Blogging the Qur’an: Sura 23, “The Believers”
posted at 8:00 am on April 27, 2008 by Robert Spencer
Share on Facebook | regular view
This sura comes from the middle of Muhammad’s Meccan period, during the time of a famine in Mecca, which is referred to obliquely in vv. 75-6. Umar, the second caliph of the Muslims after Muhammad, reported: “This Surah was revealed in my presence and I myself observed the state of the Holy Prophet during its revelation. When the revelation ended, the Holy Prophet remarked, ‘On this occasion ten such verses have been sent down to me that the one who measures up to them, will most surely go to Paradise.’ Then he recited the initial verses of the surah.”
Those Paradise-enabling verses (verses 1-11) promise success to the believers (v. 1) – recalling the muezzin’s call to prayer from the minaret, which says in part: “Come to prayer, come to success.” Allah enumerates the characteristics of those who will go to Paradise: they pray humbly (v. 2) and faithfully (v. 9); they shun vain talk (v. 3); they’re charitable to the poor (v. 4); they keep their word and their covenants (v. 8); and they’re chaste (v. 5) – except with their wives and slave girls (v. 6). The Tafsir al-Jalalayn explains: “except from their spouses, that is, to their spouses, and what [slaves] their right hands possess, that is, concubines, for then they are not blameworthy, in having sexual intercourse with them.” Maududi asserts that “the fact that the people who have accepted the Message of the Holy Prophet have started acquiring such and such noble qualities of character is a practical proof of the truth of the Message.”
Then verses 12-22 point to various elements of the natural world as proof of Allah’s power: the creation and growth of human beings from “a product of wet earth” (vv. 12-14); and various features of the natural world: the rain, trees, cattle, etc. (vv. 17-22). According to a hadith recorded in the Mishkat al-Masabih, Muhammad offers a determinist view of why some people are good and others evil. It’s all because of the type of sand they were made from: “Allah took a handful of sand from all over the earth and mixed it with water so that it became mud. Allah then cast the mould of Sayyidina [Master] Adam from this mud. Allah then blew the soul into it. The progeny of Sayyidina Adam will therefore be like the portion of sand they were created from. Among them are reddish people, white people, black people and others between these complexions. Some of them are soft, others hard, some good, others bad (according to the type of sand).”
Verses 23-52 return to the stories of various prophets: Noah (vv. 23-30); an unnamed prophet in the generation after Noah (vv. 31-41); other unnamed prophets sent to other people (vv. 42-44); Moses and Aaron (vv. 45-49); and Jesus (v. 50). As we have seen elsewhere in the Qur’an, these accounts frequently recall Muhammad’s own experience with those who rejected his message. Muhammad thereby puts his opponents on notice that they are doing the same thing that the enemies of the prophets of old did, and that they will face the same divine judgment. Noah’s enemies scoff that he is just “a man like yourselves” (v. 24), and the critics of unnamed prophet say the same thing (v. 33). And of course, Muhammad is just an ordinary man (18:110). They say Noah is possessed (v. 25) – and that’s the same thing they say about Muhammad (44:14). The unbelievers deny that the dead will be raised (v. 37), just as they did to Muhammad (19:66).
Another message here is that Muhammad’s message is the same as that of the earlier prophets, and “this Brotherhood of yours is a single Brotherhood” – that is, the Brotherhood of the Prophets (v. 52).
More warnings to the unbelievers come in verses 53-90. Those who enjoy prosperity in this life (vv. 55-56) will not escape the judgment. Those who believe in “the signs of their Lord” – that is, the verses of the Qur’an (v. 58) and do not associate partners with Allah (v. 59) will be saved. Allah gives no soul a burden greater than it can bear (v. 62). The unbelievers will “groan in supplication” on the Day of Judgment (v. 64), but Allah will not help them (v. 65), because when the verses (“signs”) of the Qur’an were recited, they would turn their backs (v. 66) and scorn the Qur’an itself (v. 67). The message that has come to them from Allah is the same as the one sent to their fathers of old (v. 68). They accuse Muhammad of being possessed (v. 69), just as Noah’s enemies said of him (v. 25), but actually Muhammad has simply brought them the truth – but most of them hate the truth. Muhammad is calling them to the straight path (v. 73), which is Islam, but even if Allah removed from the unbelievers the present distress they are suffering (because of the famine in Mecca), they would not believe (vv. 75-76). The unbelievers doubt that the dead will be raised for judgment (vv. 82-83), but everything belongs to Allah and will return to him (vv. 84-89).
Verses 91-118 conclude this sura with further warnings to the unbelievers. Allah has not begotten a son, and if he had, each god would have fought with the others on behalf of what he himself had created (v. 91). Ibn Kathir explains: “If it were decreed that there should be a plurality of deities, each of them would have exclusive control over whatever he had created, so there would never be any order in the universe. But what we see is that the universe is ordered and cohesive, with the upper and lower realms connected to one another in the most perfect fashion.” Interestingly enough, the idea of cooperation among the members of a group doesn’t seem to come up.
Allah tells Muhammad to seek refuge with him against the unbelievers (vv. 93-100). On Judgment Day the scoffers will have no one to help them (v. 101). Those whose good deeds outweigh their evil deeds will be saved (v. 102), but those whose evil deeds are heavier will go to hell (v. 103), where they will grin horribly after their lips are burnt off (v. 104), as the Tafsir al-Jalalayn says: “The Fire will scorch their faces, it will burn them, while they glower therein, their upper and lower lips having receded from their teeth.” Allah will then ask them “Were not My Signs [ayat, verses of the Qur’an] rehearsed to you, and ye did but treat them as falsehood?” (v. 105), and the damned will make excuses (v. 106) and plead for another chance (v. 107), which Allah will not grant (v. 108), because they used to ridicule his servants (vv. 108-109). Life is short (v. 113), and Allah will ask the unbelievers, “”Did ye then think that We had created you in jest, and that ye would not be brought back to Us (for account)?” (v. 115).
Next week: Sura 24, “The Light”: “And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty…”
(Here you can find links to all the earlier “Blogging the Qur’an” segments. Here is a good Arabic/English Qur’an, here are two popular Muslim translations, those of Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall, along with a third by M. H. Shakir. Here is another popular translation, that of Muhammad Asad. And here is an omnibus of ten Qur’an translations.)
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
So wait…”good” and “bad” people are then predetermined, depending on who their original ancestors might have been?
JetBoy on April 27, 2008 at 8:57 AM
JetBoy:
The idea that it’s all predetermined would seem to be the import of this Qur’anic passage:
Robert Spencer on April 27, 2008 at 9:02 AM
So then, in Islam, there is no “redemption”? Since everything is the “will of Allah”, everything including the believers and unbelievers. No “free will” so to speak…
JetBoy on April 27, 2008 at 9:12 AM
Not a bad analogy of the diverse characteristics in an already existing gene pool, but I reject the ‘determinist’ bigotry associated with such analysis.
And this is a fun one:
Heh. Doesn’t that speak volumes.
I’ve said it many times: mohammed’s meccan period seems to be his more reasonable & lucid time. But, once this doood hit medina, he went full scale over the wackjob wall.
And others smarter than me have observed that this ‘meccan philosophy’ appears to be a melding of Jewish & Christian theology. There are many parallels.
Two questions for you, R.S.: Any commentary on how zoroastrian philosophy may have influenced young mohammed?
Plus, when mohammed states that allah ‘revealed to him xy&z’, is this an audible discussion? or written instructions? or…? Is it ever detailed the exact nature of this transmission of information?
Thanks you.
locomotivebreath1901 on April 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM
I love the photo used for this on the front page. It shows the blatant hypocrisy of the idiotic islamic ideology. A muslim practicing freedom of expression, carries a sign condemning freedom of expression.
Guardian on April 27, 2008 at 10:16 AM
And that would be one of the reasons that Muslims convert to Christianity. It is natural for human beings who recognize that they have sinned to look for redemption.
Connie on April 27, 2008 at 10:41 AM
Sounds like Calvin and his predestination.
So what’s the point of converting or trying? You’re predetermined.
What a load . . .
Mommynator on April 27, 2008 at 10:59 AM
Thanks Robert.
Zorro on April 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Allah will then ask them “Were not My Signs rehearsed to you …?”
Ok, so anybody who lived and died before 632 AD went straight to hell? Oh Allah is mercyful!
Tony737 on April 27, 2008 at 11:07 AM
“I love the photo used for this on the front page … A muslim practicing freedom of expression, carries a sign condemning freedom of expression. –
Guardian
They have no sense of irony!
Tony737 on April 27, 2008 at 11:09 AM
locomotivebreath1901:
I’m not Robert (nor do I play him on TV), but ibn Warraq’s “Why I am not a Muslim” has a good discussion (including references) of Zoroastrian influences on Islam, especially pages 43-48.
irishspy on April 27, 2008 at 11:14 AM
When I was reading comments on a website for muslims who had converted to Christianity, I found one convert refer to this quote. He said muslims could never be sure if there was enough good work to outweigh the bad, while in Christianity there was a certainty of redemption.
Similarly for Judaism. God would not destroy the corrupt city of Nineveh because the city repented. In the story God teaches Jonah that these corrupt sinners were precious to Him. He did not bring out a measuring device.
The best way to raise a child is to set firm objectives that are within his capabilities. The worst way to raise a child is to keep him from ever knowing if he has met the requirements. They tend to stop trying. Then they rationalize bad behaviour since it doesn’t matter anyway.
On the other hand, if the parent is going to roast bad children in a fire, you may still be obedient but it will be obedience to the letter of the law, not the spirit of the law.
I recall an islamic marriage counseling session I caught a few years ago on Dearborn cable. The iman was coaching future brides and he described a clever way one girl got a bigger amount of money from her future husband. The audience enjoyed the story while I thought it was wierd to trick your life partner but the letter of their law was not broken.
The Christian motto would be ‘It is not whether you win or lose but how you play the game’ versus the philosophy of ‘It’s all legal’.
entagor on April 27, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I love the fact that this comment was made by someone named “The Guardian”. ;)
Shy Guy on April 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM
“Ok, so anybody who lived and died before 632 AD went straight to hell? Oh Allah is mercyful!”
Let’s not forget Dante who claimed all non-Christians and unbaptized infants went to Hell in the ring of “Virtuous Pagans”. In fact, Dante placed even the Jewish prophets and heroes (Adam, Noah, Moses, etc.) in Hell until the Harrowing of Hell by Christ at the moment of His death on the Cross. Of course, Dante does provide an ‘escape clause’ by seeming to suggest that these “Virtuous Pagans”–because they are virtuous and wise–will accept the light of God on Judgment Day.
Now, Dante was not a pope or even a priest, but he was proclaiming Catholic doctrine, and the Church is rather quiet on the idea. Just last year, the pope’s Theological Council addressed the question of unbaptized infants (Augustine put them in Hell; Aquinas took them out) and determined that this knowledge “has not been revealed” (i.e. they don’t know the answer).
I’m not Catholic, but I think the Catechism does say that one does not have to be Christian to enter Heaven. Anybody know for sure? If true, it raises an interesting challenge for the Church: “Then why should I be Catholic?”
erclimb on April 27, 2008 at 1:54 PM
True, the Catholic Church does believe in salvation outside the Church, through such things as “baptism of blood” and “baptism of desire”. Just like the Church believes in salvation for those before Christ appeared, the people of God in the Old Testament.
JetBoy on April 27, 2008 at 2:23 PM
JetBoy:
No, there is no free will in traditional Islam, in any case. While there are many verses in the Qur’an that assume that human beings have free will, early in Islamic history the proponents of this idea, the Qadariyya, were defeated, and human free will was declared a heretical infringement of Allah’s absolute sovereignty.
There is not in Islam an idea of redemption. There is just the idea, discussed in this very chapter, of the scales on the Day of Judgment: if one’s good deeds outweigh one’s evil deeds, one enters Paradise. If not, one enters hell. The uncertainty and logical difficulty (regarding the divine judgment and mercy) of this has led more than one Muslim to convert to Christianity — here is the story of one of them.
Robert Spencer on April 27, 2008 at 4:46 PM
locomotivebreath1901:
Here is a good piece on the Zoroastrian influences in Islam from William St. Clair Tisdall’s Sources of the Koran.
Robert Spencer on April 27, 2008 at 4:49 PM
locomotivebreath1901:
Muhammad would report on his discussions with Allah afterward to his followers. Once one of them asked him: “How does the revelation come to you?”
He answered: “Sometimes it comes to me like the ringing of a bell, and that is the hardest for me, and when it leaves me I remember what it has said. And sometimes the angel appears to me in the likeness of a man and talks to me and I remember what he says.”
His favorite wife, young Aisha, noted: “I saw it coming down on him on an intensely cold day, and when it had left him his forehead was dripping with sweat.”
That is all from this hadith.
Robert Spencer on April 27, 2008 at 4:51 PM
Mommynator:
Yes, they’re both iconoclastic determinists.
My colleague Hugh Fitzgerald over at Jihad Watch calls it “inshallah fatalism” — a resignation that stifles initiative and is found all too commonly in the Islamic world.
Robert Spencer on April 27, 2008 at 4:53 PM
Tony737:
No, not at all. If you have read any of the other recent Q-Blogs (or if you go back), you’ll see that the Qur’an speaks with great frequency of the other prophets, all of whom are supposed to have brought a message identical to that of Muhammad in all important particulars. These include Abraham, Noah, Moses, Jesus, etc. So anyone who followed the true Islamic message of those prophets, before their messages were corrupted by their followers, had a chance to be saved before 632AD.
Robert Spencer on April 27, 2008 at 4:56 PM
irishspy:
Irish Spy, Ibn Warraq is an extraordinary man, one of the great heroes of our age, and everything he has written is essential reading: Why I Am Not A Muslim certainly, and also his latest, Defending the West, which is a book of stunning originality and depth of insight, and all his other books as well.
Robert Spencer on April 27, 2008 at 4:59 PM
I’m curious where the whole “72 virgins” thing comes from. I spent close to two years reading the Koran and Hadiths on the internet and I never read anything even close to being that specific.
But I jumped around a lot, and I didn’t take notes. I read it because I was just so curious why liberals hate Christians so much while they defend Islam. So I wanted to learn more about Islam.
I never found anything about “72 virgins” but I see that on blogs and message boards on a pretty regular basis.
Jaynie59 on April 27, 2008 at 5:08 PM
Jaynie59:
The Qur’an doesn’t specify a number of virgins, although the virgins of Paradise — the houris — are very much in the book. The number 72 comes from a hadith, but not even a canonical one.
Robert Spencer on April 27, 2008 at 5:44 PM
Again, thank you Mr. Spencer. Learning something new every week. Without a series like this, it would be difficult for a non-Muslim to simply read the Qur’an and get it’s meaning and historical influence.
Great story too about that Muslim convert. So the “redemption” issue is the main reason of these conversions I take it.
JetBoy on April 27, 2008 at 6:17 PM
Thank you, Robert, for this effort.
I have another question about the Koran that I haven’t seen you address in these posts.
When I read the Koran and Hadiths there was one aspect that really jumped out at me and I still don’t understand. Money.
There is so much repetition, and I did jump around a lot, so I have no idea how much of the texts I did read. I read about 3 different web sites recommended by people who claimed to be Muslims, and they sent me these links in an attempt to “educate” me.
The one thing that struck me was the emphasis on money. It’s everywhere. You haven’t been focusing on that, but it sort of amazed me that the Jews have this reputation for caring about money, when it’s all thru the Islamic texts.
There is pretty much no detail of daily life that isn’t covered in the Koran and Hadiths, but money is a huge part of it.
I just wonder why it’s the Jews who are criticized for that when money seems to be so much a part of the Islamic holy texts.
Slavery. Kidnapping and Ransoms. The tax non Muslims have to pay.
It’s like the entire religion is based on money.
Jaynie59 on April 27, 2008 at 6:46 PM
I ran across the following debate hosted by The Spectator. I’m sure you’ve already listened, Robert, but I’m posting it for the rest of the readers here who may not be that familiar with Ibn Warraq. Tariq Ramadan is also a participant. I recommend listening to the entire audio, but for those of you who may have time constraints, Ibn Warraq is the first speaker. You will be impressed.
We Should Not Be Reluctant to Assert the Superiority of Western Values
Connie on April 27, 2008 at 7:28 PM
Great link Connie. And you’re right. He is very impressive. I’ve only listened to the very first part of it so far.
I had to pause it after he spoke because I started crying. It’s nice to hear someone speak so eloquently in such passionate defense of Western culture.
Jaynie59 on April 27, 2008 at 10:51 PM
I just finished listening to the entire debate and I loved this Warraq quote at the end [paraphrased]:
“I don’t want to live in a culture that stones people for adultery. I’d rather live in a culture where you get stoned first and then commit adultery”.
Exactly!
Jaynie59 on April 28, 2008 at 1:09 AM
“If you have read any of the other recent Q-Blogs (or if you go back)…” – Robert
Mr. Spencer, I read your Q-blogs every week without fail, I look forward to them and learn from it. But the quran is so contradictory that it can be very confusing.
“… you’ll see that the Qur’an speaks with great frequency of the other prophets …” – Robert
Yes, I know, it says that Moses and Jesus are on a lower plane of Heaven, a swipe at the “People of the Book”, but it also say that Allah turned their followers into apes and pigs. Allah was for the Christians and Jews before he was against them.
By the way, I just read a book you endorsed, “The Radical Eye for the Infidel Guy”. It’s good stuff, thanks for recommending it.
Tony737 on April 28, 2008 at 3:28 AM
Again with this stuff. I don’t know how anyone can slog through this with the constant repetition. It really is starting to read like they’re trying to program people.
crazy_legs on April 28, 2008 at 8:27 AM
Jaynie59:
I’ve addressed slavery and the tax. For kidnapping and ransom, stay tuned for Sura 47.
The Qur’an takes slavery for granted:
Slave women as war prizes (see. v. 3)
Slave women and marriage (see v. 24)
Freeing a slave as a penalty for oath-breaking (see v. 88)
The tax on non-Muslims:
Part I
Part II
Robert Spencer on April 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Mud from sand? Did I miss something in my Mud Pie 101 class?
Boot Hill on April 28, 2008 at 3:14 PM
Hint: Life’s a beach.
Shy Guy on April 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM
It’s not MY fault I’m evil, I was made out of volcanic ash!
Capitana on April 28, 2008 at 5:39 PM
HAMID MEETS THE GANG
“Hamid, you’ve never even read the Qur’an. Don’t tell me it’s the perfect religion.”
Mike joined in: “I find it amazing that so many people here have not read their most holy book. I’m not talking about people who can’t read, I’m talking about those who know how, but never bother.”
I piled on. “Why haven’t you read it? It’s the most important book in your life, and you’ve never read it.”
Hamid didn’t hesitate. “I don’t need to. My mullah tells me what is in the Qur’an.”
Connie on April 28, 2008 at 9:21 PM
This discussion touches on a theory of mine(I don’t pretend that it is original). The urge for “redemption” that has been discussed and the desire for some sort of certainty are both thwarted by the judgement scales idea and the determinalism(you could be trying really hard but Allah just doesn’t want you). This, I think, gives rise to the shahid urge. It is Islam’s only “get out of jail free card”.
There’s a reason that many of these people engage in a bit of very un-Islamic debauchery before their “martyrdom operations”.
They are going to get a free pass.
I have read that some leaders are even promising these suicide bombers and such that the free pass will extend to some number of their family and that this is how they are enticing women in as they don’t get the garden of carnal delights promised to the men.
TBinSTL on April 29, 2008 at 1:38 AM
from Maududi’s introduction to Sura 23:
Wow, very interesting here. Are verses 1-11 revered among Muslims as Christians/Jews revere the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20)? If so, I must say in all fairness that I am impressed. If these verses are the requirements to gain Islamic salvation (as v.11 implies), then it is interesting that is based solely on how one treats a fellow believer and *not* on any kind of orthodoxy or what one believes about Allah. Mr Spencer, what are your thoughts on this?
HeIsSailing on April 29, 2008 at 6:50 PM
Comment pages: