<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama remains oily on contributions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:03:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reasons I am still opposed to Pres. Obama: &#171; Blog Archive &#171; Anarchir&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1825655</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons I am still opposed to Pres. Obama: &#171; Blog Archive &#171; Anarchir&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1825655</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama Sneakily Funded by Oil Companies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama Sneakily Funded by Oil Companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Dishonesty &#171; A Defending Crusader&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1592426</link>
		<dc:creator>More Dishonesty &#171; A Defending Crusader&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1592426</guid>
		<description>[...] will not take money from lobbyist PACs. However, the lobbyist ban apparently doesn’t apply to personal donations from lobbyists, as Obama’s campaign has proven repeatedly during the primaries. The ban on PAC donations also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will not take money from lobbyist PACs. However, the lobbyist ban apparently doesn’t apply to personal donations from lobbyists, as Obama’s campaign has proven repeatedly during the primaries. The ban on PAC donations also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; L.A. Times Claims Obama More Honest than McCain</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1442543</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; L.A. Times Claims Obama More Honest than McCain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1442543</guid>
		<description>[...] attention to babies born alive after a botched abortion. Obama took money from oil companies and claimed he didn&#8217;t (I&#8217;ll give the L.A. Times credit for catching this &#8212; but why did they forget about it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attention to babies born alive after a botched abortion. Obama took money from oil companies and claimed he didn&#8217;t (I&#8217;ll give the L.A. Times credit for catching this &#8212; but why did they forget about it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Surprise: Obama&#8217;s taken more money from major oil company employees than McCain</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1290988</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Surprise: Obama&#8217;s taken more money from major oil company employees than McCain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1290988</guid>
		<description>[...] from FactCheck.org and a 30-second rebuttal ad from the Clinton campaign for his trouble. As Ed once said when writing about some of the fundraisers organized for him by oil executives, &#8220;Obama lies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from FactCheck.org and a 30-second rebuttal ad from the Clinton campaign for his trouble. As Ed once said when writing about some of the fundraisers organized for him by oil executives, &#8220;Obama lies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama: McCain&#8217;s In The Pocket of Big Oil&#160;&#124;&#160;The American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1282346</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama: McCain&#8217;s In The Pocket of Big Oil&#160;&#124;&#160;The American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1282346</guid>
		<description>[...] being in the pocket of big oil because he&#8217;s received donations from the industry. Uh, Barack? You&#8217;ve received six-digits from the same exact industry. Are you in big oil&#8217;s pocket, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being in the pocket of big oil because he&#8217;s received donations from the industry. Uh, Barack? You&#8217;ve received six-digits from the same exact industry. Are you in big oil&#8217;s pocket, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama&#8217;s oil flip-flop about place as well as issue</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1280009</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama&#8217;s oil flip-flop about place as well as issue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1280009</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama has proven himself slippery on oil for the second time in his campaign.  In April, he accused his opponents of taking money from oil lobbies, when in fact Obama himself not only did [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama has proven himself slippery on oil for the second time in his campaign.  In April, he accused his opponents of taking money from oil lobbies, when in fact Obama himself not only did [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saved</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089432</link>
		<dc:creator>saved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089432</guid>
		<description>You mean the oil companies have politicians in their pockets?  This seems so unfair.  Why can&#039;t I have a politician in my pocket?  Every American should have an equal number of politicians in each pocket.  This way, the process would be fair.  &lt;strong&gt;A chicken in every pot, and a politician in every pocket.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean the oil companies have politicians in their pockets?  This seems so unfair.  Why can&#8217;t I have a politician in my pocket?  Every American should have an equal number of politicians in each pocket.  This way, the process would be fair.  <strong>A chicken in every pot, and a politician in every pocket.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: upinak</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089392</link>
		<dc:creator>upinak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089392</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nichevo on April 24, 2008 at 1:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are correct.  Depending on the amount, which you failed to mention.  I.E. if I contribute, all I have to do is go under a certain amount and in which I do not have to put my employeer.  But then again, what are they going to do if I do not put my employeer down?  They have as of yet to do anything!  Thanks for the words of warning, but F.E.C. isn&#039;t my boss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nichevo on April 24, 2008 at 1:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You are correct.  Depending on the amount, which you failed to mention.  I.E. if I contribute, all I have to do is go under a certain amount and in which I do not have to put my employeer.  But then again, what are they going to do if I do not put my employeer down?  They have as of yet to do anything!  Thanks for the words of warning, but F.E.C. isn&#8217;t my boss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriel sutherland</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089382</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriel sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089382</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;not to mention having a San Francisco fundraiser at the home of one of the GETTY heirs. Where does he think their money came from?

