WSJ: Wright Stuff still looms over Obama campaign

posted at 8:06 am on April 7, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

If Barack Obama had hoped to move beyond the story of his 20-year association with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the Wall Street Journal says he will find himself disappointed. His standing in national polls has returned to the pre-Wright strength he enjoyed among Democrats, but upcoming primary states like Pennsylvania, Indiana, and West Virginia may give a hint as to whether Obama can keep suburban and rural white voters in the Democratic coalition in a general election. Nick Timiraos reports that the initial indications are mixed:

Sen. Barack Obama’s Philadelphia speech on race relations last month seemed to put the controversial remarks of his former pastor behind him. But three weeks later, there is evidence of lingering damage.

“It has not been defused,” says David Parker, a North Carolina Democratic Party official and unpledged superdelegate. He says his worries about Republicans questioning Sen. Obama’s patriotism prompted him to raise the issue of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.’s remarks in conversations with both the Obama and Clinton campaigns. …

Recent polls suggest that, in key swing states, the New York senator fares better in head-to-head matchups with Republican nominee Sen. John McCain than does Sen. Obama. In Ohio, Sen. Clinton led Sen. McCain 48% to 39%, while Sen. Obama led Sen. McCain 43% to 42% in Quinnipiac University polls conducted in the last week of March.

In Pennsylvania, Sen. Clinton had a 48% to 40% lead against Sen. McCain while Sen. Obama was ahead 43% to 39%. The polls credit Sen. Clinton’s advantage to her strength among white voters. No Democrat has won the presidency with a majority of white voters since 1964, and no president from either party has been elected without winning two of the three swing states of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida since 1960. In those three states, some 23% of white Democrats would defect to Sen. McCain in a matchup with Sen. Obama, compared with 11% who would abandon Sen. Clinton, according to the Quinnipiac polls.

 

The Wright Stuff continues to resonate for three reasons. First, it’s not a complicated issue to understand. Jeremiah Wright didn’t speak in subtle tones. He said that his congregation should pray for God to damn America, a place that most Americans love. Wright called the nation the US of KKK A, and openly accused the nation of creating HIV AIDS as an agent of genocide. Anyone supporting Wright, and the Obamas sent tens of thousands of dollars to Trinity United, has to answer for their support of this rhetoric.

Second, the sermons got videotaped and distributed by Wright himself and his church. Obviously, he felt sanguine enough about his message that he wanted it disseminated widely. That belies the notion that these were momentary and passion-induced transgressions that Wright later regretted. It indicates a pride in these statements that again calls into question the support Wright got for making them — and the “I didn’t inhale” rationalization coming from Wright’s most famous parishioner.

Most importantly, no one really knows Barack Obama. He hasn’t exactly revealed himself in legislative action, nor has he acted in any kind of executive role which would show his direction in governance.  He wants Americans to accept him for his judgment, but provides precious little evidence of it in his meager political track record.  His judgment in supporting Wright therefore gets a lot more attention and sticks closer to him as a result — and it should.

It’s unlikely that this will have much impact on the primary, even in the remaining Rust Belt states.  It will have a far greater impact in a general election, where independents and centrists that Obama hoped to reach will wonder whether his flirtation with Weather Underground radicals William Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn didn’t follow as a piece from listening to the incendiary demagogogic hate speech at Trinity United, and worry whether Obama isn’t a radical with a better sense of public relations instead of the reasonable independent-minded outsider that he paints himself to be.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Hussein Ossama is enjoying the happiest moments of his life these days.

But as History is teaching us, it will not be for so long.

Being the president is not an easy job, even if you have people doing things or making decisions for you.

But when you have a determination from the population to remove any Republican from the White House, it doesn’t matter who is the candidate on the other side, even if it’s Ossama Bin Laden.

They see more of a chance in Hussein for different reasons already outlined in many of my previous messages.

So, get ready America, it doesn’t matter who is the president. What matters is: Who can beat the Republicans and kick them out of Office?

If this is Democracy, if this is how voters are thinking, then any Banana Republic is way ahead of America in terms of political maturity.

Indy Conservative on April 7, 2008 at 8:20 AM

“… reasonable independent-minded outsider …”

Ha! Yeah, (W)right! But the sad part is, people are fallin’ for this crap.

Tony737 on April 7, 2008 at 8:21 AM

“He wants Americans to accept him for his judgment”

If he truly had good judgment, he would have spent some time obtaining executive experience prior to running for President.

As it is, he is the entitlement candidate. Just hand everything to me on a platter and all will be well.

This is like a quarterback playing well in high school, playing a couple games in college and then demanding the starting position on a team.

Which would be ridiculous. Why are we more serious about our sports, than we are about elected office?

NoDonkey on April 7, 2008 at 8:21 AM

Hitchens and Andi Sullivan on the Russert show went over this…it’s not going to go away.

Hitch made a good point about Wright, he is not apologetic, no matter what fabrications Barry throws out, he is gleefully pleased that he angers the White Power Structure.

Of course, Andi is a Kool Aid drinker, he didn’t want to hear anything negative about his paramour Barry.

This guy has it all. It’s def worth a watch.

benrand on April 7, 2008 at 8:33 AM

I find it hard to believe that Obama can carry Ohio. I live in Indiana and I know that the Republican party in Ohio screwed up big time…but still, I just do not see it happening.

Terrye on April 7, 2008 at 8:34 AM

This Wright situation is a big ongoing Liberal still ongoing mess.Obama’s poll numbers are virtualy untouched!

Slick Willys “Fairy Tale” comment backfired,the Wright
GD America comment didn’t even fizzle on the left!

I don’t have any idea how a the liberal brain works,
but if that kind of speach was used by the right,you
would be witnessing a new era of hate from the Left!

So,Republicans don’t think,talk or speak of the Wright
soap opera,let the left spin in that mess,because its
nothing but a distraction,the left simply don’t care
what Rev.Wright has said!

canopfor on April 7, 2008 at 8:34 AM

Most importantly, no one really knows Barack Obama.

Judicial Watch came up empty with its F.O.I.A. requests for his State Senate years, but Sean Hannity did a good job of parsing his votes as a State Senator on Hannity’s America last night. In addition to voting “present” instead of yea or nay, Barry often voted one way then claimed that he hit the wrong button after the fact – a very clever (and slippery) way to take both sides of controversial issues.

Except that the obvious downside for Obama is that it disqualifies him on the age old question of whose finger we want on the nuclear button.

Buy Danish on April 7, 2008 at 8:38 AM

Obama has more than adequately defined himself. Now, we’ll see if the voting public is smart enough or perceptive enough to recognize a race driven Marxist.

rplat on April 7, 2008 at 8:40 AM

“It has not been defused,” says David Parker, a North Carolina Democratic Party official and unpledged superdelegate. He says his worries about Republicans questioning Sen. Obama’s patriotism prompted him to raise the issue of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.’s remarks in conversations with both the Obama and Clinton campaigns. …

Don’t these people ever worry about why the Republicans would attack rather than just that they will? Democrats are obsessed with the political damage of certain positions rather than what those positions actually say of the candiate.

Obama claims an America-hating racist as his spiritual guide and Dems worry what other people will think, rather than what Obama himself thinks. Typical.

amkun on April 7, 2008 at 8:41 AM

Ophra quit the Church supposedly in 1984. Since there is no Google record of her being asked about this or her present position on Pastor Wright, I find it very interesting that the media apparently has not questioned her about this, assuming the info is correct. The media obvious doesn’t want to hurt either her or Mr. Obama.

amr on April 7, 2008 at 8:44 AM

WSJ: Wright Stuff still looms over Obama campaign

Great work Sherlock.

Canceled my subscription to that waste of trees too.

JiangxiDad on April 7, 2008 at 8:47 AM

Rev. Wright isn’t Barry’s only concern. I received an email from the NRA, seems Barry is trying to get the pro-gun voters in Pennsylvania, and there’s a lot of them. A pro-gun legislator has endorsed Barry but you can believe that the NRA is emailing voters there letting them know about Barry’s record and the fact Barry and Hillary got an “F”
on gun issues.

2theright on April 7, 2008 at 9:00 AM

The Wright Stuff continues to resonate for three reasons.

No. The reason that the Wright Stuff continues to resonate is that Obama did not state Wright’s specific statements to denounce them, did not apologize for his own lapse in judgment by staying in the church*, and did not resign from the church. Had he done that, this story would have ended in March.

* By contrast, see McCain, who apologized for opposing the MLK holiday in Arizona.

aunursa on April 7, 2008 at 9:11 AM

Obama: Fire Imus
Obama First White House Contender to Call for Imus’ Firing Over Racial Slur

“I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus,” Obama told ABC News, “but I would also say that there’s nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude.”

“He didn’t just cross the line,” Obama said. “He fed into some of the worst stereotypes that my two young daughters are having to deal with today in America. The notions that as young African-American women — who I hope will be athletes — that that somehow makes them less beautiful or less important. It was a degrading comment. It’s one that I’m not interested in supporting.”

Though every major presidential candidate has decried the racist remarks, Obama is the first one to say Imus should lose his job for them.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3031317

And then, I heard David Axelrod, on Morning Joe this morning, telling us how “consistant” Obama is.

franksalterego on April 7, 2008 at 9:19 AM

He [obalma] introduced legislation last January calling for withdrawal to start on May 1 and for all combat brigades to be pulled out by March 31, 2008.
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2007/Sep/12/br/br6275409318.html

Quite a different story than the one we’re hearing, now.

And then, I heard David Axelrod, on Morning Joe this morning, telling us how “consistant” Obama is.

The only thing consistant about obalma is, his inconsistancy.

franksalterego on April 7, 2008 at 9:37 AM

I’m trying to imagine if I were a blue collar guy who’d put $5 or $10 a week into the collection basket of my church every Sunday for the last 20 years……I really think I’d be pissed that my pastor got the church to buy him a $1.6 million dollar mansion for a retirement gift.

Wright must be quite talented at brainwashing lots of those poor people.

funky chicken on April 7, 2008 at 9:55 AM

And then, I heard David Axelrod, on Morning Joe this morning, telling us how “consistant” Obama is.

franksalterego on April 7, 2008 at 9:19 AM

Axelrod says Obama is consistent? That’s funny. Obama has been all over the place on the Iraq war, despite his claims that he has always opposed it; that’s a “fairy tale” (Bill Clinton was right for once when he said that). And look at Obama’s position(s) on gun control: he supported a total ban on handgun ownership, but he also says that the Second Amendment ensures that individual citizens (and not just militias) have the right to possess guns. Obama’s been on every side of every issue. The only thing Obama has been consistent on is his desire to be President, and he’s willing to do or say anything to achieve that desire.

AZCoyote on April 7, 2008 at 9:56 AM

Obambi, schmobambi. I’m still trying to understand who it is that is reading and listening to Andrew Sullivan, and why he is on Russert’s show.

He is a gay liberal Democrat Brit, who claims to be a dissident conservative – despite being hilariously unable to identify a single issue on which he actually agrees with conservatives — he supports a racialist liberal with Marxist followers for President, a guy without a single position that could be described as anything other than radically liberal. He’s a writer by trade, but isn’t very good at it; a blogger now without a readership other than his critics, apparently.

Does anyone give a crap what Andrew Sullivan says about anything, and if so…why?

Jaibones on April 7, 2008 at 10:11 AM

funky chicken on April 7, 2008 at 9:55 AM

You’re conflating…

It’s only $1 Million,

Complete with elevator, whirlpool, butler’s pantry, circular driveway and four-car garage,..a rubberized exercise room and a spare room for a future theater or swimming pool.

“God Damn America”

franksalterego on April 7, 2008 at 10:20 AM

a l b a t r o s s

Maybe even…

u n e l e c t a b l e

petefrt on April 7, 2008 at 10:33 AM

Ed writes, “Most importantly, no one really knows Barack Obama.”

I’d say we know quite enough about him by his CHOICES and JUDGEMENT. This includes all his “present” votes, as well as his 20-year commitment to Reverend Wright.

As to…”moving beyond”…:

How much distance is there between

GOD and DAMN and AMERICA

or

I and CANNOT and DISASSOCIATE and MYSELF and FROM and REVEREND and WRIGHT…?!

Lockstein13 on April 7, 2008 at 10:39 AM

Well, as the good Reverend might have said, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God.”

We get to see first hand the practice of what he preached.

unclesmrgol on April 7, 2008 at 10:56 AM

and the “I didn’t inhale” rationalization coming from Wright’s most famous parishioner.

Great line, Ed.

sleepy-beans on April 7, 2008 at 11:03 AM

What? Dare we question his patriotism?

