A Trackback is one of three types of Linkbacks, methods for Web authors to request notification when somebody links to one of their documents….

Anita Kuntz’s 1993 NYT Sunday Mag illustration of Saint Hillary graced the first and still definitive Hillary Clinton take-down by Michael Kelly, wrote Peggy Noonan five years back. At the intersection of vanity and liberalism — one of our Hillary!…

This column by Dan Calabrese on the conduct of Hillary Rodham Clinton (then Hillary Rodham) as a staff member of the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate hearings is now making the rounds in the blogosphere:

The now-retired general c…..

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”…

She’s done. The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther — an…

It is indeed, and something that the Bush administration has worked assiduously to try to deny whenever it can.

sdm on April 2, 2008 at 11:30 AM

Examples???
What citizen is being denied the right to counsel?

Captain, do with this story what JustOneMinute did with the brazen CIA hussy and her bitch of a husband.

Recall: CLINTON used the FEDS to attack the Branch Davidians of Mt.Carmel, TX outside of Waco whose crime was being accused by the CLINTON’S of having weapons and practicing polygamy perhaps. NOTHING WAS PROVEN except that the Clintons could murder everyone in cold blood and provide the MSM propaganda story that we all swallowed in order to disassociate ourselves from what just happened. Women and children were bombed and burnt to death alongside their men outside of Waco, TX without public outcry, opening the door to do whatever Clinton wanted without domestic reprisal. Bombing Bosnia was wrong as USA/NATO attacked CIVILIANS with the most advanced weaponry save nuclear.

As a 27-year old lawyer, Lady Macbeth Hillary Clinton served on the staff of the House Judiciary Committee during its investigations into impeaching President Nixon. How did her service there end? She was fired for lies and unethical behavior. As…

Nobody reputable is gonna touch this story. The guy is crazee crazee.

funky chicken on April 2, 2008 at 12:28 AM

This guy is impressive and extremely logical and well spoken to me

I have read his book Without Honor:Crimes of Camelot and the Impeachment of Richard Nixon

It is quite a book. Zeifman was the chief counsel to the Democrats for the Nixon impeachment and had some very good reason to dislike the unprofessional actions of pipsqueak Hillary

I have also heard Zeifman interviewed on local radio. He is no Huffington.

He has to be labeled a ‘kook’ to discredit his very credible witness to the Nixon impeachment, an impeachment he did not disagree with.

The book is an excellent clear headed introduction to big politics. Interestingly, it is on the reading list at the Richard Nixon Library and Foundation.

Zeifman opposed the war in Yugoslavia. It is a multicultural mix who supported and opposed that war

Wow. This is devastating stuff. Hat Tip: Power Line.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and une…

I don’t think the story’s all that huge, really — just like the Kuzla story.

Yeah, but the Kuzla story is big because there’s visual evidence that directly contradicts her. No, it doesn’t tell you anything you didn’t already know, if you’ve been paying attention, but the image of her standing there telling a whopper and then flashing back 12 years to what really happened, that’s powerful.

It is indeed, and something that the Bush administration has worked assiduously to try to deny whenever it can.

Surprise, surprise: As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern……

“This isn’t exactly news.” So says Hot Air on the claim by Jerry Zeifman that “he fired Hillary for unethical behavior and that she conspired to deny Richard Nixon counsel during the hearings.” (Via Glenn Reynolds.) Well, no, the new……

We haven’t been listening AND how did we miss the Sandy Berger comparison? Jerry Zeifman has been talking and writing about his sub-ordinate, 27 year old Hillary Clinton, since at least 1995. Here’s the history….

The MSM is going to keep the story buried, though I have doubts it would make any difference if it were otherwise. Aging liberal boomers still nurse a Nixon-hatred that approaches modern BDS, and I doubt many of them would care about this story if they even knew about it — after all, Nixon wasn’t a foreign terrorist, so I guess he wasn’t deserving of the full protections of the legal system.

And even if Democrats might be otherwise disposed to care about this story, for someone to tell the truth about a Democrat’s past behavior apparently constitutes “swift-boating,” and is grounds for huffy indignant denunciation.

I don’t think the story’s all that huge, really — just like the Kuzla story. With Rodham, these are “dog bites man” stories, which fit perfectly with what many of know about her nature. What would be a blockbuster story would be Rodham telling the truth about something that didn’t reflect well on her.

Methinks you’re being generous when you say it “borders on malpractice”, but then again I’m not a lawyer.

You’re right. I was too generous. It is malpractice. If there’s anything that’s malpractice, it’s stealing evidence and also writing a brief that is flatly factually incorrect.

Sydney Carton on April 1, 2008 at 8:23 PM

Actually,that would be obstruction of justice.

Re our post below, here’s why she was fired from the Watergate hearings. This is amazing (but not surprising), at Hot Air.She’s done….