I’ll be Hamas’ worst nightmare. – Sen. John McCain
I was privileged to listen in to a conference call Senator McCain had with bloggers on Friday. McCain issued the above comment in response to a question about this quote from Hamas politic…

like every other issue, he stabs conservatives in the back. and he’ll appoint souter-like judges, no doubt about it.

right4life on April 26, 2008 at 9:09 PM

I agree with you. With Obama or Clinton, you get more Justice Ginsbergs (John Edwards, perhaps?). With McCain, you get more Souters. With Mike Huckabee, you get more Roberts, Alitos, Thomases, and Scalias.

John McCain does not deserve the Republican nomination, and by the grace of God Mike Huckabee will be the next POTUS.

The ad is about judgement, lack of which on the D side is best exemplified by Obama’s twenty year endorsement of Wright. Senator McCain, however, is entitled to his objection, and should be able to characterize the style of his campaign ……

I assume “right4life” means that you are pro-life. If that is true, you can’t in good conscience vote for Hillary. She voted:
- Against the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
- Against the confirmation of John Roberts
- Against the confirmation of Samuel Alito

Voting for Hillary is being an accessory to murder.

(Ditto for Obama)

Red Pill on April 26

McCain is not pro-life, please. you need to look at his record, not his words.

In a Jan. 7, 1992, letter to Arizona’s major pro-life group, McCain promised to support President Bush’s ban on federal funding of such abortion-dependent research. I have no intention of supporting the use of fetal tissue resulting from artificially induced abortions for research purposes,” McCain wrote.

A few months later, however, McCain began voting to overturn Bush’s pro-life policy-a drive that succeeded

after President Clinton took office. As recently as 1997, McCain led the way in defeating a pro-life amendment offered by Sen. Dan Coats (R.Ind.) that would have placed some limits on federal funding of abortion-dependent fetal tissue research.

One example-the subject of another ad-is what McCain said when he met with the editorial board of the very liberal San Francisco Chronicle on August 19: “I’d love to see a point where it [Roe v. Wade] is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.”

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200002/ai_n8895341/pg_1

like every other issue, he stabs conservatives in the back. and he’ll appoint souter-like judges, no doubt about it.

His third divorce. Is breaking wedding vows before God and community, “conservative”?

Several times over the past few months, he’s clearly insinuated that he’s spent the night with one of his stable of women.

Which again, is his business. I’m not condemning him. Before I got married, I lived a similar lifestyle. And I knew it wasn’t conservative.

glad to see you’re holier than thou!

I can see why you like captain Queeg mccain, he thinks he knows whats best for everyone else too, like with mccain feingold.

yeah thats real conservative, telling everyone else how to live.

pharisee.

Well, if supporting idiotic big government ideas like border fences and at the same tauting Democrats for higher office makes one a “conservative”, then call me liberal.

you ARE a liberal. Anyone against the border fence, which has been proven to work is an open-border liberal.

as far as a ‘democrat’ for higher office, what do you think mccain is??? get a clue…mccain IS a democrat

Finally gave yourself away, liberal troll.

Well, if supporting idiotic big government ideas like border fences and at the same tauting Democrats for higher office makes one a “conservative”, then call me liberal.

Ministry of peaceandprosperity, very Orwellian.

LegendHasIt on April 25, 2008 at 4:23 PM

Interesting perspective. You might want to find a way to work this in.

On Iraq McCain hasn’t wavered one bit. He supported it from the beginning and wants to win it. On that issue he has a stellar track record.

seanhackbarth on April 25, 2008 at 1:05 PM

And he has a son in Iraq.

I am also losing interest in McCain. If the republican party wants to marginalize its conservative base then they need to get the message loud and clear. I will not support or vote for McCain and the consequences of the White House being taken over by the liberals is the RNC fault, not mine. I am beginning to think Hillery would make a better POTUS then McCain and would love to watch her get even with all her defectors during her 4 years in the White House. I believe it is time for the conservatives to draw a line in the sand. I will not compromise my core beliefs to appease the wussification of the Republican Party. No money, no support!

trs on April 25, 2008 at 11:51 AM

Check out the conservative candidates being supported by HuckPac. If you like what you see, send your money there to show your support. If HuckPac is more successful at fundraising than the RNC, maybe Juan McCain and the RNC will get the message.

He is downright malicious towards the Constitution and conservatism.

Valiant on April 25, 2008 at 11:10 AM

He is part of the problem, not part of the solution. That is why he does not deserve the Republican nomination.

I was going to vote third party, but if Hillary wins, I’ll vote for her, at least she’s tough.

I would NEVER EVER vote for juan mccain.

as long as the republican party follows his course, I will not support them in any way.

right4life on April 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM

I assume “right4life” means that you are pro-life. If that is true, you can’t in good conscience vote for Hillary. She voted:
- Against the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
- Against the confirmation of John Roberts
- Against the confirmation of Samuel Alito

Voting for Hillary is being an accessory to murder.

(Ditto for Obama)

On Earth Day, Nancy Pelosi quoted the Bible: “The Bible tells us in the Old Testament, ‘To minister to the needs of God’s creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us.’ On this Earth Day, and every day, let us honor the earth and our future generations with a commitment to fight climate change.”

Apparently, it’s a favorite verse of hers. She has used it in official statements on global warming, the budget, Martin Luther King Day, Christmas, and why she’s a Democrat.

Will John McCain condemn Nancy Pelosi?

John McCain has been all to happy to condemn conservatives in the past…we’re the “Agents of Intolerance”, remember?

Back to McCain:

Schwarzenegger’s success there shows it can be done.

Now who’s out of touch with reality?! Arnold’s a joke! CA’s back to the budget deficits it faced when Beige Davis was recalled.
His stances on Goreball Warming, health care for illegals, and raising taxes in the face of declining tax revenues is right out of the Dem playbook.
*phew!*
I got out of CA just in time.

….”Moreover, a Dem win in 2008 is not going to do anything towards getting George Soros to give up……”
Sekhmet on April 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM

That’s the ‘brilliant’ thing about this election. He doesn’t need a democrat to win this time around. No mater which Bozo wins, they will be indebted to Ernst Stavlo Blofeld Soros.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/02/soros-funded-maverick-mccain-since-2001.html

Maybe, but if I had to attempt to please the completely unpleaseable “conservative” nutbag base as represented by the likes of many on this forum

Finally gave yourself away, liberal troll.

And don’t count on 2012. We haven’t even predicted 2008 yet. Moreover, a Dem win in 2008 is not going to do anything towards getting George Soros to give up. It will also keep the on-credit relationship between the Democrat Party and its publicists, media hounds, and guys who follow candidates around waiting for them to say “macaca.”

NoDonkey on April 25, 2008 at 5:33 PM

I don’t listen to Rush to examine his lifestyle, which has been messy, but then again, I’m not a 100% rock-solid social conservative. I am a conservative, however, and respect Rush for his solid and consistent fiscal and defense-based security views.
I have no problem with Rush. He’s a genius, and has been more responsible for the conservative resurgence than any other living person.

As for that schmuck Huckabee, as we say down here in Texas, “I wouldn’t p*ss on him if his face was on fire”.

Entelechy on April 25, 2008 at 3:14 PM

Not if you have an Al Gore eco-friendly “green” .1-liter flush toilet.

Think Progress

The AP reports today that as a result of Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s recent offensive against Iraqi Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s militia, Sadr may “set aside his political ambitions” and restart &#…

For the “fences don’t work” crowd: Do you bother to lock your doors at home? After all, locks are just like fences. If you lock your doors you are a hypocrite.

Cindy McCain’s little adventure

I didn’t realize that Cindy McCain has offered herself a the beacon of conservatism, set to judge who and who is not conservative, like Rush has.

“if I had to live life that closely attached to John McCain.”

Maybe, but if I had to attempt to please the completely unpleaseable “conservative” nutbag base as represented by the likes of many on this forum, I’d be shooting heroin.