UN covered up peacekeeping war crimes in DR Congo
posted at 9:22 am on April 28, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
This comes as absolutely no surprise to anyone paying the slightest attention to UN peacekeeping scandals over the last several years, but the BBC sounds a little shocked in their report on the latest war crimes allegations involving the blue helmets in Africa. The UN covered up allegations of gun running and smuggling in ivory and gold from their peacekeeping mission in DR Congo. Investigators claim that high-ranking UN officials obstructed their efforts to get to the bottom of corruption and war crimes (via Instapundit):
The UN has covered up claims that its troops in Democratic Republic of Congo gave arms to militias and smuggled gold and ivory, the BBC has learned.
The allegations, based on confidential UN sources, involve Pakistani and Indian troops working as peacekeepers.
The UN investigated some of the claims in 2007, but said it could not substantiate claims of arms dealing.
UN insiders told the BBC’s Panorama they had been prevented from pursuing their inquiries for political reasons.
In fact, the so-called peacekeepers did everything they could to both exploit DR Congo and ensure that the conflict continued. They re-armed the FNI militia that had been disarmed to stop the violence. Why? The Pakistanis in Mongbwalu had a gold mine in their control and needed guards while they stole the gold. Indians in another part of the country established ties to another militia, the same one that conducted the horrific Rwanda genocide, from whom they traded gold, ivory, and drugs — using UN helicopters for their efforts.
In 2006, peacekeepers in DR Congo faced widespread allegations of sexual abuse, much the same as many other UN deployments. Those charges also resulted in little action by the UN. Their response has become routine, assigning investigators who reliably come up with little evidence, allowing Turtle Bay leadership to escape any real consequences for their abject failure to impose discipline in their own missions. Now it appears that the investigators have had enough of the interference that keeps them from making clear cases of criminality against UN peacekeepers and want to reveal the duplicity of UN leadership in these crimes.
The UN and its peacekeeping missions had long ago lost all credibility with their sexual exploitation of women and children. Now they not only abuse the locals for their own amusement, they have turned into an arms distributorship. That doesn’t keep the peace — it ensures war and misery for years to come. The UN has transformed from a benign anachronism to a malignant mechanism for destruction. The time has long since passed for Western nations to demand either significant reform or an outright dissolution of the United Nations.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
If the US and this administration had any reasoning with the abuses on a host of issues, they would simply withddraw from the UN. It is a waste of taxpayer money and essentially a left wing bagman for socialist dictatorships.
Starlink on April 28, 2008 at 9:25 AM
I’m Corona gold and I endorse this message.
Coronagold on April 28, 2008 at 9:26 AM
Good post Ed.
“Reforming” the UN is a little like “Reforming” the UN. An impossible task because the vested interests within the power structure would never allow it to succeed? And why should they? It’s a freeloader’s paradise.
Ares on April 28, 2008 at 9:35 AM
The corruption, and ineptitude, of the United Nations could be the source of hundreds of Pulitzer prises for reporters and newspapers. Instead they chase ambulances and the undergarment habits of washed up singers. All those greedy corrupt diplomats right under the NYTs nose and the Grey Lady sends her reporters out to find the dirt on Barney.
Tear the U.N. down. Use the steel in the fence.
Limerick on April 28, 2008 at 9:38 AM
Well, I for one am faking my shock and indignation at this latest allegation.
Pam on April 28, 2008 at 9:39 AM
Once again, the UN proves its utter uselessness. I wish our gov’t had more guts to just be done with it.
CP on April 28, 2008 at 9:43 AM
mmmmm….I’m a little confused. Where is the Bush/Cheney regieme connection?
I’m hoping for an Internet movie backed by Soros that digs a little deeper to expose the real truth.
moxie_neanderthal on April 28, 2008 at 9:45 AM
So the U.N is power hungry, corrupt, evil, incompetent and anti-human? Gee Ed, next your going to be telling me the sun comes up in the morning.
I’m joking…. thank you for this article, people need to be made aware of how power hungry, corrupt, evil, incompetent and anti-human the U.N. truly is. They are all these things on an astounding scale. And keep in mind, the biggest advocates of the global warming scam, is the IPCC, which is a U.N. body. Why would any clear thinking person ever trust a word these people say?
Long past time to de-fund the U.N..
Maxx on April 28, 2008 at 9:50 AM
What is the legal basis for allowing the UN to remain in its headquarters on very valuable real estate in NY? I’ve read several times that we legally “can’t” withdraw from the UN and tell them to move their headquarters to another nation. Can’t? Can’t evict a malignant force which we for some reason give billions of dollars of US taxpayer money every year?
funky chicken on April 28, 2008 at 9:54 AM
If the UN has to stay in the United States by law, how about we build them a new headquarters in New Orleans? You know, the government has already pledged billions to rebuild NO anyway. Why not send the UN down there as part of the reconstruction?
I remember a while back Kofi Annan was saying that the UN needed 2 billion dollars to renovate the complex in NYC. I’d guess for half that money we could build a gleaming, state of the art complex for them in NOLA and fund the demo on the current Manhattan buildings.
funky chicken on April 28, 2008 at 9:57 AM
Oops, I meant to say reforming the UN is like reforming the EU.
The EU tried it and then slapped the entire body of evidence under a top secret classification so that was the end of that. The UN would no doubt try the same trick.
Ares on April 28, 2008 at 10:05 AM
No, we cannot “demand . . . outright dissolution of the United Nations.” But we can withdraw from the organization, keeping our dues and other fees, kick them out of the US, and watch them wither away. The UN only bitches and moans about the US and Israel because we pay dues. Once we stop paying dues, they’ll have to bitch on their own dime, and being the corrupt, cheap bastards they are, will not do so.
The US involvement with the creation, and subsequent anti-Americanism, of the UN is a model for “no good deed goes unpunished.”
RickZ on April 28, 2008 at 10:12 AM
Funky, my suggestion is that ‘for the sake of neutrality’, the UN needs to relocate to somewhere neutral. I don’t think we could get away with sending them to Antartica as I’d like, but maybe Switzerland can take them. We would need to implement a New York hooker emigration plan, though, to support the move.
The UN troops are worse than useless; they give ‘feel-good’ cover for atrocities to continue. And AN troops are not any better.
michaelo on April 28, 2008 at 10:19 AM
This is the same criminally corrupt organization to which Senator Barack Obama (“judgment to lead”) wants to commit nearly $1 Trillion U.S tax dollars to combat the “global war on poverty.” Any guesses as to how many of our Trillion dollars will go directly into the pockets of these filthy thieves at the U.N.?
AZCoyote on April 28, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Time for the UN to build its headquarters in someplace like North Korea, the Sudan, or Zimbabwe. You know someplace where they can connect with the world’s downtrodden instead of just learning about it second-hand from vistors and witnesses who are forced to travel to the UN so that the delegates don’t have to disrupt their Manhattan lifestyle which is far more comfortable than anything back in their third-world nations.
highhopes on April 28, 2008 at 10:35 AM
The most EVIL institution in the history of mankind.
kcluva on April 28, 2008 at 10:36 AM
+1
Having pulled my head out of the sand only 8 months ago, I had no real idea how bad it was. Thanks, Ed. Keep it coming.
shibumiglass on April 28, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Make condos out of the UN building and send all those jokers to Iran.
Travis1 on April 28, 2008 at 10:47 AM
The UN involved in a cover up – that’s a shocker!
TooTall on April 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM
If you watched the documentary “Darwin’s Nightmare” you wouldn’t be surprised.
mylegsareswollen on April 28, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Don’t forget Katanga.
Wayne Clark on April 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Blood gold? Blood ivory?
funky chicken on April 28, 2008 at 12:19 PM
All the citizens of 70%+ of the enemy states in the UN want to vote for Obama, so there you have it.
el Vaquero on April 28, 2008 at 12:27 PM
If the Left cared about people, it would care about this.
…waiting….
29Victor on April 28, 2008 at 12:56 PM
The UN is a criminal enterprise without merit.
Maquis on April 28, 2008 at 1:40 PM
It’s pretty awful what Indian and Pakistani soldiers did but Pakistan conscript army is the largest contributor of men for UN missions and like other UN missions, those troops have immunity from prosecution except from the contributing governments so shouldn’t concerned parties be campaigning for some sort of punishment from the Moroccan, Indian, and Pakistani governments rather than the UN? Also, despite the issues notesd conditions in the DR Congo are in fact much improved since the deployment so it is not a complete failure. The transgressions need to be investigated and made public. the most worrying aspect is that Un officials played down the criminal activity but the UN needs the ongoing support of Pakistan in order to perform these missions.
Funky Chicken… go read the terms of the lease for the UN building. The UN essentially has to rebuild the entire complex in order to get out of the lease. That is the main reason why they remain there although with the dollar so cheap it is probably economic these days.
lexhamfox on April 28, 2008 at 2:48 PM
Things aren’t all that good in the Congo, better or not: IRC Special Report: Congo
I’m not prepared to say the UN hasn’t done some good, but I certainly am not impressed.
Maquis on April 28, 2008 at 3:07 PM
Evacuate the UN building in New York and topple it into the water. It`s taking up valuable space.
ThePrez on April 28, 2008 at 4:33 PM
Between raping children and forcing native women into prostitution for food, how do the blue helmets of peace find time for war crimes?
jukin on April 28, 2008 at 6:30 PM