Mugabe aiming for immunity?

posted at 7:45 am on April 4, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

When dictators reach the end of the line, they sometimes discover that all they really want is a little peace and quiet. Robert Mugabe reportedly wants a deal for immunity in exchange for allowing a peaceful transition of power to Morgan Tsvangirai after losing the election last weekend, according to the Guardian. If the opposition MDC will not agree, Mugabe will declare an emergency and order a rerun of the entire election:

Robert Mugabe’s aides have told Zimbabwe’s opposition leaders that he is prepared to give up power in return for guarantees, including immunity from prosecution for past crimes.

But the aides have warned that if the Movement for Democratic Change does not agree then Mugabe is threatening to declare emergency rule and force another presidential election in 90 days, according to senior opposition sources.

The opposition said the MDC leadership is in direct talks with the highest levels of the army but it is treating the approach with caution because they are distrustful of the individuals involved and calling for direct contact with the president, fearing delaying tactics.

Those fears were reinforced last night when at one point Zimbabwe’s election commission abruptly halted the release of official results from the Saturday’s election for “logistical reasons” and the police raided opposition offices.

Clearly, Mugabe has no intention of putting himself in jeopardy of prosecution — a tacit admission of his crimes as de facto dictator of Zimbabwe.  After 28 year of disastrous rule as Prime Minister and then President, Mugabe has destroyed the national economy, rigged elections, abused his power to maintain his regime, and perhaps committed even worse crimes about which only his victims know.  Mugabe knows that Zimbabweans will want justice when he gets weak enough for them to seek it, and that time may rapidly be approaching.

Will the MDC cut that kind of deal with Mugabe?  It would almost certainly have to involve exile if they do.  That won’t just be for the stability of the successor government, which would fear a Mugabe change of heart, but also for Mugabe’s own safety.  One of Zimbabwe’s neighbors would have to agree to give Mugabe asylum so his own people don’t give him an ending like that of Benito Mussolini or Nicolae Ceausescu.

The MDC apparently is willing to negotiate a soft exit for Mugabe.  He deserves a lot worse, but getting Zimbabwe on its feet again has to take first priority.  That requires Mugabe and his regime’s removal before any improvements can occur, and the avoidance of civil war has to be the highest priority.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Wow, he’s using the lives of his countrymen as a bargaining chip to save his own hide. Color me unsurprised, I’m afraid.

It would burn to see him walk after his crimes (I can’t imagine what it would be like for the people who actually suffered under his rule), but it would be worse to see hundreds more die in a futile war. Let God judge him, when the time comes.

joewm315 on April 4, 2008 at 7:49 AM

Just get him out of there. If he wants to be sipping on margaritas in Tahiti, fine. It’s much better than a civil war.

SoulGlo on April 4, 2008 at 7:50 AM

Let God judge him, when the time comes.

joewm315 on April 4, 2008 at 7:49 AM

God will. But he will also judge the people who facilitate his evil. I think it would have been better to kill him a long time ago. I think it’s best he’s killed even now. I’m tired of living in a world where leaders are too often considered immune by virtue of being heads of state. Strikes me as a loss of confidence in W. Civ. by us. It’s immoral to send young Americans to die abroad, instead of cutting off evil at the head as surgically as possible.

JiangxiDad on April 4, 2008 at 7:52 AM

I’d let him walk. You can always hunt him down and kill him later. And I’d do that, too.

manfriend on April 4, 2008 at 8:05 AM

Get him out of power. If he wants to live in SA with his buddy Mbeki (sp?) I’m fine with that; better to let him walk than to have a civil war.

He can always have an accident later.

rbj on April 4, 2008 at 8:14 AM

Mugabe aiming for immunity

I hope somebody’s aiming for him … with a TAZER!

Tony737 on April 4, 2008 at 8:17 AM

It’s immoral to send young Americans to die abroad, instead of cutting off evil at the head as surgically as possible.

JiangxiDad on April 4, 2008 at 7:52 AM

You make an excellent point, as usual, JD. Is it really worth, say, 4,000 Americans to avoid the stigma of assassinating one murderous despot? I don’t know the answer, though I have my opinion, but I wish someone in a position of authority in our government would at least ask the question.

joewm315 on April 4, 2008 at 8:29 AM

Now if only Saddam Hussein had gone into exile…

Seixon on April 4, 2008 at 8:43 AM

I say let him go into exile but first, TAKE THE MONEY!

2theright on April 4, 2008 at 8:54 AM

They should negotiate with him, ultimately promising him what he wants and then they should kill him and hang his body in public as a warning to the next potential despots.

If they need weapons, we should provide them, but the heavy lifting for building their democracy has to be THEIRS.

dogsoldier on April 4, 2008 at 9:08 AM

It’s immoral to send young Americans to die abroad, instead of cutting off evil at the head as surgically as possible.

The problem is that simply offing Saddam would have left Iraq in the control of his sons and other baathists. Same as offing Bashar Asshat or l’il Kim. Or Mugsy. None of these people work in a vacuum. They have support groups of fanatical sycophants (a la HillaryLand) who can function in their absence. It’s not like chopping off the head of a snake, more like trying to stop Army Ants by killing them a few at a time.

GeneSmith on April 4, 2008 at 9:19 AM

The problem with what dogsoldier suggests is that it sets a precedent.

In another twenty or thirty years, when Tsvangirai needs to be ousted like Mugabe does now, if the rule is “revenge on past dictators” Tsvangirai will have every motive to hang on and kill opponents.

Regards,
Ric

warlocketx on April 4, 2008 at 9:26 AM

It’s immoral to send young Americans to die abroad, instead of cutting off evil at the head as surgically as possible.

JiangxiDad on April 4, 2008 at 7:52 AM

I have a Lebanise vendor (Arminian christian) who is a very smart guy and has been all over the middle east fixing copy machines for an American company. He was in Jordan in 1973 when the king hammered the palestinians. He was in Beruit during the civil war.

He does not like the war in Iraq because he thinks the muslems are not worth dying for. He respected Saddam because at least he could bring order there and he killed fewer people there than we have. He says setting up a good government there is like hearding cats.

He reccomends that we pull out, and donate millions of rounds of ammo to Iraq because he knows they will use it to kill each other like they always have and do.

He is convinced the middle east is lost because all the smart people have left. He uses Lebanon as an example. The young christians are gone, and the ignorant muslems are left. He remembers in Lebanon when the palestinians moved in that they would carry their AK 47s to the movies and go shopping. Then, when they set up camps in the city, the place turned to shit and the professional people left.

saiga on April 4, 2008 at 10:14 AM

I’d give him a choice.
Bullitt or rope?

roninacreage on April 4, 2008 at 10:29 AM

Soft exit or civil war.

civil war

pseudonominus on April 4, 2008 at 10:30 AM

Tough call. I’d like to see him get what’s coming to him but at what cost?

TooTall on April 4, 2008 at 10:59 AM

It’s an interesting situation. On the one hand, Mugabe deserves to be prosecuted for his crimes; and there are many to choose from. It’s not just Mugabe though, many of his cronies are guilty of crimes by virtue of enforcing Bob’s policies over the years.

On the other hand, it would be a somewhat peaceful transition if they just loaded them all up on a jet and sent them away, never to return.

I received an email from a friend in Harare this morning, and he said things are “quiet” and that they are all waiting for a “positive” result. Doesn’t sound like much, but he really can’t say much as Mugabe implemented a policy a couple of years ago where all electronic communications were to be monitored. I know for a fact that people have been detained because they told friends in the US or the UK how things really are.

In any event, I hope they work out a deal to just make Mugabe go away. If someone can deal with him later, then so be it. In the meantime, they can begin the long process of getting the country back on it’s feet. It’s going to be a very, very long process which will require massive amounts of foreign aid.

BacaDog on April 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM

I think we just found Obama’s running mate.

BDavis on April 4, 2008 at 11:03 AM

I’m surprised he’s going at all, without a fight.

Maybe he can come hang with Jeremiah Wright.

PattyJ on April 4, 2008 at 11:04 AM

Man, look what those white imperialist bastards did to that country.

TheSitRep on April 4, 2008 at 11:13 AM

Why isn’t the press going after Jimmy Carter — who’s supported this thug since he was president (and Mugabe’s brutality was apparent even then, to anyone with their eyes open) and legitimized his last couple of power-grabs? I want to see Carter try to defend Mugabe now, but apparently nobody in the press has got the stones to ask him about it.

Alex_SF on April 4, 2008 at 11:16 AM

Y’think maybe Hugo Chavez would grant him permanent asylum? Maybe even offer him a post as advisor?

njcommuter on April 4, 2008 at 12:39 PM

rbj,

Get him out of power. If he wants to live in SA with his buddy Mbeki (sp?) I’m fine with that; better to let him walk than to have a civil war.

He can always have an accident later.

I like your way of thinking…

Spiny Norman on April 4, 2008 at 2:14 PM

I am sure he already has a place in South Africa. His pals there will provide him with a palace as well as security. They (S.A.) have been consistent in their support since the ANC took over.

SIJ6141 on April 4, 2008 at 4:18 PM

Indeed, those damn whiteys and their genocide…whoops…you mean it was a black dictator oppressing white minorities? Nah? Never happens.

That little pecker will likely be welcome in Cuba, or with the Saudis. Hopefully we can get him before he gets there.

Faramir on April 4, 2008 at 4:21 PM

Why bother going for him afterwards? If we didn’t have the ‘nads and the sense of justice to do it while he was destroying his country and his people, why do it now?

Maquis on April 4, 2008 at 9:00 PM