The Obama (Sr.) Paper
posted at 12:30 pm on April 15, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Politico has the latest on Barack Obama and his economic policy positions — but only if you’re interested in Barack Obama Sr., and if by latest you mean 1965. Spurred on by bloggers, Ben Smith and Jeffrey Ressner exhume a paper written by the elder Obama while in Nairobi that addresses Kenya’s adoption of socialism by attempting to parse whether new ruler Mzee Jomo Kenyatta intended on imposing Soviet-style socialism or something softer. This will have readers scratching their heads in bemusement:
Now, a long-forgotten essay written 43 years ago by Obama’s father has surfaced, and its contents reveal much not only about the senior Obama’s grasp of economic theory but also the iconoclastic politics that, his son would later write, sent him into the spiral of career disappointment that concluded with his death in 1982 in his native Kenya.
Parts of the article, titled “Problems Facing Our Socialism,” have been making the rounds on several small blogs over the past week, but Politico is now reproducing the entire piece in its original form online for the first time. …
Published in the esoteric East Africa Journal in 1965, the year after Kenyan President Mzee Jomo Kenyatta took power and the country declared independence from British rule, the paper takes a gently mocking tone to the Kenyatta government’s key, controversial statement of economic policy, titled “African Socialism and its Applicability to Planning in Kenya.”
Obama Sr.’s journal article repeatedly asks what the Kenyan government means by “African Socialism,” as distinct from Soviet-style communism, and concludes that the new phrase doesn’t mean much.
So what does this have to do with the 2008 presidential election in the US? Not much. Some have called this the “Rosebud” that explains Barack Obama fils, but Obama apparently has never read the paper. It focuses on Kenyan economic politics, and actually critiques the application of socialism in Kenya by Kenyatta.
In any case, it has little to do with the current presidential race. Obama Sr isn’t running for President, and his son only saw him once after this paper was written. Like many who grow up without a parent, Obama spent some time pursuing his ghost for very personal reasons, but this paper didn’t come to his attention. Obama grew up and developed his own political philosophies, which is what voters should consider in 2008 — not a dusty paper written by someone he hardly knew and who is in no position to exert any political influence over the candidate.
James Joyner agrees:
Obama’s a liberal Democrat who wants more government regulation of the economy, more redistribution of wealth, more deference to international institutions, more nationalization of medicine, and so forth and so on. Some of his policies — although probably none of his goals — are indeed “far to the left … of mainstream America.” He’s as close to a socialist as it gets in serious contenders for the presidency; but that’s not very close.
He’s part of a long movement that has adopted some of the tools of socialism in an effort to make society better, with decidedly mixed results. The state hasn’t taken over the means of production, but it has created layers of bureaucracy to oversee them. The tax code has more than a smattering of “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” And we’ve instituted speech codes and a thought police in our schools and institutions, ostracizing those who dare to speak other than the orthodox Truth.
Again, this is mostly, if not all, well-intentioned. These were all reactions against real injustices, if often over-reactions, that had negative unintended consequences. But Obama’s not talking about cleaning up these messes but rather moving further in that direction.
The above is argument enough about Obama’s politics to convince people to cast their votes elsewhere. We should stick with Obama himself and the team that has surrounded him during his political career rather than chase ghosts. This paper chase makes the argument against an Obama presidency look like it’s reaching when unnecessary.
Update: Baldilocks has a very unique perspective on this, and agrees that way too much is being made of this paper.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
As we’ve noted here before, this is newsworthy though not definitive in the least: Obama’s done plenty on his own. But again, newsworthy.
Vizzini on April 15, 2008 at 12:37 PM
I beg to differ. Obama like many other so called liberals is in fact a socialist. But he is also very smart and well educated and understands that Americans won’t vote for socialism …. IF you call it socialism. So he calls it hope and change.
D0WNT0WN on April 15, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Well said, and Obama is mostly socialist in his proposals. He doesn’t think people can survive and prosper without the government ‘helping’ them.
ThackerAgency on April 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM
Not very close? Exactly what does Barack Obama believe in, politically and economically, that ISN’T Socialist? Why the euphemism – “liberal Democrat”? Why not call a Socialist, a Socialist? Why do people fear calling these bastards what they are? Socialists!
Socialism is the destroyer of nations. It sucks the lifeblood out of the people. It turns them into hopeless pawns of the State.
And calling Socialist bastards like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton – “liberal Democrats” – will only hasten the destruction of America.
OhEssYouCowboys on April 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM
Yesterday Barack Obama told a Philadelphia reporter that if elected President, he would “immediately” ask his Attorney General to look into prosecuting former Bush officials for war crimes and torture: Obama would ask his AG to ‘immediately review’ potential of crimes in Bush White House.
“What I would want to do is to have my Justice Department and my Attorney General immediately review the information that’s already there and to find out are there inquiries that need to be pursued. I can’t prejudge that because we don’t have access to all the material right now. I think that you are right, if crimes have been committed, they should be investigated. You’re also right that I would not want my first term consumed by what was perceived on the part of Republicans as a partisan witch hunt because I think we’ve got too many problems we’ve got to solve.
funky chicken on April 15, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Wholeheartedly agree. How are voters going to be persuaded to understand, much less buy, a “political trajectory” from Sr.’s paper to Jr.’s record?
The lack of paper trail in Obama’s own history is much more relevant to this campaign.
Weak, Politico.
RushBaby on April 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Libs are already screaming at Politico, and esp at Ben, who they call a shill for Herself. That being said, apples really do not fall far from the tree, and if Obama won’t tell us details of his hope and change, folks are going to search for clues whereever they can.
Think_b4_speaking on April 15, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Well, Democrats evoke McCarthy every time a Republican candidate talks about hard-left Hollywood, 1984 every time a Republican talks about domestic security, and Viet Nam every time a Republican talks about the war in the Middle East.
Dragging a paper from 1965 into this race is perfectly legitimate, ever more so since the Democrat candidate does have a connection to the issues discussed therein.
Niko on April 15, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Since he was raised by his mother, the only tangential effect this could have is if Barak Sr.’s political leanings were mirrored by mom and discussed regularly in the house while Barak Jr. was growing up (and even then, that only would show the climate he grew up in, which can at times indicate how a person’s political beliefs will be as an adult while other times doesn’t prove anything — there are a lot of Red Diaper Babies out there like David Horowitz who outgrew their family ties to the far left as adults).
The paper is an interesting piece of trivia, but it’s not something Obama’s foes should harp on, especially since the candidate’s own words have offered up such a rich vein of quotes to challenge him with, as opposed to a 43-year-old tome on East African socialist economic theory.
jon1979 on April 15, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Who is doing that?
wise_man on April 15, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Greg Ransom’s original post on this lays out the relevance; that Obama’s book Dreams From My Father reveals that he dabbled with Marxism in college, inspired by his daddy (if not by this paper). There’s nothing terribly wrong with that (I was pretty far left myself back in my Ivory Tower years), but it does fill in a missing piece of the puzzle.
The Politico’s analysis, though, is risible. Obama’s dad was clearly a socialist at best and a communist more likely. His critique of Kenyatta’s socialism is clearly from the left. I agree that it largely doesn’t matter except as an insight into Barack as a young man.
Brainster on April 15, 2008 at 1:01 PM
I disagree.
Obamha has run a campaign on hollow “hope”& “change” without any substance. He has NO real experience or track record to point to to see what his hope and change actually means.
Under those conditions who he surrounds himself with is VERY relevant.
-He writes a book glorifying his father’s dreams yet we are not supposed to dig into what those dreams were of?
-He gives great credit to his pastor’s influence, yet we are not supposed to dig into what those pastor speeches said?
-He has open socialist/anarchist/communist supporters working at his campaign office (Che gear and all), yet we are not supposed to dig into that?
-He has a school teacher that he admits meeting and befriending others around him claim he started his Presidential run after meeting this teacher, yet we are not supposed to dig into the fact this teacher is a admitted proud liberal terrorist?
“Birds of a feather flock together.”
C-Low on April 15, 2008 at 1:06 PM
IMO, the reason that you (AP) refuse to admit that there’s a chance of Jr. being influenced even just a tiny bit by senior, is because of some personal experience with your own dad where he did something bad and you are trying to prove to yourself that you’re nothing like him (I hope I’m not pitching this idea too rudely…). There is absolutely no freaken way that he would be 100% immune from daddy’s socialist ideas. Something MUST have been rubbed off.
AlexB on April 15, 2008 at 1:06 PM
Him (AP) didn’t write the post.
RushBaby on April 15, 2008 at 1:09 PM
I respectfully disagree.
Red Pill on April 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM
Ed,
Just curious – what’s the source for that?
Buy Danish on April 15, 2008 at 1:17 PM
As someone with a living father who is both Kenyan and communist, I keep pointing this out. Maybe I’ll mention it to the Lefties. Maybe not.
baldilocks on April 15, 2008 at 1:28 PM
No one right now, since this is a Day 1 story in the regular media with the Politico report. It’s just pointless for anyone to continue to push it after that, since the more important things to focus on are what the candidate himself says and does (which is also why using Obama’s middle name in a taunting way is also counter-productive. It provides a low level of style without the substance of all the dumb ideas that could come to fruition if Barak Jr. was actually elected in November).
jon1979 on April 15, 2008 at 1:30 PM
My disagreement with James Joyner is over the “well intentionedness” of the left’s socialism. Lenin, Mao, Castro all had real injustices they were facing, but the overreaction was just as bad, in effect recreating the same systems they fought against. (I’m going to leave out the German example, though even there the Treaty of Versailles was bad). Socialism is about gaining power and believing your ideas are so good that it is ok to use force/threat of force to run other people’s lives.
rbj on April 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM
I don’t see Stalin and Pol Pot in your list of those facing “real injustices.”
If only a few tens of millions more could’ve been exterminated – the Communist Utopia would’ve prevailed. Those “well intentioned” souls just needed more time.
OhEssYouCowboys on April 15, 2008 at 1:39 PM
Right…and he had no clue that
ReverandJeremiah Wright was a racist…he never heard him say any of those things…and Mrs. Obama is just kidding about all that “hate America” stuff…I’m tired of people saying that none of these people affect Obama in any major way. I’m tired of all the excuses…however, I do agree with:
He’s the swiss cheese of candidates, but with the media having his back and excusing everything, people appear to be unable to see the holes…
charlie36r on April 15, 2008 at 1:39 PM
BBBUT WHAT ABOUT PRESCOTT BUSH AND ADOLF HITLER!!>!>!?!?!?#$?#@$
benrand on April 15, 2008 at 1:42 PM
A much better issue to ‘nail’ Obama on - he’s a “guilty” yuppie candidate, and so is his bitter wife.
Entelechy on April 15, 2008 at 1:54 PM
Yawn.
Loved my pop, but some things he believed I will never believe. 1924 Arkansas vs 2008 Texas. Sorry pop, but ya taught me to think for myself.
This ‘track’ into Mr O is about as crooked as it gets.
Limerick on April 15, 2008 at 2:09 PM
Last time I checked Obama had a book out titled “Dreams of My Father.”
In other words, Obama himself dragged his father into this race.
Niko on April 15, 2008 at 2:16 PM
Well then I hope you will keep us all up to date on this non-existent phenomenon.
wise_man on April 15, 2008 at 2:20 PM
I agree with Ed. Exhuming this paper is of limited value. Sen. Obama may have been influenced to some degree by what he knew of his father, but his father wasn’t around enough to make that a strong influence. I think Sen. Obama comes by his far left views of his own volition, and digging around in the writings of the father he saw only once after toddlerhood is not valuable.
Jill1066 on April 15, 2008 at 4:37 PM
tt
dave742 on April 16, 2008 at 8:41 AM
Comment pages: