The reactions from the left and the MSM (pardon the redundancy) over the Obamessiah’s performance (or lack thereof) during the debates with the Hildebeast the other night are hilarious.
These same people who for a decade have defended former Clin…

Speak the truth about their savior, and they will do anything and everything to smite the unbelievers.

Obamanuts anyone?
Zealots.

wise_man on April 17, 2008 at 3:52 PM

How ’bout, Obamalots?

//Now there’s an hilarious parody based on a famous Monty Python routine that’s just begging to be written.

Unlike all you John “100 Years In Iraq” McCain supporters, Obama doesn’t play gotcha poltics.

ninjapirate on April 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM

.
Gotcha politics would be too much like substance for the empty words from this empty suit.

This has been a hilarious day, especially if you’re on the right looking at the rabid left bloviate about how ABC had the “audacity” to dare to question their candidates on issues specific to their, hrrrmp! “Character”.
I …

NewsBusters.org – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

If the anger from the left over Wednesday night’s debate on ABC continues to manifest itself this way, an old phrase concerning women will have to be altered to "Hell hath no fury like a liberal scor…

gridlock2 on April 17, 2008 at 5:46 PM

Good job. Message delivered.

It is time to answer the question Sean…

The answer is, because Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dorne are something like royalty to the elite liberal Hyde Park set, to which Barack Obama so desperately wants to belong. Obama needed the support of these unreconstructed leftists in order to run for Illinois State Senate and again when he ran for the US Senate. Kissing the ring of Bill Ayers is a necessary step in gaining this support.

It is ridiculous to suggest that Barack Obama was unaware of this. Bill Ayers is famous for his association with the Weather Underground and has parlayed that association into a lucrative life as the icon of the radical elites. Absent the influence he has with these people, influence that is entirely dependent on his terrorist past, Ayers would just be another English professor and Obama would not give him the time of day.

The damaging thing about this association is that it shows that Obama seeks and receives the support of the most radical elements of society, and that these people are his political base, and will be first in line for political favors. Barack Obama is from Chicago, where political favors are akin to a Holy Obligation. Just as with Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama knew exactly who he was jumping into bed with, and it is dishonest in the extreme to pretend otherwise now.

He did not care then, and he does not care now, because his is an elitist. He accepts the radicalism of his associates because he is “down for the struggle”, but he thinks the mass of Americans are just too stupid, too bitter, or too blinded by the things to which they cling to understand and accept his radical friends. So he lies about knowing them, and expects us to take his word for it.

Sean has done an excellent job framing the question. Now it is time to give the answer, and in giving it, reinforce the accurate perception that Barack Obama is a radical elitist, and hopelessly out of touch with ordinary Americans.

WHAT ARE THEY AFRAID OF???? Hmmmm. Maybe the American people might actually get a glimpse of the real candidate, who they are, what they stand for, how they handle themself under a tiny bit of pressure. In other words…unfiltered.

The left never ever ceases to amaze me.

A lot of people have let that part slide, but I think that’s one of the most damaging parts of the comment. It sustantiates the claim that his NAFTA talk is insincere, exploitive empty rhetoric not to be taken seriously.

Spolitics on April 17, 2008 at 3:17 PM

Exactly. I thought the moderators were pretty easy on Obama, compared to what they could have done. The NAFTA/Canada lie could bring him down, but no one’s talking about it. Maybe they’re saving it for next week, after PA, going into IN and NC.

If it was the CAIR honcho as the subject I wonder how many criminal complaints would already be in the system? Like I said before, creepy. Substitue a school logo for George. There would be tear gas and plasti-cuffs scattered everywhere. This isn’t free speech, this is sicko/wacko you need answer some questions time.

I had to say, the moderators actually asked the two gradeschoolers on stage some tough questions. Finally.

I agree. I didn’t watch the entire debate, but the few portions I did watch were great questions to prepare BOTH candidates for what they WILL face whomever wins the nomination. This naturally upsets the nutroots.

I couldn’t believe how short George is. Charlie was sitting on a stool and was taller than George standing up. What is George, about 5′5″ tall?

saiga on April 17, 2008 at 2:47 PM

Who the he!! cares. Would you comment, “I couldn’t believe how ( )[insert derogatory word, ie: fat, skinny, black, white, retarded, ugly like saiga, many moles, hair lipped, feminine looking] Goerge is. A couple of my best friends are 5’5″ or shorter and it gets extremely old hearing ignorant fire trucks like you comment on their height to overcome their obvious deficencies. If someone is an asshat, that is in their control. Physical features not so much.

Keep up the good work George!

Has anyone noticed Obama supporters acting very similar to Ron Paul supporters?

ScoopPC11 on April 17, 2008 at 3:30 PM

Maybe they are one and the same.

Anybody ever see Paunots and Obamawamas in the same room at the same time?

Ever see Obamawamas on the street the same weekend a Star Trek convention is in town?