Obama loves America so much he wants to transform it into the antithesis of itself… from capitalist to socialist, from limited government to big government, from melting pot to multiculturalist class/race/sex warfare, from classical liberal individualism to Marxist collectivism, from free markets to state-controlled markets…

After all, hating America is the highest expression of patriotism. Jeremiah Wright’s “God damn America” is an expression of pure patriotism, as it shows he loves America enough to ask God to curse it.

petefrt on April 7, 2008 at 11:08 AM

The Wright Stuff continues to resonate for three reasons.

No. The reason that the Wright Stuff continues to resonate is that Obama did not state Wright’s specific statements to denounce them, did not apologize for his own lapse in judgment by staying in the church*, and did not resign from the church. aunursa on April 7, 2008 at 9:11 AM

AND because the speech that he gave that was supposed to make all this go away contained the three words that will mark him forever as a phony. Typical. White. Person. You cannot, absolutely, and unequivocally CANNOT use that kind of formulation, and be “post-racial.” That formulation, and being the bearer of a message of racial healing do not belong in the same area code, much less the same speech. If McCain said that someone were a “typical black person,” or a “typical Mexican,”–game over. Obama would probably say that it was a forgettable “misstatement,” if someone were to press him on it , but the “typical white person,” such as you might find in Ohio or Pennsylvania, may not find it so forgettable.

smellthecoffee on April 7, 2008 at 11:27 AM

I thought WV had a pension for racists? How else did screwball Robert Byrd get elected? He and Wright are two horns on the same goat.

Hening on April 7, 2008 at 11:52 AM

There are none so blind as those who do not see and none so deaf as those who will not hear. That is the tinfoil hatted leftist loons problem and to a slightly lesser degree the Liberals/democrats in general. I have a very bright son who simply will not hear and so we table politics when we are in the same room. He is so smart he makes stupid choices. I can’t blame him, he has a real hard on for the right and their pandering to the money. My only hope is that there are enough adults with thinking and reasoning brains out there who will see and hear and vote accordingly, and make the Right choice!!

sharinlite on April 7, 2008 at 11:56 AM

Obama also stirs crowds into a frenzy of cheering and clapping when he talks about treating military veterans with respect, of giving them the best possible equipment, of providing top-notch health care for the wounded.

“They have earned our respect,” the Illinois senator exclaims.

And yet he wants to cut military funding, how exactly does that work?
There are so many issues that are coming up and out and getting attention now, thanks mostly to the rev. Wright disaster. I hope to God that the majority of sane people listen to this stuff and shrug off their white guilt when they go to vote in the general.

4shoes on April 7, 2008 at 12:37 PM

WSJ: Wright Stuff still looms over Obama campaign

Hopefully like a wall about to fall over and crush him!

pseudonominus on April 7, 2008 at 1:09 PM

smellthecoffee on April 7, 2008 at 11:27 AM

AND because the speech that he gave that was supposed to make all this go away contained the three words that will mark him forever as a phony. Typical. White. Person. You cannot, absolutely, and unequivocally CANNOT use that kind of formulation, and be “post-racial.”

Good point. All in all, Obama’s speech to quell the Wright controversy actually did more harm than good for him. In spite of the MSM adoration.

aunursa on April 7, 2008 at 1:15 PM

smellthecoffee on April 7, 2008 at 11:27 AM
AND because the speech that he gave that was supposed to make all this go away contained the three words that will mark him forever as a phony. Typical. White. Person. You cannot, absolutely, and unequivocally CANNOT use that kind of formulation, and be “post-racial.”

Not to be nitpicky, but Obama didn’t use the term “typical white person” in his race speech on March 18, 2008. The word “typical” does not even appear once in the speech. Neither does the word “person”. The word “White” does appear 30 times in the speech, which is understandable in a approximately 40 minute speech about race. Source: http://www.drudgereport.com/flashos.htm

I think you are conflating a different incident in which Senator Obama is reported to have used the phrase “typical white person” in describing his grandmother. Obama was quoted in a radio interview on March 20, 2008 as saying: “The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity, but that she is a typical white person. If she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know (pause) there’s a reaction in her that has been bred into our experiences that don’t go away and it sometimes comes out in the wrong way.” Source: National Review

Just wanted to correct your mistake.

New_Jersey_Buckeye on April 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM

I just have one question for the Wrights of the world. If Jesus was so pro-black/anti-white then why did he choose to have his body memorialized by a white cracker.

Corsair on April 7, 2008 at 4:07 PM