BuzzCrutcher on April 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Tell me about it.  Most of Billionaire&#039;s Row is the fruits of capital investment in the oil and gas industry.  Getty and Gulf Oil heirs dominate the street.

Also, the Getty Oil fortune funds Gavin Newsom in San Fran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>not to mention having a San Francisco fundraiser at the home of one of the GETTY heirs. Where does he think their money came from?</p>
<p>BuzzCrutcher on April 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Tell me about it.  Most of Billionaire&#8217;s Row is the fruits of capital investment in the oil and gas industry.  Getty and Gulf Oil heirs dominate the street.</p>
<p>Also, the Getty Oil fortune funds Gavin Newsom in San Fran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeanie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089365</link>
		<dc:creator>jeanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089365</guid>
		<description>Being proved a liar on more and more issues. Bad!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being proved a liar on more and more issues. Bad!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalleywag</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089322</link>
		<dc:creator>scalleywag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089322</guid>
		<description>So much for change.  Why should he be any different than the Clintons?  Because he SAYS he will be?  We all know where that line goes, so this certainly isn&#039;t surprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for change.  Why should he be any different than the Clintons?  Because he SAYS he will be?  We all know where that line goes, so this certainly isn&#8217;t surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lehuster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089305</link>
		<dc:creator>Lehuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089305</guid>
		<description>Do I see a Harvard lawyer from Chicago wearing a &lt;strong&gt;cowboy hat&lt;/strong&gt;???  

Take it off, ya phony!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I see a Harvard lawyer from Chicago wearing a <strong>cowboy hat</strong>???  </p>
<p>Take it off, ya phony!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nichevo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089251</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089251</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But if you were a employee of a oil/gas comp, I don’t care where you send your contributions too. As long as you didn’t use the name of the comp. As I would not have problems if you were a construction, industrial, vehicle employee of a large manufacturer etc., UNLESS you used the name of the Comp. It is that simple!

upinak on April 24, 2008 at 12:41 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are aware that under Federal Law, you have to declare your employer when you make a political contribution? So you are required to &quot;use the name of the Comp.&quot; 

The Federal Elections Commission tracks contributions by individual &lt;strong&gt;and&lt;/strong&gt; employer, for fairly obvious reasons. There&#039;s nothing underhanded about it; it&#039;s a legal requirement, and it&#039;s common sense to suppose that CEO&#039;s who traditionally make large contributions (often to both parties) aren&#039;t doing so for personal or altruistic reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But if you were a employee of a oil/gas comp, I don’t care where you send your contributions too. As long as you didn’t use the name of the comp. As I would not have problems if you were a construction, industrial, vehicle employee of a large manufacturer etc., UNLESS you used the name of the Comp. It is that simple!</p>
<p>upinak on April 24, 2008 at 12:41 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You are aware that under Federal Law, you have to declare your employer when you make a political contribution? So you are required to &#8220;use the name of the Comp.&#8221; </p>
<p>The Federal Elections Commission tracks contributions by individual <strong>and</strong> employer, for fairly obvious reasons. There&#8217;s nothing underhanded about it; it&#8217;s a legal requirement, and it&#8217;s common sense to suppose that CEO&#8217;s who traditionally make large contributions (often to both parties) aren&#8217;t doing so for personal or altruistic reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089241</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089241</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of Hu and Clinton. 

Here&#039;s a $2,300 bonus and by the way if I don&#039;t see a $2,300 contribution you&#039;re fired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of Hu and Clinton. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a $2,300 bonus and by the way if I don&#8217;t see a $2,300 contribution you&#8217;re fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snaggletoothie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089235</link>
		<dc:creator>snaggletoothie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089235</guid>
		<description>I think it is becoming clear that Obama never makes statements in anything buy a Clintonian sense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is becoming clear that Obama never makes statements in anything buy a Clintonian sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089214</link>
		<dc:creator>ctmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089214</guid>
		<description>It is the same as Obama saying he wasn&#039;t &quot;for&quot; the Iraq war.  Many of his followers think he didn&#039;t &quot;vote&quot; for the war, when we all know he wasn&#039;t in a position to vote for or against.  And probably would have not voted at all since he can&#039;t vote &quot;present&quot; anymore.

So he doesn&#039;t take money (checks only?) from the oil industry, because the oil industry can&#039;t give it to him.  But his followers don&#039;t realize that, they just think he is pure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the same as Obama saying he wasn&#8217;t &#8220;for&#8221; the Iraq war.  Many of his followers think he didn&#8217;t &#8220;vote&#8221; for the war, when we all know he wasn&#8217;t in a position to vote for or against.  And probably would have not voted at all since he can&#8217;t vote &#8220;present&#8221; anymore.</p>
<p>So he doesn&#8217;t take money (checks only?) from the oil industry, because the oil industry can&#8217;t give it to him.  But his followers don&#8217;t realize that, they just think he is pure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drjohn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089207</link>
		<dc:creator>drjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089207</guid>
		<description>I am telling you that Obama really believes the rest of America is as stupid as those in Chicago. They are immmersed in Daley politics and are willing to suspend disbelief.

It&#039;s why Obama won&#039;t debate Hitlary again.

He won&#039;t want to debate McCain more than once either.

Just watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am telling you that Obama really believes the rest of America is as stupid as those in Chicago. They are immmersed in Daley politics and are willing to suspend disbelief.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s why Obama won&#8217;t debate Hitlary again.</p>
<p>He won&#8217;t want to debate McCain more than once either.</p>
<p>Just watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbj</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089202</link>
		<dc:creator>rbj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089202</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, The Obamassiah:
1) decries taking oil industry money, yet takes oil industry money

2) complains about bitter people clinging to religion, yet attended church for 20 years with a bitter minister.

and

3) complains about America&#039;s good name being tarnished around the world, yet wants to &quot;renegotiate&quot; NAFTA and kick to the curb Colombia&#039;s free trade status.

Um, yeah, that sounds like a consistent candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, The Obamassiah:<br />
1) decries taking oil industry money, yet takes oil industry money</p>
<p>2) complains about bitter people clinging to religion, yet attended church for 20 years with a bitter minister.</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>3) complains about America&#8217;s good name being tarnished around the world, yet wants to &#8220;renegotiate&#8221; NAFTA and kick to the curb Colombia&#8217;s free trade status.</p>
<p>Um, yeah, that sounds like a consistent candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: upinak</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089187</link>
		<dc:creator>upinak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089187</guid>
		<description>kirkill on April 24, 2008 at 12:48 PM

Maybe they (oil exec&#039;s) think that if people know, that the American will buy their stock&#039;s.  Heck I have heard it all working with and for oil/gas companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kirkill on April 24, 2008 at 12:48 PM</p>
<p>Maybe they (oil exec&#8217;s) think that if people know, that the American will buy their stock&#8217;s.  Heck I have heard it all working with and for oil/gas companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Napsalot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089180</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Napsalot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089180</guid>
		<description>The cowboy hat SURE DON&#039;T look natural on Obama&#039;s head.  

Too bad it&#039;s not as ridiculous as Dukakis&#039; tank photo or Kerry&#039;s duck hunting or space suit bunny photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cowboy hat SURE DON&#8217;T look natural on Obama&#8217;s head.  </p>
<p>Too bad it&#8217;s not as ridiculous as Dukakis&#8217; tank photo or Kerry&#8217;s duck hunting or space suit bunny photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirkill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089177</link>
		<dc:creator>kirkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089177</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But if you were a employee of a oil/gas comp, I don’t care where you send your contributions too. As long as you didn’t use the name of the comp. As I would not have problems if you were a construction, industrial, vehicle employee of a large manufacturer etc., UNLESS you used the name of the Comp. It is that simple!

