Excuse me? There’s “ambiguity” surrounding the female body? And this chick went to Yale?

Honey, take a basic physiology course. Then you’ll know what the form & function of the female body is. There is no ambiguity!

Of course, physiology is usually taught from a “heteronormative” point of view. :)

The decline and fall of Western Civilization, high and low edition: First, found via the Corner, here’s a switchblade-sharp slice of life amongst the down and out of Commerce City, Colorado, as “Parents Fight Over Which Gang Toddler Should Join”:A…..

“Ambiguity about the Form and function of a woman’s body”… go back to physiology class.

The Book of Enoch (which was once cannonized and repeatedly quoted by Jude in the NT), describes how abortion was taught to mankind via the fallen angels:

“And the fifth was named Kasdeja: this is he who showed the children of men all the wicked smitings of spirits and demons, and the smitings of the embryo in the womb, that it may pass away“

It is a tragedy that all of us who do not believe in the official state religion of secular humanism, do not have anyone representing us this election!

Mccain needs to change his position on the Human Life Amendment or he will not get my vote.

If not, the republican party deserves to lose this year for nominating Mccain and throwing our principles out the window!

NARL, wow, they do have souls!
Torch on April 18, 2008 at 10:41 AM

Nah, it’s CYA. Mustn’t make the connection between groups like NARAL trivializing/politicizing abortion and the logical result in this POS “art.” I seem to remember a parade with women walking down the street wearing “I Had An Abortion” T-shirts, but I guess that wasn’t offensive to women who had miscarriages.

I’ll bet NARAL doesn’t want you to remember that right now — generalized disgust just might hurt their fund-raising or lobbying efforts.

Her educators told her to STFU and swallow their spin story.

SHE is the lowest bottom feeder of the most affluent opportunistic social system. She hasn’t the self determination to carry through with her own bloody project. SHE wanted discourse, but fails to deliver!

Yale “miscarriage artist” confesses to hoax? Update: I don’t know if I miscarried or not, says “artist”
HotAir

by Allahpundit
Art major Aliza Shvarts ‘08 wants to make a statement
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts (pictured) will be dis…

“This ‘project’ is offensive and insensitive to the women who have suffered the heartbreak of miscarriage.”

NARL, wow, they do have souls!

It’s not like she collected it once and used it time and again. She would need a new batch within a couple hours prior to “self fertilization”.

Did she give some guy a free “handy” every time she needed some batter?

Whoever provided it needs to be more careful with his boys. I have had plenty of mine go down the drain or toilet, but just handing them out can get you into trouble 9 months down the road.

I still want to know if she created a biohazard.

TexasDan on April 18, 2008 at 9:39 AM

No, it seems she did not reproduce.

RDuke on April 18, 2008 at 10:28 AM

Heh!

I still want to know if she created a biohazard.

TexasDan on April 18, 2008 at 9:39 AM

No, it seems she did not reproduce.

I guess what it reveals, given the hysteria about this in the righty blogosphere today, is the bottomless depths of credulity on the right about the evil secular humanists of the left.

Grow Fins on April 17, 2008 at 9:16 PM

Maybe you spoke too soon. The woman is standing by her original statement.

It still leaves room for doubt, considering she’s offering no proof that she was ever pregnant, but her intention, unless she’s lying now, was to impregnate herself for the purpose of aborting a fetus.

What are the odds that someone suggested that she confess to this “hoax” before someone in the DA’s office decided to charge her with multiple counts of pre-meditated murder?

If the woman who shot herself in the stomach the day she was supposed to give birth for the sole purpose of terminating her pregnancy wasn’t charged with murder, then this woman too will suffer no consequences.

“I wonder if she thought this up as a cover for having no real project.”

Perhaps, but this would just be an example of the Emperor’s New Clothes approach to art favored by the modern/pomo idiots, where “art” is whatever is shoved into a display area with a manifesto attached.

Every attempt to be wild or provocative in a meaningful way has already been done, and they run up against the fact that the Dadaists and Surrealists went down this path as far as you can go 90 years ago. Those boychicks at least took responsibility for the outcomes of their provocations, while today’s pseudo-artiste whines if he or she is called out on grounds of willful aesthetic stupidity.

What are the odds that someone suggested that she confess to this “hoax” before someone in the DA’s office decided to charge her with multiple counts of pre-meditated murder?

Arbalest on April 17, 2008 at 7:35 PM

Abortion is legal so I wonder if they could charge her with murder. I think that in some cases if the pregnancy was desired then a person can be charge with murder. Her stated goals and methods may show that she desired the pregnancy so maybe it could be murder. How about charging her with performing abortions without training or permits? How about charging her with improper handling and disposal of medical waste? How about the way she did it? Was that a medical procedure? I’m betting there are a number of charges that could be brought against her and the school for this. Then again it’s a collage and liberal one in a liberal state so it’s really doubtful she will get anything but praise. How did she get her “samples”? Would you provide one knowing that it was going to be used to impregnate someone? Someone that could come after you for child support if it didn’t work out as planned? It’s just another example of stupid collage kids and worthless collages. It’s ashamed what has happen to what were once intuitions of higher learning.

Ugly on April 18, 2008 at 3:45 AM
That says it all,LOL