Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Rice in Iraq

posted at 9:15 am on April 20, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Condoleezza Rice landed in Iraq this morning in an unscheduled visit with Nouri al-Maliki, the first top-level American visit since Maliki launched his operations against the Mahdi militia. The day before, Moqtada al-Sadr threatened to end his cease-fire if the operations didn’t cease. Rice told reporters that the US considers that an internal matter for Iraqis to resolve, but obviously took a great interest in observing the results:

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice flew to Baghdad on Sunday to strengthen the Iraqi government’s efforts to isolate Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who has threatened an “open war” on security forces.

Underscoring the threat of widening violence, the U.S. military said it killed 20 militiamen overnight in clashes in the cleric’s Baghdad stronghold of Sadr City. A military spokesman called it the capital’s “hottest night” in weeks.

Arriving on an unannounced visit, Rice said she wanted to support what she called a new political “centre” in Iraq that has backed Shi’ite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s crackdown on Sadr’s Mehdi Army militia.

“You have seen a coalescing of a centre in Iraqi politics in which the Sunni leadership, the Kurdish leadership and the elements of the Shia leadership that are not associated with these special groups have been working together better than at any time before,” Rice told reporters travelling with her.

“Special groups” means those elements of the Mahdi Army receiving direction from Iran’s Quds Force, the terrorist arm of the Revolutionary Guards. The US has usually referred to these Mahdis as “rogue elements”, as does the Reuters report, in an attempt to give Sadr an opportunity to save face and to eschew arms for politics. It hasn’t worked, although circumstances forced Sadr to leave Iraq after the beginning of the surge.

Sadr has threatened to end his cease-fire, but he has already lost Basra and Umm Qasr. His Mahdis have strength in Sadr City in Baghdad, but they are being reduced block by block with a combined effort from the Iraqi Army and US forces. He may not have much ground from which to conduct his war, and the threat underscores the myth that the Mahdis have “rogue elements” at all.

Besides, as Rice points out, no viable state can abide large private armies controlling its sovereign territory, especially not when receiving significant assistance from another nation. If Sadr thought Maliki would never challenge his position, then he is either naive or overconfident. Maliki has spent the last three years building an army at least five times the size of Sadr’s, with much better recruitment, training, and supply. Maliki doesn’t want a war with Sadr, but he wants a war with the Sunnis, the Kurds, and SCIRI Shi’ites even less. Sadr overreached years ago and now the bill has come due.

Rice’s visit, I notice, has not gained much media attention today. She still can’t openly announce a visit ahead of time, but the almost non-story of her visit to Baghdad indicates a certain trend to normality.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Maliki has shown a habit of kicking the can down the road in the past when it comes to dealing with factional situations like Mookie’s Army. But leaving Sadr in place and/or giving Iran an opening to conduct new actions and open new fronts into the summer and fall could not only damage his country’s unity, but hurt Iraq’s supposed desire to see continued U.S. support into 2009 (and the Iranians are smart enough to know that if they can generate bad news out of Basra, Baghdad or other parts of the country come September and October, it’s not good for John McCain).

Rice may just be in Iraq for a first-hand look at the situation, but I wouldn’t be surprised if after the recent bump up in bombings and the temporary — but well-reported in the media — military setbacks in the south, that Condi is reminding Maliki that if he lets things go for too long, his future may depend on the kindness of President Obama or President Hillary by the end of the year.

jon1979 on April 20, 2008 at 9:30 AM

This woman has more courage than most male politicians. She is performing very well and has earned a great deal of respect. Any media attention will only reinforce these points and not be tolerated. She will be relegated to the back page of the classified section of the local newspaper.

DAT60A3 on April 20, 2008 at 9:32 AM

that if he lets things go for too long, his future may depend on the kindness of President Obama or President Hillary by the end of the year.

Probably the real motivation for cracking down on sadr. He knows barry will be pulling forces out of combat and harms way on their way out of the country like the british at the air base in basra. maliki will be on his own and sadr will be escorted back by the qods force to take over iraq.

peacenprosperity on April 20, 2008 at 9:41 AM

Sadr is responsible for the killing of several high level opponents and U.S. civilians. At one time he was targeted for extinction by the U.S. for his crimes. He has still not been brought to justice.

As long as he is free to work his own will there will be problems in Iraq. Perhaps the U.S. and Maliki have allowed him to continue to operate so as to be able to take out his minions, but the time is going to come soon when he will have to be disposed of because he has shown no signs of accomodation.

JonRoss on April 20, 2008 at 9:42 AM

Good news, indeed!

And while Dr. Rice is traveling in the ME, perhaps she could drop by Jimmuh Catarrh’s current hotel to seize his passport and to deliver a persona non grata notification to him, compliments of the State Department.

onlineanalyst on April 20, 2008 at 9:42 AM

And while Dr. Rice is traveling in the ME, perhaps she could drop by Jimmuh Catarrh’s current hotel to seize his passport and to deliver a persona non grata notification to him, compliments of the State Department.

onlineanalyst on April 20, 2008 at 9:42 AM

This would be good. Another approach would be to bring a contingent of U.S. military with her to the hotel, cuff and ankle Jimmuh and Roz BOTH and drag them to a waiting military aircraft for transport to Gitmo and questioning. Carter has spent the last 32 years making the world a more dangerous place.

JonRoss on April 20, 2008 at 9:50 AM

“Sadr has threatened to end his cease-fire …”

Um, why has this guy not been arrested or killed? The Iraqi Govt is at war with his private army, yet he can make statements to the media? How is that he can still breathe?

Perhaps Major John can help us to comprehend this.

Paging Major John, please pick up the white courtesy keyboard.

Tony737 on April 20, 2008 at 9:53 AM

but the time is going to come soon when he will have to be disposed of because he has shown no signs of accomodation.

Except he is hiding out in iran and will not go back to iraq until he feels safe. At that point he may have been made an ayatollah by the iranian shiites and will be untouchable by the iraqi government.

peacenprosperity on April 20, 2008 at 9:55 AM

It’s time to eliminate the Mahdi Army completely and for good …

tarpon on April 20, 2008 at 10:13 AM

Sadr is still in power because he provides some stability within the madhi army. If he is taken out, the “army” will likely fracture into many different splinter groups/factions. It is easier to understand, and therefore counter, one like minded unit. All these guys want power and given the chance all will try to take it, don’t expect one guy to step into Sadr’s shoes if he is killed or arrested. Sadr has more controll than you think.

gator70 on April 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM

No more “deals”. Finish it.

THE CHOSEN ONE on April 20, 2008 at 11:05 AM

“But leaving Sadr in place and/or giving Iran an opening to conduct new actions and open new fronts into the summer and fall could not only damage his country’s unity,…”

What do you propese, that Iraq invade Iran and go and get him.

The British Army has a view on the Basra action – The British-trained Iraqi Army’s attempt to retake Basra from militiamen was an “unmitigated disaster at every level”, British commanders have disclosed. . Mind You, they don’t seem to place any corelation on “British Trained” and the disaster.

davod on April 20, 2008 at 11:37 AM

Alright, Ed! Sharp analysis of this whole mess. The only thing I would correct is that the “Special Groups” also involve Shi’ite militia thugs who are just out for money and Soprano-style racketeering.

LT Nixon on April 20, 2008 at 11:44 AM

How long before Jimmy shows up in Iraq to take a meeting and broker a peace with Mookie?

Bicyea on April 20, 2008 at 12:11 PM

The British Army has a view on the Basra action – The British-trained Iraqi Army’s attempt to retake Basra from militiamen was an “unmitigated disaster at every level”, British commanders have disclosed. . Mind You, they don’t seem to place any corelation on “British Trained” and the disaster.

davod on April 20, 2008 at 11:37 AM

The Telegraph and davod may have to try to keep up with current events as the media continues their “spin-cycle” of defeatism.

From Sadr’s own words:

“So I direct my last warning and speech to the Iraqi government to refrain and to take the path of peace and abandon violence against its people,” al-Sadr said in the statement. “If the government does not refrain and leash the militias that have penetrated it, we will announce an open war until liberation.”

It appears Maliki is calling Sadr’s bluff in what may become the last bastion of real division within the nation. The Mahdi army has but two choices left—-surrender or become more marginalized as they are left out in the cold. Does anyone really think General Petraeus doesn’t have a plan to put an end to a leaderless army that may be just as tired of dieing for a lost cause?

Rovin on April 20, 2008 at 12:28 PM

Don’t get your hopes too high. We are a long way from getting rid of Sadr

bnelson44 on April 20, 2008 at 12:38 PM

Baghdad – The Iraqi government is not targeting followers of radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and is seeking to open a dialogue with his political group, a cabinet spokesman said Sunday.
The statement comes a day after al-Sadr threatened to launch an open war ‘until liberation’ unless the government halted its offensive against his followers.

‘There is a need for opening a dialogue as the al-Sadr Bloc is an effective part in parliament and government,’ government spokesman Ali al-Dabagh told reporters.

‘The Iraqi government is not in confrontation with any political group. But it is incumbent on the government under the constitution to protect its citizens against those who raised arms against it,’ al-Dabagh said.

http://news.monstersandcritics.com/middleeast/news/article_1400882.php/Baghdad_seeks_dialogue_with_cleric_al-Sadr_calm_in_south__Roundup

bnelson44 on April 20, 2008 at 12:38 PM

Um, why has this guy not been arrested or killed?

Sadr is a member of Iraq’s parliament. Iraq is a democracy remember? You can’t go around assassinating elected officials in a democratic country.

aengus on April 20, 2008 at 12:46 PM

bnelson44 on April 20, 2008 at 12:38 PM

This is good news indeed. Sitting down and talking about a political solution other than an all out confrontation is in everyones best interest. I guess my point was that some one is applying the “pressure” and it’s certainly not Sadr or his fracturing militias.

Rovin on April 20, 2008 at 12:51 PM

Our forces control Sadr city’s southern part – U.S. admiral
Baghdad, Apr 20, (VOI) – A U.S. army admiral said on Sunday that his forces control the southern part of Sadr city, which was isolated from its northern part, while Tahseen al-Sheikhli, the civilian spokesperson for Fardh al-Qanoon (Law Imposing) plan, repeated the Iraqi government’s insistence on providing services in areas that witness military operations, especially Sadr city.

Admiral Patrick Driscoll explained in a press conference with al-Sheikhli in Baghdad that U.S. forces were able to control Sadr city’s southern part by separating it from its northern part, using a temporary concrete wall, and conducing security and military operations against armed groups that randomly open fire on residential neighborhoods and the Green Zone.

http://66.111.34.180/look/english/article.tpl?IdLanguage=1&IdPublication=4&NrArticle=76964&NrIssue=2&NrSection=1

bnelson44 on April 20, 2008 at 12:51 PM

Rovin on April 20, 2008 at 12:51 PM

A lot of pressure is being applied right now on Iranian backed units and units who the Iraqi goverment see as a threat.

bnelson44 on April 20, 2008 at 12:53 PM

no viable state can abide large private armies controlling its sovereign territory, especially not when receiving significant assistance from another nation.

After the Mahdi & their Iran connection, perhaps she will use the same language about the FARC & Hugo?

clghitis on April 20, 2008 at 1:03 PM

Sadr is a member of Iraq’s parliament. Iraq is a democracy remember? You can’t go around assassinating elected officials in a democratic country.

aengus on April 20, 2008 at 12:46 PM

Oh yes you can. Malaki realizes that there is no going back now. Either Sadr or he has to go. Look for Sadr to live in exile over with his buddies in Iran. The time has passed where these two can make nice.

THE CHOSEN ONE on April 20, 2008 at 1:13 PM

Hoping Condi has time to stop and give Jimmah a good hard knee in the filberts.

whitetop on April 20, 2008 at 1:52 PM

The Iranian leader can announce he is coming and gets a parade and teaming crowds welcoming him in Iraq. He can make public appearances. They can’t kill Sadr because he is very powerful politically and still has a support base among ordinary Iraqi Shi’ites. Sadr City still bears his family name and his support base remains intact. Presenting Sadr as the last impediment to success in Iraq is absolute rubbish as recent events in Sunni areas not involving AQI illustrate.

Condi Rice is partly responsible for this shameful result in Iraq as is the current President and yet people here are still obsessed over Carter meeting with Hamas leadership telling them to decaler a unilateral cease fire and pointing out that they need to abandon some of their core political aims. There is no denying that we have helped Iran achieve some very important strategic objectives in the region and most importantly in the Gulf. Nice job W & Co.

lexhamfox on April 20, 2008 at 2:49 PM

Sadr is a member of Iraq’s parliament.

He is? Are you sure about that? I thought Mookie backed certain M.P.’s, but wasn’t actually one himself. I’m
not being sarcastic or rhetorical, but can somebody confirm that Mookie holds a seat in Parliament? Thanks.

Tony737 on April 20, 2008 at 3:08 PM

He is? Are you sure about that?

No he’s not. His political party had some ministry seats, 6 or 8 I think, and he has some parliamentary seats, I thinking something like 23. But he withdrew his group in protest last fall to force Maliki out because Maliki wouldn’t telll the US to leave. And as I recall Maliki succeeded in reforming the government with the Sunnis and Kurds and the remaining Shia parties thus eliminating Sadr. He might have sent his parliamentary reps back, I can’t recall, but I do believe he’s lost his ministry seats because they were either filled by the other parties that joined with Maliki’s Shia group and I think a few of them were merged with other ministries.

He’s just sh!t out of luck now.

Texas Gal on April 20, 2008 at 4:29 PM

After maliki started stomping the mahdi army this month, sadr renewed his call for cease fire, and the sadrist iraqi politicians tried to reintegrate into parliament.

I don’t have a link handy, but here is wikipedia which does not list muqtada al sadr as an iraqi parliamentarian.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Members_of_the_1st_Iraqi_Council_of_Representatives#Sadrist_Movement

It’s a bit out of date though.

hatespam on April 20, 2008 at 5:08 PM

Sadr has threatened to end his cease-fire, but he has already lost Basra and Umm Qasr. His Mahdis have strength in Sadr City in Baghdad, but they are being reduced block by block with a combined effort from the Iraqi Army and US forces. He may not have much ground from which to conduct his war

This sounds very good. Success and victory must be just around the next corner.

Obama’s plan to have all U.S. combat forces out of Iraq by the middle of 2010 clearly must be too pessimistic as with all this marvelous success and victory George W. Bush will surely have them out by the end of his Presidency on January, 2009.

That other pessimist, General Petraeus can probably start looking for a cork screw to open up that bottle of champaign that he put in the back of his refrigerator.

MB4 on April 20, 2008 at 5:09 PM

1. Sadr is in Iran. He is not a Member of Parliment.
2. The cease-fire ended 25 March and Sadr’s offer of another was never accepted by Maliki. The fighting continues and JAM is losing.
http://www.defenselink.mil//news/newsarticle.aspx?id=49632
3. The propaganda in the press about what is going on with the ISF might as well been written in Tehran.
4. The coalition has quit mentioning the cease-fire and quit using honorifics when refering to Sadr in its releases about two weeks ago.
5. Even most of the press quit referring to JAM as “powerfull” over two weeks ago. Only the Iranian propagandist continue that theme.

The real game is on, JAM is over-rated, the ISF is attacking, and only the press is stupid enough not to realize it.

DJ Elliott on April 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM

“The Telegraph and davod may have to try to keep up with current events as the media continues their “spin-cycle” of defeatism.”

My linking of the Telegraph article was for information only. I wonder if the British Army officers quoted find the headline ironic – “The British-trained Iraqi Army’s attempt to retake Basra from militiamen was an “unmitigated disaster at every level”, British commanders have disclosed.”

davod on April 20, 2008 at 6:45 PM

Tony737 on April 20, 2008 at 3:08 PM

Texas Gal on April 20, 2008 at 4:29 PM

My mistake. I thought he held a seat himself.

aengus on April 20, 2008 at 6:48 PM

aengus, I’m sure he would like to have a seat in parliament, I think he thought he was going to get a ministry seat, but you see he wants to be Sistani’s replacement when he dies and Sistani has said that Clerics should keep out of politics. Sadr would be going against Sistani if he did that, at least as long as Sistani is alive.

Texas Gal on April 20, 2008 at 7:49 PM

That’s cool, Aengus, but ya sure threw me for a loop there! :-)

Tony737 on April 20, 2008 at 8:07 PM

Boots?

- The Cat

MirCat on April 21, 2008 at 3:21 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.