upinak on April 24, 2008 at 12:41 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I UNDERSTAND the legality of it. But to think that BO and the oil executive are NOT AWARE of the oil executive&#039;s position being politically adventageous is naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But if you were a employee of a oil/gas comp, I don’t care where you send your contributions too. As long as you didn’t use the name of the comp. As I would not have problems if you were a construction, industrial, vehicle employee of a large manufacturer etc., UNLESS you used the name of the Comp. It is that simple!</p>
<p>upinak on April 24, 2008 at 12:41 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I UNDERSTAND the legality of it. But to think that BO and the oil executive are NOT AWARE of the oil executive&#8217;s position being politically adventageous is naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canopfor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089173</link>
		<dc:creator>canopfor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089173</guid>
		<description>So lets see,

Obama says taking money from Dirty rotten filthy rich oil
companys is bad!

But,then Obama rails and Demonizes ConHillary for taking
said money from filthy rich oil companys!

But then again,Obama gets money from the filthy rich oil
companys,ummm I&#039;m Perplexed as usuall in the way the 
Liberals operate!

Were talkin Democrats here,nothing to see,move it along!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So lets see,</p>
<p>Obama says taking money from Dirty rotten filthy rich oil<br />
companys is bad!</p>
<p>But,then Obama rails and Demonizes ConHillary for taking<br />
said money from filthy rich oil companys!</p>
<p>But then again,Obama gets money from the filthy rich oil<br />
companys,ummm I&#8217;m Perplexed as usuall in the way the<br />
Liberals operate!</p>
<p>Were talkin Democrats here,nothing to see,move it along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawaiiLwyr</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089163</link>
		<dc:creator>HawaiiLwyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089163</guid>
		<description>Why does anyone think Obama is not the same or worse than other politicians?  I am just offended that he thinks the American People are so stupid. He insults our intelligence on a regular basis.  I am tired of him and his circle of friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does anyone think Obama is not the same or worse than other politicians?  I am just offended that he thinks the American People are so stupid. He insults our intelligence on a regular basis.  I am tired of him and his circle of friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obladioblada</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089164</link>
		<dc:creator>obladioblada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089164</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I still fail to see the reasoning behind any oil executives driving even one dime into Obama’s coffers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Gasp!  I thought &lt;em&gt;Republicans&lt;/em&gt; were the greedy, rapacious, war-mongering, blood-for-oil, Big Corporate plunderers.  This is all so confusing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I still fail to see the reasoning behind any oil executives driving even one dime into Obama’s coffers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gasp!  I thought <em>Republicans</em> were the greedy, rapacious, war-mongering, blood-for-oil, Big Corporate plunderers.  This is all so confusing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: upinak</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1089158</link>
		<dc:creator>upinak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/obama-remains-oily-on-contributions/#comment-1089158</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;kirkill on April 24, 2008 at 12:37 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Even if they are Oil Exec.&#039;s, as long as they are not using the name of the so-called oil comp.... it doesn&#039;t matter.  

If a Presidential Candidate&#039;s Priest, Pastor etc was telling people to vote for him/her on Sunday.... That Church shoudl lose it&#039;s 501c3.  

These are two different arguements.  

But if you were a employee of a oil/gas comp, I don&#039;t care where you send your contributions too.  As long as you didn&#039;t use the name of the comp.  As I would not have problems if you were a construction, industrial, vehicle employee of a large manufacturer etc., UNLESS you used the name of the Comp.  It is that simple!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>kirkill on April 24, 2008 at 12:37 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Even if they are Oil Exec.&#8217;s, as long as they are not using the name of the so-called oil comp&#8230;. it doesn&#8217;t matter.  </p>
<p>If a Presidential Candidate&#8217;s Priest, Pastor etc was telling people to vote for him/her on Sunday&#8230;. That Church shoudl lose it&#8217;s 501c3.  </p>
<p>These are two different arguements.  </p>
<p>But if you were a employee of a oil/gas comp, I don&#8217;t care where you send your contributions too.  As long as you didn&#8217;t use the name of the comp.  As I would not have problems if you were a construction, industrial, vehicle employee of a large manufacturer etc., UNLESS you used the name of the Comp.  It is that simple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
