I watched him melt like a candle in Arizona.

Anybody could see he was lying (about most everything) because he defended before he was asked or he defended more than he was asked.

Anybody knows that the argument is lost when the interviewee believes he is compelled to talk over the interviewer.

He was right to refuse to appear on Fox News Sunday and he should have not changed his mind. On the other hand, I’d resign as chief of staff if I couldn’t prep him better than that.

Anyway, it’s all history now. He is Bruce Willis in Sixth Sense. Only question is how long it takes for the zombie’s brain to realize it’s dead.

All Chris had to do was sit there and watch.

he could come up with no example of a time when he bucked Democratic leadership.

The most hilarious point came when Obama tried to claim credit for bipartisanship on the John Roberts confirmation vote — not because he supported Roberts. He voted against Roberts.

And thats why he is the Most Liberal Senator, WORSE THAN TED KENNEDY!

NewsBusters.org – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Well, sports fans, the highly-anticipated, years in the making interview of Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama on "Fox News Sunday" is over, and it’s certain that folks on both sides o…

It’s over. Turn out the lights. Shut down the McCain web sites, send the Clintons home. Senator Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States. I just watched his interview on FOX News Sunday and I do……

People vote for Obama for one reason alone.
SouthernGent on April 27, 2008 at 1:27 PM

Yep, if you challenge his politics, lack of experience or his questionable character who is labeled the Racist?

Go figure…..!

Fox has drunk the Obama KoolAid, (see above)

Because the term “Out of context” implies that, were the quoted passage to viewed/heard in its proper place within the entire statement, what preceded the quote and/or what followed the quote would cause one to interpret the quote differently.

The quotes stand for themselves – I’ve seen what precedes and follows several of the various quotes attributed to the Rev. Wright and nothing alters the meaning of the words. The Wright Kool-Aid drinkers know that they may succeed in persuading people that the quotes would have a different meaning when viewed/heard “in context.”

It’s a classic “straw man” argument and the Obamaholics are using it like Pam – to keep the quotes from sticking.

Obama sits down for a little chat with Chris Wallace on Fox News.  Ed Morrissey:The most hilarious point came when Obama tried to claim credit for bipartisanship on the John Roberts confirmation vote — not because he supported Roberts. He……

Why does the media keep letting Obama get away with saying that Wright’s words are being distorted and deliberately taken “out of context”? Do Obama and the media not understand that the entire text of Wright’s sermons are available, and that the public can judge for themselves the context of Wright’s hateful words? Or does Obama just hope that if he repeats the “out of context” lie often enough, people will just assume it’s true, and not bother to check the context for themselves?

AZCoyote on April 27, 2008 at 11:26 AM

‘Taken out of context’ works for muslim apologists. Oh wait, . . .

If that’s not a ripe Republican ad waiting to happen, I don’t know what is.

Excellent observation. Obama claimed that he had the most liberal voting record because everything was designed to be polarizing, and I agree with your summation about Roberts’ nonpartisan record.

Seems like Obama voted against Roberts for another reason. The likely one is that he was nominated by a republican.

wise_man on April 27, 2008 at 11:53 AM

Perhaps. But given what we have learned about him, I am more fearful that he is in fact a left-wing Critical Legal Studies disciple with very specific philosophical reasons for opposing the nomination of a mainstream judicial superstar like Roberts. Or, he is simply a dumb sheep who followed orders from Dick Durbin. Neither gives me much comfort.

rockmom on April 27, 2008 at 11:34 AM

Excellent observation. Obama claimed that he had the most liberal voting record because everything was designed to be polarizing, and I agree with your summation about Roberts’ nonpartisan record.

Seems like Obama voted against Roberts for another reason. The likely one is that he was nominated by a republican.

Obama complained that people took Wright out of context, but said Americans were honestly offended by Wright’s remarks, and that his relationship with Wright can inform voters of his values — but that voters should take into consideration the totality of Trinity United and Wright on those issues, and not just sound bites.

How is this any different from Obama’s past comments on Wright? Brushing aside the condescension built in to this and other similar statements, I have indeed considered the totality of Trinity United and have gone far beyond the sound bites to find it a hive of hate inspired anti-Americanism.

How are you going to keep ERs from closing? What is your plan for saving SS? How are you going to root AQ out of the mountains in Pakistan? Why talk with Iran when you won’t talk with Hamas? Would you sit on a board with a unrepentant PP bomber?

Mamby-pamby-tangential-horsepotatoes.