strove to improve their reporting, editing and fact-checking to compete for eyes. These guys have lost the spirit.
RiverCocytus on May 4, 2008 at 5:29 PM
I think it’s time that bloggers in the Twin Cities start a little broadsheet during the convention, “Best of the Blogs Daily,” with comment, facts, etc.
It doesn’t have to be fancy; it just has to be honest.
PattyJ on May 4, 2008 at 5:42 PM
James Lileks would be such a hot property for a writers’ group that knew what to do with him.
Kralizec on May 4, 2008 at 6:02 PM
It’s about time the Red Star died from self-inflicted wounds.
.
Sorry about the disruption for your friends there.
Right_of_Attila on May 4, 2008 at 6:12 PM
So, buy the paper and fix it.
Helloyawl on May 4, 2008 at 6:15 PM
I blame Bush.
TABoLK on May 4, 2008 at 6:27 PM
Oh no! If the RedStar goes under, where will Nick Coleman go to vent his spleen?
Not surprised – stopped getting home delivery 10 years ago. When their marketing department called to ask why, I told them of my displeasure with their editorial bent, and stated that they might a well rename the paper Pravda.
Had to explain that one to the employee, who literally was speechless. Never heard from them again.
Blue-eyed Infidel on May 4, 2008 at 6:28 PM
Is it any wonder the leftist media hates free markets?
petefrt on May 4, 2008 at 6:32 PM
They wouldn’t have lost my subscription if they weren’t so left-wing.
ZRyan on May 4, 2008 at 6:47 PM
Ahhh… the success of the left-wing media.
madmonkphotog on May 4, 2008 at 7:00 PM
No matter what happens to the paper I’m sure he’ll land on his feet.
srhoades on May 4, 2008 at 7:01 PM
I can hardly wait for the LA Times to take a dump too. They’re subscriptions are DOWN…..big time.
DfDeportation on May 4, 2008 at 7:05 PM
This is what happens when you use a newspaper primarily as an ideological sledgehammer. Newspapers are meant first and foremost for information or entertainment. I don’t have to pick up a NYT or Strib, because I can go online and get national stories from from sources and places where they aren’t going to bludgeon me with their ideology or even share my ideology.
doubleplusundead on May 4, 2008 at 7:17 PM
I’d be happier if I thought that the old leftist dinosaurs that ruined the paper, and turned it into a national joke, could learn anything from their failure. But that’s not very likely. They’re impervious to logic or criticism. Bankruptcy is exactly what they deserve.
RBMN on May 4, 2008 at 7:18 PM
Good riddance. There’re plenty of table waiting jobs for the staff.
Skipper50 on May 4, 2008 at 7:23 PM
Ehem….True North…..
LL (co-founder of True North)
Lady Logician on May 4, 2008 at 7:33 PM
Speaking of money and media, take on online poll here on whether taxes should fund PBS:
Online Poll from Parade Mag.
PattyJ on May 4, 2008 at 7:41 PM
I don’t think restoring editorial sanity would help the paper reverse its decline in any significant fashion. The problem with papers is deeper than that. Paper is what you read on the bus or on the toilet. And now the macbook air is proving to be an adequate substitute in both instances. What’s a newspaper to do?
mpbk on May 4, 2008 at 7:43 PM
If you do something expertly, honestly, and with passion, you should be able to make a living at it. Even if you’re just printing words on paper. The Star Tribune editors had the most trouble with the honesty part.
RBMN on May 4, 2008 at 7:56 PM
I don’t know if Strib is about to go under, but Global warming may be before much longer. Of course Al Gore will still get to keep all his ill gotten gains I can only presume.
Watch the web for climate change truths
On one hand our politicians are committing us to spending unimaginable sums on wind farms, emissions trading schemes, absurdly ambitious biofuel targets, and every kind of tax and regulation designed to reduce our “carbon footprint” – all based on blindly accepting the predictions of computer models that the planet is overheating due to our output of greenhouse gases.
On the other hand, a growing number of scientists are producing ever more evidence to show how those computer models are based on wholly inadequate data and assumptions – as is being confirmed by the behaviour of nature itself (not least the continuing non-arrival of sunspot cycle 24).
The fact is that what has been happening to the world’s climate in recent years, since global temperatures ceased to rise after 1998, was not predicted by any of those officially-sponsored models. The discrepancy between their predictions and observable data becomes more glaring with every month that passes.
