Maliki takes on Sadr City
posted at 8:48 am on April 12, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Apparently, Nouri al-Maliki doesn’t read American newspapers to determine whether his offensives against the Mahdi Army have succeeded. While our reporters managed to a person to get the story in Basra wrong, Maliki lined up a broad political coalition to issue an ultimatum to Moqtada al-Sadr — disarm or face the consequences. Maliki has now stepped up the consequences in Sadr City, Sadr’s main base of support, with a complete commitment of military forces against his militia:
Shiite militants fought U.S. and Iraqi forces around Baghdad’s Shiite district of Sadr City early Saturday, despite a call for calm by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr after the assassination of one of his top aides.
At least 13 Shiite militants died in the clashes, which erupted Friday night and tapered off early Saturday, the U.S. military said. Iraqi police reported seven civilians were killed as a result of the fighting between American and government troops and al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army militia. …
In Sadr City, a U.S. military statement said American soldiers used Abrams main battle tanks and drone-fired Hellfire missiles in support of troops who came under sniper and rocket attack while trying to erect concrete barriers in the area.
Two armored vehicles were damaged by at least 10 roadside bombs that exploded during the operation, but there were no casualties among the U.S. and Iraqi soldiers, the military said.
The AP continues its clueless reporting at the end of the article, saying that Maliki’s operations in Basra “quickly faltered” after he began them. While the Mahdis put up a stronger fight than expected, it didn’t “falter” at all. Within days Sadr sued for peace, and this report notes that Maliki has a second operation under way to mop up the Qibla district and wipe out the stragglers.
The “quickly faltered” meme sounds suspiciously like the “American invasion bogged down in the desert” analysis that occurred in week two of the 2003 invasion. It’s the result of an attention-span deficit in the media. Rather than wait for an outcome, journalists draw conclusions from the first hours of a battle. Major military actions take longer than a single news cycle.
Maliki’s aggressive action in Sadr City shows that he has confidence that he can maintain pressure on Sadr and the Mahdis. If Iraq is to have provincial elections, the central government has to control security in the provinces, and Maliki has six months to make that happen. He also needs to cut off Iran’s influence in the south, which has primarily come through Sadr. With Sunnis, Kurds, and other Shi’ites supporting him, Maliki has an opportunity now to rid Iraq of the Mahdis, the last significant militia in independent operation.
And so far, it appears he is succeeding. It may take weeks to finish the job, but Maliki slowly will use the Iraqi Army to take back Sadr City block by block, if necessary. The elected government of Iraq has no choice but to do this at some time if its sovereignty is to be taken seriously.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The “quickly faltered” meme sounds suspiciously like the “American invasion bogged down in the desert” analysis that occurred in week two of the 2003 invasion.
Or week one in Afghanistan.
It’s the result of an attention-span deficit in the media. Rather than wait for an outcome, journalists draw conclusions from the first hours of a battle. Major military actions take longer than a single news cycle.
This is why prior military service oughta be a requirement for reporters.
The new Iraqi Army is stepping up and winning, that SHOULE be GOOD news, but to the lefty news media this is BAD news, because it means America has won.
Tony737 on April 12, 2008 at 9:02 AM
I hate the MSM (main steam media). They sounds like they draw their paychecks from Iran or Russia or China.
Zorro on April 12, 2008 at 9:06 AM
It’s game on, down here in the South. Bad time to be in the JAM…
The IA is loaded for bear and moving. Funny, if they had been “defeated” – I wonder why the IA is the one with the initiative.
Prepare for more “Jeningrad” style Western reporting.
major john on April 12, 2008 at 9:08 AM
The medias relative silence on the growing danger in zimbabwe and focus on the negatives of malikis attempts to finally turn iraq into a civilized nation are already very interesting. If mugabes troops start killing citizens the contrast will probably become even more interesting.
peacenprosperity on April 12, 2008 at 9:08 AM
Normal thinking people would wonder the same thing. Take care of yourself. Thoughts and prayers with all of you.
Sue on April 12, 2008 at 9:11 AM
They got the story wrong 13 people died…say AP.
tomas on April 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM
Major John, that’s an intresting blog you have there, thanks for putting it up, and thank you for your service too. >
Tony737 on April 12, 2008 at 9:16 AM
The multinational force has been killing and capturing mookies guys all week. Six and twelve at a time. Check out the news briefs at the MNF website. Here is the link:
http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=category§ionid=1&id=4&Itemid=21
dogsoldier on April 12, 2008 at 9:54 AM
Looks like Maliki has decided to grow a pair.
ThePrez on April 12, 2008 at 10:33 AM
Thank you for your service Major John and Godspeed to you, your fellow Soldiers and their mission.
The MSM has become to pathetic to take serious anymore.
It’s American Idol journalism with Olberman,Couric,and the NYtimes leading their sheep.
Analyst like Micheal Yon,Bill Roggio,Micheal Totten,Amy Proctor,Captain Ed,Mudville Gazette,and the Captain’s Journal leave the MSM in the dust.
Baxter Greene on April 12, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Was Soldier Jailed to Appease Iraqi ‘Allies’?
aengus on April 12, 2008 at 11:04 AM
It’s game on, down here in the South. Bad time to be in the JAM…
major john on April 12, 2008 at 9:08 AM
Get some Major, happy hunting.
x-wing on April 12, 2008 at 11:31 AM
The multinational force has been killing and capturing mookies guys all week. Six and twelve at a time. – Dog
I’ll take the word of a soldier like Dog who’s been there over a teleprompter reading bubbleheaded ditz any day of the week.
Tony737 on April 12, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Thank God!
TooTall on April 12, 2008 at 11:36 AM
One would have to wonder what would transpire if the Maliki government started banning all “foreign journalist” from Iraq that publish agenda-driven fabrications. Which human-rights violations would our liberal friends claim are infringed?
Rovin on April 12, 2008 at 11:36 AM
Godspeed, Major John.
A’ash al Iraq, A’ash al America!
PattyJ on April 12, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Don’t blame the MSM. Their filtration committee (Hillary, Obama, Reid, and Pelosi) has told them that this is what is going on and that they should report it.
Kafir on April 12, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Working to ensure Iraq’s security for all Iraqi’s. Isn’t that a benchmark we have been looking for? With all due repsect to General Petreaus, but there is a light at the end of the tunnel, dim as it may be, it’s there.
Hog Wild on April 12, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Impossible, the NY Times has said it can’t be done; already failed.
second digit on April 12, 2008 at 1:19 PM
/pats self on back…
Called this one.
Romeo13 on April 12, 2008 at 2:13 PM
If modern AP reporters were present at the time of Custer’s defeat, they would no doubt report something like this:
“This utterly predictable defeat just shows once again the incredible poor judgment of trying to bring Europeans to the New World. Anyone with the IQ above that of a Chimpanzee should surely be able to see that our only option is to return everyone back to Europe while there is still anyone left alive to save. Cannot even the arrogantly stubborn U.S Grant administration see that continuing to waste lives and treasure trying to establish a permanent foreign presence in a monolithicly hostile indigenous population with a history of thousands of years of instability and conflict will be no more permanent than a boil waiting to be lanced and is folly of historic proportions. However, we will not hold our breath waiting for the ignorant militarist hick from the western Prairies of Illinois to admit his inexcusable incompetence.”
KW64 on April 12, 2008 at 2:17 PM
You’ve made me curious to look up the newspapers of the day to see what they did say.
aengus on April 12, 2008 at 2:44 PM
Now Sadder (I can hear HW pronouncing it that way) wants to negotiate by saying he will play nice if Al gets rid of Gates. Kinda sounds like Saddam (looking down a gun barrel) saying he wants to negotiate with GW.
oakpack on April 12, 2008 at 5:57 PM
I do not think that General Petraeus would be at all pleased by this kind of claim.
If folks are lead to believe that Maliki can take back Sadr City, in what is Sadr’s stronghold, and anything like every block, and in just a few weeks, and with the Bush administration now saying that the Shiite militias are now the main threat in Iraq, then a lot of Americans will expect many to most American troops to be withdrawn from Iraq by a few months from now.
General Petraeus himself has said “Progress in Iraq is fragile, it is tenuous” and “I think everybody recognizes that there has been progress in the security arena, but there’s no one who is doing any kind of celebration here. There is an enormous amount of hard work to be done.”
If General Petraeus is reading any of this, highly unlikely of course, he is probably thinking about that old saying, “I can handle my enemies, but please God save me from my ‘friends’”.
MB4 on April 12, 2008 at 6:06 PM
I can’t help feeling like this initiative by Maliki is somewhat of a turning point.
Is it possible that the Iraqi people will start to realize that the IA is strong enough (and now more experienced) to dominate all conflicting forces within the country?
If so, won’t this help the perception that the central government is in charge and that the best way to oppose them is through elections?
I’m not asking if this will happen overnight. Just that it’s a start.
blink on April 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM
A story from the Times indicates what’s going on in Basra now. Leaving aside the discussion of British forces, it seems a lot of Basra’s people are coming out of hiding. Apparently they’ve formed their own opinion of who’s winning.
tbrosz on April 12, 2008 at 10:09 PM
J_Gocht on April 13, 2008 at 10:22 AM
One person’s force is U.S. and Iraqi, another’s is Iraqi Army?
One wonders how M. Yon would describe the action?
J_Gocht on April 13, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Another source states… “U.S. and Iraqi troops…”
How would M. Yon characterize the action…?
J_Gocht on April 13, 2008 at 11:23 AM
Would appear to me… dogsoldier had it right…!
Where are they standing… after five and a half years of “potty training”?
On our point?
Along our side?
Letting U.S. lead?
J_Gocht on April 13, 2008 at 11:44 AM
Maliki’s troops rushed into Basra a couple weeks ago “lonesome George” and got their nose damn bloody.
U.S. had to get into the “dustup” after the fact, quickly… when it became apparent the IA was getting their arse kicked!
Maliki then flew quickly to Teheran to negotiate a ceasefire with Sadr.
But that’s just me…!
J_Gocht on April 13, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Hey Mikie…!
You say…!
J_Gocht on April 13, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Come on…
Mike!
J_Gocht on April 13, 2008 at 1:21 PM
J_Gocht, you’re take on this might be right. In fact, I would have agreed with you two 10 days ago.
However, everyday it seems more likely that you’re wrong.
Politically, it might not matter if he won in Basra or not. He took the initiative. It seems as if that initiative might have earned him some political capital with the Sunnis and Kurds. Enough political capital to stay engaged. Enough political capital to seem like a bad ass.
blink on April 13, 2008 at 11:13 PM
maybe even a…. leader?
I think your point is right on.
Hog Wild on April 14, 2008 at 7:04 AM