Jimmy Carter to meet with … Hamas?
posted at 12:20 am on April 9, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The left’s senior statesman, sitting down for a photo op with this degenerate in the heat of an election? After having only just recently quasi-endorsed a guy who, thanks to his associates, is already suspect on Israel? It’s too good to be true. Memo to JC: As an icebreaker, ask him how many Jews really died in the Holocaust.
Gingrich once compared Bush to Carter in how completely each managed to lose the public’s confidence. Another similarity: Each is willing to follow his principles with an almost total disregard for the political consequences.
Former President Jimmy Carter is reportedly preparing an unprecedented meeting with the leader of Hamas, an organization that the U.S. government considers one of the leading terrorist threats in the world.
The Arabic-language newspaper Al-Hayat reported Tuesday that Carter was planning a trip to Syria for mid-April, during which he would meet with Khaled Meshal, the exiled head of the Palestinian terror group Hamas, on April 18.
Deanna Congileo, Carter’s press secretary, confirmed in an e-mail to FOXNews.com that Carter will be in the Mideast in April. Pressed for comment, Congileo did not deny that the former president is considering visiting Meshal.
“President Carter is planning a trip to the Mideast next week; however, we are still confirming details of the trip and will issue a press release by the end of this week,” wrote Congileo. “I cannot confirm any specific meetings at this point in time.”
Follow the link for reaction from John Bolton and CAIR tool Ibrahim Hooper, who’s naturally pleased as can be. How beyond the pale is Hamas? According to his now former foreign policy honcho, Samantha Power, even Obama won’t talk to them — ostensibly because as president he’ll only deign to meet with heads of state, which in the Palestinian case would mean Abbas, but in point of fact because even he can’t work enough messianic mojo to make a summit with Khaled Meshaal go down smoothly with the public. Exit question: Which prominent Democrat will be tasked tomorrow with phoning Jimbo to explain why it’s not a good idea for someone who thinks Israel is an apartheid state to be huddling with terrorists in an election year? Will it be Obama himself? Or the left’s other secular Jesus?
Update: Patrick Ishmael e-mails to reminds us this was a long time coming.
The 39th U.S. president said he met with Hamas leaders in Ramallah, in the West Bank, after last week’s elections.
“They told me they want to have a peaceful administration. They want to have a unity government, bring in Fatah members and independent members,” Carter said. But he added that “what they say and what they do is two different matters.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
useful idiot to the extreme
Defector01 on April 9, 2008 at 12:23 AM
Denounce. All I can say.
Vizzini on April 9, 2008 at 12:25 AM
He is the definition of Useful IDIOT
Bodhi on April 9, 2008 at 12:25 AM
Obama will put him in charge of Middle East affairs.
Entelechy on April 9, 2008 at 12:26 AM
Execrable.
Cicero43 on April 9, 2008 at 12:33 AM
Does Hamas need help creating stagflation and a national malaise?
trubble on April 9, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Self-important traitor.
jgapinoy on April 9, 2008 at 12:36 AM
I think Jimmy’s still upset that the Soviet Union fell before he had a chance to surrender to it.
RBMN on April 9, 2008 at 12:37 AM
Best sound bite of the day!
jgapinoy on April 9, 2008 at 12:37 AM
Jimmy needs to grow a tree on his head to replace the air that he’s wasting.
29Victor on April 9, 2008 at 12:38 AM
Jummah is probably just stopping by to hand in his dues money.
Warner Todd Huston on April 9, 2008 at 12:42 AM
Have we grown so soft as a people that we can ignore TREASON when it smacks us in the face. I hope we haven’t grown so soft that we can’t say Jimmy Carter is a Traitor to his people. Because he is.
AYNBLAND on April 9, 2008 at 12:49 AM
Carter’s going to meet with Hamas!
Me thinks: Well,thats TYPICAL!
canopfor on April 9, 2008 at 12:49 AM
Actually,cough cough,wink wink,shhhhhhhhh maybe
since Fata,Hamas are so peaceful,Carter going
over to see about converting to their religion!Haa Haa!
canopfor on April 9, 2008 at 12:54 AM
Let him…………..
……. then when he tries to return home to the United States, either arrest him for treason (we are at war people), or deny him access (sorry, your Passport has been invalidated, go back to where ever you were pissing on the United States was and have fun with it).
Let’s see how he reacts to that?
Seven Percent Solution on April 9, 2008 at 12:59 AM
He needs to be arrested if he ever tries to reenter our country…if he actually meets with Hamas.
Ya know? It’s moments like this that I really disrespect President Bush. Because I trust he or someone in his administration will find some pious reason to overlook Carter’s blatant treason (aiding and abetting the enemy in time of war).
RushBaby on April 9, 2008 at 1:01 AM
Not idiot.
Not useful.
Traitor.
urbancenturion on April 9, 2008 at 1:17 AM
I’m Shocked!! /sarc
I still don’t wish the man dead, and I think it is foolish to do so.
p40tiger on April 9, 2008 at 1:20 AM
Good. Let the bastard go. And when his plane touches down, back in the USA, have Stars & Stripes, the Army Times and FOXNews there to watch as openly-armed FBI agents nab him, warrant in hand personally signed by the Attorney General, charging him for violating the Logan Act.
Virus-X on April 9, 2008 at 1:24 AM
Brilliant stroke of political genius. Way to go Rove!
danking70 on April 9, 2008 at 1:26 AM
Jimmy Carter loves Hamas, it doesn’t surprise me. Remember how he swooned after Hamas took control of the Palestinian territories? I remember this article because it was one of subject of one of the earliest posts on my crapblog.
doubleplusundead on April 9, 2008 at 1:31 AM
Hamas did win the Palestine elections…aren’t they Palestine’s official government?
Oh, that’s right…
alphie on April 9, 2008 at 1:49 AM
I think the concern some have is that it’s bad PR for HA and MM, plus the lefties will use aggro or inflammatory statements made by commenters against MM and HA.
doubleplusundead on April 9, 2008 at 1:49 AM
The one nice thing about Carter and international relations through the years is that he has exhibited historically-proven consistency: whatever policy he advocates or whichever side he supports, you always know it’s the wrong one.
Socratease on April 9, 2008 at 1:52 AM
Oh Jimmy. What will I do without ya.
maynila on April 9, 2008 at 2:15 AM
quick somebody turn out the lights and change the locks maybe when he comes back he will think we are out and go away .
Mojack420 on April 9, 2008 at 2:47 AM
I’m sorry Allah, but has it EVER occurred to you that Jimmah is not making a rush trip to SYRIA because he’s tone deaf and wants to sip tea with HAMAS, but because Peolsi or Rockefeller ET AL. simply can’t make the trip politically this time to WHISPER intentions or make negotiations ?
Jimmah’s trip is a panic trip.
Topsecretk9 on April 9, 2008 at 2:54 AM
Who would have guessed that when he said he lusted after other women in his heart, there were 72?
Canadian Infidel on April 9, 2008 at 3:31 AM
When he attempts to reenter America, how about a real life version of The Man With No Country?
OldEnglish on April 9, 2008 at 4:31 AM
labrat on April 9, 2008 at 4:45 AM
sorry, forgot to close tags.
labrat on April 9, 2008 at 4:45 AM
See doubleplusundead on April 9, 2008 at 1:49 AM for my 1st response, and secondly, if Carter is ever charged, arrested, and convicted of treason, then perhaps we could/should string him up, but 1) I don’t see that happening in the few years he has left, and 2) making wild judgements against a former president no matter how bad that president was/is, as if you are the sole judge and jury, is a bit silly in my opinion, and is precisely, as doubleplusundead states, like the leftists who are so convinced that they are right that anything that disagrees with their opinion becomes worthy of death. I think you have valid points, but I can’t go with you on calling for the head of an uncharged, never convicted former president. Let him spew his nonsense and wait him out. I’m guessing he will be silent before you will.
p40tiger on April 9, 2008 at 5:38 AM
Why Hamas?
A man of his supreme diplomatic talents would be far better employed negotiating with the Taleban. This whole jihad thing is just a little cultural misunderstanding. And if we reach out and embrace the headchoppers and suicide bombers all will be right with the world.
That’s change you can believe in (if you are psychotic).
Ares on April 9, 2008 at 5:46 AM
Carter want to meet with Hamas.
Obama wants to meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Isn’t there an ad in there somewhere?
Lockstein13 on April 9, 2008 at 6:42 AM
Actually, Yimmie answered a monster.com add for a PR person…
Yogurt on April 9, 2008 at 6:42 AM
My head! Ibuprofen. Aspirin. Acetominophen. Naproxen… Wall.
Malaise.
silverfox on April 9, 2008 at 6:56 AM
Carter has now become something of an international embarrassment. It’s too bad the State Department can’t move in and revoke his passport. The man is a fool.
pilamaye on April 9, 2008 at 7:09 AM
Is he French?
dentalque on April 9, 2008 at 7:29 AM
Why? The right will be outraged, and the left will yawn. Won’t change anyone’s vote.
flipflop on April 9, 2008 at 7:33 AM
Do it Jimmy, do it. This is just the kind of stunt McCain needs. It makes the Dems look like terrorist-coddling useful idiots and will force Barry into an interesting corner. Either the Messiah denounces Jimmy or He agrees that Carter has the right to meet with whomever he wants, even would-be genocidal killers hiding from justice in a dictatorship. Plus, whatever Jewish vote BHO had will collapse.
It’s a win-win for McCain. Can Rev. Wright join Carter on the trip to complete the trifecta?
Vote Sauron 08 on April 9, 2008 at 7:38 AM
So who in the administration authorized this trip? If nobody did then what is Carter’s authority to negotiate on behalf of the United States?
abcurtis on April 9, 2008 at 7:39 AM
Any normal American would rightly be imprisoned. But when it’s a leftist [words fail], the government rolls over. Nancy Pelosi aids and abets Syrian terrorists, Carter aids and abets Palestinian terrorists, and Bush does nothing.
Just because you’re an ex-president, you don’t have the right to do anything you want. Yes, that includes treason.
amkun on April 9, 2008 at 7:40 AM
Oh yes he will. I hope he lives for a long time and continues to show his true colors so there is never any doubt about his miserable legacy. He dies and the demofascists will bus every single loser they can round up out to the funeral route so they can compare his funeral to President Reagan’s and will say he was a beloved president and will immediately start rewriting history. We will have to hibernate to escape a weeks worth of lies about his legacy.
peacenprosperity on April 9, 2008 at 7:42 AM
Carter’s shock value and power derived from seeing a former US President associating with our adversaries worldwide, and the implicit support of the American people such actions showed.
But he’s practically useless now, even to our enemies, as he and Clinton demeaned the office, and plenty of Americans disavow his actions. I don’t think it matters much what he says or does. His legacy is sad, almost a tragedy, and verging on pathetic. How could a living American President become unimportant? It’s staggering.
JiangxiDad on April 9, 2008 at 7:47 AM
Carter is an old fool. He planted the seed in Iran that has grown into an international threat to world peace. Now, he visits one of the bastard children he helped bring into this world to kill Americans and wipe out Israel, named Hamas.
Hening on April 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM
Nah. See my comment at 7:33 AM.
flipflop on April 9, 2008 at 8:02 AM
Just call a spade a spade. Jimmuh Cahtah is a Jooooo hater. Like almost all the leftists over on Huffpost or DailyKos. Ask any of them, Hitler should have finished the job. Yet Jews in this country still vote Dem….My head hurts….
adamsmith on April 9, 2008 at 8:02 AM
I wish he would not be allowed back into the country.
4shoes on April 9, 2008 at 8:14 AM
thats just what Hamas needs another loon…
sko17 on April 9, 2008 at 8:16 AM
There are several historical reasons for this, even if none of them make sense anymore. Here’s the most important one, IMHO. Most American Jews sought to assimilate as completely as possible into American culture. Their ties with the old country were completely cut. In order to assimilate, they largely dropped their religious observation so that they would appear less different in Christian America. The Democrat party was perceived as the place a non-christian or non-religious person would be more welcome.
There are other reasons for sure, like affection for idealistic political systems that exist better in books, but this figures prominently. There was, and still probably is, a fear/suspicion of Christians. But things are changing. The generation of Jews with these issues figuring prominently will be gone soon. There’s a resurgence of religious identity among younger Jews who are secure in their American identity, and a greater affiliation with Republican and conservative causes.
JiangxiDad on April 9, 2008 at 8:20 AM
For those of you wishing death would come for Jimmy Carter.
For all practical purposes, Carter is politically dead. The DNC wishes this loser would go to his room, stay drunk, and never show his face in public again. Both Obama and Clinton wish much worse for this loser, esp. Obama following the Carter “kiss of death” endorsement. The only people that don’t hold such disdain for this loser are the MSM far left whacko’s, who to this day have no clue as to the fact that they are standing in quicksand.
Make no mistake about it folks, Jimmy Carter was the worst President to ever reside in the White House; an embarrassment to the Democrat Party; an embarrassment of historical proportions to America; the man who gave hope to the enemies of Freedom simply due to the fact that such a weak minded POS would/could be elected by a free people sent a strong message to those who wish death for all Americans.
Keemo on April 9, 2008 at 8:25 AM
Carter merely adds flourish to his permanent position as worst president in U.S. history.
whitetop on April 9, 2008 at 8:27 AM
Hey, many thanks to everyone who momentarily turned this into the conservative equivalent of one of those HuffPo or dKos threads about Dick Cheney.
Now that I’m awake, anyone who ventures back into that territory is banned. Immediately.
Allahpundit on April 9, 2008 at 8:38 AM
I apologize to you, Michelle, and the entire HA community for my part in last night’s excessive rhetoric.
RushBaby on April 9, 2008 at 8:47 AM
You what’s great about Carter? he doesn’t give a f*ck what idiots like some in this thread think of him.
He’s working to better the world. He’s taken part in more courageous acts and done more for the good of people around the world than any of the small, dim minds calling for his death.
You may very well have a different philosophy on how to deal with organizations like Hamas or governments like the one in Sudan, but his actions have in no way constituted treason. He seeks to engage and change those who take part in horrific acts. I think part of his philosophy is that if you engage people, bring the “into the civilized world” that they’ll abandon voilent means to their end.
Ironically, it’s the same philosophy that the US is currently trying Iraq.
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2008 at 8:47 AM
Maybe he can bring 15% mortgage interest rates to them also.
He damn near collapsed the American economy, maybe he can do the same to the Palestinians. Take your brother Billy with you, he always was the brains of the family.
trs on April 9, 2008 at 8:48 AM
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2008 at 8:47 AM
That post cements what many of us have feared about you Tom.
Keemo on April 9, 2008 at 8:50 AM
Just stating the facts, man.
And I should have said Darfur, not Sudan… they all look the same to me.
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2008 at 8:52 AM
Wow. Just wow. Almost 30 years past his administration and he’s still screwing things up.
Jimmy, just go away. It’s really becoming disgraceful. Why don’t you go follow up on Mugabe’s election or something. OK? Go back to build homes for the poor. Anything. Fade away…..
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on April 9, 2008 at 8:53 AM
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2008 at 8:52 AM
The facts about Jimmy Carter are available for all to study up on Tom. When assessing facts, one must be capable of separating good intentions from poor results. Jimmy Carter was a disaster for America and it’s people; the facts support this conclusion.
Keemo on April 9, 2008 at 9:03 AM
More accurate.
peacenprosperity on April 9, 2008 at 9:04 AM
Way too early to be hitting the bong, Tom.
peacenprosperity on April 9, 2008 at 9:05 AM
carter is on the board, shows up for a photo op a couple of times a year, and is called a great humanitarian. Thousands spend their weekends/free time building those houses and a lowlife like carter gets the credit.
peacenprosperity on April 9, 2008 at 9:07 AM
I am trying really hard to think about anything ‘courageous’ or even vaguely useful that Carter has done.
Hamas have a charter that calls for the destruction of Israel. They have never hinted that they would drop that aim. Negotiating with someone who refuses to compromise is not negotiation, it is not ‘courageous’, it is folly bordering on abject insanity.
that said I do agree that Carter’s behavior is not treasonous and calls for his death are abhorrent and really have no place here IMO.
Ares on April 9, 2008 at 9:08 AM
It seems to be a Democrat Party thing to insult the American people by meeting with our enemies without Government sanction. Kerry met with the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong while still serving as a Naval Reserve Officer. Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, meets with Haffez al-Assad and Congresscritter Jim McDermott meets with Saddam Hussein. Fortunately, Barry Obama and Herself! have kept their anti-American positions in the closet.
But then thinking Americans already know the Lib/Prog/Socialist/Democrat Party is firmly on the side of our enemies.
SeniorD on April 9, 2008 at 9:13 AM
“Jimmy Carter to meet with … Hamas?”
I’m confused. Was there some point where he was not?
Kevin M on April 9, 2008 at 9:22 AM
They have never hinted that they would drop that aim. Negotiating with someone who refuses to compromise is not negotiation, it is not ‘courageous’, it is folly bordering on abject insanity.
Apparently a majority of those in the direct line of fire disagree with you:
http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/958473.html
And here’s one curagous act of Carter’s:
http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071003/NEWS11/71003003/-1/ARCHIVE
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2008 at 9:23 AM
“Jimmy Carter to meet with … Hamas?”
He has to pay his 2008 membership fees.
davenp35 on April 9, 2008 at 9:23 AM
Carter wrote in his book that Hamas should stop suicide attacks on Israeli civilians “When Israel returns to the 1967 borders”. Carter and Mashaal of Hamas therefore share the same views of suicide bombings. Carter sees suicide bombers and their handlers as legitimate figures and Carter has romanticized suicide bombers. Let him go meet with Hamas. It might just make even his last defenders at the New York Times a little less loving of Carter.
Larraby on April 9, 2008 at 9:30 AM
Dotage: a state or period of senile decay marked by decline of mental poise and alertness
Zorro on April 9, 2008 at 9:38 AM
Interesting take.
You’ve just admitted that you agree with Bush’s decision to send troops into Iraq.
You know they’ll take away your “Liberals Who Hate Bush” membership card when the word gets out to the authorities.
fogw on April 9, 2008 at 9:47 AM
There is a masterful understatement…from a weakened desperate ex-president who wants to go out with something besides being the worst president post-war.
right2bright on April 9, 2008 at 9:57 AM
Jimmy Carter to meet with HAMAS… Soooo, what else is new???
pueblo1032 on April 9, 2008 at 9:57 AM
You’ve just admitted that you agree with Bush’s decision to send troops into Iraq.
Well, no, not really. I was more referring our decision not to take out Sadr and engage him politically.
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2008 at 9:58 AM
Carter proves the arrogance of ignorance.
Imagine a Pres. Barack thirty years from now.
Speakup on April 9, 2008 at 9:59 AM
Now you’re admitting you are in favor of playing nice with both Sadr and Hamas.
Keep talking Ambassador Tom. When you’re done there will be a big enough hole for you and Jimmah to jump into
fogw on April 9, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Traitor, and Traitors should be dealt with, harshly.
Viper1 on April 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Bush should charge him with treason if he goes and speaks with Hamas!
xler8bmw on April 9, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Can we pack Jimmuh full of C-4?…
mojo on April 9, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Don’t call him a traitor. Just say this:
“Carter is apparently willing to meet with an organization that hates & wishes to annihilate the Jewish people, that is pledged to the destruction of the state of Israel, that uses bombs & terror against innocents, that seeks to kill Americans at every opportunity and that hides among women, children & the infirm while it plots murder.”
“I wonder what he wants to discuss with Hamas? Common interests?”
It is sad that such a bitter old crank was once our President.
BD57 on April 9, 2008 at 10:57 AM
Just to clarify, I don’t wish death on Carter. He is 83, so I’m expecting it to simply happen due to his old age. However, I will be glad when it comes, because as I said earlier, he’s showing friendship and alliance to people who would, without a moment’s hesitation, kill any or all of us. He’s cozying up to the people whose ilk took his citizens hostage, and defending their doing so. He’s standing shoulder to shoulder with those who want to see America fall, and I really do think a large part of that is simply due to his bitterness that the hostages were released the moment he left office. This ought to be covered under the Logan act, but sadly, I don’t think the writers of that bill ever considered a president would stoop to this.
Jimmy Carter is hubris personified, and his time spent building a few projects doesn’t even begin to make up for the damage he did to this nation. Every president makes bad decisions, but Jimmy Carter is the only one who has gone on to make things even worse by continuing to represent our nation through his weak, pandering sycophantic mewing to terrorists.
MadisonConservative on April 9, 2008 at 11:12 AM
And Allah, I’m sorry that you felt what I said needed to be deleted. It was not my intention. Hopefully my clarification above will make sense.
MadisonConservative on April 9, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Ah, senility.
Johan Klaus on April 9, 2008 at 11:15 AM
I have no doubt he sincerely believes he’s working for a better world. But the results prove he’s been wrong time after time. The man has learned nothing from this in 84 years and is blind to the enormous damage he has done. Senility cannot excuse it, he has always been this way.
Socratease on April 9, 2008 at 11:36 AM
I’m sure that President Carter’s “peanut politics” with Hamas will be exactly as effective as his handling of the Iranian hostage crisis.
TooTall on April 9, 2008 at 11:47 AM
Unlike Ronald Reagan’s funeral procession, Jimmy ‘Malaise’ Carter’s will be lined by people who should turn their back as the casket trundles forward. Of course the anti-Semites will be out in droves to mourn their loss.
Cremation is obviously out of the question – too much air pollution for carbon offsets.
SeniorD on April 9, 2008 at 12:11 PM
You know, guys, I really hate it that you guys get a couple of hours head start on us California pukes. I read each and every comment that I was going to make put forward by somebody else. The truth is that unsanctioned meetings with foreign governments are illegal. Too bad Pres. Bush has a track record of ignoring the little fools.
TimothyJ on April 9, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Jimmy “misery index” Carter must have gotten into the Billy Beer…Jimmy Carter…Marshall applewhite…seperated at birth? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Applewhite
PatriotPete on April 9, 2008 at 12:43 PM
Looks like the reception party has begun.
Allahu Carter.
Texas Rainmaker on April 9, 2008 at 12:54 PM
My Lebanese intelligence source who told me about this, last week, had other details of this disgusting meeting.
Debbie Schlussel on April 9, 2008 at 1:14 PM
So if he is fraternizing with terrorists, just put him on the no-fly list – but do it after he gets there.
Think_b4_speaking on April 9, 2008 at 1:30 PM
The epitome of a loser. One would think that a disastrous failure like Carter would simply want to go away and hide.
rplat on April 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM
Jimmy Carter’s failing peanut business was bailed out by Saudi oilmen in the 1970s. In 1981, Carter found himself in financially disastrous circumstances. So the Saudi oilmen bailed him out again. The Carter Center is fueled with Saudi money. But in addition to Carter’s financial debt to the Saudis, Carter’s allies in his political career also cashed in on their Saudi ties. Former South Carolina Governor John West was Carter’s ambassador to Saudi Arabia. West became a Saudi mouthpiece after his sinecure in Saudi Arabia finally ended. Beyond his selfish reasons for being a mouthpiece for Arab causes, Carter has psychological reasons for being an Arab sycophant. Carter never accepted his drubbing in 1980 by Ronald Reagan. Today Carter still seethes at this loss. It eats away at his very existence. That is why, over twentyfive years after the loss, Carter can still send nasty mail to George F. Will blaming Will for the Carter loss. Carter, in his warped mind, also blames Israel and Jewish Americans for the loss. On Larry King recently, Carter smiled that sick demented smile of his and talked angrily about “Supporters of Israel”. Carter was a slighly softer version of Reverend Wright.
Larraby on April 9, 2008 at 1:49 PM
Really?
Go eat your pudding and go to bed Jimmy.
ThePrez on April 9, 2008 at 2:14 PM
I can only imagine what people would think of a President Gingrich at this stage. Since he would never be elected, I must be content with that.
God bless President Bush.
capitalist piglet on April 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »