Chinese send guns and ammo to Mugabe

posted at 9:56 am on April 19, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Talk about bad timing! Just as Thabo Mbeki had begun to attract negative attention around the world for his apologetics for Robert Mugabe after the Zimbabwean dictator had stolen the last presidential election, along come the Chinese to make the situation even worse. A ship full of armaments bound for Mugabe arrived in Durban and set off a series of protests that highlighted Mbeki’s decision to run interference for Mugabe:

A Chinese ship loaded with armaments for Zimbabwe steamed into the port of Durban this week and set off a political firefight, putting newfound pressure on South Africa — and now China — to reduce support for Zimbabwe’s government as it cracks down on its rivals after a disputed election.

Dock workers at the port, backed by South Africa’s powerful unions, refused to unload the ammunition and weapons on Friday, vowing protests and threatening violence if the government tried to do it without them.

Meanwhile, the Anglican archbishop of the province appealed to South Africa’s High Court to bar transporting the arms across South Africa, arguing that they were likely to be used to repress Zimbabweans. The court agreed, and by late Friday the ship had pulled up anchor and set sail.

The arms shipment was ordered from China before the elections, but its arrival amid Zimbabwe’s political crisis illuminated deep fissures within South Africa over how to respond, and brought new scrutiny on China at a time when its human rights record is already under fire for suppressing protesters in Tibet and supplying arms to the government of Sudan.

Wherever peoples are oppressed these days, two constants appear. One is the inevitable chorus of apologists with ready excuses for the oppressors, blaming colonialism from a century ago or Crusades from a millenium past. The other is the Chinese government.

In Iran, the Chinese refuse to meaningfully support the sanctions regime intended on both ending nuclear proliferation and the reign of the mullahcracy. In Sudan, Beijing props up the government that conducts genocides against its own people and allied with Arab Janjaweeds to conduct a parallel Islamic ethnic cleansing. They have kept Kim Jong-Il in power for decades while North Koreans starve to death. Now they want to prop up Robert Mugabe while Zimbabwe melts from a self-sufficient nation to a failed state of starving masses.

Why do the Chinese seem so insistent on subsidizing oppression? It’s not just oil. That could certainly be the reason in Iran and Sudan, but not in North Korea or Zimbabwe. Rather, it seems to be a deliberate policy to support regimes that murder, starve, and oppress people. There is a word for that — evil.

After this latest proof of Chinese policy, the International Olympic Committee has even more reason to hide their heads in shame this summer when they supply Beijing with its propaganda platform.

Update: The ship, An Yue Jiang, has headed for Angola to offload its cargo instead.  The Chinese do not easily give up.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Just offer them a chest full of basketballs.

BobMbx on April 9, 2013 at 6:03 PM

who to believe…..

PappyD61 on April 9, 2013 at 6:04 PM

If you want something done right, send Susan Rice.

steebo77 on April 9, 2013 at 6:04 PM

……….an government with a charismatic leader that lies or….

PappyD61 on April 9, 2013 at 6:05 PM

Barack will blink. He’ll offer something of substance behind closed doors. No way this escalates to war.

BKeyser on April 9, 2013 at 6:07 PM

Send Obama over there; maybe he’ll bore him to sleep with his speeches.

squint on April 9, 2013 at 6:08 PM

Second look at pulling U.S. troops out of North Korea?

and they say Palin is dumb. Allah when is the last time we had troops in NORTH korea?

unseen on April 9, 2013 at 6:08 PM

It’s tomorrow in North Korea right now…

Seven Percent Solution on April 9, 2013 at 6:10 PM

North Korea didn’t go for a comprehensive common sense balanced approach to not bombing anybody?

Apparently the Obama Campaign needs a better focus group consultant in North Korea.

forest on April 9, 2013 at 6:11 PM

Second look at pulling U.S. troops out of North Korea?

and they say Palin is dumb. Allah when is the last time we had troops in NORTH korea?

unseen on April 9, 2013 at 6:08 PM

Did you even click on the link. He was quoting Chuck Hagel.

RickB on April 9, 2013 at 6:12 PM

the difference between Korea and Iraq and Afgan is we have a treaty with SK and we would be the defenders not the attackers. the public is weary of empire building in far off corners of the world. empire building done poorly and for no reason it seems. A korean conflict is about defending an ally and friend.

unseen on April 9, 2013 at 6:12 PM

It’s a good thing Obowma has that party tonight…

Seven Percent Solution on April 9, 2013 at 6:12 PM

Did you even click on the link. He was quoting Chuck Hagel.

RickB on April 9, 2013 at 6:12 PM

no I didn’t and I didn’t see any quotes around it either.

unseen on April 9, 2013 at 6:13 PM

There’s a key distinction in the public opinion I think between Yes South Korea should be defended as an ally of the US and No the US should not keep nearly 30,000 troops along the DMZ trip wire for 60 years as little more than cannon fodder while the ROK goes from war-ravaged refugee to economic mini-superpower more than capable of meeting the great majority of its military/security needs.

Sacramento on April 9, 2013 at 6:13 PM

if China didn’t intervene on the NorKs’ side.

It would seem more likely that China would intervene on the NorKs’ side if we did simply leave South Korea to defend for themselves, our presence may give China second thoughts about intervening.

fourdeucer on April 9, 2013 at 6:13 PM

Did you even click on the link. He was quoting Chuck Hagel.

RickB on April 9, 2013 at 6:12 PM

ok clicked the link still didn’t see where it mentioned pulling troops out of north korea.

unseen on April 9, 2013 at 6:15 PM

Must have delivered it to the wrong general. How’d that work out for ya?

jake49 on April 9, 2013 at 6:16 PM

We should pull all of our troops out of Korea and most other countries across the world, and then when someone attacks us our response should be BARBARIC. That’s what military policy should be.

thphilli on April 9, 2013 at 6:23 PM

I guess the wording wasn’t sufficiently stern, or something.

msmveritas on April 9, 2013 at 6:25 PM

There’s a key distinction in the public opinion I think between Yes South Korea should be defended as an ally of the US and No the US should not keep nearly 30,000 troops along the DMZ trip wire for 60 years as little more than cannon fodder while the ROK goes from war-ravaged refugee to economic mini-superpower more than capable of meeting the great majority of its military/security needs.

Sacramento on April 9, 2013 at 6:13 PM

Distinction in public opinion or not, the US keeps 30,000 troops on the DMZ because the US is still at War with North Korea.

SWalker on April 9, 2013 at 6:29 PM

Why give anything to Barky, it’s not as if he will respond back forcefully; the norks have his number just as everyone else does.

Bishop on April 9, 2013 at 6:30 PM

This just goes to prove the demo-rat socialists running our nation into the ground now believe everyone (including the NORKS) are just as stupid as the low information voters that got Obummer elected not once, but twice!

Problem with BS talking point spinners (like most demo-rats are) is they eventually start to believe their own BS spin…problem with that is doing so in such a delicate foreign affairs situation like we now find ourselves in with the NORKS BS spin can get us and South Korea blowed up!

SMART POWER INDEED!!

Liberty or Death on April 9, 2013 at 6:35 PM

Why give anything to Barky, it’s not as if he will respond back forcefully; the norks have his number just as everyone else does.

Bishop on April 9, 2013 at 6:30 PM

The GOP has Bark’s number?

Cudda fooled me.

Bruno Strozek on April 9, 2013 at 6:35 PM

Why in the world did they not try the reset button Hillary carries around??

HotAirian on April 9, 2013 at 6:37 PM

Maxwell Smart Power!

Bet they met in the cone of silence.

Marcola on April 9, 2013 at 6:43 PM

Fortunately there are no Muslims involved front and center to paralyze you into submission. It’s all up to leftard common sense and how they feel about social justice.

BL@KBIRD on April 9, 2013 at 6:47 PM

Why in the world did they not try the reset button Hillary carries around??

HotAirian on April 9, 2013 at 6:37 PM

It got busted during that Benghazi dust-up.

antipc on April 9, 2013 at 6:48 PM

Should have sent Dennis Rodman. He talked to Li’l Kim and his wife personally. Sheesh.

Philly on April 9, 2013 at 6:49 PM

Second look at pulling U.S. troops out of North Korea?

and they say Palin is dumb. Allah when is the last time we had troops in NORTH korea?

unseen on April 9, 2013 at 6:08 PM

Says ‘South’ now; corrected?

Midas on April 9, 2013 at 6:59 PM

Jeez, the libertarians are ‘slow’. We have an international treaty with South Korea. We always honor our treaties. Period. Financial pointyheads will always complain. Thats in their nature. Lol.

tommy71 on April 9, 2013 at 7:01 PM

North Korean diplomat

Isn’t that a contradiction?

JetBoy on April 9, 2013 at 7:08 PM

For nearly two decades the U.S. stalwartly fought for the six party talks. The bipartisan consensus in the foreign policy establishment is and was that bilateral talks would quickly turn into pure blackmail sessions, and the potential for crises (and danger to the world) would grow larger. America fought for those talks for twenty years, un Democrat and GOP administrations, precisely because the alternative would endanger alliances and, potentially, populations.

So in come the Obama smarty-pants. And look where we are: they give in, and commence bilateral talks (even if they aren’t calling them that formally). The Japanese are scared out of their minds, because the Americans have been secretly negotiating with their craziest enemies, and the NORKS are threatening world peace.

There is no imbecility too far off the balance-beam for these Democrats.

MTF on April 9, 2013 at 7:12 PM

North Korea is full of it, they aren’t going to do anything more than try to test a few missiles (that might get shot out of the sky by Japan, assuming they make it that far), and irradiate their own lands. I gotta say, Obama is actually handling a foreign ‘crisis’ pretty well for once. China has been flexing its muscle against a lot of our allies in the region lately, particularly against Japan over the Senkakus. Obama is using the North’s belligerence as cover for bolstering the defenses of our Pacific allies, and calling out the Kim regime as a bunch of blowhards in the process.

Lawdawg86 on April 9, 2013 at 7:17 PM

I’m betting Obama sent an IPod with all his speeches and a box of DVDs that only work in the US.
Should have sent him your recipe for Getman Shepard Soufflé, you limpd!ck jug eared jackhat.

RovesChins on April 9, 2013 at 7:22 PM

Report: U.S. met secretly with top North Korean diplomat last month to, er, deliver talking points

…no food…no peace

KOOLAID2 on April 9, 2013 at 7:53 PM

Just offer them a chest full of basketballs.

BobMbx on April 9, 2013 at 6:03 PM

How about offering them Dennis Rodman and a player to be named later?

Happy Nomad on April 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM

Says ‘South’ now; corrected?

Midas on April 9, 2013 at 6:59 PM

yes.

Update: Whoops — accidentally typed “North” when I meant “South” up above. Corrected now.

Just pointing out how easy it is to get them “confused” when talking about the conflict. not trying to say Allah thought there were troops in North korea.

unseen on April 9, 2013 at 8:33 PM

Not sure I can follow this let the South do it…blah blah twice as many people, blah blah 40X larger wallet. Would the South want to risk what they built or would they make a sweet sweet deal with China as their new protector? My bet, the latter. Smart power indeed, inside The Great Wall.

Limerick on April 9, 2013 at 8:53 PM

Not sure I can follow this let the South do it…blah blah twice as many people, blah blah 40X larger wallet. Would the South want to risk what they built or would they make a sweet sweet deal with China as their new protector? My bet, the latter. Smart power indeed, inside The Great Wall.

Limerick on April 9, 2013 at 8:53 PM

Hmm.

slickwillie2001 on April 9, 2013 at 9:13 PM

A North Korea crisis might be a good thing. It will collapse like a house-of-cards, and perhaps the “international community” (of hypocrites) can get off their backsides and end the NK concentration camps.

NK as a society does not have far to fall, so I recommend kicking away the stool and letting them hang.

The Norks are not completely nuts. Nobody has done anything to provoke them. They hope to get some freebies to keep their pantomime on the road. They can probably launch a few missiles but I doubt they can hit anything. A first launch with a nuke would be instant death for them, they have to know that. And Obama would love to be credited with saving the free world, so he’ll be ready with his finger on the buzzer.

The only thing we know they have done for sure is to fire at some SK fishing boats and worry some islands, so I don’t think nuclear is the next stage (even if they can do it). They probably need gas money for the launching trucks.

virgo on April 9, 2013 at 10:20 PM

My bet, the latter. Smart power indeed, inside The Great Wall.

Limerick on April 9, 2013 at 8:53 PM

good point.

unseen on April 9, 2013 at 10:27 PM

Deterrent
Fry the little bastard. No one will really care.
Unite the peninsula into one Korea under the flag of South Korea.
Give the infrastructure reconstruction contracts to China.
China will kiss off Lil Kim, the Koreas will again be united.
The World will be at ease and no one will mess with us for a long time to come.

jpcpt03 on April 10, 2013 at 2:01 AM