Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Stupid: Hillary gets another 3 a.m. phone call — about mortgages; Update: McCain to issue response ad

posted at 4:22 pm on April 2, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

That meeting on interest rates couldn’t wait ’til breakfast, I guess. Our gal’s circling the drain so let’s indulge her this fantasia, in which she’s somehow won the nomination and now has to start worrying about John McCain’s very straight talk on this subject (to which the public might be surprisingly receptive). What’s her thinking here? A goodwill gesture to the left by focusing her bile on the Republicans instead of Obama for once? Or an audition tape for the superdelegates, to make the thought of her as nominee slightly less strange than it is now? Whichever it is, I hope it was worth peeling off a few bills from that ever shrinking bankroll of hers.

Exit question: Maybe the call’s from her campaign manager to tell her that she’s rich?

Update: John Dickerson of Slate puts the same question to Hillary’s team that he put after the original 3 a.m. ad, i.e. when has she ever had to answer the phone? No pause this time, but no good answer either.

Update: Halperin reports that Maverick’s got a response ad in the works and has a copy of the script. Cheeky. I like it.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Go to bed you old hag.

srhoades on April 3, 2008 at 8:25 AM

How about a 3am intervention?

moxie_neanderthal on April 3, 2008 at 8:58 AM

Then explain to me why I am able to buy a house during this time?

F15Mech on April 2, 2008 at 11:32 PM

Alot of people can buy a house at this time because they still have jobs. Remember that negative feedback loop I spoke about. Look at today’s jobless claims. Way up. the layoffs are starting. the last several years has not been a job seeker’s delight. the last two months have seen an accelration in job cuts. If the home prices continue to fall it will get worse. Are you sure your job is secure?

From the comments it appears that most people can’t imagine that their sitution will change. They think their job is secure, that life will go on the same as it has regardless of all other factors occurring in the economy.
They can not/will not see that they are a part of the economy and that their futures will rise and fall in tandem to everyone else. Yes I could go buy a house today. I won’t because that 50k off offer will seem like a bad deal in another year if home prices continue to fall. In fact I have no dog in this fight. I choose to stay out of the real estate runup just as I choose not to try to catch a bottom. If I did not understand economics I too would be shouting to let them eat cake. However, I do understand the ramifications that this country faces, I have studied the boom and busts cycles of capitalism, I understand the power that socialism gains during busts cycles, the power grab that FDR was able to make during the 1930’s that changed this country into a quasi socialist state. I do not wish to give socialism more of a chance to gain a foothold in this country. We have a smaller oppurtunity today than we did last year to make the downturn short and less painful. A very long and painful downturn will usher in a major socialist government, strikes will occur on a regular basis, unions will gain power, governmental programs will be proposed and accepted, new deal politics will be the law of the land. a chicken in every pot. the taxpayer instead of paying billions will pay trillions. Freedoms will be lost. I guess it comes down to if you think this coming downturn is small or large. We are facing forces not seen since 1929 IMO. the recent Fed actions (actions they have not used since the 1930’s) point to this. the rise in gold and other hard assets point to this, the fall of the stock market’s , the drying up of the credit markets point to this. the storm clouds are gathering and yet not many see the danger. We can act and avoid the worse of the storm or we can continue on blinding laughing at others misfortune, stupid mistakes, and greed thinking it will not effect us.

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 9:40 AM

Only 3am call she’s likely to get is from some security guard that Bill’s latest bimbo keyed her car as she left.

michaelo on April 3, 2008 at 9:40 AM

I understand the power that socialism gains during busts cycles, the power grab that FDR was able to make during the 1930’s that changed this country into a quasi socialist state. I do not wish to give socialism more of a chance to gain a foothold in this country. We have a smaller oppurtunity today than we did last year to make the downturn short and less painful. A very long and painful downturn will usher in a major socialist government, strikes will occur on a regular basis, unions will gain power, governmental programs will be proposed and accepted, new deal politics will be the law of the land. a chicken in every pot. the taxpayer instead of paying billions will pay trillions. Freedoms will be lost. I guess it comes down to if you think this coming downturn is small or large. We are facing forces not seen since 1929 IMO.
unseen on April 3, 2008 at 9:40 AM

…and by allowing the feds to bail out foolish borrowers under who knows what terms and conditions, we would not be allowing yet another socialist program? Besides, 2% problem loans is not even the size of the S&L crisis, much less 1929 – I think you have bought into the dem hysteria. Remember, this is an election year with a republican incumbent, so the economy MUST be melting down….

Think_b4_speaking on April 3, 2008 at 9:48 AM

“Mommy, I just puked in my bed.”

“Ok honey, I’ll call the president.”

Akzed on April 3, 2008 at 10:02 AM

Okay, what the heck happened to your website format? This looks so 1996. Yikes!

Coronagold on April 3, 2008 at 10:05 AM

Think_b4_speaking on April 3, 2008 at 9:48 AM

It is 2% problems loans but that 2% is split up into all loans by use of CDO and SIV’s therefore ALL home loans are suspect. In fact 165 of the forclosures are happening to PRIME borroers not the poor, not those with bad credit.
If it is hystria explain why the FED is using rules not used for 70 years to bail out Bear Streans, why did the Federal government pass a 150 billion stimulus package with little deabate. A government that is always split on every issue came together and passed it in record time, for washington. why is the dollar falling to record lows, gold rising to record highs? why is the stock market in a bear market during times of record company profits? Why are people paying for their gas and food with credit cards and how long can that last? what happens when that is gone? Record debt for consumers, lack of job formation, loss of wealth in homes, stocks, loss of income from savings with lower rates etc. Paints a nice little picture when you place them all together.

As far as bailout. it comes down to this. you can have a little socialism now, in and out quick and to the point, or set yourself up to have decades of it. Hoover allowed socialism to gain a 70 year foothold in this country because he believed to let free markets work without government intervention.

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 10:06 AM

In fact 165 16% of the

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 10:06 AM

If it is hystria explain why the FED is using rules not used for 70 years to bail out Bear Streans, why did the Federal government pass a 150 billion stimulus package with little deabate
unseen on April 3, 2008 at 10:06 AM

1. Bear Stearns was bought out by JP Morgan, with loan guarantees by the Fed (not a bailout), and the guarantees were necessary to keep JP Morgan in the deal.The reason the deal needed to go through is that Bear Stearns underwrites/processes 15% of the stock market and futures contracts traded daily. Were the deal to not be negotiated, the following Monday, Bear would not open for business, and the stock markets could not trade properly.
2. the stimulus package was passed quickly because….wait for it….wait for it…. it is an election year!

Think_b4_speaking on April 3, 2008 at 10:17 AM

With as little sleep that Hillary now gets with all these morning calls, one wonders where Bill is at that time. This woman can’t balance a checkbook and she wants to run our nation. Not for me.

geminicontender on April 3, 2008 at 10:26 AM

And what part of “variable interest rate” is so misunderstood? I am sure it was written in Spanish also.

geminicontender on April 3, 2008 at 10:27 AM

Think_b4_speaking on April 3, 2008 at 10:17 AM

1) bear Streans was saved from bankrupcty by the FED, it was a shotgun marriage. Call it what you want. the fact of the matter is an 85 year old firm one of the biggest financial firms in the World was wiped out. but you know what that happens all the time right? No really it doesn’t. It was a HISTORIC event. Bear Streans was the lead company on the home loan problem. the carney in the coal mine so to speak. the Fed went further, they opened the discount window to investment banks so none of the others would fail. Again a historic event.

2) the stimulus package only came about AFTER the FED chairmen went to capital hill and met privately with the Congressional leaders. again it being an election year and a large majoirity of the voters being against a bailout, the proper thing would have been to fight it. they didn’t. Not only didn’t they fight it, you had both sides come together and sit around the campfire. No debate, very few amendments, etc. Record time…another historic event. that’s three historic events in a very small time. Add into the mix the historic interest rate decrease in record time from 5.25% to 2.25%. How many more historic events do you need to happen to understand that we face an unprecendented financial/economic crisis in this country. Maybe the historic rise of oil/gold? the historic fall of the dollar? the historic rise of grains and food stuffs? Not getting it yet? How about the historic rate of home price decline? No? still not seeing the picture? still seeing hystria around every bush? the only thing that has been keeping this economy up is low unemployment and consumer spending. Now we have consumer confidence numbers coming out not seen since the early 70’s, we have a rise in unemployment, we have consumer debt at a HISTORIC high. we have company after company reporting a sharp violient drop off in consumer spending.
What part of this picture do you not see? this isn’t about bailing out a few homeowners. this isn’t about votes or election year media coverage. It’s about our economy, our credit, our finacial systems.

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 10:44 AM

How many more historic events do you need to happen to understand that we face an unprecendented financial/economic crisis in this country. Maybe the historic rise of oil/gold? the historic fall of the dollar? the historic rise of grains and food stuffs? Not getting it yet? How about the historic rate of home price decline? No? still not seeing the picture? still seeing hystria around every bush? the only thing that has been keeping this economy up is low unemployment and consumer spending.
unseen on April 3, 2008 at 10:44 AM

I would be the first to say that Americans have too much debt and don’t save enough, etc. but I think you are indeed buying into the hysteria. Gold and to a certain extent oil are up ONLY because the dollar is down – think about it – a commodity priced in dollars has to go up when the dollar goes down. Foodstuffs are up because of foolish government intervention – think mandatory ethanol requirements. The historic home price decline only exists in a few areas, where the bubble needed to burst. Home prices in some places more than doubled in less than a decade – is that growth or feverish speculation? The consumer confidence numbers reveal an important story….people say that they are doing fine, but everyone else is in serious trouble, which proves that this is a media/politics driven self-fulfilling prophecy. Once again, I shake my head at the level of debt and lack of savings by Americans, but this whole economic collapse thesis is being blown all out of proportion.

Think_b4_speaking on April 3, 2008 at 10:55 AM

I can see a military crisis requiring a 3:00 a.m. call because decisions need to be made immediately. However a call at 3:00 a.m. for an “economic crisis” that should be carefully deliberated and doesn’t require action within an hour or two is ridiculous.

It makes me wonder if this is how Hillary thinks things are done. Was Bill always getting calls at 3:00 a.m. and rolling over to tell Hillary, “Sorry, gotta go! There’s a crisis requiring my immediate attention. Its a… a… housing crisis! Yeah, that’s it, a housing crisis!”

taznar on April 3, 2008 at 11:04 AM

…this isn’t about bailing out a few homeowners. this isn’t about votes or election year media coverage. It’s about our economy, our credit, our finacial systems.

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 10:44 AM

And how many times do you have to be told, the government can’t control the economy. You can’t stop cycles. When you try to control economic cycles, you are just putting a lid on it, and it builds up steam so the cycle becomes more volatile.
Go back to the Carter years, he tried all kinds of snake oil solutions…and the market became for erratic, loans were at 18%, cars lined up for gas because he “capped” the price. Let the free market move, it will balance out. Some will get hurt, some will get wealthy.
The government, no person or group, can control this nations economy…you have no concept on how large this economy is. You “help” one sector, and you harm another. Let the cycle takes it course, and move on. There are no guarantees in life on whether you make money or lose money when you invest.

right2bright on April 3, 2008 at 11:06 AM

Isn’t the message to the general public that

“It is OK to be irresponsible, if you can get enough dumbasses to be as (or more) irresponsible at the same time. As soon as you can create a big enough problem, the government will spend someone else’s money to make it not your problem any more.”

Sir Napsalot on April 3, 2008 at 11:14 AM

You can’t stop cycles
right2bright on April 3, 2008 at 11:06 AM

Economic cycles are simply a product of the human emotions of fear and greed. yes the underlying economic conditions cause the cycles but it is the human emotion of fear that make a small contraction into a large depression and the emotion ogf greed turns a boom into a bubble. While I agree you can not wipe out these emotions you can curtail them. Like a herd of cattle. there will be stampeds but rather you push them towards the cliff or a walled in canyon is the role of the government. the Bear streans bailout was a walled canyon. the markets calmed down when the gunshots were removed. The quote by FDR rings true “nothing to fear but fear itself” fear of loss causes banks to stop lending, fear of job loss causes consumers to quit spending, fear of home decline causes people not to buy. you can soothe fear and you can limit greed by the policies you make and the statements you make. high credit debt can go on forever as long as people believe they will be paid back, as long as people believe that they will be able to pay the loans back.

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM

Think_b4_speaking on April 3, 2008 at 10:55 AM

oil is up 10 times
gold is up 300%
dollar down about 10%
corn as doubled.

All of the move is not dollar related.

The historic home price decline only exists in a few areas, where the bubble needed to burst

Nationwide 17 out of 18 cities tracked had price declines last month. while I agree the bubble needs to deflate, home are different than stocks, or bonds, or oil etc. homes wealth is the underlying bedrock of our economy.

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 11:37 AM

Sir Napsalot on April 3, 2008 at 11:14 AM

yes,,the best course would to make it illegal to do the thing in the fist place.

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM

…and no benies for her employees on top of it! Perhaps She wants our tax dollars to go to the folks that she’s stiffed, that would fit into the pattern alright.

Christine on April 3, 2008 at 12:31 PM

oil is up 10 times – (over 8 years)http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2007/10/does_dollar_wea_1.html
gold is up 300% – (over a decade)http://www.kitco.com/scripts/hist_charts/yearly_graphs.plx
dollar down about 10% – (over 2 years)
corn as doubled. – (see previous comment about mandatory ethanol requirements)
unseen on April 3, 2008 at 11:37 AM

added relevant time sequence, etc. to your post to help explain

Think_b4_speaking on April 3, 2008 at 12:38 PM

right2bright on April 3, 2008 at 11:06 AM

Amen. Liberals don’t understand economics, period.
If they start bailing people out for not paying their mortgages, then I guess I won’t pay my mortgage anymore. What’s the point? Whether my money pays via taxes for my mortgage or my money pays via hard work for my mortgage? Granted, hard work requires character, ethics and preparation, but if my money is going toward bailing people out anyway… /sarcasm off Btw: I’m part of that rare breed who actually lives within her means.

foxforce91 on April 3, 2008 at 1:08 PM

Any ad about the Clintoons should go to the heart of their character.

(3 A.M)
Hill: (yawns) “Okay, Bill what are you in for this time.”
Bill: “Ah, um, soliciting a prostitute and public indecency.”
Hill: “Ya know Bill, that’s third time this week.”
Bill: “Ahm sorry Hill, ah truly am but Eliot’s gone and he can’t help me on this anymore.”
Hill: ” Ya know Bill, ya know ya can’t expect others to keep it zipped for ya.”
Bill: “Ah know Hill, it won’t happen again for at least two weeks, ah promise.”
Hill: “Well, ya know Bill what happens when you promise things.”
Bill: “Ah know Hill, ah know, but ah mean it ah really do.”
Hill: “Well maybe so Bill, I’ll get Attorney General Janet Reno to run interference just like old times. She can FIX it for us ya know she can. And what’s Pellicano’s number. Bill Richardson and Lieberman are causing trouble again.”
Bill: “Check with Carville and Ah love ya Hill, ya know I truly do.”
Hill: “Just keep it zipped Bill.”
Bill: “Ah’ll trah, Hill. Huh, huh. Thanks.”
(cut to voice over)
“Hillary and Bill. A national tradition of well, ah, you know.”

viking01 on April 3, 2008 at 1:12 PM

Economic cycles are simply a product of the human emotions of fear and greed.
unseen on April 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM

I don’t think that is out of any text book. Simply a product of fear and greed? I hope you have not graduated yet, I don’t think your education is finished. Spoken like a true socialist.
Let me give you an example of a cycle not driven by fear and greed…
Silicon valley, and all that the computer age are given us…
You see, our industrial revolution wasn’t inspired by greed, but the desire to create, to build.
The housing boom of the 1950’s didn’t come from greed, the the necessity to provide jobs to a growing urban economy. Unless you feel owning your own washer and dryer and TV is greed (then you move into Marxism).
The baby boomer’s, which have driven the economy for 60 years, are nearing retirement at a rate of biblical proportions. We hold 70% of the wealth of the nation, as we retire, our production and drive goes with us.
Our shifting economy from a manufacturing base to a service base, has to be adjusted.
And many for issues, far from being “simple”.
None of these are inspired by greed or fear, they are natural cycles of an economy.
The boomers are scaling back, we are changing the landscape as we have always. That is why medical care is such an issue.
The U.S. economy has followed the birth of the boomers. When we needed schools, we built schools, when we needed golf courses, we built golf courses, you are equating wants and desires to greed (back to the “ism’s”), when a couple hundred years ago a Scotsman wrote (as a basis of a free economy) “human wants are insatiable). That’s is what drives success, and as those “wants” change, so does the economy. (please don’t make a fool of yourself and equate wants with greed, that would be too desperate)
Now, who wrote that great sentence (and not Aristotle, although he said something similiar)? And please read more about him.

right2bright on April 3, 2008 at 1:22 PM

Anybody have Ann Coulter’s email address? Ann needs to do a “Leave Hillary Alone!!” video to support her girl right away!! You wanna see viral – THAT would be viral!

drunyan8315 on April 3, 2008 at 1:44 PM

right2bright on April 3, 2008 at 1:22 PM

First finish the thought: Economic cycles are simply a product of the human emotions of fear and greed. yes the underlying economic conditions cause the cycles but it is the human emotion of fear that make a small contraction into a large depression and the emotion of greed turns a boom into a bubble

You see, our industrial revolution wasn’t inspired by greed, but the desire to create, to build.

Yeah Morgan, Standard oil, Biltmore no greed there. Nope. They were after the betterment of civilization. ever hear of the gilded age? the entire industrial revolution was based on greed.

The housing boom of the 1950’s didn’t come from greed, the the necessity to provide jobs to a growing urban economy

and what drove the people to move to the cities? the greed for a better life. they could have stayed on the farm. But they wanted better.

None of these are inspired by greed or fear, they are natural cycles of an economy.

and what drives these natural cycles? that’s right fear and greed. Are human wants greed? depends what the want is and who is in relation to that want. A human want of a CEO might seem incredibly greedy to a worker on the line. whereas that washing machine might seem gredy to the African child that has no food. It is a matter of degree.

If you do not understand that fear and greed are the drives of all economic cycles it is you who must go back to school. The stock market is a microcosim of that fear and greed on display on a daily basis. what is the present credit crunch but a big fear revival of the money lenders. what has caused the housing bubble but the greed for a bigger house or the fear of not keeping up with the neighbors? Why do you invest but not for the fear of being without or the greed of doing better? what is the difference between a recession and a depresion but a magnitude difference in fear and hopelesness? why do you think we call it a DEPRESSION? that is a human condition not an economic one. What is the difference between boom times and a bubble but the unrestrained emotion of greed?

that scotsman you quote was in the vangaurd of a nation that wanted to rule the world. that was not greedy? what is absolute power but run away greed of power? sure you have other reasons for making things, building a better life but the emotions of fear and greed amplify those cycles makes them bigger, longer and higher

unseen on April 3, 2008 at 4:23 PM

Hillary in August:

http://theclintonfiles.net/

revolution on April 3, 2008 at 4:41 PM

Ring….ring…ring…
“Hello”
“Hillary?
“Yes..who is this?
“This is….hee..hee..hee…Barry”
“Barry, are you OK? It’s 3AM!
” Madame President, I have a question…heehee..of great national importance..please, just a moment of your time could save a nation…is your refridgerator running?”
“Yes William it is…is there a global warming crisis? Do we have a food shortage? Are we out of funds to pay for our energy costs?”
“No….heeheehee…but you better catch it!!!” CLICK…

evilcon555 on April 3, 2008 at 5:58 PM

viking01 on April 3, 2008 at 1:12 PM

I like that. :D

Ryan Gandy on April 4, 2008 at 11:14 AM

If Hillary “misspeaks” herself into fantasy due to sleep deprivation…then any sensible person should fear greatly what she might say at 0300…

Harry Schell on April 4, 2008 at 12:29 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.