Obama: Carter shouldn’t meet with Hamas

That’s my job old man.

This time, when he makes a fool of himself, he’s not going to win the Nobel Prize for it.

logis on April 10, 2008 at 11:16 PM

Don’t bet the house on that. Nobel Prize became a joke many years ago.

Here’s Obama on Hamas: “Sen. Obama does not agree with President Carter’s decision to go forward with this meeting because he does not support negotiations with Hamas until they renounce terrorism, recognize Israel’s right to exist, and abide by…..

This time, when he makes a fool of himself, he’s not going to win the Nobel Prize for it.

logis on April 10, 2008 at 11:16 PM

Actually, I think he’s doing this to try and clinch a second NPP. Nothing impresses the Nobel folks quite like an ex-POTUS who hates The U.S. AND pals around with terroists.

Thanks for the jihad, Jimmah! You brought us the Ayatollah who got this snowball rolling.

Either way [Jimmy Carter]’s going to make a fool of himself.
logis on April 10, 2008 at 9:22 PM

…so what else is new?
91Veteran on April 10, 2008 at 10:02 PM

This time, when he makes a fool of himself, he’s not going to win the Nobel Prize for it.

Now I’m perplexed,Obama which is it!

Obama is it good to talk to Terrorists,
or bad to talk to Terrorists,please
clarify!

Either way he’s going to make a fool of himself.

logis on April 10, 2008 at 9:22 PM

…so what else is new?

Then the ball’s back in Obama’s court to either take what Hamas tells Jimmy with the grain of salt, or to actually treat this as some sort of major agreement, which would please many of his far left supporters but would create dozens of potential land mines for the general election race against McCain.

Does Obama lose face if Carter ignores him?

No; the big loser here is Carter.

When Jimmy Carter met with Kim Jung Il, it was with Clinton’s blessing. That’s why Clinton rubber-stamped the agreement to finance North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.

This time, Carter was hoping Bush would ignore him and let him act as “unofficial ambasador” like Jesse Jackson did. But no, the Bush’s punking him. I haven’t heard yet, but I assume Hillary has nixed this too. This means that EVERYONE is telling Carter not to go. This makes him an so useless that Hamas can’t get a propaganda boost out of being seen with him – and that’s saying an awful lot.

So now he’s stuck. What’s he going to do, back down and not go after this huge buildup? Either way he’s going to make a fool of himself.

Obama: Carter shouldn’t meet with Hamas

I think this has more to do with jealousy, Barack wants to be surrenderer in chief or maybe thats chief surrenderer.

Or at least Carter shouldn’t step on Barack’s surrenderer cred.

Speakup on April 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM

Exactly.

You took my thought, or you wrote it before me, should I say.

But I’d put it in other words:

Hussein wants to have an exclusive meeting with his brothers the Muslim terrorists.

Gaza is a territory — not an independent state. The residents of Gaza are not citizens of any nation.

aunursa on April 10, 2008 at 7:44 PM

aunursa, reread my post. I put the word state in quotes for that reason. However, check the definition of the word state.

#5 in websters: “politically organized body of people usually occupying a definite territory; especially : one that is sovereign”

Gee, notice that sovereignty isn’t a requirement. I’m even MORE confident in my post now – thanks.

And by the way, I NEVER used the word nation. (You might want to check that definition also.)

Bullshit.

He’s an old man you know.

“Senator Obama does not agree with President Carter’s decision to go forward with this meeting because he does not support negotiations with Hamas until they renounce terrorism, recognize Israel’s right to exist, and abide by past agreements.”

Then this:

“Obama said its clear what terms will be required in order to legitimatize talks: “a reorganization of Israel, a renunciation of violence and making sure that prior agreements are respected.”

We’re going to “reorganize” a sovereign state? I thought Obama objected to all that — like, say, in Iraq, where we just should have butted out and let Saddam do his thing, right?

Oh, that’s right — it’s Israel, so never mind.

Yes — he’s a tool.

Doubtless his Palestinian fans are reading this statement as having been issued with a wink and a nudge, crafted to preserve his electability by pandering to Israel’s Democratic supporters but in no sense heartfelt and unlikely to be taken as such by Carter.

Yep, it’s just like his anti-NAFTA position. (Pssst, hey Canada, all that anti-NAFTA talk is just for the rube voters. Once I con the gullible idiots into voting for me, it’ll be business as usual. Not to worry).

I wonder if Carter and Bolton got in the same room, would there be a massive explosion. Not matter and anti-matter, idiot and anti-idiot.

BOLTON FOR PRESIDENT!

Jimmy Carter is the accidental prime minister for OPEC. I say accidental because I doubt he knows this is what he’s being used to do.

Bullshit.

Carter hates the Jews.

No he doesn’t. He just doesn’t like Jews as much as he likes Petrodollar philanthropy funding.

Jimmy Carter is the accidental prime minister for OPEC. I say accidental because I doubt he knows this is what he’s being used to do.

So does he hate the Jews or just sorta, kinda dislike them?

Carter or Obama? Carter hates the Jews. Obama hates them but would like to have their votes anyway.