MB4 on May 4, 2008 at 8:05 PM
Hey Ed, it may be the Strib to you, but its the Star and Sickle to us readers who see their bias for what it is.
cjs1943 on May 4, 2008 at 8:16 PM
Those of us living in MN can’t possibly be that lucky to see the (Red) Star Tribune go under.
If it happens, I’m going out to celebrate!
BTW – Now you know why they’ve been hoping to sell their prime downtown real estate for the new Vikings Stadium.
Dr. Bob on May 4, 2008 at 8:18 PM
I hate the left wing bias of the Toledo Blade, but I get it because I want to read the sports & comics (which are also pretty weak these days) with breakfast, without having to sit at the computer (I’ll be staring at a screen most of the day). Better local content, and some impartial news — show the good stories about Iraq as well as the bad.
Best of luck to Lileks.
rbj on May 4, 2008 at 8:50 PM
Jim K: “The Fifth Estate has become a Fifth Column instead. It’s no wonder so many of them are going under.”
Lovely line, but I believe that technically, the media and especially the MSM, is the *fourth* estate. Comes from a remark attributed to Edmund Burke regarding the journalists in the gallery watching Parliament, made some years after the French Revolution. I think I have seen some references to broadcast media as the ‘fifth estate,’ dating to the late 1940’s or early to mid 1950’s. Also, I think the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. has some kind of a TV news / public affair program called The Fifth Estate, though I could be mistaken. Also, I believe the term Fifth Estate has been used to pertain to so called alternative media.
Seriously, I agree, much of the trash the MSM offers really does qualify as fifth column work. Of course, that’s what one expects from the NYT and like minded scandal sheets. The Strib, like the Seattle papers, is very short on news, and long on politically correct pronouncements from the local
Politburoexcuse me, Democratic Party Central Committee.Orson Buggeigh on May 4, 2008 at 9:23 PM
Sorry people, but to cheer the slow-burn collapse of our press corp is foolish. GOOGLE IS WORSE THAN the Times, Tribune and Gannett papers put together.
Guess where the 20% in advertising revenue is going….. primarily to Google.
100 years of NYT is better than another decade of Google flexing its liberal muscle. And we all just feed at the teat.
Go buy a newspaper. Save an American job, other than a journalist.
The Race Card on May 4, 2008 at 9:36 PM
The Race Card on May 4, 2008 at 9:36 PM
I’m sorry you brought up Google..they stack the deck against conservatives with their page rankings, or ignore entirely. Call and complain, and you get some long-haired eunuch oozing his left coast superiority with snarky comments. I think Google was Putin’s idea to destroy our culture.
eaglesdontflock on May 4, 2008 at 10:06 PM
Lileks will probably take over that defunct local show … Tightline … and interview Dr. Sphincter … or not.
I have a feeling he won’t have trouble finding work.
crosspatch on May 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM
I can’t believe they keep killing trees for these newspapers in 2008. It’s making waste for waste’s sake.
Buddahpundit on May 4, 2008 at 10:48 PM
Keep doing the same thing and expect a different result…What does this mean?
d1carter on May 4, 2008 at 11:10 PM
I can’t believe they keep killing trees for these newpapers
in 2008.It’s making waste for wastes sake.
Buddahpundit on May 4,2008 at 10:48PM.
Buddahpundit: Excellent point,for enviromental wackos and
the Liberal media,someone needs to make a
picture to illustrate a point to them!
Show a picture of clear cutting,and in the
middle of it,show how many newpapers per tree
they are using to print their Liberal views!
Hypocrisy on Parade!
canopfor on May 4, 2008 at 11:20 PM
I’m assuming that the owners of the Strib are more concerned with the bottom line rather than the politics of the editorial
board. If you own a boat, and some fool is firing a shotgun, blasting holes in the hull…you stop the fool from sinking your boat.
The Strib could be a great paper if it only did what it was supposed to:objectively report the truth. It wouldn’t need to be reborn as a “Conservative” paper-one uncolored by political affiliation would be fine. Imagine what it would be like to open the paper, read an article about the election, for example, and not be able to recognize the politics of the reporter. Just the facts on the ground, not the facts as seen through the liberal OR conservative prism.
“They so bent, straight looks crooked to them.”
Doug on May 5, 2008 at 12:37 PM
I have to go take a Star Tribune
sabbott on May 6, 2008 at 7:37 AM
Comment pages: