Blogging the Qur’an: Sura 22, “The Pilgrimage”
posted at 8:00 am on April 20, 2008 by Robert Spencer
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Islamic scholars are divided over whether this sura dates from the Meccan or Medinan period of Muhammad’s prophetic career. Ibn Kathir and Maulana Muhammad Ali say it’s Meccan, while the Tafsir Anwar ul-Bayan, Daryabadi and others say it’s Medinan. Maududi splits the difference by noting a stylistic change between verses 1-24 and verses 25-78, and postulating that the first part comes from Mecca and the second from Medina.
Verses 1-24 are another warning about the dreadful Day of Judgment (vv. 1-2, 4, 7) and excoriation of the perversity of the unbelievers (vv. 3, 5-6, 8-13). The righteous will be admitted to luxuriant Gardens (vv. 14, 23-24). Those who doubt that Allah will help Muhammad in this world and the next should hang themselves (v. 15). “This,” says Ibn Kathir, “was also the view of Mujahid, ‘Ikrimah, ‘Ata, Abu Al-Jawza, Qatadah and others. The meaning is: whoever thinks that Allah will not support Muhammad and His Book and His Religion, let him go and kill himself if it annoys him so much.” Allah has sent down clear signs – a reference to the verses (ayat, or signs) of the Qur’an – and guides to the truth those whom he wills to guide (v. 16). Jews, Christians, and others will all be judged (v. 17); “Allah will decide on the Dauy of Judgement between them,” says Maulana Bulandshahri in the Tafsir Anwar ul-Bayan, “and disclose to them that only the Muslims were guided aright.”
Even the sun, moon, stars, and all created beings worship Allah (v. 18). In fact, Muhammad was once asked where the sun went when it set. He replied: “It goes (i.e. travels) till it prostrates itself underneath the Throne and takes the permission to rise again, and it is permitted….”
How dreadful will the Judgment and hellfire be? Allah luridly describes the horrors of hell – scalding water, iron whips (vv. 19-22). According to a hadith, Muhammad says that 999 out of every thousand people will be sent to hell. On that Day, Adam will ask Allah: “O Allah! How many are the people of the Fire?” Allah will answer: “From every one thousand, take out nine-hundred-and ninety-nine.” Muhammad explained that that one person saved would be a Muslim, telling his companions: “Rejoice with glad tidings; one person will be from you and one-thousand will be from Gog and Magog.”
Maududi suggests that verses 25-78 were revealed not long after the Muslims migrated from Mecca to Medina, and around the time of the Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca, were feeling particularly homesick. The pagan Quraysh controlled Mecca at that time, and had barred the Muslims from making the pilgrimage. “Therefore, they might even have been praying for and expecting Divine permission to wage war against those tyrants who had expelled them from their homes and deprived them of visiting the House of Allah and made it difficult for them to follow the way of Islam. It was at this psychological occasion that these verses were sent down.”
Those who are keeping the Muslims from making the pilgrimage will suffer a grievous punishment (v. 25). Allah directed Abraham to the site for the Sacred Mosque in Mecca and told him that it would be a place of pilgrimage for those who believe in Allah and do not associate partners with him (vv. 26-31). All people should perform sacrificial rites, sacrificing animals to Allah (vv. 32-38).
Those who have been expelled from their homes and victimized in other ways have permission to fight against those who have wronged them (vv. 39-40). According to Mujahid, Ad-Dahhak, Ibn ‘Abbas, ‘Urwah bin Az-Zubayr, Zayd bin Aslam, Muqatil bin Hayan, Qatadah and others, this was the first verse revealed about jihad – that is, says Maududi: “v. 39 is the first verse that grants the Muslims permission to wage war.” This verse is also the epigraph of Osama bin Laden’s October 6, 2002 letter to the American people, in which he details his motives and goals.
The Muslims, “if We establish them in the land, establish regular prayer and give regular charity, enjoin the right and forbid wrong” (v. 41) – that is, they establish the proper ordering of society. But those who reject the message of the Muslims will ultimately be destroyed, as were the disbelievers of bygone ages (vv. 42-48). Allah tells Muhammad how to address the unbelievers, telling them that he is just giving them a warning: follow the way of righteousness or face hellfire (vv. 49-51).
Satan has interfered with the messages of all previous prophets, but Allah abrogates whatever falsehood he throws in (vv. 52-53). Ibn Kathir says at that this point many commentators of the Qur’an discuss the Satanic Verses incident, in which Muhammad, hoping to reconcile with the pagan Quraysh tribe of Mecca (of which he was a member and who had rejected his prophethood) was said to have declared three goddesses worshipped by the Quraysh as the “daughters of Allah.” Then, realizing he had compromised his message of monotheism, he retracted the verses in question, saying that in that instance he had been inspired by Satan. Ibn Kathir, however, doesn’t believe that any of the accounts of the incident are reliable. We will return to this when we come around to sura 53, in which the beginning part of Muhammad’s revelation about the goddesses still appears, although of course the “Satanic” elements are not there.
Allah guides believers to the straight path of Islam (v. 54), while those without faith will never accept Islam, until finally judgment comes upon them (vv. 55, 57). Those who are killed in jihad warfare will be rewarded (v. 59). Those who have retaliated only in proportion to the injury they suffered, and then are attacked again, will receive help from Allah (v. 60). Ibn Kathir explains: “Muqatil bin Hayan and Ibn Jurayj mentioned that this was revealed about a skirmish in which the Companions encountered some of the idolaters. The Muslims urged them not to fight during the Sacred Months, but the idolaters insisted on fighting and initiated the aggression. So the Muslims fought them and Allah granted them victory.”
Allah has power over all things, and all things bear witness to his presence and power (vv. 61-66). Muhammad is to call all people to Islam, without arguing with them (vv. 67-69). Allah knows everything (v. 70), and yet they persist in their perversity and idolatry (vv. 71-72). The idols of the unbelievers can’t even create a fly (v. 73). The believers should worship Allah (v. 77) and fight for his cause, which is the religion of Abraham. Allah has called the believers Muslims both before this revelation and now in it also. The believers’ job is to be witnesses to Allah before all mankind (v. 78).
Next week: Sura 23, “The Believers.” “Successful indeed are the believers” – with Islam comes success.
(Here you can find links to all the earlier “Blogging the Qur’an” segments. Here is a good Arabic/English Qur’an, here are two popular Muslim translations, those of Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall, along with a third by M. H. Shakir. Here is another popular translation, that of Muhammad Asad. And here is an omnibus of ten Qur’an translations.)
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
“The Muslims are commanded for the first time to wage war.”
I confess to a complete ignorance of the Koran, having never read it. But a few questions to you sir:
Have you ever read/blogged the Torah or Bible? I seem to remember the Jews receiving commands from their god to wage war, indeed to wipe out entire populations, sparing none. Not even the women and children, or cattle for that matter. According to their myths, wasn’t their first king Saul actually punished for not carrying out such commands to the letter, sparing the cattle for sacrifice? Where would be the difference?
Are you sir a practicing Muslim, Christian or Jew, or perhaps like myself, (and from my understanding the illustious Allahpundit), an atheist?
Watchman on April 20, 2008 at 8:51 AM
Thanks, but no thanks.
Well, then, we must be pretty far from the day of judgement, since Muslims make up about 15% of the entire world population. There aren’t enough non-Muslims to make the ratio work and at the relative fertility rates, there will never be enough non-Muslims to make up 999 out of 1000 souls in hell. Either that, or, just maybe, this whole Islam thing is an ideological rationalization for a pedophile sociopath’s activities here on Earth, based on the psychological insight that Arabs are lazy but emotional people who can be whipped up into a frenzy at the thought of war and looting.
This question has been asked at almost every step of the way through this series, and the actual answer is a profound reflection on the nature of the deity as envisioned by the two religions, Judaism and Islam. Now, if you actually read Mr. Spencer’s reply and take it to heart, you will learn something about the difference and realize why Islam’s envisioning of the nature of the deity is so much more dangerous to non-Muslims TODAY than the Judaic idea of God’s nature is to non-Jews TODAY. If you just asked the question because you thought you were being clever and don’t take Mr. Spencer’s reply to heart, you will leave this exchange as ignorant as you came in. It’s your choice.
venividivici on April 20, 2008 at 9:05 AM
Watchman:
The difference would be that the commands in the Old Testament were localized, and uniformly spiritualized by Jewish and Christian exegetes. No Jews or Christians have ever taken these passages as normative for their behavior or as marching orders in later ages.
In contrast, as the use of 22:39 as an epigraph by Osama bin Laden (which I noted above) indicates, the Qur’an does contain instructions to believers to wage war against and subjugate unbelievers — instructions which mainstream Muslim exegetes have interpreted as valid and binding upon believers for all time.
There are many passages involved in this, but see especially my discussions of Qur’an 9:29:
Part 1
Part 2
Yes, I am one of those things, and actually it is no secret. But the Qur’an blog is not written from a sectarian standpoint. A primary concern is the Qur’an’s abundant teaching on unbelievers, since that teaching is of pressing moment in world politics today, but if you read a few of the segments you will see that I am concentrating on how Muslim interpreters have understood the Qur’an, not on how it has been understood by people of different faiths.
Robert Spencer on April 20, 2008 at 9:05 AM
venividivici says:
I bet many devout Muslims believe, like many devout Christians, that many of their own who fill the mosques are not ‘true believers’. Ever heard a good Pentacostal preaching based on Matthew 7:21?
HeIsSailing on April 20, 2008 at 9:20 AM
I thought about that and to make the ratios work, there would have to be about 6 million “true” Muslims (or really only 5 million, since there are 5 billion infidels and we need to have that 1 to 999 ratio to make the hellfire story work), with a world population of about 6 billion. For those Muslims that believe in this 999 out of 1000 junk (and they all should, since the Koran is the literal word of their god and all that), the obvious solution is for them to start killing their fellow Muslims (since killing infidels only worsens the situation) until there are only about 5 million Muslims left in the world. It’s tragic, of course, but it’s in the hadith, so what can you do?
venividivici on April 20, 2008 at 9:37 AM
Another great addition to the series. Thanks Robert.
Zorro on April 20, 2008 at 10:15 AM
Are you sure muhammed wasn’t Baptist?
Kidding.
Thank you for another good lesson.
locomotivebreath1901 on April 20, 2008 at 10:54 AM
Robert,
Did the, “Satanic versus” cause Muhammad any lost credibility at the time? I would think that incident could have completely undermined Islam at the time and even today cause major problems… his motivations for writing them was clear. The inconsistency was clear. His excuse, “the devil made me do it”, seems hollow since he must have known they weren’t coming from Allah if for no other reason than it contradicted what he had already been told and surely Allah does not make mistakes. It just seems to me this must have been a serious gaff that he somehow managed to overcome.
Also, are these versus the subject of Rushdie’s book by the same name?
TheBigOldDog on April 20, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Yeah, but how many Pentecostal churches have you heard of taking up machine guns and committing mass murder upon those they deem nonbelievers?
There is a difference.
Mommynator on April 20, 2008 at 11:52 AM
venividivici:
Please note that “this 999 out of 1000 junk” is from the Hadith, not from the Qur’an itself, although it does come up in the context of commentary on this sura.
Robert Spencer on April 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM
TheBigOldDog:
Clearly yes, by the record of the early Islamic sources on this.
Today most Muslim scholars deny that the incident happened at all. Many of their predecessors, however (notably Zamarkhshari), were not so sure.
Yes.
Essentially, yes. Rushdie’s book is a novel, but it uses the actual incident as a jumping-off point.
Robert Spencer on April 20, 2008 at 2:22 PM
True, I corrected myself in a later comment. I hope it’s a strong hadith, with a well-attested transmission chain.
venividivici on April 20, 2008 at 2:22 PM
venividivici:
Yes, it is, in fact. It’s from Bukhari, the hadith collection that Muslims consider most reliable. Only a small minority of Bukhari ahadith (not including this one) are questioned as to their reliability.
Robert Spencer on April 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM
Mommynator, from today’s commentary from Mr Spencer, it seems to me that many devout Muslims consider many of their fellow Muslims to be “not true Muslims”. The same is also true of many of today’s devout Pentacostals. In that, both religions are very similar. That is the context in which I was comparing the two.
I was not comparing the two religons in their totallity – obviously there are vast differences between them. But to me they do seem similar in that one regard.
HeIsSailing on April 20, 2008 at 3:53 PM
FWIW, I knew where you were going with the comparison. I think as a general rule, the smaller the differences between people, the larger they make them seem as a way of defining who is “in” and who is “out”.
As for the differences between Christianity and Islam, I remember someone saying, “Christians will tell you you’re going to Hell and Muslims will try to send you there.” Rings true to me.
venividivici on April 20, 2008 at 4:18 PM
On the off chance that you did ask a legitimate question, and are not just a troll playing troll games, I’ll give you my perspective as an atheist.
It doesn’t matter what the Torah or Bible says. This series is not about the Christian or Jewish texts. It’s about Islam. (Excuse me, it’s about the Koran. Wouldn’t want to offend all those people who insist on claiming that Islamic terrorists “misunderstand” their own religion.)
To give you an analogy: whenever I post anything negative about John Kerry, some idiot always has to reply and bring up George W. Bush’s history. George W. Bush could be Ed Gein’s evil twin, and that still wouldn’t change the fact that John Kerry is a liar and an opportunist.
The same principle applies here. No matter how bad any other religion is, it doesn’t change the fact that Islam is the worst. And if you are an atheist as you claim to be, you would have no problem with concept.
Unless, of course, you’re a college educated liberal, in which case you’ve been taught that Christians and Jews are horrible, and Islam is The Religion Of Peace.
Jaynie59 on April 20, 2008 at 8:34 PM
Would you be excusing the muslim war that is now going on in the world?
Johan Klaus on April 20, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Jaynie59 on April 20, 2008 at 8:34 PM
Perhaps a student or professor.
Johan Klaus on April 20, 2008 at 9:53 PM
Watchman, a comment acknowledging Mr. Spencer’s reply in some form or fashion would be appropriate right about now. Has he just explained himself to the four winds, or did you actually read his reply?
RD on April 21, 2008 at 6:59 AM
… and “explained himself” should been placed in quotation marks, as it’s hardly necessary to do *that*; but Mr. Spencer does patiently offer the reply – a prototype of sorts, given how many times the same questions have been asked in the past – in response to questions like yours, which are also prototypes, invariably of the form “Don’t Judaism and Christianity say X too?” or “Aren’t you a Jew / Christian / … too?”
RD on April 21, 2008 at 7:22 AM
Robert, all – I finally had the opportunity to read the recent FrontPage symposium. I won’t comment here, other than to recommend it highly to those of you interested in this topic. I am no scholar, but even I knew enough to be able to come to the same conclusion as Robert did at the end of it.
Symposium: A New Koran?
Connie on April 21, 2008 at 10:15 PM
I always look foward to this thread..Thanks again Robert!!
jerrytbg on April 21, 2008 at 10:37 PM
I usually like to leave a comment here just to show my continued interest, but Mr. Spencer writes it all so clearly that I seldom have questions.
Thank you Mr. Spencer, an excellent presentation as always.
Maxx on April 21, 2008 at 11:01 PM
What a great essay.
I finally have to admit I am having a hard time reading this, because so much of what is good in this faith is unacceptable in mine, to the point it is like reading a tract against my own faith.
I wonder if this sort of response happens a lot.
I can listen to the Dalai Lama, who is to me a pagan, and find a lot of agreement, but this stuff gets my dander up
This doesn’t read like the Old Testament which I find inspiring history of people good and bad, and a great saga of faith and prophecy. But then, the Old Testament gives my defintions of good and bad. God did not order me to attack Jericho but those fighting the battle of Jericho found strength in God. They were escaping slavery in Egypt and returning home. That is not the same as a requirement to subjugate the earth
I am going to send this essay to my friends. Something about this session drives home the great chasm between me and them
entagor on April 23, 2008 at 4:50 AM
Comment pages: