whenever Huckabee or Romney come up, Saint Olaf, Red Pill, and Apolcolyps come out and within a few posts it invariably turns into a anti-mormon hate fest

I challenge you to provide a link to a post of mine that you consider “a anti-mormon hate fest”.

If you can’t, you have made it obvious who the liar is.

Have a great day.

” was able to return to HotAir when Captain Ed came aboard. I’m thankful that Allah has not banned me again. But, if that happens again, I’ll start posting to my own blog instead of HotAir, and those of you who are interested in what I have to say can find me there.”

HA HA HA!! I didnt realize you were banned. Thank you Allah for banning this troll. Hey Red Pill, I am quite positively sure that you will have tons of people “interested in what (you) have to say). We will all be sure to follow you to your own blog. HA HA HA HA!!!

“Something has to change, and I am still believing God that Mike Huckabee is the next President of the United States.”

What else do you guys need? This is troll stuff. I for one wont bother with them anymore.

I have told you at least 3 times that I am not a Mormon. I was raised in a family where nobody went to church. My parents were non-practicing catholics and they still are non-practicing catholics.

Because I turned the tables on you and told you that YOU are going to hell (if there is a hell) which was just a way to show you how stupid you sound, you keep saying I am a mormon.

Dude, I am not a mormon. You know that because I have told you that many times.

Stop lying you moronic sack of sh**.

I voted for Romney and I hate Huckabee…and I admit Romney discussing religion sounded less intrusive to me than when Huckabee banged people in the head with it by quoting the bible.

And to the rest of you, whenever Huckabee or Romney come up, Saint Olaf, Red Pill, and Apolcolyps come out and within a few posts it invariably turns into a anti-mormon hate fest with these losers. TGhese guys actually believe that Huckabee could win the presidency…Apoloclypse guaranteed it and Saint Olaf says he would win 49 states…obviously these are kids playing on the internet.

My suggestion: stop feeding the trolls.

Those words mean something to me, but they don’t appear to mean much to John McCain.

CNN originally scheduled a series of debates, including one for February 28, 2008. John McCain did not have the honor and courage to go through with that debate and face Huckabee 1-on-1.

For those of you who think that CNN cancelled the debate and McCain had nothing to do with it, I remind you that Huckabee presented McCain with a letter, signed by thousands of voters, asking McCain to debate him before the March 4th primaries. A venue was arranged. All McCain had to do was be a real man and accept the invitation. Instead, McCain claimed a “prior commitment” which turned out to be a barbecue dinner for reporters, at which he apparently did nothing more than slop cole slaw and ribs onto the trays of impartial journalists. I wonder how many of them were from CNN? It seems to me that they were celebrating their apparent victory in suppressing the vote for Huckabee. Tasteless. Classless. Devoid of honor. Devoid of courage.

Now John McCain won’t face Michelle Malkin 1-on-1.

How can we trust John McCain to protect our country when he hasn’t had the courage to do a debate with Mike Huckabee or an interview with Michelle Malkin?

The answer is we can’t trust John McCain. He is afraid of being exposed for who he truly is, just like Obama.

As things currently stand, your choice in November will be between two Democrats.

Something has to change, and I am still believing God that Mike Huckabee is the next President of the United States.

Speaking the day before Virginia’s GOP primary, McCain linked rival George W. Bush to the leaders he criticized, calling him a “Pat Robertson Republican” who couldn’t defeat Al Gore if the vice president is the Democratic nominee.

Not only did George W. Bush defeat Al Gore in 2000, George W. Bush went on to be relected with a greater percentage of the popular vote than any Democrat has received since LBJ in 1964. If it were Constitutionally permissible for George W. Bush to run for a third term, he would win again. (I remind you of the loud chants of “four more years” at CPAC when George W. Bush spoke there in February.)

Sen. John McCain Attacks Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Republican Establishment as Harming GOP Ideals
Aired February 28, 2000 – 9:59 a.m. ET

A lot of people walk around talking about the Reagan days and the next Reagan. I was with the old Reagan and I can promise you that this man comes as close as anyone to filling those shoes.

Everyone’s looking for the next Reagan, while he’s been right under your nose the whole time. Don’t you think that a man who was a vital part of Reagan’s campaign knew Reagan pretty darn well? When that man says he’s been looking for the next Reagan for a long time, and he’s finally found him, don’t you think that we should listen?

Paul Weyrich to evangelical leaders: We should have backed Huckabee

Too late.
Apr 8, 2008 6:12 PM by Allahpundit

Too late? Maybe, maybe not. I do not wish any evil upon John McCain, but what would happen if between now and the Republican convention, due to some health issue, John McCain was not physically able to perform the duties of the office of the President of the United States? The party has to nominate someone. I believe the party will nominate Huckabee, and Huckabee will defeat Obama in November. Mike Huckabee will be the next President of the United States, and you will thank God when he is.

The Republican Party chose poorly when it nominated Ford over Reagan in 1976. We had to suffer through four years of Carter before the party came to its senses and nominated Reagan. We don’t have to repeat that mistake and suffer through four years of the socialist/communist Obama.

The “Religious Right” (including both evangelicals and Mormons/LDS) helped re-elect Bush in 2004. Those who want to “Defeat the Ultra-Right” had a plan to split us into three groups in 2008, so that no one group could stop McCain. Those three groups were: Huckabee, Romney, and Thompson.

Mormons/LDS naturally support Romney.

I am one of those people who were initially fooled by Thompson. He was my preferred candidate before he dropped out and I took a deeper look at Huckabee (and liked what I saw).

Huckabee was, and continues to be, marginalized.

This triangulation, along with Democrats voting in Republican primaries, is what gave McCain the lead. I remind you that Florida Democrats had no reason to vote in the Democrat primary. I think that was very intentional on the part of the DNC. Many Florida Democrats voted for McCain.

The triangulation against Romney and Guiliani is what made McCain the nominee.

Well put. The people who hated Rudy and Mitt gave us McCain.

Huckabee was given many chances to define a presidential position that would allow him to grow beyond his base and each opportunity was shot down and he chose to defend everything he had done as if he would the same as President.

Maybe you’re forgetting that Reagan was a Christian icon and was extremely vocal about his Christianity.

SaintOlaf on April 8, 2008 at 11:43 PM

You mean Ronald Reagan? A Christian icon? The twice married actor who signed the bill which made abortion legal in California? Come on. As for Reagan’s brand of conservatism, he wasn’t much in favor of exclusionary Christians. Reagan was a libertarian who harbored no ill will to his fellow Christians. It is high time for exclusionary Christians such as Weyrich and Hagee to distinguish between libertarians and libertines.

Like Hagee’s hatred of Catholics, Mitt hatred makes Weyrich a very small man. Hardly befitting of the title Christian leader.

“If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals — if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.”

RONALD REAGAN, Reason Magazine, Jul. 1, 1975