Sadr’s political universe continues to shrink
posted at 9:00 am on April 7, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Moqtada al-Sadr has found himself increasingly isolated in Iraqi political circles. Once considered a kingmaker when Nouri al-Maliki ascended to the Prime Minister post, he has managed to bring unity to the various sectarian factions in Iraq in a unique manner. He has everyone looking to kick him and his Mahdis out of the next election:
Iraq’s major Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish parties have closed ranks to force anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr to disband his Mahdi Army militia or leave politics, lawmakers and officials involved in the effort said Sunday.
Such a bold move risks a violent backlash by al-Sadr’s Shiite militia. But if it succeeds it could cause a major realignment of Iraq’s political landscape.
The first step will be adding language to a draft election bill banning parties that operate militias from fielding candidates in provincial balloting this fall, the officials and lawmakers said. The government intends to send the draft to parliament within days and hopes to win approval within weeks.
“We, the Sadrists, are in a predicament,” lawmaker Hassan al-Rubaie said Sunday. “Even the blocs that had in the past supported us are now against us and we cannot stop them from taking action against us in parliament.”
The move against Sadr in Basra clearly had a lot more support from Iraqis than previously thought. Even Shi’ites have had enough of the militia leader and want to see security and control managed from the elected government. The military phase was only the start; the political phase has just begun. And this time, unlike in 2004, the central government has increased the stakes. They now demand that Sadr disband the Mahdi Army entirely, not just stand them down.
Undoubtedly, Sadr’s Iranian support has prompted the isolationist coalition within the Iraqi government. Sadr has flaunted his Iranian backing a little too publicly. Even Maliki, who wants good relations with Iran, cannot abide foreign troops abetting an insurrection in his second-largest city. It has given Shi’ites, Sunnis, and Kurds a common focus and a point on which unity naturally arises.
Now even Sadr’s political supporters have acknowledged that the end of the road may have come. Rubaie has offered to send a delegation to Sadr to explain that he has to cut the Mahdis loose if he expects to retain any political influence at all. If it doesn’t work, the Iraqis in the Assembly appear prepared to have the Americans and British conduct full-scale military operations against Sadr, which they have prevented for the last four years.
The American media seemed eager to portray Maliki as out of touch and defeated after the first few hours of fighting in Basra. Will they update their reports to show the unity that Maliki has achieved in his aggressive opposition to Sadr’s militias and the collapse of Sadr’s political standing as a result?










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Still more evidence that Maliki is smarter than the American media.
Well THAT ain’t sayin’ much.
Tony737 on April 7, 2008 at 9:04 AM
No
Rode Werk on April 7, 2008 at 9:04 AM
My 12 y.o. God-daughter could even do that….prove smarter than the MSM.
El Guapo on April 7, 2008 at 9:05 AM
Still more evidence that Maliki is smarter than the American media.
Book smart and common sense stupid; about the best one could say when referencing the American media. It all goes down hill from there!
Keemo on April 7, 2008 at 9:09 AM
Before the war the government had no idea what was going on in Iraq. We had no intelligence, no sense of ground truth. The media has rightly criticized that. Now the media has no idea what is going on in Iraq. Honest incompetence? Or do they not really want to get the story right? At least not right away. Not the first headline.
D0WNT0WN on April 7, 2008 at 9:10 AM
Encouraging, but let’s be realistic . . . even an amoeba is smarter than the American mainstream media.
rplat on April 7, 2008 at 9:12 AM
“The first step will be adding language to a draft election bill banning parties that operate militias from fielding candidates in provincial balloting this fall …”
Sweet. If they wanna have true representative freedom, then the political militias gotta go. Sounds like liberty, progress and democracy. Who was it that said this’ll never work? Oh yeah, the “liberals”, “progressives” and “Democrats”. How ironic.
Tony737 on April 7, 2008 at 9:13 AM
Wonder how long before some Iraqi tips off their government or the Iraqi army on Sadr’s whereabouts?
2theright on April 7, 2008 at 9:13 AM
Key here is that Al Mal and the other centrist Iraqi’s understand that they only have a short window of time to reign in these militias.
They can read the tea leaves, and understand that the US’s internal politics, which are beyond their control, are now a ticking time bomb. They have to gain military control of the whole country, BEFORE the US elections, because if a Dem wins, they will not be able to count on US backup even between the election, and the Presidential Inagguration.
Romeo13 on April 7, 2008 at 9:19 AM
Actually we had all that, but political interests and politically motivated bureaucracy (I allege Clinton leftovers/holdovers) within our intel community ended up screwing up and even manipulating the end product of intel reports. Why do you think there was so much outcry when Porter Goss wanted to fire and prosecute leakers?
El Guapo on April 7, 2008 at 9:20 AM
I like the way you think. But I would also like to conclude that being fed up with the rapes and kilings by extremists and Iraqis finally getting the courage (and dawning of who the real enemy is) to fight back is the real major factor.
El Guapo on April 7, 2008 at 9:24 AM
I agree that elements within the intelligence community (specifically CIA) along with the State Department were actively undermining the administration but we really had almost no intelligence presence in Iraq before the war.
D0WNT0WN on April 7, 2008 at 9:28 AM
Iraqis have realized that they have to make it look good over there or a Dem will surely get into the white House. Politics REALLY does make strange bedfellows.
jeanie on April 7, 2008 at 9:28 AM
Is this a trick question?
crazy_legs on April 7, 2008 at 9:31 AM
Yes, Joseph Wilson comes to mind.
Smarter than MSM, how could that be? Oh that be!
Wade on April 7, 2008 at 9:33 AM
Do they ever?
Don’t they have something like this in Palestine? That’s why the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade is a political party, but never fields candidates. Everyone knows it’s just the military wing of one of the “real” political parties.
Kafir on April 7, 2008 at 9:33 AM
Oh, I agreee with you… for the man on the street.
One key aspect to the Middle East philosophy and history that most miss is that they will invaribly back the strong horse. Shifting alliances is not looked down on, as it is in the West, and is a much more normal activity. They don’t seem to take is as perssonaly as we do…
With that cultural perception as a backdrop, Al-Mal had our backing, BUT, the Politicians did not know if WE would last long enough to allow him to actualy gain control. The surge showed that we were willing to stick with Al-Mal thus making him a “strong horse”, and gaining him more internal back up.
Now, he has to consolidate his power base, and show he will still be able to maintain control IF we leave. So he has about 6 months to get rid of the militias…
Romeo13 on April 7, 2008 at 9:34 AM
This is amazing . . . while things were going very well in Iraq there was nary a word from the leftist mainstream media. Now, we have a skirmish and they can’t leave it alone. This country has several enemies and the so-called “MSM” stands conspicuously among them.
rplat on April 7, 2008 at 9:35 AM
We fell for it too.
AbaddonsReign on April 7, 2008 at 10:00 AM
The heartbreak of unintended consequences for the donks. All that “get out now” rhetoric was heard by the Iraqis as well as our lefty base, so Malaki decides to get off the dime before our elections. Bush should send Pelosi, Reid, and Obama a nice Thank you note.
a capella on April 7, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Those buttheads got me again. I appreciate the heads up on this Basra fight. The MSM sure made Malilki out to be a dufus on this, but as no surprise, there is a completely different truth to it all. Glad u put this together, or I’d still be in the dark.
WildBillIII on April 7, 2008 at 10:27 AM
…more evidence that Maliki is smarter than the American media.
Most Chordates are.
mojo on April 7, 2008 at 10:32 AM
It is sad to think how many lives have been lost by all these lies in the media.
tomas on April 7, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Not according to the moronic Frank Rich, (as of yesterday):
The problem is Mr. Rich’s post is one of the most emailed and read from the “paper of record” even though Rich has no clue that the “minions” exist in his own mind, and the propaganda the New York Times continues to publish with an anti-military agenda praying for defeat for their leftist political gain.
Rovin on April 7, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Ah, so Malaki is emerging as a strong man after all? The “speak softly but carry a big stick” method works, albeit the Iraqi way.
The Dhimmis has mastered the art of unintended consequences once again. The egg on their faces becomes them: a white flag of surrender (cut and run) is exposed along with their deep yellow streak.
One of the intriguing aspects of Qadaffi’s rambling at a recent convergence of Arab powers is the recognition that Iran is a threat to their powers. The other was his inadvertent admission that Muslim expansion by the sword was a fact in Andalusia. The memri clip at littlegreen footballs of the event is revelatory both in what Qadaffi says and what he doesn’t say.
onlineanalyst on April 7, 2008 at 10:38 AM
I have a feeling this subject might come up in the Petraeus testimony tomorrow and then the MSM will have a hard time avoiding it.
Dudley Smith on April 7, 2008 at 11:32 AM
This is why this is my favorite site! Where else could I
go to hear good news. OK, maybe a couple of places, but
not where my father used to get his news. Thanks ED, you
rock on.
aceinstall on April 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM
I’ve suggested the following slogans to our local MSM for their mastheads:
“Yesterday’s News Tomorrow”
…or…
“All The News that Fits, We Print” (and we ignore or edit the heck out of the rest)
landlines on April 7, 2008 at 1:54 PM
Not saying much, a mole is smarter than the msm.
allrsn on April 7, 2008 at 2:36 PM
Crap, you beat me to the snappy answer. :)
ThePrez on April 7, 2008 at 2:46 PM
Thanks for your fine work, Ed.
mymanpotsandpans on April 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM
Wow! Iraqi PM al-Maliki and the moderate majority of parties in Iraq’s Parliament are learning. They are acting in Parliamentary concert against the al-Sadr extremist Iranian proxy army and party.
.
I do believe this is what can be called “great political progress”. All the moderate Iraqi parties are working together in the Iraqi Parliament for the Iraqi national interest. The Shia, Sunnis, Kurds…all acting as IRAQIS.
.
The upcoming Congressional briefing by Gen Petraeus and (who’s his civilian counterpart? Ryan Cooper from State?) should be most interesting. We will see in Congress a contrast to the Iraqi Parliament. While the moderate majority in the Iraqi Parliament are finally acting AS IRAQIS, for their national interest, we will see Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats acting in a cheap partisan way, hostile to America’s national interest for the Democratic Party’s ambitions for power.
DavePa on April 7, 2008 at 7:29 PM