Bad news for Barack: Media moving beyond “bitter”
posted at 9:10 pm on April 14, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Maybe a few years ago, had Barack Obama said something as stupid as he did in San Francisco last week, his defense focusing on the least objectionable part of his remarks may have fooled the media into following suit. So far, though, Obama has had no such luck. Mainstream journalists have focused on the entire statement, and like John Dickerson at Slate, can’t see any way to spin his comments — and Dickerson gives it his best shot:
Obama has not helped himself in his efforts at damage control. First, he said he was just telling the truth, but edited the truth he was telling. People are “bitter” because they’ve been let down by previous administrations, he said; his campaign seeks to take up their cause. This ignored the incendiary religion, guns, and xenophobia portions of his remarks.
Obama then argued that he was really complimenting small-town voters. At the CNN Compassion Forum Sunday night, he said, “you know, Scripture talks about clinging to what’s good.” This works only if you close your eyes to the rest of Obama’s original sentence, since surely he wasn’t saying it’s a good thing to cling to xenophobia and racism. Which is to say it doesn’t work at all. Obama also admitted that he didn’t choose his words carefully when he spoke about small-town values in San Francisco. But this was more than a slip—it was an extended riff. …
Ultimately, in trying to explain what Obama was thinking, I run out of string. He wasn’t expressing a sweeping view of the human behavior of small-town people. He was making a tactical point about how politicians appeal to voters at election time, but that tactical point about electoral behavior still relies on an unflattering view of small-town voters. No matter what helping hand you extend him, Obama still claimed that voters have been hoodwinked on Election Day, and no one wants to be told that in the past they’ve been duped into voting for the wrong person.
Obama supporters should know just how offensive it is to hear this line of argument. They’ve been on the receiving end of it for months, as Hillary Clinton and her allies have described them as deluded cult members who are marching behind the inexperienced senator because he gives a pretty speech. Obama supporters don’t like it when they’re [sic] well-thought-out reasons for following Obama are dismissed as emotional, irrational, and thoughtless. They should understand, then, why people who don’t support Obama—or in the past haven’t voted for Democrats—don’t like being told that they’ve drunk some kind of crazy Kool-Aid.
That’s the problem. No matter how Obama tries to spin it, his statement assumes Midwestern voters are idiots. That’s also the Thomas Frank attitude as well — Why won’t Kansas voters support Democrats trying to buy them off? — which answers itself. And note that in Obama’s original remarks, the audience laughed at his assertions in their condescension, and recognition of his.
Dickerson doesn’t mention the ramifications of Obama’s citation of Scripture, but that may even compound the problem. People with religious faith are used to people throwing Bible quotes out of context at them to challenge their faith and their values. It’s the hallmark of someone who treats Biblical faith with contempt. It smells a lot like Obama (or more likely, one of his staffers) did a text search for “cling” on an online Bible site, and coughed up a particular verse to cover himself.
In fact, Obama’s quote comes from Romans 12:9 — “Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good.” However, in the New International Version, “cling” appears 13 times (12 in the KJV), and almost all of them have negative connotations:
- Deuteronomy 28:60
He will bring upon you all the diseases of Egypt that you dreaded, and they will cling to you. - 1 Kings 1:51
Then Solomon was told, “Adonijah is afraid of King Solomon and is clinging to the horns of the altar. He says, ‘Let King Solomon swear to me today that he will not put his servant to death with the sword.’ “ - 2 Kings 5:27
Naaman’s leprosy will cling to you and to your descendants forever.” Then Gehazi went from Elisha’s presence and he was leprous, as white as snow. - Job 8:15
He leans on his web, but it gives way; he clings to it, but it does not hold. - Job 41:17
They are joined fast to one another; they cling together and cannot be parted. - Psalm 31:6
I hate those who cling to worthless idols; I trust in the LORD. - Psalm 44:25
We are brought down to the dust; our bodies cling to the ground. - Psalm 63:8
My soul clings to you; your right hand upholds me. - Psalm 101:3
I will set before my eyes no vile thing. The deeds of faithless men I hate; they will not cling to me. - Psalm 137:6
May my tongue cling to the roof of my mouth if I do not remember you, if I do not consider Jerusalem my highest joy. - Jeremiah 8:5
Why then have these people turned away? Why does Jerusalem always turn away? They cling to deceit; they refuse to return. - Jonah 2:8
“Those who cling to worthless idols forfeit the grace that could be theirs.
Clearly, Scripture treats “cling” as a mostly negative term — just as we do in regular life. Perhaps what frustrates Obama and the fellow liberals is that most believers follow Psalm 31:6, and would rather trust in the Lord than cling to the statists that promise Utopia through government control of their lives.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Don’t see it……Bwahaahhaahhh!
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 9:18 PM
What’s The Matter With San Francisco? That question has many answers and almost all of them also apply to Barack Hussein Obama.
D0WNT0WN on April 14, 2008 at 9:19 PM
Good. There’s no way to spin it if you look at his whole remark. Now I hope people drop with the “elitism” charge because the liberals always retort with “Hey look at boosh” and “Look at McCain and HillDog’s money”. McCain did well by focusing on the words and not directly make the accusation.
ninjapirate on April 14, 2008 at 9:20 PM
My favorite verse regarding “cling” is positive:
Oh you can’t do a thing,
without that cling,
Do wrap, do wrap, do wrap,
Do wrap, do wrap.
Hening on April 14, 2008 at 9:24 PM
Cling isn’t used in the KJV.
Regardless, “cling” itself is not offensive. One can cling to life, or cling to God as you ref: in Psa 63:8. Neither of those are remotely offensive. It’s just demonstrates intensity.
It’s the fact that Obama casts it as an either/or. Ie if they had economic prosperity, all “clinging” would be gone.
Spirit of 1776 on April 14, 2008 at 9:30 PM
Liberals “Cling” to Obama
Chakra Hammer on April 14, 2008 at 9:31 PM
Smells like Obama?
Smells like teen spirit, only less rational.
James OK on April 14, 2008 at 9:32 PM
I use that Bible site every week as I prepare Sunday School for my fourth-graders.
jgapinoy on April 14, 2008 at 9:33 PM
Everyone is blowing this out of proportion. I mean, it’s not like he said “macaca.” Baby-talk is far more hateful than condescending ideas and speech.
When he baby-talks, then I expect the media to be on him like white on rice.
ZRyan on April 14, 2008 at 9:34 PM
Oh,this is getting more clever by the moment,now
Obama is trying to drag the (K)clingons into this!
canopfor on April 14, 2008 at 9:34 PM
Thank you.
VolMagic on April 14, 2008 at 9:38 PM
The voices a Messiah hears….”bring out your dead”
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 9:40 PM
John Dickerson does a very good job except he goes astray a bit here:
True, but –
I think that misses the point. Politicians of all stripes make false promises they know they can’t and won’t keep, but we don’t need to be told this by other people – we figure it out for ourselves.
In any case Obama wasn’t talking about voting for the wrong person so much as he was talking about using the wrong criteria (in his not so humble opinion) to make voting decisions.
Buy Danish on April 14, 2008 at 9:41 PM
My favorite is: “I love the clingy way that red dress fits on my wife!”
Oh yeah, and Obamanation IS elitist, but then again so are Hill and McLame too.
Vntnrse on April 14, 2008 at 9:43 PM
Pffft……you all are a bunch of Clingons.
Limerick on April 14, 2008 at 9:46 PM
I forgot to add that this sounds just like you know who:
Buy Danish on April 14, 2008 at 9:46 PM
At the gym I saw CNN lead with this story again on the Campbell Brown show. A former Romney staffer went straight to the ‘cling to’ comments. Usually CNN treats Barry like a cross between George Clooney and Al Gore. But tonight they let Obama take his lumps for a few minutes.
Unless something dramatic happens I expect this story to cling to the front pages all week.
Vote Sauron 08 on April 14, 2008 at 9:50 PM
I agree.
You have to look at context to determine if cling has a good or bad connotation, also taking into account grammar and the meaning of the Hebrew and Greek words.
If you follow the links and then look at verses in the Verse Count column you will see how the word in the original language was translated using various English words.
I don’t think you can really make too much of how cling was used in an English version to refute Obama.
What you can conclude is that Obama/staff cherry-picked a verse to try to take the word cling used in a good context and try to extrapolate that virtue and use it to wallpaper over Obama’s use of cling in an obviously bad context.
And that’s not only pitiful, but silly.
INC on April 14, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Vntnrse on April 14, 2008 at 9:43 PM
Moral equivalence – does an argument not make! Why you choose to include McCain in your comment says all that needs to be said about your perspective…no soup for you!
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 9:52 PM
Your comment goes along with what Patrick Ruffini twittered.
terryannonline on April 14, 2008 at 9:56 PM
Proposed tee shirts:
1) Too Stupid to Vote for Obama.
2) Neanderthals for Clinton.
3) Knuckledraggers for McCain.
4) False-Consciousness Republican.
Dr. Charles G. Waugh on April 14, 2008 at 10:00 PM
I just think calling a RINO a RINO is not a bad thing. I’m conservative enough to know that McCain is bad for this country. Maybe not as bad as Hill or Obamanation but the lesser of three evils is still an evil. I don’t trust the man, that’s all…. In My Humble Opinion of course…and we all know what opinions are like. They are like noses…everyone has their own and they all smell!!! :)
Vntnrse on April 14, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Spirit of 1776 on April 14, 2008 at 9:30 PM
Intensity? Yes. However, when taken in context, David is clinging to God as his enemies are damned.
In any case, David is not clinging because of bitterness, rather because God’s love is better than life. One would assume that in good times or bad, the devout “cling” to their faith.
No matter how it’s parsed, Obambi is projecting his and Michelle’s bitterness onto small town & rural religious white folks. Just as Obambi clings to mentor Jeremiad because America is mean, not because of the love of God & salvation.
BLT will be the undoing of Obambi the Marxist, or at least it should. We’ll see. In the meantime, I’m loving it as he gets ripped from all sides.
AH_C on April 14, 2008 at 10:02 PM
Ha Ha!
baldilocks on April 14, 2008 at 10:03 PM
Sorry, but “teen” is way too near “adult”, way too near…
dmh0667 on April 14, 2008 at 10:04 PM
By the way, I didn’t order the soup. I asked for a salad to go with my meatloaf sandwich! (sorry, couldn’t resist)
:)
Vntnrse on April 14, 2008 at 10:04 PM
I’m not comfortable with the religious references because even mentioning God or the Bible means you want to create a Christian Taliban© nation.
At least thats what I have been told by the left for the last eight years.
Bishop on April 14, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Vntnrse on April 14, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Reality says its McCain Vs. ???? so…what ya gonna do? Sadly we are stuck with Juan, maybe Ed can convey some of our frustrations via the weekly Juan-blog…quiza?
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Ed,
Using the KJV, NIV or some other English translation doesn’t teach you much about the original connotation. If I had my Even-Shoshan concordance handy I’d check it out but it’s buried in a box.
I do know that Psalm 63:8 (63:9 per Jewish verse numbering) is definitely not negative.
The Hebrew word in this case and in 137:6 are both conjugations of the verb DBK, which means to stick. In modern Hebrew, debek is glue. The term “dveikut” is used to describe meditations that achieve communion with God.
Clinging to God is not a negative thing. It may take place in bad circumstances, but I think it’s a stretch to say that it is “a mostly negative” term.
rokemronnie on April 14, 2008 at 10:11 PM
I’m not a Bible expert, although I studied it a while ago, but from what I quickly glanced at in this topic, I think I’ll go back to refreshing my memory.
Maybe that’s the good thing that will come out from this circus that is called “presidential campaigns.”
Maybe that’s the good thing that will come out from all the garbage who are running for president.
Maybe a more personal with God can come out from this total fiasco that is called “The U.S. presidential elections.”
Maybe praying more will save America from people like Hussein Banana O’Bamba, Hairy Clicton and John “toilet” Mclain.
Indy Conservative on April 14, 2008 at 10:12 PM
I’d be curious to hear what their “well-thought-out reasons” are. I’ve heard Obama supporters on television give reasons such as “because he’s an African-American” and “because he’s different from other politicians.” Are those considered to be “well-thought-out reasons” for voting for Obama? They sound sort of bitter and bigoted to me. But then I’m just a typical white person, so perhaps I don’t understand.
AZCoyote on April 14, 2008 at 10:13 PM
Ummm meatloaf! Screw the doctors, the kids and the wife….its a big stinkin grease drippin meatloaf tomorrow night…cheese and onions an peppers with a pile-o-tatters… MANNN thats good eats!
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 10:15 PM
Hope. Change. Cling.
We have our trifecta.
TexasDan on April 14, 2008 at 10:15 PM
The Old Testament was written in Hebrew.
The New International Version is a translation.
The use of the word “cling” in the New International Version translation in not a very strong argument to interpret what BO meant when he was talking to the billionaire boys club in San Francisco.
slp on April 14, 2008 at 10:20 PM
AZCoyote on April 14, 2008 at 10:13 PM
Yep……
How long can you hold your breath?
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 10:21 PM
That makes me trust Ed wording even more.
Squid Shark on April 14, 2008 at 10:22 PM
Something Obama should have considered when he attempted to use it to justify his statement. All I’m doing is following his lead.
Ed Morrissey on April 14, 2008 at 10:23 PM
Speaking of crappy Biblical exegeisis, has anyone hung Wright for his “damn” thing yet? Aside from the whole patriotism angle, which is *ahem* damning enough, his understanding of scripture on this point is beyond lame.
I heard a radio caller on Hannity a few weeks ago claim that Wright was speaking in the context of receiving what we deserve from God based on our actions, and that the word “damn” is all over the Bible.
Really, really stupid stuff, that. If this was indeed Wright’s intent, he missed that the opposite of blessing is cursing, not damning. I can’t think of one use of the word “damn” in the Bible, but we can find the word “condemn”, which contains the same idea. That being, that final judgement has occurred, and the object of judgement has been consigned to Hell. That’s what being damned is.
Briefly, the idea of blessing and cursing starts with the fall–Adam and Eve come under the “curse” as a result of their (initial) sin. Pain in labor, hard toil to grow food, all that. At the giving of the covenant with Israel, God explains that if they walk in His ways, he will bless them, and enumerates the blessings. Walk away from Him, they come under a curse, which he also lays out for them.
Blessing and cursing are tied to our actions, and note that while cursing is reversible, Damnation is not.
So when Wright wishes “God damn America” on us all, his sentiments are not one of calling Americans to repentance, but of wishing the country as a whole to be consigned to Hell forever. No good way to spin that, dear “reverend”.
TexasDan on April 14, 2008 at 10:26 PM
When Ed said it was mostly negative, I concluded that the example you cited is one of the exceptions.
Buy Danish on April 14, 2008 at 10:26 PM
I think the thing that is the most offensive to me is that Obama acts as if it is all about money. After making a point of talking about everyone else’s greed he ponders how it could be that the white trash losers don’t vote for their “economic interests”….whatever that might be. After all the Democrats will give the po folks more free stuff and it is not as those rubes have principles or values or anything.
Nope it is all about money. Just ask Jeremiah Wright.
Terrye on April 14, 2008 at 10:26 PM
And calling McCain “toilet” seems a tad ridiculous to me. I listen to a lot of people complain, but where were all these complainers when the nominating process was going on? Why not field some people, support some people, get them in the public eye. No, people just sit back and wait to be served up a candidate and if it that candidate is not to their liking they act personally insulted or something. That is how people like Obama get this close to the White House.
Terrye on April 14, 2008 at 10:31 PM
dmh0667 on April 14, 2008 at 10:04 PM
I can tell that you do not have teen age children.
Johan Klaus on April 14, 2008 at 10:34 PM
Reminds me…
You know how a roll of Charmin and the crew of Star Trek Enterprise are alike?
They both go to Uranus to wipe out the (C)Klingons…..
CynicalOptimist on April 14, 2008 at 10:34 PM
TexasDan on April 14, 2008 at 10:26 PM
Well said.
Johan Klaus on April 14, 2008 at 10:37 PM
TexasDan on April 14, 2008 at 10:26 PM
Dan..Dan..Dan, being the good Christian that you are, please refrain from associating anything other than condemnation for the Charlatan that is Reverend Wright. The scriptures were the last thing on his mind when he delievered that wonderful sermon.
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 10:38 PM
HOPE
custer on April 14, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Are you saying Reverend Wright isn’t a “real” Christian, dmann?
Sounds like a rather “elitist” thing to say.
alphie on April 14, 2008 at 10:50 PM
Dude, nice on the scripture quotes. That pretty much explains it all.
knat on April 14, 2008 at 10:51 PM
Are you kidding? Remember McCain-Kennedy; that backroom deal to amnesty untold millions upon millions of illegal aliens, demolishing our nations sovereignty in the process, which they tried to ram through congress, bypassing normal procedures? Remember the disdainful epithets the bills opponents were called at the time? Remember that La Raza was reported to have had a role in the crafting of the bill?
If that isn’t elitism then there simply is no such thing.
FloatingRock on April 14, 2008 at 11:10 PM
Cling peaches in heavy syrup – just like an Obama speech.
whitetop on April 14, 2008 at 11:20 PM
Obama MUST be a bitter man. He spent twenty years attending a church whose pastor and congregation dwelt on the evils of the government screwing them over and railing on Jews and Italians.
Bishop on April 14, 2008 at 11:22 PM
He’s getting a lot of “static” for that “cling” remark, “static cling” get it?
I’ll be here all week, try the veal, don’t forget to tip the waitresses.
2Tru2Tru on April 14, 2008 at 11:22 PM
Cling, cling, cling to the follies…
SouthernGent on April 14, 2008 at 11:23 PM
Clingon’s for McCain
Chakra Hammer on April 14, 2008 at 11:25 PM
alphie on April 14, 2008 at 10:50 PM
Well, yes…yes I am! If elitist means I work for a living, make a good buck doing so and actually care where my tax dollars are spent, guilty as charged! We are all confronted by choices, how and what we choose does matter. Call me whatever you want, but I’ll invite you to stand with me, together we will ensure that our children prosper and thrive in an environment which is fair, honest and based on values which are solely based on talent and effort and not dictated by a superficial definition of opportunity.
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 11:26 PM
FloatingRock on April 14, 2008 at 11:10 PM
And….it did not pass because of folks like us. Without term limits we are stuck with what we got! McShame appears to be cognizant of some conservative values (stretching more than a Chinese gymnast), far from defending him I am only trying to say he is better than the alternative. (BS: I did not vote for Juan in my states primary)
dmann on April 14, 2008 at 11:39 PM
dmann: No I don’t disagree with you there. I am one to agree with the “None of the Above” group in this case. I think that says a great deal to the big party types. I have donated to the GOP in the past but I hope they are very frustrated now because I make a point of returning their requests in their own envelopes at their own expense with “No Money for RINO’S” in big bold black letters written on their request, and when they call me I tell them to give me a conservative and I will give them my money. I don’t want to sit out the election but…
I think dmann is not necessarily disagreeing with us, this person is just wondering what I intend to do regarding a RINO (or at least someone far less conservative then myself) in office. I’m still floundering and being flummoxed about that myself. I only know that I will disagree with McLame 35-40% of the time where as I will probably disagree with either dhimmicrat 95 to 100% of the time.
Problem is I really hate to vote for the lesser of two evils!
My wife will tell ya that unless it’s baked potato soup or corn or clam chowder, it’s salad for me! ;)
Vntnrse on April 14, 2008 at 11:44 PM
But the attempt itself was the epitome of elitism in action, not just a verbal expression of it.
I agree. McCain is the best Democrat in the race but that’s not saying much and it doesn’t mean people have to like it or overlook his faults.
FloatingRock on April 14, 2008 at 11:51 PM
Isn’t Obama just digging a deeper hole with this “explanation?” He quotes a scripture that we should “cling” to what’s good, in the context of explaining why he said small-town people cling to guns, religion, anti-trade sentiment, and anti-immigration sentiment. It sounds to me like he’s saying that guns and religion are not good. At least, I would presume he wasn’t calling “antipathy to others not like them,” “anti-trade sentiment,” and “anti-immigration sentiment” good.
On the language front, I believe “cling” is at least vaguely negative, unless rescued by context. It’s interesting that the King James translators never once used it. Many of the given references above use the word “cleave” instead. But then, I’ve noticed the King James translators were generally more precise in their work than most modern translations.
Obama said last week at a fundraiser that decades of lost jobs and unfulfilled promises from Washington have left some Pennsylvanians “bitter.” He said they were “clinging to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
theregoestheneighborhood on April 14, 2008 at 11:55 PM
Did anyone see that douchebag professor on O’Reilly…he used to be on RedEye some…Hill somebody…trying to explain to all of us retarded people what Ubama really meant. O’Reilly was having none of it.
SouthernGent on April 15, 2008 at 12:06 AM
Much more clean eloquence like this, and the Bama campaign is gonna be clinging to life.
My definition of “bitter”… how I feel about the fact that they both can’t lose.
drunyan8315 on April 15, 2008 at 12:42 AM
No, I don’t thinks so. I’ve got nothing against dmann, I just think that a lot of people here seem to prefer to overlook McCain’s faults or are hesitant to voice them because he is better than the alternative. They don’t want to diminish his chances… however I’m not sure this is necessarily a correct appraisal of the circumstances.
If McCain believes that conservatives have already ceded their support to him then he is likely to move even further to the left, but if he knows our support is grudging and conditional he may conclude that jumping back on the liberal bandwagon to embark on a new adventure is a risky proposition that may do more harm than good.
McCain isn’t entitled to my vote; he’s going to have to earn it. And if I end up voting for McCain I want him to understand that it should not be mistaken as an endorsement of McCain and his policies, especially amnesty. If everybody is silent about their objections it will only strengthen his inevitable claim, in the event that he wins, that he has an amnesty mandate.
Let’s make him work for our votes. I’m far from ready to fall into line behind McCain.
FloatingRock on April 15, 2008 at 12:47 AM
dmann,
Anyone who passes moral judgment on other people, divides humanity in good and evil…they’re elitists.
Include me out of your circle of snobs, please.
alphie on April 15, 2008 at 12:47 AM
My Websters dictionary defines Elitism as:
Elitism: 1. a. Belief in rule by elite. b. Domination or rule by an elite. 2. A sense of being part of an elite.
Elite: 1. a. The best or superior members of a society or group. b. A small, privileged, and often powerful group. 2. A size of type on a typewriter, equal to 12 characters.
It doesn’t mention anything about passing judgment on or dividing people into good and evil. Elite and elitism is a matter of power and privilege. If it’s about dividing people, it’s about dividing them into a small group of people that matter and the rest that don’t.
FloatingRock on April 15, 2008 at 1:05 AM
By all means. Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.
There is evil in the world. Wishing it were not so, or denying it exists is unwise at best. And appeasing it due to cowardice and ignorance to try to claim moral superiority is dispicable.
techno_barbarian on April 15, 2008 at 1:40 AM
You can enforce the law without being a Church Lady, techno.
alphie on April 15, 2008 at 1:53 AM
Absent the concepts of good and evil there is no need for law, only anarchy.
FloatingRock on April 15, 2008 at 2:02 AM
Trying to explain his stupidity as some kind of intelligence is Obama’s greatest demonstration of sheer idiocy.
You got some ‘splainin’ to do, Obama!
Keep ‘splainin’, Barry.
It gets better each time.
profitsbeard on April 15, 2008 at 2:04 AM
Church Lady? Not making the connection. I didn’t dance, mention… SATAN?!
What’s the matter alph? That cowardice remark make you uncomfortable?
Step away from the bong, lil’ alphie. Sounds like you’ve had enough.
techno_barbarian on April 15, 2008 at 2:07 AM
Excellent post, Ed.
Mallard T. Drake on April 15, 2008 at 2:12 AM
Haha, techno,
Cowardice is such a tiny word, no cause for discomfort.
The law can be objective, judgments on good and evil are always rather subjective and prone to bias.
alphie on April 15, 2008 at 2:39 AM
Obama — Stuck on stupid …
tarpon on April 15, 2008 at 3:52 AM
Obama keeps making his hole deeper: (I don’t know where or exactly when he said it, but) he recently responded with the out-and-out gall of
===I’ve made misstatements in the past and I’m going to make misstatements in the future===
Now, THERE’s a level of judgement and capability to look for in presidential timber…. /s
Lockstein13 on April 15, 2008 at 5:21 AM
You just can’t throw things together like that. If you are talking about what is wrong with small-town voters, and the answer is that they cling things which are, in the typical Liberal view:
Guns – Bad
Religion – Good
Racism – Bad
Anti-Immigrant – Bad
Anti-Trade Sentiment – Bad
Which of these things is not like the other? The only way this squares is if Religion is also considered “Bad”, which confirms the suspicion small-town voters have always had about the Liberal elites. Doctrinaire Leftists have always derided religious faith as counter-revolutionary, and have sought to replace the individual’s faith in God with reliance on the State, but when they need to pretend to be faithful for politcal purposes, they are willing to do so. From the racist/religious hash of Black Liberation Theology to the rationalizations of the Sandanista’s Liberation Theology to Bill Clinton carrying around a 10-pound Bible through Monicagate, the Left has been only too happy to exploit religious symbols and sentiments for short-term gain. But small-town voters see these things, compare them to the faith they cling to, and know that they are false.
Of course, Obama further confuses the issue by labeling anti-immigrant and anti-trade sentiments bad, when about half the time he is using anti-immigrant and anti-trade rhetoric, depending on whom he is talking to at the time.
gridlock2 on April 15, 2008 at 6:30 AM
Obama’s not spinning out of this one, this isn’t a skid, it’s not hydroplaning; this is a head-on collision with a tree at 75 mph.
SuperCool on April 15, 2008 at 6:54 AM
Maybe. But Obama will claim the tree bamboozled him.
Lockstein13 on April 15, 2008 at 7:13 AM
Proposed tee shirts:
1) Typical White Person Too Stupid to Vote for Obama.
2) Typical White Neanderthals for Clinton.
3) Typical White Knuckledraggers for McCain.
4) Typical White False-Consciousness Republican.
davecatbone on April 15, 2008 at 7:28 AM
Great write-up, Ed!
Grafted on April 15, 2008 at 8:05 AM
As a whole, his entire family hate America.
Period.
madmonkphotog on April 15, 2008 at 8:27 AM
How can we get rid of statist cling?
Kralizec on April 15, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Obama said in the same sentence that small-town people “cling to their religion and their guns”, as if there was a moral equivalence between God and a gun. A person may use a gun for self-defense when threatened in this life, but turns to God for the hope of eternal salvation when life on earth is over. But for Obama, the two are one and the same–a means of vengeance.
To what religion does Obama cling? To Jeremiah Wright, who asks God to d@mn America and only love black people? Is Obama’s “god” an avenger, like a gun?
How about a T-shirt idea:
Obama for Dummies, God-Clingers for McCain!
Steve Z on April 15, 2008 at 10:31 AM
In regards to an earlier comment on Wright and cursing/damning… perhaps he should read the book of James…
Brings to mind another scripture verse about the Word of God being a double-edged sword…
dominigan on April 15, 2008 at 1:12 PM