Ask Ayman: When do we start killing the yahouds?
posted at 7:05 pm on April 2, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Dear Ayman: I have a problem with a Muslim group that claims to hate infidels and yahouds, but slaughters Muslims like sheep at a halal farm. What’s up with that?
In December, Ayman al-Zawahiri offered to take questions regarding the jihad from friends and foes alike. Evidently, he got flooded with queries about why al-Qaeda has killed tens of thousands of Muslims over the last few years and hardly any Jews at all. His answer? Patience, my brothers, patience:
Al Qaeda’s No. 2 man offered renewed threats to Israel Wednesday in response to the thousands of questions he received from jihadist message boards.
“We promise our Muslim brothers that we will strive as much as we can to deal blows to the Jews inside Israel and outside it,” Ayman al Zawahri said.
The questions were posted in response to Ayman al Zawahri’s December solicitation for online questions from “friendly or hostile” individuals and organizations with the promise that they would be answered one month later.
AQ has managed to kill everyone except the Jews ever since adopting Iraq as its main front against the West and the US. It managed to enrage their natural allies in western Iraq, the native insurgents, by raping their daughters and slaughtering just about everybody else. On its only other hot-war front in Pakistan and Afghanistan, AQ has murdered Pakistanis and Afghans with ease.
Zawahiri had an explanation for their indiscriminate aim. Either the killings were just a big mistake, or the fault of the infidels “as in the cases of al-Tatarrus”, or the use of human shields. I guess strapping bombs onto mentally challenged teenagers and having them walk through markets was a “big mistake”, as were almost all of AQI’s operations in western Iraq. And what Zawahiri calls human shields, we in the West refer to as “cities” and “highways” and “markets”.
They’re they Gang That Can’t Commit Suicide Straight. With radical Muslims like these, who needs infidels?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
It’s all a Zionist plot, I tell ya.
sondiehl on April 2, 2008 at 7:07 PM
What happens if I send him a new batch of Mohammed cartoons to review?
amerpundit on April 2, 2008 at 7:11 PM
Well, he did manage to bog down the world’s greatest superpower in a small country and shatter the myth of US invincibility. Not to mention diverted a massive percentage of the US military budget to a fight against a relatively small number of al Qaeda fighters. Perhaps evil beyond imagination, but far from ineffective.
bayam on April 2, 2008 at 7:12 PM
bayam on April 2, 2008 at 7:12 PM
What a piece of work you are bayam.
Keemo on April 2, 2008 at 7:26 PM
I would take that craggy faced old ba$tard at his word. We should concentrate on arranging a face to face meeting between him and allah ASAP.
Zorro on April 2, 2008 at 7:34 PM
Whatever happened to that intra-AQ struggle with him and that other guy whose name I can’t pronouce/write?
Is that over?
VolMagic on April 2, 2008 at 7:35 PM
It’s sort of like the Fatah – Hamas feud. We both hate the infidels, so let’s kill muslims.
rbj on April 2, 2008 at 7:40 PM
What a lunatic! And those Muslims will take him at his word…how dumb are they? ugh!
I’m actually surprised there were muslims actually questioning him about the high number of dead….maybe they will finally realize there are no virgins waiting for them.
becki51758 on April 2, 2008 at 7:41 PM
New Flash: Obama State That If Elected President He will Meet with al Qaeda to negotiate find our common values. Obama will be advised by Rev Wright and Lewis Farakhan who has stated the all the Jews can’t be killed but that Obama will negotiate in good faith to come up with a compromise number
georgealbert on April 2, 2008 at 8:03 PM
The logic these Muslims use to slaughter other Muslims is baffling. Even more baffling is the support these Muslims have from other Muslims for the continued slaughter of their own.
PBoilermaker on April 2, 2008 at 8:34 PM
Not since 2007 dude. Who knows if AQ in Iraq will pick up again this year, but they got whupped by the surge. Even the MSM acknowledged that.
mram on April 2, 2008 at 8:35 PM
Hey,they have already said if they have to take a portion
of their own people,Muslims in their quest to take out
infedels,no problem!
canopfor on April 2, 2008 at 8:39 PM
Well he did…
bayam on April 2,2008 at 7:12PM.
bayam:Bayam you either are drinking lib koolaid or
your brain has found itself in the Bermuda triangle
of the net!
Or,nice Liberal talking points!
canopfor on April 2, 2008 at 8:45 PM
Will his blog be considered part of the left or right blogosphere?
Connie on April 2, 2008 at 9:48 PM
The only reason those turds still exist is because we’ve been hamstrung by bleeding heart, PC libs and an enemy afraid to stand on the field of battle and fight like men. We could go apeshit and level the whole damned place but that’s not our goal. Wake up shit-fer-brains.
Big John on April 2, 2008 at 10:01 PM
And I suppose a better plan would have continued to bomb empty training camps and allow them to get away with 9/11 scott free?
We have hurt them. Recruiting is down. People who used to support them or at least tolerate them are no longer doing so.
Hog Wild on April 2, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Not since 2007? I thought we remain bogged down there in 2008. You’re right that sending more troops into Iraq made a huge difference- what McCain told Bush to do for years before it finally happened.
I respect your opinion but still find appalling the amount of treasure and blood that’s going into a fight against a relatively small part of the AQ infrastructure. I don’t think the US should suddenly leave Iraq, although the military would like to start transferring troops from the Iraqi theatre to Afghanistan.
But I didn’t say that invading and fighting in Afghanistan was a bad idea. I believe that we should have finished the job in Afghanistan before going into Iraq. Recent statements from the joint chiefs back that up.
bayam on April 2, 2008 at 10:52 PM
I don’t care what he says, but can someone please swat that fly in the center of his forehead already?
awake on April 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM
Fire up the Predator.
Johan Klaus on April 3, 2008 at 12:10 AM
How unconvincing is the bad doctor? He didn’t even make an effort to seem plausible.
“Yes Holy Warriors, we have killed tens of thousands of muslims but this is just a prelude to attacking the jews. We have to kill many muslims before we get started on the jews because, well never mind why.”
Who writes his lines? L Ron Hubbard?
Ares on April 3, 2008 at 4:41 AM
Now that Musharraf has been marginalized in Pakistan we have seen the US Military more willing to attack inside the border territory where these douchebags play army. It is just a matter of time before we get Dr. Evil.
Good article in LA Times about al-Masri here.
Note that it was the communication intercepts from the US that helped us eliminate Al-Libbi
A look inside Al Qaeda
AntonDomi on April 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM
Again, I go back to the WWII well. Should we have concentrated solely on Japan (The only one who actually attacked us) before going after Germany? Had we done that, by the time we had succeeded, England and France would have fallen to the Nazis and the German navy would have been shelling the east coast. When you’re talking about war on a global scale, you cannot limit yourself to one front at a time. We were sure Saddam had WMDs, and could not control what he did with them. Therefore, he was a danger and had to be taken out.
Has it stretched the military? Yes. Has it worked? Yes, Iraq and Afghanistan are a nice matched set of killboxes into which the Jihadis are walking in droves. Of the tens of thousands of Iraqis who have died in this war, only a small percentage of the non-combatants were killed by American bullets or bombs. The rest were killed by AQ and now they’re having to answer for it to their own supporters. Perhaps it’s a good thing we haven’t gotten bin Laden, it gives the Muslims someone to blame for all of this. If we keep doing what we’re doing, the Muslims may deliver the head of bin Laden to American forces on their own. I wonder if the MSM would cover that story.
Kafir on April 3, 2008 at 1:57 PM
Comment pages: