Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


McCain’s son in Iraq: A story best left untold?

posted at 12:13 pm on April 6, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Not many people know that John McCain has a son stationed in Iraq. James McCain enlisted in the Marine Corps at 17, and his unit deployed to Iraq months ago. He found out his father won the New Hampshire primary while digging a truck out of the mud.

If you didn’t know this, thank the McCain campaign and Senator McCain himself. He has tried to keep that story quiet, even to the point of not introducing his son at campaign events the younger McCain manages to attend. The campaign asked the New York Times to kill a story on his son’s service to keep the public eye off of him — to which the paper reacted like a bull to a red cape:

Mr. McCain has largely maintained a code of silence about his son, now a lance corporal, making only fleeting references to him in public both to protect him from becoming a prize target and avoid exploiting his service for political gain, according to friends. At the few campaign events where Lance Corporal McCain appeared last year, he was not introduced.

The McCains declined to be interviewed for this article, which the campaign requested not be published. “The McCain campaign objects strongly to this intrusion into the privacy of Senator McCain’s son,” Steve Schmidt, a campaign spokesman, said in a statement. “The children of presidential candidates in this election cycle should be afforded the same respect for their privacy that the children of President Bush and President and Senator Clinton have been afforded.” (To protect Lance Corporal McCain in case he is again deployed to a war zone, The New York Times is not publishing recent photographs of him and has withheld some details of his service). …

Two of Jimmy’s three older brothers went into the military. Doug McCain, 48, was a Navy pilot. Jack McCain, 21, is to graduate from the Naval Academy next year, raising the chances that his father, if elected, could become the first president since Dwight D. Eisenhower with a son at war.

The McCains come from a long military tradition. Unlike the derogatory general implications about conservative supporters of the war that Michael Moore included in his film Fahrenheit 9/11, McCain’s sons have continued that tradition. Jimmy McCain went out of his way, however, to eschew the McCain family name by enlisting in the Marines rather than enter the academies for a career as an officer, and now finds himself in the middle of the action that his father espouses — just as McCain’s own father did when the Senator was a POW in Hanoi.

Does it seem irresponsible to offer this profile of Jimmy McCain while he serves in the combat zone? The McCain campaign has taken pains not to talk about his son’s service, so it hasn’t been a political theme for either Republicans or Democrats. If the candidate doesn’t want it discussed, even though it would redound to his credit, why bring it up at all?

Over the last few years, anti-war activists have picked up on Moore’s theme of a lack of familial sacrifice from the nation’s leaders, especially in their weird insistence on shaming George Bush’s daughters into military service. That could make this relevant. John McCain has insisted on the forward military strategy against terrorists and the securing and stabilization of Iraq despite, as it turns out, the risk to his own son, and possibly two of them. That would demonstrate American egalitarianism that makes all of us proud.

However, as the controversy that surrounded the reporting on Prince Harry in Afghanistan shows, it comes at a cost. It would make Jimmy McCain and his unit a bigger target for terrorists and insurgents if they return to Iraq. The focus unfairly highlights the efforts of the younger McCain and the burden on his parents more than the same efforts and burdens facing all of our Marines and their families.

While it may paint McCain in a better light, the Senator obviously doesn’t want to run for office on the back of his son. Given that clear indication, the Times should have left the story alone until such time as the Senator wanted it told.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

I disagree on one solitary point. Its great that McCain refuses to politisize his son’s service.

However I think its more than good that Jimmy McCain get to tell his own story. Its not a story of a Senators son serving in a war zone as much as it is of a patriotic American serving his Country. Jimmy made the decision to serve and recognition of him and his fellow soldiers and their service is always a good thing.

However again it should be Jimmy’s choice to be the story not the NY Times trying to turn this into a political story.

William Amos on April 6, 2008 at 12:18 PM

The NYT should have honored the Senator’s request. But at least it was a balanced story, unlike the usual Times garbage.

amr on April 6, 2008 at 12:20 PM

The McCain’s are a great American military family, and could get a lot of political mileage out of it if they wanted.

While I’d surely like to rub the “chickenhawk” crowd’s nose in this for the next eight years or so, the McCains have decided to take the high road.

I think we should respect their wishes.

Blacksheep on April 6, 2008 at 12:21 PM

However again it should be Jimmy’s choice to be the story not the NY Times trying to turn this into a political story

Exactly.

Look how apesh*t the press went over an English Prince in Afghanistan who’s only chance at EVER seeing the King’s crown on his head would have to be through a virtual apocalypse, now they’ve got blood in the water for the son of someone who could very well be the next President. (Not to mention the full-on attention of every swinging jihadi over there now seeking him out).
And all this coming on the heels of the “Breaking news” that McCain had not had, nor wanted Secret Service protection up until that story got broadcasted out to the whole World.

Good job NYT, once again you prove how clueless you are to not only OPSEC but of a soldier’s desire for privacy.

UncleOlaf on April 6, 2008 at 12:25 PM

“Does it seem irresponsible to offer this profile of Jimmy McCain while he serves in the combat zone?”

You answer that question quite well: “… the Times should have left the story alone until such time as the Senator wanted it told.”

McCain is to be applauded for raising such fine men. And, so much for the ‘chicken-hawk’ argument.

Tony737 on April 6, 2008 at 12:27 PM

John McCain knows what it is like to be in the enemy’s crosshairs because of a famous dad. I think it is a good call.

bnelson44 on April 6, 2008 at 12:29 PM

It should be mentioned when the idiots on the left start questioning his military experience and self-sacrifice (because they will), but not dwelt upon.

They know that the only “warmonger” who doesn’t have children doing rotations in Iraq this election is NObama.

No more shoddy, thinly-sourced allegations of draft-dodging, favoritism or other hijinks. They got nothing on McCain.

Good Lt on April 6, 2008 at 12:33 PM

I like McCain and I voted for him in the primaries back when all the blogs and talk show hosts were on the anti-McCain band wagon. I may not always agree with him, but I beleive he is genuine. The fact that McCain’s son is fighting in the same war that his father supports – and isn’t flaunting it – speaks volumes.

I just hope that if John McCain wins, he surrounds himself with the right people and doesn’t appoint a whole cabinet full of cronies and jackals like Bush did.

John on April 6, 2008 at 12:36 PM

As far as I’m concerned, McCain’s stock just went up…way up.

jackmac on April 6, 2008 at 12:42 PM

Sen. McCain is doing the right thing here by letting his sons Jimmy and Jack pursue their military careers outside of the spotlight and NOT trying to score brownie points with their service.

The NY Times story was interesting and seemed quite balanced. At least Jimmy McCain is back from Iraq and Jack McCain hasn’t yet graduated from Annapolis so the story won’t immediately place them in greater danger.

As for the folks on the left who are always so quick to throw the “chickenhawk” line out – wise up. Politicians’ children are individuals and free to make whatever choices they feel are appropriate for their career interests.

Jill1066 on April 6, 2008 at 12:43 PM

Shhh.

profitsbeard on April 6, 2008 at 12:44 PM

Wait? Didn’t Hillary try to join the Marines, too?

With all the shameless and disgusting pandering, lying and self-aggrandizement going on in politics, it’s great that McCain campaigns on his own merits, not appropriating the hard work of others.

This is the kind of idiocy I expect from the Times. And as for the Lefty creeps, I’m eagerly awaiting Chelsea’s enlistment, even if she won’t be getting that six-figure trainee income any longer.

MrScribbler on April 6, 2008 at 12:47 PM

It is not just Sen. McCain and his son who have a stake in this, it is the fellow members of the younger McCain’s unit that may not care to have a “bullet magnet” in their midst widely advertised. It should be the military’s decision to keep this sort of deployment under wraps and neither the Times or the McCains should undermine the military’s decision.

KW64 on April 6, 2008 at 12:49 PM

Yes, McCain’s kids being in the military sets a good example for an aspiring war-time president and I respect the Senator’s and his sons’ service (even though I’m not voting for the guy for other reasons). It’s good that his son’s service in Iraq is kept under the radar as that kind of media attention would make his unit a more lucrative target (I agree with you there). However, the fact that many children from the elite DC class are not serving our country is an utter disgrace, and further exemplifies the lack of priorities for my generation (quite possible the worst one in decades). So I guess I agree with Michael Moore on that one, ewww.. suddenly I feel so…dirty.

LT Nixon on April 6, 2008 at 12:52 PM

“Does it seem irresponsible to offer this profile of Jimmy McCain while he serves in the combat zone?”

Dang, Ed. He’s back home. But they still should have honored the request. Just another example of how different McCain is than the two Democrats. While Hillary lies about how she and her daughter dodged sniper fore, and how she lied about Chelsey regarding 9-11; McCain keeps something under his hat that would help his campaign. His sons safety trumps that. I respect him very much for this.

It was know by the MSM when Lance Corporal McCain returned from Iraq. There was almost no mention. Had it been an Obama child? OMG.

scotth on April 6, 2008 at 12:52 PM

Just how much influence the New York Times has for all people to be afraid of it?

Who reads the Times except those living in New York and the politicians in D.C.?

Anybody outside these two areas in America?

And New York is liberal anyway, so who cares what the Times writes about Republicans or Conservatives?

Yeah, yeah, you’ll say that the so-called TV hosts mention the Times, so what?

Do you really think the Independent and Conservative viewers will change their mind because of a quote from the times which lost its credibility among many readers after admitting that it fabricated stories?

I think Bill O’Reilly and the other Republican and Conservative “pundits” are giving the Times more credit than it deserves, or more value than its worth.

Indy Conservative on April 6, 2008 at 1:00 PM

The NYT assumes McCain was keeping his son’s service as a trump card to be revealed later.

It wants to take that away now, by forcing him to come home now.

daryl_herbert on April 6, 2008 at 1:02 PM

The fact that three of four of Mr. McCain’s sons chose to join the military at some point in their lives speaks volumes to me about the kind of man he is – a good father.

In spite of things I disagree with him about, I think he’s another decent man who is seeking to serve his country politically, who I would rather see in the White House than the other two opportunists.

The stuff we disagree on – we can be very vocal just like we were with the immigration fiasco congress attempted to slide under the radar.

Mommynator on April 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM

McCain should ask the New York Times not to print the fact that their circulation has fell by over 30% in the past four years. And CC the rest of the mainstream press.

Rovin on April 6, 2008 at 1:11 PM

The NYT assumes McCain was keeping his son’s service as a trump card to be revealed later.

It wants to take that away now, by forcing him to come home now.

daryl_herbert on April 6, 2008 at 1:02 PM

You’re probably right Daryl. I don’t think it would occur to the NYT that he’s there because he want’s to serve, and his father isn’t tlaking about it for his son’s safety.

The NYT is undermining the military and endangering decent people – again. I’ll have to remember to tune in to FNC on Monday to see what Papa Bear has to say about this one. It should be a serious mauling.

forest on April 6, 2008 at 1:31 PM

I went to a McCain rally in NYC on Super Tuesday, and I recall McCain’s wife telling the crowd of her two sons, with one serving in Iraq. John, though, did not mention it for one bit.

jencab on April 6, 2008 at 1:35 PM

However, the fact that many children from the elite DC class are not serving our country is an utter disgrace, and further exemplifies the lack of priorities for my generation (quite possible the worst one in decades). So I guess I agree with Michael Moore on that one, ewww.. suddenly I feel so…dirty.

LT Nixon on April 6, 2008 at 12:52 PM

Actually, there are several-D-Sen. Tim Johnson’s son, and the sons of Rep. Joe Wilson (R) of California and Rep. Duncan Hunter (R), also of California, as well as the son of Missouri Senator Kit Bond (R) and Rep. Todd Akin (R) of the same state. Former AG Ashcroft’s son served in the Navy in the Persian Gulf, and Rep. Mark Kennedy of Minnesota (R) had a nephew serve in Afghanistan. Sen. Jim Webb, D-VA also has a son who served in Iraq, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla, has a stepson and daughter in law who were bother fighter pilots in the combat zone.

Tim Johnson is a Dem who voted for the resolution in 2002, knowing his son would be sent there.

Sadly, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Montana, lost his nephew in Iraq.

Del Dolemonte on April 6, 2008 at 1:54 PM

I know I have heard that John McCain, does not speak on his son’s service. Yes, he very well could have and used it. I feel this makes John McCain look even better and humble.
Bless his sons and all our military!

Conservatives R Us on April 6, 2008 at 1:54 PM

Does it seem irresponsible to offer this profile of Jimmy McCain while he serves in the combat zone?

Yes. But the NYT has made it a policy to create news and controversy from nothing, because the are too lazy to go after real news, and because they refuse to print any good news they don’t otherwise want to hear, so this should be no surprise.

Lawrence on April 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM

Exit question: If Obama or Clinton had an offspring fighting overseas,   would he or she shield them from media attention     would he or she mention the offspring in the campaign   how often would he or she bring up the offspring fighting bravely in a pointless war?

calbear on April 6, 2008 at 2:13 PM

You know what’s pathetic? That we respect and admire a politician for keeping his son’s safety in mind, rather than trumpeting it up for political gain.

