Olberdouche? He really should change his last name to Olberbama.

When are we going to get back to drilling and building refineries?

Neither Olberman nor Herself! mentioned the fact that Iran possesses a sizable amount of oil. Said oil is purchased by other countries which, unfortunately, would be seriously P.O.’d if she nuked the Mad Mullahs and their seriously deranged dwarf. How would a blockade of the Straits of Hormuz be perceived by the people of this country as retaliation to such a act? For that matter, is this country ready for oil rationing, the sky rocketing food costs (hey, it takes FUEL to farm) and inflation that would make Zimbabwe look like its economy was on fire.

Granted, Comrade Clinton was playing to the people of Pennsylvania, but one must give pause to consider the consequences and the mental stability of the person that makes such statements. No where in her history has she shown anything but outright arrogance and disdain for the military. Now we’re to accept she would cook off nukes in the Middle East?

What is she thinking??!!! Or is she?

If she positions herself as the “female McCain” she could be a problem. Democrats vote democrat, period. Ideas don’t mean squat to them.

Republicans need to continue to be critical of McCain all the way to the election and THEN “hold their noses”. If we start giving him slack now, we could be out of breath (holding our noses) by the time of the election.

Olbypocrisy

OK. Can we please stop trying so hard to bastardize words? The elusive vanity of coining a new term is clearly addictive to the point of becoming pathological.

Or maybe I’m guilty of cynicatwatification?

I remember watching him to a standup comedy routine like Chris Rock, mocking her about shooting duckings with a six shooter

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2008 at 11:57 PM

Reads like a Clancy, or even better, Drury novel. So did 9/11. God help us all.

Iran passes a bomb off and Israel melts WITH a claim of responsibility from some AQ outfit. Our morals keep us from lashing out and melting anyone.

Limerick on April 21, 2008 at 11:30 PM

I’ve long had a nagging fear that much of the growing alliance between the Left and the Islamofascists has been a careful laying of the groundwork to prepare the world for the coming nuclear attack on Israel. The fauxtography scandals from the battle against Hamas, the incessant Palestinian victimhood pornography, agitprop like “I Am Rachel Corrie”… I’m sure the Left plays along with a lot of this because it agrees with their fetishes, Israel being a proxy for the hated U.S. and Palestinians seen as oppressed peoples of color, but the Islamist side of these manipulations seems more deliberate and sinister. I don’t have a hard time imagining the Islamists making speeches at the U.N. while fallout is still raining down on Tel Aviv, saying how it’s all so very terrible, but really the Israelis brought it on themselves, and we must remember that an Arab people have also died in this nuclear blaze (that would be the Palestinians, whom no Arab country would mourn as collateral damage, or would welcome as refugees). The Islamists might say that no matter how outraged the world is feeling, the damage is done, one cannot unscramble eggs, and does the world *really* want to compound this tragedy with a war of vengeance, especially after the horrors of the Bushitlerburton years…? And one can easily imagine the likes of Jack Murtha, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and their legion of nutroots followers nodding their heads and muttering, “No, of course not, let us move on…” If we don’t choose our leaders wisely now, we may one day remember the 90s as the years of laying the groundwork for the second Holocaust, when the world got comfortable with the idea of Israel’s death as an unsolved homicide.

not preventing the Iranian maniacs from getting weaponry of the Apocalypse in the first place

is the really disturbing part of this entire “I’d nuke ‘em” conceit.

An ounce of fry their frikkin’ centrifuges is worth a pound of flying neutron bombs

“The strategic reserve is an insurance policy meant for a sudden disruption of our energy supply, or for war. The strategic reserve should not be used as an attempt to drive down oil prices right before an election. It should not be used for short- term political gain at the cost of long-term national security.” GOV. GEORGE W. BUSH, 2000

think that it would be in America’s interest to join the fray in any Iranian attacks on Saudi Arabia.

Whatever the Iranians hit Saudi Arabia with we could just hit Saudi Arabia with more of the same thing and blame it all on the Iranians.

MB4 on April 21, 2008 at 11:04 PM

Diabolically brilliant!

9/11 = AQ. Nobody to hit so we went after their sanctuary Afghanistan. Still can’t wrap that up after 7 years.

Iran passes a bomb off and Israel melts WITH a claim of responsibility from some AQ outfit. Our morals keep us from lashing out and melting anyone.

To hope your enemy isn’t crazy is…well…crazy. There is no way that Iran can first strike Israel into a non-response situation. Their cruise missle capability from their subs means Iran melts too. Yet they continue on their course to getting the bomb. This isn’t a martyr complex?

I need another beer and a shot.

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2008 at 10:29 PM

Doctor Zero, you have absolutely nailed the Clinton bluster. The Democrats have no clue about national security.

Just wait ’till they use them (against Israel or maybe sorta possibly anyone else too) and then “obliterate” the whole country? Yeah, that’s a Hell of a plan, there.

It would be more fun to hit the Iranians and blame it all on Saudi Arabia.

john1schn on April 21, 2008 at 11:08 PM

OK, but we would have to leave the Iranians with enough left over to hit Saudi Arabia back pretty good.

Whatever the Iranians hit Saudi Arabia with we could just hit Saudi Arabia with more of the same thing and blame it all on the Iranians.

It would be more fun to hit the Iranians and blame it all on Saudi Arabia.

being drawn into one to defend Riyadh is something else.

I think that it would be in America’s interest to join the fray in any Iranian attacks on Saudi Arabia.

Whatever the Iranians hit Saudi Arabia with we could just hit Saudi Arabia with more of the same thing and blame it all on the Iranians.

1 – Hillary Clinton might nuke Iran because she wants to prove that women can drop the Bomb too.

2 – Hillary Clinton might nuke Iran because it’s easier said than done.

3 – Hillary Clinton might nuke Iran because it’s her stress reliever after the long campaign.

4 – Hillary Clinton might nuke Iran because life is boring in the White House after doing laundry and folding clothes.

5 – Hillary Clinton might nuke Iran because she believes 3 A.M. dreams come true.