<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama stumbles on capital-gains tax again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 19:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 46% Are Watching You, President Obama &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1614783</link>
		<dc:creator>The 46% Are Watching You, President Obama &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1614783</guid>
		<description>[...] His promise to tax anyone who buys shares more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] His promise to tax anyone who buys shares more. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PROVEN - American Investors Think Obama is BAD for Business &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1614693</link>
		<dc:creator>PROVEN - American Investors Think Obama is BAD for Business &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1614693</guid>
		<description>[...] all, Obama has only promised to tax them more, tax anyone who buys shares more, intentionally makes energy costs &#8220;skyrocket&#8221; and bankrupt the coal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all, Obama has only promised to tax them more, tax anyone who buys shares more, intentionally makes energy costs &#8220;skyrocket&#8221; and bankrupt the coal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ODS - Obama Derangement Syndrome &#171; I Think ^(Link) Therefore I Err</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1573796</link>
		<dc:creator>ODS - Obama Derangement Syndrome &#171; I Think ^(Link) Therefore I Err</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1573796</guid>
		<description>[...] think that no matter what Reagan or Clinton did or didn&#8217;t do, you believe, based on evidence, that increasing or even the existence of the capital gains tax inhibits investments -or if you think that Obama&#8217;s free wheeling online donations center is a bit shady -or if you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think that no matter what Reagan or Clinton did or didn&#8217;t do, you believe, based on evidence, that increasing or even the existence of the capital gains tax inhibits investments -or if you think that Obama&#8217;s free wheeling online donations center is a bit shady -or if you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demure Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1097812</link>
		<dc:creator>Demure Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1097812</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obligatory, &#8220;Jen&#8217;s Been Neglecting Her Blog Post&#8221;: Link Dump...&lt;/strong&gt;

	Al Sharption&#8230; Shut the fuck up already: I am not familiar with this case at all and from what I can get from the articles I have read the media isn&#8217;t too interested in the deaths so much as the fact it was racial and Al is threatening to c...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obligatory, &#8220;Jen&#8217;s Been Neglecting Her Blog Post&#8221;: Link Dump&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	Al Sharption&#8230; Shut the fuck up already: I am not familiar with this case at all and from what I can get from the articles I have read the media isn&#8217;t too interested in the deaths so much as the fact it was racial and Al is threatening to c&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JetBlast</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1095255</link>
		<dc:creator>JetBlast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1095255</guid>
		<description>I lived in Chicago for over 15 year before taking a job overseas for a year (Iraq).  When I&#039;m done over here, I&#039;m not going back to Chicago.  

Besides being an openly anti-Republican city I often just overlooked the idiots and took advantage of the great things the city offered.  Well, no more!  Strogers new 11% County sales tax was the last straw. 

I&#039;m well above the &quot;rich people&quot; threshold that Obama refers to and instead of Cook Co. getting 9% of every penny I spend, they&#039;re not going to get any.  How&#039;s this for an Economics lesson:

$250K x 9% = $22,500
ZERO  x 11% = ZERO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lived in Chicago for over 15 year before taking a job overseas for a year (Iraq).  When I&#8217;m done over here, I&#8217;m not going back to Chicago.  </p>
<p>Besides being an openly anti-Republican city I often just overlooked the idiots and took advantage of the great things the city offered.  Well, no more!  Strogers new 11% County sales tax was the last straw. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m well above the &#8220;rich people&#8221; threshold that Obama refers to and instead of Cook Co. getting 9% of every penny I spend, they&#8217;re not going to get any.  How&#8217;s this for an Economics lesson:</p>
<p>$250K x 9% = $22,500<br />
ZERO  x 11% = ZERO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unseen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094995</link>
		<dc:creator>unseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094995</guid>
		<description>Harry Schell on April 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM

good post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Schell on April 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM</p>
<p>good post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Schell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094803</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Schell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094803</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m the founder of a technology startup and am in the process of trying to get venture funding. I want to employ about 100 people or so with good paying jobs, good benefits and a future. That is important to me. However, the sources of money for startup companies is hyper-sensitive to capital gains rates. Rates go up, available capital goes down and with that innovation and jobs. &lt;strong&gt;For the life of me I don’t see why Obama or any of the other candidates don’t look America in the eye&lt;/strong&gt; and tell us that if we want to encourage innovation and job creation we need people and companies with money to put that money to work funding startup and expanding businesses.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I emphasized part of the quote because IMO none of the politicians are willing to really endorse the idea of people building businesses.

One step further...Barry O&#039;s illiteracy about real economics reflects his literacy of Marxist economic theory and inability, by omission or comission, to see its faults/failures.

Marxist and &quot;liberal&quot; thought on taxes are as coercive and punitive devices to force certain behaviors.  The less economic growth, the more people on the dole, the more businesses depend on favors from the poltical class...the role of the state is enhanced.  

People start making a lot of money, they buy cars and consume more, have aspirations to live in places other than high-density housing that government planners think they should.  Soem figure out they can afford to have kids.  Businesses form a more vital power bloc of power that can challenge the politicos.  

Economic freedom breeds a lack of control over people to a statist, and then the elite running the state, directly or indirectly, are not able to supervise so well.  People can pay for and decide to select their own doctors.  It is really very messy from an eltist&#039;s perspective and if the elitist is going to save the world and get the trains running on time...he tries to push things back into his comfort zone.  The hubris hobbles those outside the elite so the elite are happier.  How can we deny a superior being a happy day?  

Marxist economics and politics, Barry&#039;s ferevent belief and extensive education in them, fumbles completely to explain that the Bush tax cuts have significantly shifted income tax burden to higher income taxpayers and increased revenues, because that goal in Marxist terms can only be achieved by punitive taxation and/or a combination of nationalization of businesses by the state.  

The Russian/Zimbabwean notion of equality...of misery.  But Barry O, he will be doing fine, like Mugabe, who isn&#039;t missing meals while much of his country starves.  Whatever happens to us he, Michelle and the kids will get whatever they want.  &quot;Do as I say, not as I do&quot;.  A little subtler than Mike Bloomberg and your human right to self-defense, but no different in the end.  John Edwards&#039; &quot;two Americas&quot;, but not quite as Edwards described it.

I think Obama (and Hillary) get a pass on this stuff because the MSM doesn&#039;t understand the issues or how to read economic data, they support statism and due to their utter bigotry against business people...every CEO is a Ken Lay, they just haven&#039;t been caught at it yet.  That for every crook CEO there are maybe 2 politicians just has to be overlooked if the belief system is to remain intact.

This is also the legacy of &quot;educators&quot; like Ayres.  Why do you think so many of that ilk went into education?  It is a safe place to promote their ideas, not face consequences of starting a business and failing due to incompetence and bad thinking, etc.  These people stopped learning real lessons long ago, and education is the only place they can survive and even win awards.

So Barry is a Senator, not a technology company CEO;  poltics being the other place you can not learn and survive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m the founder of a technology startup and am in the process of trying to get venture funding. I want to employ about 100 people or so with good paying jobs, good benefits and a future. That is important to me. However, the sources of money for startup companies is hyper-sensitive to capital gains rates. Rates go up, available capital goes down and with that innovation and jobs. <strong>For the life of me I don’t see why Obama or any of the other candidates don’t look America in the eye</strong> and tell us that if we want to encourage innovation and job creation we need people and companies with money to put that money to work funding startup and expanding businesses.</p></blockquote>
<p>I emphasized part of the quote because IMO none of the politicians are willing to really endorse the idea of people building businesses.</p>
<p>One step further&#8230;Barry O&#8217;s illiteracy about real economics reflects his literacy of Marxist economic theory and inability, by omission or comission, to see its faults/failures.</p>
<p>Marxist and &#8220;liberal&#8221; thought on taxes are as coercive and punitive devices to force certain behaviors.  The less economic growth, the more people on the dole, the more businesses depend on favors from the poltical class&#8230;the role of the state is enhanced.  </p>
<p>People start making a lot of money, they buy cars and consume more, have aspirations to live in places other than high-density housing that government planners think they should.  Soem figure out they can afford to have kids.  Businesses form a more vital power bloc of power that can challenge the politicos.  </p>
<p>Economic freedom breeds a lack of control over people to a statist, and then the elite running the state, directly or indirectly, are not able to supervise so well.  People can pay for and decide to select their own doctors.  It is really very messy from an eltist&#8217;s perspective and if the elitist is going to save the world and get the trains running on time&#8230;he tries to push things back into his comfort zone.  The hubris hobbles those outside the elite so the elite are happier.  How can we deny a superior being a happy day?  </p>
<p>Marxist economics and politics, Barry&#8217;s ferevent belief and extensive education in them, fumbles completely to explain that the Bush tax cuts have significantly shifted income tax burden to higher income taxpayers and increased revenues, because that goal in Marxist terms can only be achieved by punitive taxation and/or a combination of nationalization of businesses by the state.  </p>
<p>The Russian/Zimbabwean notion of equality&#8230;of misery.  But Barry O, he will be doing fine, like Mugabe, who isn&#8217;t missing meals while much of his country starves.  Whatever happens to us he, Michelle and the kids will get whatever they want.  &#8220;Do as I say, not as I do&#8221;.  A little subtler than Mike Bloomberg and your human right to self-defense, but no different in the end.  John Edwards&#8217; &#8220;two Americas&#8221;, but not quite as Edwards described it.</p>
<p>I think Obama (and Hillary) get a pass on this stuff because the MSM doesn&#8217;t understand the issues or how to read economic data, they support statism and due to their utter bigotry against business people&#8230;every CEO is a Ken Lay, they just haven&#8217;t been caught at it yet.  That for every crook CEO there are maybe 2 politicians just has to be overlooked if the belief system is to remain intact.</p>
<p>This is also the legacy of &#8220;educators&#8221; like Ayres.  Why do you think so many of that ilk went into education?  It is a safe place to promote their ideas, not face consequences of starting a business and failing due to incompetence and bad thinking, etc.  These people stopped learning real lessons long ago, and education is the only place they can survive and even win awards.</p>
<p>So Barry is a Senator, not a technology company CEO;  poltics being the other place you can not learn and survive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094601</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094601</guid>
		<description>Has anyone noticed two things about Barack Obama and taxes?

1.  Whatever happened to the $200,000 floor for tax increases the Dems were talking about not six months ago?  (&quot;We won&#039;t raise taxes on anyone making less than $200,000 -- this is just a tax the rich thing!&quot;)  Now, the floor for tax increases apparently has dropped to $75,000.

2.  Obama proposed eliminating the ceiling on payroll tax (i.e. social security tax) contributions.  Now, those taxes cut off at a certain income ($102k for this year) because social security is a retirement system, not a tax.  But Obama has proposed ELIMINATING that ceiling, which effectively serves as a 13% marginal tax increase above $102,000.  (Employers pay 50%).

I&#039;m surprised those two pieces of Obama&#039;s tax policy haven&#039;t gotten much attention...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed two things about Barack Obama and taxes?</p>
<p>1.  Whatever happened to the $200,000 floor for tax increases the Dems were talking about not six months ago?  (&#8220;We won&#8217;t raise taxes on anyone making less than $200,000 &#8212; this is just a tax the rich thing!&#8221;)  Now, the floor for tax increases apparently has dropped to $75,000.</p>
<p>2.  Obama proposed eliminating the ceiling on payroll tax (i.e. social security tax) contributions.  Now, those taxes cut off at a certain income ($102k for this year) because social security is a retirement system, not a tax.  But Obama has proposed ELIMINATING that ceiling, which effectively serves as a 13% marginal tax increase above $102,000.  (Employers pay 50%).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised those two pieces of Obama&#8217;s tax policy haven&#8217;t gotten much attention&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickZ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094591</link>
		<dc:creator>RickZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094591</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I keep saying this because it is true. Obama thinks all of America is as stupid as they are in Chicago.

He’s finding out the hard way that not everyone is.

drjohn on April 27, 2008 at 7:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s an interesting observation.

When I did corporate taxes, all I know is that of all the cities in this country that I had to deal with, Chicago was the absolute worst, with all sorts of hidden corporate (&#039;speed trap&#039;) taxes.  When it came to dealing with the taxing bureaucracy, one clearly got a sense of taxes levied to make money from businesses &#039;because they could&#039; as well as providing made-up government jobs, with no true oversight or supervision, to satisfy some political base or IOU (that probably got the taxes put in place in the first place).  From my recollection, Chicago is very much a tax the businesses into oblivion in order to give to the politicans (to dole out accordingly) kind of city.  That is, a government job is something to which one aspires, one desires; it&#039;s safe and requires little effort to keep.  And this is the milieu from which Obama comes on his white horse, &#039;Progressive&#039;, to save us hicks and rubes from our bitter selves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I keep saying this because it is true. Obama thinks all of America is as stupid as they are in Chicago.</p>
<p>He’s finding out the hard way that not everyone is.</p>
<p>drjohn on April 27, 2008 at 7:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s an interesting observation.</p>
<p>When I did corporate taxes, all I know is that of all the cities in this country that I had to deal with, Chicago was the absolute worst, with all sorts of hidden corporate (&#8216;speed trap&#8217;) taxes.  When it came to dealing with the taxing bureaucracy, one clearly got a sense of taxes levied to make money from businesses &#8216;because they could&#8217; as well as providing made-up government jobs, with no true oversight or supervision, to satisfy some political base or IOU (that probably got the taxes put in place in the first place).  From my recollection, Chicago is very much a tax the businesses into oblivion in order to give to the politicans (to dole out accordingly) kind of city.  That is, a government job is something to which one aspires, one desires; it&#8217;s safe and requires little effort to keep.  And this is the milieu from which Obama comes on his white horse, &#8216;Progressive&#8217;, to save us hicks and rubes from our bitter selves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mormon Doc</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094543</link>
		<dc:creator>Mormon Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094543</guid>
		<description>I have great sympathy for Mr. Obama on this issue because it reminds me of my freshman finance class.  It helped me realize that I needed to pick a major that was more suited to my aptitude.

In the end it seems that he doesn&#039;t quite have the acumen necessary for this whole Presidency thing.  That&#039;s OK, he can change his major.  Maybe Women&#039;s Studies or Multiculturalism.  I hear those are very fun and don&#039;t require much complex analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have great sympathy for Mr. Obama on this issue because it reminds me of my freshman finance class.  It helped me realize that I needed to pick a major that was more suited to my aptitude.</p>
<p>In the end it seems that he doesn&#8217;t quite have the acumen necessary for this whole Presidency thing.  That&#8217;s OK, he can change his major.  Maybe Women&#8217;s Studies or Multiculturalism.  I hear those are very fun and don&#8217;t require much complex analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N4646W</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094530</link>
		<dc:creator>N4646W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094530</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;I’m mindful that we’ve got to keep our capital gains tax to a point where we can actually get more revenue&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
It&#039;s all they think about.  What ever happend to &quot; We the people&quot;, you know, the ones that have to pay the bills?  Maybe someday, just maybe, folks will wake up.  Then again, maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;I’m mindful that we’ve got to keep our capital gains tax to a point where we can actually get more revenue&#8221;</strong><br />
It&#8217;s all they think about.  What ever happend to &#8221; We the people&#8221;, you know, the ones that have to pay the bills?  Maybe someday, just maybe, folks will wake up.  Then again, maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unseen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094480</link>
		<dc:creator>unseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094480</guid>
		<description>True, if you don’t count retirement savings.

PattyJ on April 27, 2008 at 11:34 PM


Oh yes the beauty of math equations.  you get out what you put in.  All math can tell whatever story you want.   want USa to be big spenders low savers.  there&#039;s an equation.  Want them to be rapers of entire worlds there&#039;s an equation for that.  It&#039;s too bad the MSM doesn&#039;t know how to do math just headlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, if you don’t count retirement savings.</p>
<p>PattyJ on April 27, 2008 at 11:34 PM</p>
<p>Oh yes the beauty of math equations.  you get out what you put in.  All math can tell whatever story you want.   want USa to be big spenders low savers.  there&#8217;s an equation.  Want them to be rapers of entire worlds there&#8217;s an equation for that.  It&#8217;s too bad the MSM doesn&#8217;t know how to do math just headlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094478</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094478</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You hear on the news every so often that the U.S. has one of the lowest numbers of people who save money. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

True, if you don&#039;t count retirement savings.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.todaysengineer.org/2005/Mar/retirement.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Critics of the calculated savings rate, obtained by subtracting consumption from disposable income, point out that growth in value of owned assets, including retirement accounts and housing, is ignored in this statistic, as are employer contributions to retirement savings.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You hear on the news every so often that the U.S. has one of the lowest numbers of people who save money. </p></blockquote>
<p>True, if you don&#8217;t count retirement savings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.todaysengineer.org/2005/Mar/retirement.asp" rel="nofollow">Critics of the calculated savings rate, obtained by subtracting consumption from disposable income, point out that growth in value of owned assets, including retirement accounts and housing, is ignored in this statistic, as are employer contributions to retirement savings.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unseen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094471</link>
		<dc:creator>unseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094471</guid>
		<description>profitsbeard on April 27, 2008 at 5:00 PM

It was the best of times it was the worse of times.
It was the age of wisdom, 
it was the age of foolishness, 
it was the epoch of belief, 
it was the epoch of incredulity, 
it was the season of Light, 
it was the season of Darkness, 
it was the spring of hope, 
it was the winter of despair...
We had everything before us, 
we had nothing before us, 
we were all going direct to Heaven, 
we were all going direct the other way

Tale of two cities/ dickens...sums it up better IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>profitsbeard on April 27, 2008 at 5:00 PM</p>
<p>It was the best of times it was the worse of times.<br />
It was the age of wisdom,<br />
it was the age of foolishness,<br />
it was the epoch of belief,<br />
it was the epoch of incredulity,<br />
it was the season of Light,<br />
it was the season of Darkness,<br />
it was the spring of hope,<br />
it was the winter of despair&#8230;<br />
We had everything before us,<br />
we had nothing before us,<br />
we were all going direct to Heaven,<br />
we were all going direct the other way</p>
<p>Tale of two cities/ dickens&#8230;sums it up better IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unseen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094465</link>
		<dc:creator>unseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094465</guid>
		<description>Does this mean I was rich and needed to pay more in taxes? 
Mojack420 on April 27, 2008 at 6:43 PM

Why yes it does.  Why?  because BHO is a citizen of the world.  Considering that a person making 20,000 is in the top 20% of the world&#039;s wealthy the entire USA is just one big collection of filthy rich people that must pay their fair share of the global tax bill.  why should Haiti or North Korea or Subshara Africa have to pay for their roads and dams and security.  We can&#039;t expect the poor to pay for basic services that would be immoral.

/scarm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean I was rich and needed to pay more in taxes?<br />
Mojack420 on April 27, 2008 at 6:43 PM</p>
<p>Why yes it does.  Why?  because BHO is a citizen of the world.  Considering that a person making 20,000 is in the top 20% of the world&#8217;s wealthy the entire USA is just one big collection of filthy rich people that must pay their fair share of the global tax bill.  why should Haiti or North Korea or Subshara Africa have to pay for their roads and dams and security.  We can&#8217;t expect the poor to pay for basic services that would be immoral.</p>
<p>/scarm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unseen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094452</link>
		<dc:creator>unseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094452</guid>
		<description>landlines on April 27, 2008 at 7:52 PM

If BHO wins in Nov or even appears to be able to win I would suggest selling all stock, be it in a 401k or private account.  the market will sell off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>landlines on April 27, 2008 at 7:52 PM</p>
<p>If BHO wins in Nov or even appears to be able to win I would suggest selling all stock, be it in a 401k or private account.  the market will sell off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unseen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094444</link>
		<dc:creator>unseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094444</guid>
		<description>There are levels where further tax cuts do not result in more revs.  for instance if the tax rate is reduced to zero then tax rev would decrease to zero.   The opposite is also true there are times when a tax increase will generate more tax rev. finding this elusive point is very hard because it floats with the underlying economy.  Also is he talking about short term or long term capital gains?  At the present short term capital gains are tax at the underlying income rate of the person.  whereas long term is taxed less.  If BHO raises the long term rate to say 28% without a coresponding increase in the short term CGT rate then you are settingthe masses up (those below the 28% income bracket) to become short term traders and not investors.  If this is the case then it would become more profitable to sell your stocks before a year is up take the smaller tax hit and trade into the next high flying sector.  You will in essense create bubble/crash after bubble/crash in the market.  this would also be true for mutal funds.  the turnover rate of mutal funds would skyrocket.

Another point not mentioned in the CGT rate is will the special div tax rate remain in force.  this tax rate has seen more and more companies start to offer divs and larger div to their shareholders thereby increasing the wealth to the masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are levels where further tax cuts do not result in more revs.  for instance if the tax rate is reduced to zero then tax rev would decrease to zero.   The opposite is also true there are times when a tax increase will generate more tax rev. finding this elusive point is very hard because it floats with the underlying economy.  Also is he talking about short term or long term capital gains?  At the present short term capital gains are tax at the underlying income rate of the person.  whereas long term is taxed less.  If BHO raises the long term rate to say 28% without a coresponding increase in the short term CGT rate then you are settingthe masses up (those below the 28% income bracket) to become short term traders and not investors.  If this is the case then it would become more profitable to sell your stocks before a year is up take the smaller tax hit and trade into the next high flying sector.  You will in essense create bubble/crash after bubble/crash in the market.  this would also be true for mutal funds.  the turnover rate of mutal funds would skyrocket.</p>
<p>Another point not mentioned in the CGT rate is will the special div tax rate remain in force.  this tax rate has seen more and more companies start to offer divs and larger div to their shareholders thereby increasing the wealth to the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mooseman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mooseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094338</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
    But that’s not something that’s going to affect the average person with a 401(k).

Oh, yes, it is–and it has. The boomers are just entering the phase where they can cash in a portion of their retirement funds, and they are noticing that they are getting killed by the capital gains tax. No one minds so much the income tax; it’s the penalty for savings and investment that so rankles.

Note to Obama: it’s the older people, the investors with a stake in the nation’s prospertiy, who vote, not the MTV crowd.

PattyJ on April 27, 2008 at 9:32 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You hear on the news every so often that the U.S. has one of the lowest numbers of people who save money. With the capital gains tax, tax on interest earned on bank accounts, and the tax on dividends. It shouldn&#039;t be a shock that American&#039;s aren&#039;t saving money. 

I don&#039;t want to think about withdrawing money from my 401-K in 30 years. If we have another Jimmah Carter or B.J. Clinton then, it will make retirement very expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
    But that’s not something that’s going to affect the average person with a 401(k).</p>
<p>Oh, yes, it is–and it has. The boomers are just entering the phase where they can cash in a portion of their retirement funds, and they are noticing that they are getting killed by the capital gains tax. No one minds so much the income tax; it’s the penalty for savings and investment that so rankles.</p>
<p>Note to Obama: it’s the older people, the investors with a stake in the nation’s prospertiy, who vote, not the MTV crowd.</p>
<p>PattyJ on April 27, 2008 at 9:32 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>You hear on the news every so often that the U.S. has one of the lowest numbers of people who save money. With the capital gains tax, tax on interest earned on bank accounts, and the tax on dividends. It shouldn&#8217;t be a shock that American&#8217;s aren&#8217;t saving money. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to think about withdrawing money from my 401-K in 30 years. If we have another Jimmah Carter or B.J. Clinton then, it will make retirement very expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094305</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094305</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But that’s not something that’s going to affect the average person with a 401(k).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, yes, it is--and it has.  The boomers are just entering the phase where they can cash in a portion of their retirement funds, and they are noticing that they are getting killed by the capital gains tax. No one minds so much the income tax; it&#039;s the penalty for savings and investment that so rankles.  

Note to Obama: it&#039;s the older people, the investors with a stake in the nation&#039;s prospertiy, who vote, not the MTV crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But that’s not something that’s going to affect the average person with a 401(k).</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, yes, it is&#8211;and it has.  The boomers are just entering the phase where they can cash in a portion of their retirement funds, and they are noticing that they are getting killed by the capital gains tax. No one minds so much the income tax; it&#8217;s the penalty for savings and investment that so rankles.  </p>
<p>Note to Obama: it&#8217;s the older people, the investors with a stake in the nation&#8217;s prospertiy, who vote, not the MTV crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094296</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094296</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama thinks all of America is as stupid as they are in Chicago. He’s finding out the hard way that not everyone is.

drjohn on April 27, 2008 at 7:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think they are all stupid in Chicago.  A lot of them are stupid, but more of them are racist and corrupt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obama thinks all of America is as stupid as they are in Chicago. He’s finding out the hard way that not everyone is.</p>
<p>drjohn on April 27, 2008 at 7:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they are all stupid in Chicago.  A lot of them are stupid, but more of them are racist and corrupt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misterpeasea</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094291</link>
		<dc:creator>misterpeasea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094291</guid>
		<description>Come on, people.  You know it&#039;s racist to criticize Obama&lt;strike&gt;&#039;s knowledge of economics&lt;/strike&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, people.  You know it&#8217;s racist to criticize Obama<strike>&#8216;s knowledge of economics</strike>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094262</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094262</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s an idiot, pure and simple. He knows nothing about how the economy really works and only &quot;feels&quot; things and goes with it. Your standard liberal. Higher taxes &lt;em&gt;feels&lt;/em&gt; fair, so lets do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s an idiot, pure and simple. He knows nothing about how the economy really works and only &#8220;feels&#8221; things and goes with it. Your standard liberal. Higher taxes <em>feels</em> fair, so lets do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegendHasIt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094249</link>
		<dc:creator>LegendHasIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094249</guid>
		<description>aengus -  My apologies, sometimes I get confused as to who idolizes the guy, who isn&#039;t thrilled, but OK with him, and who, like me, suffers from what others call MDS, but is, in actuality, realistic analysis of his character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aengus &#8211;  My apologies, sometimes I get confused as to who idolizes the guy, who isn&#8217;t thrilled, but OK with him, and who, like me, suffers from what others call MDS, but is, in actuality, realistic analysis of his character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myamphibian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094242</link>
		<dc:creator>myamphibian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094242</guid>
		<description>aengus, realistically the choices are limited at this point. You may not &quot;want&quot; him to win, but if Obama is the democrat nominee, the next president will be BHO or McCain. If someone defends McCain here, then he is labeled  not a real conservative. There&#039;s a fine line between disagreement and MDS. Is bitter a family value now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aengus, realistically the choices are limited at this point. You may not &#8220;want&#8221; him to win, but if Obama is the democrat nominee, the next president will be BHO or McCain. If someone defends McCain here, then he is labeled  not a real conservative. There&#8217;s a fine line between disagreement and MDS. Is bitter a family value now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windansea</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1094240</link>
		<dc:creator>windansea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/27/obama-stumbles-on-capital-gains-tax-again/#comment-1094240</guid>
		<description>Wright&#039;s on TV at NAACP dinner raising Obama&#039;s negatives by 10

lets dis McCain some more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wright&#8217;s on TV at NAACP dinner raising Obama&#8217;s negatives by 10</p>
<p>lets dis McCain some more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