This is the state of America’s political class.

amkun on April 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM

I’m not sure it is fair to say the Times should have honored the request to kill until the Senator said otherwise. This would leave open the possibility of the campaign using this for maximum political effect. I should add that while I do not think the principles in the campaign would stoop to this, I can easily imagine someone leaking it to rebut some comment by the left about sacrifice.

So I do not see the issue with them breaking the story, provided they do so in a way that does not violate security or put his son in additional risk.

OBQuiet on April 6, 2008 at 2:53 PM

Lcpl McCain is a Marine, and can take care of himself along with 175000 other Marines. I see no reason why he would need to be brought home, if he was in country. It’s not like he wears a neon sign announcing where he is at. We can take care of our own, and I dont see Senator McCain pulling any strings for his son anyways and making the US looking like a horses ass like the Brits did.

gator70 on April 6, 2008 at 2:59 PM

This is simply amazing. A situation and a stance that OBVIOUSLY reflects well on the candidate is depicted as if it were scandalous, simply because the candidate in question is a Republican. I may have my differences with Senator McCain on immigration, for example, but he is showing the world what an honorable man does in this case. It is beneath contempt for the Times to portray it in any other way.

Longhorn Six on April 6, 2008 at 3:43 PM

Jimmy McCain is not the only one……

Seven Percent Solution on April 6, 2008 at 4:00 PM

Seven Percent Solution on April 6, 2008 at 4:00 PM

Yeah, that’s been covered. I always winced a bit when Hunter’s supporters used the son’s service to promote the father. The point was valid but it just didn’t seem right. I’ve never been a McCain fan but his way of handling it seems better and will reflect better on him in the long run.
Much better to let someone else toot your horn for you.

TBinSTL on April 6, 2008 at 4:36 PM

While it may paint McCain in a better light, the Senator obviously doesn’t want to run for office on the back of his son.

Compare Her Majesty… running on the back of her daughter?

petefrt on April 6, 2008 at 4:48 PM

Another aspect of McCain’s character that’s escaping the limelight–click on my username, then scroll down to “Senator’s Surprising Soft Side.”

jgapinoy on April 6, 2008 at 5:36 PM

Another aspect of McCain’s character that’s escaping the limelight–click on my username, then scroll down to “Senator’s Surprising Soft Side.”

I liked your blog post but I think the comparison to Truman misses the point. Aside from some anti-semitic scribblings in his diary Truman lost his temper for understandable reasons whereas McCain seems to fly off the handle for irrational reasons i.e. the ‘bigotry’ of ‘nativist’ Americans.

aengus on April 6, 2008 at 6:28 PM

I would say shame on the New York Times, but it has none.

slp on April 6, 2008 at 6:32 PM

Once again NYT exposes itself as nothing more than a patison gossip rag. This rag should never be read, referred to and cerainly never purchase. It is a useless and unreliable source of information, and unless it does a complete turnaround, it should be allowed to fall by the wayside.

oakpack on April 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM

Compared to the metrosexual Obama, everything about McCain is looking better and better.

(That 37 in bowling is going to haunt Barry O. till the day he dies.)

Mojave Mark on April 6, 2008 at 6:53 PM

I just hope that if John McCain wins, he surrounds himself with the right people and doesn’t appoint a whole cabinet full of cronies and jackals like Bush did.

John on April 6, 2008 at 12:36 PM

amen

funky chicken on April 6, 2008 at 6:54 PM

For the first time in a while, I’m full of questions and not a answers.

I thought I was bad at bowling! I am very reassured by Mr. Obama’s dismal performance.

aengus on April 6, 2008 at 7:03 PM

This Jimmy McCain. Someone to watch. Digging a truck out of the mud in Iraq while monitoring his Dad’s political progress in NH? Enlisting rather than entering the elite officer corp? This sounds like a true Maverick. Stories of young Men like this and what with the recent story of Prince Harry, starts to give one hope for the future. There’s simply too darned few young Men like these. Lance Cpl McCain’s Dad must well up with pride every time he thinks of his valiant son. Our prayers must be frequent for young men like Jimmy McCain. DD

Darvin Dowdy on April 6, 2008 at 7:05 PM

Juan Hernandez!!!!!!

Thats all that matters!

::rolls eyes::

Chakra Hammer on April 6, 2008 at 7:32 PM

I’m surprised the NYT didn’t give his GPS coordinates.

dalec on April 6, 2008 at 8:31 PM

Well,being on Hot Air is a never ending and a continuos
education.I didn’t know John McCain’s son was in Irag.

And for a Presidential election it is interesting to note
that I never heard of McCain mention his son in Irag,in
contrast to Hillarys daughter being in the news fairly
steady!

canopfor on April 6, 2008 at 9:12 PM

Over the last few years, anti-war activists have picked up on Moore’s theme of a lack of familial sacrifice from the nation’s leaders

I’m sorry. Can someone please help me find some information on the military service record of the Bloated Socialist.

I’m sure he served with distinction, I just can’t seem to find anything. I’ll keep looking.

labrat on April 6, 2008 at 10:21 PM

Kid, your dad is a U.S. Senator.
Kid, your dad has bucks.
Kid, whatchathinkyurdoin?

Good kid. Lance Corporal. Right there with the rest. Sweating. Freezing. Digging the dirt out of his ears. Stirring the honeypot when it is his turn. Oh yeah, and lead lives in the air sometimes.

Like I said. Good kid.

Now leave him be.

Limerick on April 6, 2008 at 10:23 PM

It’s strange how those, and the family members of those, that have, and are at present, really dodging sniper fire, don’t like to talk about it.

labrat on April 6, 2008 at 10:26 PM

I’m surprised the NYT didn’t give his GPS coordinates.

dalec on April 6, 2008 at 8:31 PM

They’re probably negotiating that with CNN.

labrat on April 6, 2008 at 10:36 PM

I just hope that if John McCain wins, he surrounds himself with the right people and doesn’t appoint a whole cabinet full of cronies and jackals like Bush did.

John on April 6, 2008 at 12:36 PM

Yes, and while he’s at it, he should take out the left over Clinton trash (especially in the State Department) that Bush has left rotting in the waste baskets for eight years.

labrat on April 6, 2008 at 10:41 PM

Alright, a crazy left-winger here thinks the newspaper shouldn’t think too much about what kinda campaign a specific politicians wants to run. If it’s newsworthy, let them print it. If McCain Jr becomes a bullet magnet, he should be pulled out of Iraq. Representative democracy isn’t entirely free. Including for the son.

As for Bush’s daughters etc. Clearly they shouldn’t enlist. That’s insane. Much like what’s his name of the British Royal family shouldn’t have gone to Iraq. They are in a unique position. Demanding that they be like the common folks is ridiculous. They aren’t. Their Dad/Mom/Granny is the leader of your country. Part of it trickles down to the relatives. Get over it.

However, their behavior should be consistent with the Dad’s message. Same applies to Romney’s sons btw. We’re either in the middle of an existential struggle, or we aren’t. If we are, own it. This “war is hell man, pass me another burger” bs isn’t gonna fly. If by looking at your kids I can’t tell we’re at war, I’m well within my right to draw conclusions about your sincerity.

freevillage on April 6, 2008 at 10:47 PM

To protect Lance Corporal McCain in case he is again deployed to a war zone, The New York Times is not publishing recent photographs of him and has withheld some details of his service). …

How kind of them to do that, maybe they should get a Nobel Prize for it. /sarc
What scum.

4shoes on April 6, 2008 at 10:54 PM

Class.
McCain not the NYT.

ArmyAunt on April 6, 2008 at 11:52 PM

I am not sure what value the NYT sees in this story.

But I do think that Sen. McCain showed some class so more credit to him.

Ares on April 7, 2008 at 5:26 AM

Meanwhile, scores of Iranian snipers head west to take out L/C McCain.

We’re fighting an enemy that would sacrifice anyone of their comrades in order to kill the son of a future president that wants to remain and fight their tyranny.

The Liberals ignore these type of stories when reality flies in the face of their limited opinions on the subject. Serving your country, honor and duty are concepts of total disconnect for them. The Liberal talking heads would probably paint this honorable Marine with the same ‘lame brain’ paint brush they do the President.

Hening on April 7, 2008 at 7:10 AM

Juan Hernandez!!!!!!
Thats all that matters!…..
Chakra Hammer on April 6, 2008 at 7:32 PM

Oh, No, Thats hardly all that matters. His desire to cripple the American economy by his buying fully into Gorebull Warming matters even more.

LegendHasIt on April 7, 2008 at 8:16 AM

As usual the NYT is totally irresponsible. Putting that entire marine unit in extra danger to run a story that should not have been run is just what you expect from them.

duff65 on April 7, 2008 at 10:19 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.