Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


75 Colombia unions want the free-trade agreement

posted at 11:55 am on April 8, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view

Few reporters have covered the Colombian trade pact story as well as Monica Showalter at Investors Business Daily. Today, she updates readers on a particularly nasty deception made by the opponents of the pact in the US, which exploits the murder of a trade unionist to argue against the pact’s ratification. What they don’t mention is that Jairo Giraldo Rey supported the free-trade pact before his murder, and was joined by 75 unions in Colombia in that position:

Jairo Giraldo Rey’s murder near Cali last November gave big labor a seemingly textbook case for why Congress should reject the Colombia free-trade pact, which President Bush sent to Congress Monday, forcing a vote on the contentious deal within 90 days.

The 35-year-old union leader’s death showed why “the AFL-CIO remains unalterably opposed to passage of the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement,” wrote AFL-CIO President John Sweeney in a Nov. 8 letter to House and Senate members.

The only problem is, Giraldo supported free trade.

Indeed, his fellow members of Sinaltraifrut, a 10,000-member banana harvester’s union, say trade creates jobs and breaks up vested oligarchies. Whoever killed Giraldo likely didn’t want him flying to Washington that week to lobby Congress to pass the pact.

Democrats who oppose the bill do so on behalf of their friends in Big Labor, not out of friendship for the Colombians. They claim that Alvaro Uribe has not done enough to end the violence against unionists in Colombia. Yet during the last six years, murders have decreased by over 40% in all categories, and by 86% against unionists.

The government conducted serious reforms during that period. Uribe helped rewrite the entire justice system, transforming it to a more modern system. As a result, they have won 156 convictions in crimes against trade unionists, when they only had one in the entire ten years that preceded 2002. The backlog of prosecutions in these crimes has dropped from six years to less than 18 months, and is still improving.

Not all of the unions in Colombia support free trade, but it’s worth noting which unions do support it. Showalter reports that the majority of the private-sector unions want the pact approved, while the overwhelming number of public-sector unions oppose it. Because 70% of public-sector jobs are unionized as opposed to only 4.5% in the private sector, the public-sector unions in Colombia have a greater voice. However, the private sector unions understand that untariffed trade creates private-sector jobs and reduces the need for nanny-state positions on which the unions rely.

Instead of penalizing Colombia for their progress, the US should welcome Colombia into a free-trade agreement.

Monica Showalter will be my guest on this afternoon’s Ed Morrissey Show at 3 pm ET.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Instead of penalizing Colombia for their progress, the US should welcome Colombia into a free-trade agreement.

Heartily agreed.

Monica Showalter will be my guest on this afternoon’s Ed Morrissey Show at 3 pm ET.

Looking forward to hearing the podcast!

RushBaby on April 8, 2008 at 12:03 PM

Did someone bust Hot Air? It’s not showing all the nice page layouts.

DakRoland on April 8, 2008 at 12:09 PM

Given that Colombia has 100 Bn BBL of oil (at least 20% recoverable) and perhaps 50,000 Bn Cu ft of natural gas, not to mention they are one of the few non-leftist countries in South America, it would seem a natural to to this. Predictably, the left will fight tooth and nail to prevent it. Wonder how Rep. McGovern of MA will vote? Still waiting on the Interpol report re: the hard drive of the FARC #2 man – and who all will be implicated in trying to bring down Uribe, incl McGovern..

Think_b4_speaking on April 8, 2008 at 12:15 PM

Did someone bust Hot Air? It’s not showing all the nice page layouts.

DakRoland on April 8, 2008 at 12:09 PM

That happened to me the other day, and everyone else said they had no problem. Today it looks fine to me.
When it happened to me, all of the ads were beneath the comments and the comments stretched across the whole page.

right2bright on April 8, 2008 at 12:44 PM

Is it any surprise that the private company unions (there) are for it, and the government sector unions oppose it? The private ones know it would mean jobs for them, and increase their membership at the same time.

bikermailman on April 8, 2008 at 1:04 PM

Oh, and John Sweeney is a total moron…I can say this as our union is affiliated with the AFL/CIO.

bikermailman on April 8, 2008 at 1:05 PM

Leftist thinking:

“Unions are more important than prosperity.”
“Why?”
“Because they foster prosperity.”

Wha?

Sign the damned thing, people. The “lands to the South” very clearly need a positive role model.

Merovign on April 8, 2008 at 1:34 PM

Even Sander Levin had a difficult time mounting opposition to the free trade pact with Columbia on the “The News Hour” last night.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june08/tradepact_04-07.html

gabriel sutherland on April 8, 2008 at 1:53 PM

In case it interests anyone, Canada is in the process of negotiating a Free Trade deal with Colombia, and is expected to have it completed within the next few months. There is no difficulty in getting treaties through the Canadian parliament which means, if the US Congress refuses to pass the US-Colombia deal, Canada will have a free pass into Colombia.

As a Canadian,of course, that’s not all bad…but it would be pretty shortsighted of the US Congress to penalize an ally whose economy grew 7.4% last year.

Blaise on April 8, 2008 at 1:54 PM

I’m running Camino 1.5.5 on Mac OS X (10.4.11) and it’s messed up, but in Safari and Firefox, it renders fine. Camino for some reason is NOT liking the site today. :(

DakRoland on April 8, 2008 at 2:25 PM

From Robert Novak:

The difficulty in getting only about 30 House Democrats to provide the needed margin of victory reflects the Democratic Party’s abandonment of free trade over the past half-century. Less obvious, labor’s intense opposition shows that the AFL-CIO no longer leads the way against the far left throughout the world, as it did under George Meany and Lane Kirkland in bygone years. Their successors are not concerned with the prospect of Chavez, allied with communist Cuba, dominating the Western Hemisphere. …
A rare insight into what the Uribe regime really thinks is going on was provided me by Vice President Francisco Santos on one of the many trips to Washington by senior Colombian officials to court congressional support. Santos told me Chavez’s controlled labor unions in Venezuela are in close touch with Colombia’s leftist unions, who in turn influence the AFL-CIO. Thus, the labor intransigence in Washington can be traced to Caracas.

Amazing how our politicians sidle up to our enemies, and stab us in the back.

Think_b4_speaking on April 8, 2008 at 3:19 PM

Amazing how our politicians sidle up to our enemies, and stab us in the back.

When exactly have Democrats not done this?

This is who Democrats are. When they aren’t selling out their country, they are stealing money by the truck load.

Democrats politicians are absolute scum, period. Else why would they be associated with the other Democrat party scum?

NoDonkey on April 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM

DakRoland on April 8, 2008 at 12:09 PM

right2bright on April 8, 2008 at 12:44 PM

It’s just the CCS style sheet failing to load, hit refresh. Same thing if vids say no longer available, just refresh and try again.

- The Cat

MirCat on April 8, 2008 at 4:07 PM

Giraldo’s murder not only silenced an unexpected voice for free trade, it also jacked up union killings data to stoke the case in the U.S. against Colombia’s pact

Whenever a poll comes out that people on this blog don’t like, the knee-jerk reaction is to say “the sample is too small.” So IBD brings up one murder out of 2,200 mentioned in the Sweeney letter, and says that the inclusion of that murder “jacked up union killings data.”
I’m not a pollster, but I think a sample of one out of 2,200 is too small of a sample.

dave742 on April 8, 2008 at 4:16 PM

10,000 people harvest bananas for a living!?!?!?!?

Kevin M on April 9, 2008 at 1:11 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.